frankfurter

support Ukraine? 1 million men dead and disabled? what kind of sicko war monger are you? everything you write is premised upon war. besides, what have your rants to do with oil/gas ?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306630/ only a dickhead like you would argue against such papers.

agree. definitely, the people at Toyota know infinitely more than you. consider: burning NH3 will result in increased levels of N, NO, nitromethane, and other N compounds in the atmosphere. N destroys Ozone, which will destroy our planet much faster than CO2. N by itself kills all life forms: CO2 does not.

excellent. another war monger and colonialist. the world can have only one power, the USA, who sets the rules and gives the orders. only the USA can have wealth and prosperity. all other people are the undesirables, the untermensch. everybody must be subservient. one superior, exceptional, chosen people to rule over all others. the Ukros need people like you. hope to see you at the front line. beware: today Gaza, tomorrow you. besides, what have your ravings to do with oil/gas?

In other words, enforce the old colonial structures. Apple tried to migrate to India; how did that go? The value-add by Apple in China is less than $1/phone. The total China exports to USA amounts to 0.6% of China GDP. The people with the greatest number of legal violations in China are the amurcuns. If amurcuns want to leave China, good riddance. Virtually everything in Walmart is imported from China. Eliminate this, and how many thousands of jobs lost? Tesla's largest facility, market, profits come from China. US exports to China are +$150bn/yr. I wonder how the people benefiting from those exports would react to your myopic views. besides, what has this to do with oil/gas per se?

yet more poopaganda from you? or are you woke? uh, +75% of all urban buses in China are EV. fyi... https://www.sustainable-bus.com/news/china-electric-bus-market-2022-subsidies/ Unlike amurcuns, China is actually doing something about carbon emissions. Instead of denigrating, you should be complimenting.

If you cannot understand the importance of volume, I know not what to say to you. The global economy has many sides and dynamics. If you focus upon 1 only, you are no different from the blind men at opposite ends of the elephant. to quote FT.com ... "IMF raises Russia growth outlook as war boosts economy. New 2024 forecast of 2.6% rise doubles previous prediction and prompts questions over sanctions against Moscow". The IMF hates BRICS, has deliberately lied, yet has now reluctantly agreed the Russian economy is doing just fine.

People who get their jollies spreading lies need psych help. At least they should be stopped. Free speech is respected: lies are not.

Don't know what hallucinogens you take, but Russia advances daily into the territories held by Kiev, with the support of the local people in the Donbass. Yet you consider this losing? Your comments state clearly your support for a war between Natostan and Russia. Such would be a nuclear-weapons war. Bro, you need help. Fact: Russians have never attacked Europe. Europeeons have attacked Russia 5 times since ca 780. Yet you claim Russia is the threat?

oh, I see... the amurcans are the only people with any intelligence to create all the ideas, IP, and tech in the world. The amurcun government never spies upon its own citizens, never passes laws to limit their freedoms, never invades other countries and murder the inhabitants, and very much more nevers. Actually, such poopaganda is good for you, as you will later not see or know what hits you. But please, do continue to enlighten us.

The bus problem stems from crony capitalism: the design and manufacture in USA. An EV bus in China is far less cost and is reliable. But the US has banned participation by any Chinese companies: re the legislation against BYD. Yet, the amurcuns believe they have a God given right to participate in the China market, be completely tax free, pollute the enviro, steal China tech, and walk away with all the profits. Such is the rules-based order. So the average Joe in amurka is gonna pay dearly for sub-standard tech and greedy corp execs. ya can't fix stupid.

so, it's a case of... the referendums were a sham because I say so. the referendums were no sham. The provinces today are in no different political situation than were the early US states in their declaration against King George. Besides, who are you, the US, the UK to decide how those people may live?

During September 2022, the peoples of Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson held referendums on joining Russia. Over 90% of residents voted yes. This came after Ukraine bombed and murdered those residents for 8 years prior. The UN Charter establishes the basic human right for people to choose and be free of violence and oppression.

Thanks to geologists, we know the Earth has had many Ice Ages and Hot Ages in its 4 billion year history; and NONE are attributed to human activities, except for the warming trend we have now. So, over the span of 4bn years, is carbon the reason for warming, or could the reason be another factor/s such as the Precession? We simply do not know. Every minute of every day, we humans rape, pollute, destroy our only home. Would I like to have this stopped? Yes. The issue is how. The atmosphere is comprised mainly of 78% Nitrogen, 20% Oxygen, 1% Argon, and the remainder 1% is a mixture of many compounds. CO2 is about 325 parts per million. CO2 is thus 0.0325%. wow, so much, shocking! But note a singular problem: Nitrogen. N is highly reactive, and destroys Ozone. Without the Ozone layer, all life on Earth dies. So, it seems to me we should not increase the concentration of N, not even one iota. Ergo, talk of using Ammonia (NH3) as a fuel is complete insanity to me. Given the ice ages, etc, I have trouble accepting the premise a level of 0.0325% CO2 is the main reason we have global warming. Fact; N gas and its compounds (NO, etc) are also 'greenhouse' gases. But if CO2 is a reason, and we wish to be rid of it, then logically we need a fuel with zero carbon. The only safe fuel prospect we have currently is Hydrogen. But H itself will not remove the C from air. To remove C, vehicles must be built with scrubber devices to remove C from the exhaust. And burning H only, requires removing O from the atmosphere, which is then combined with the elements in air to form new compounds, such as NO, H20, etc. hmm, removal of O from air doesn't sound like such a great idea either. so, we face a dilemma.

Imagine forcing manufacturers to comply with safety laws, and people with licensing laws. Such laws are a violation of personal freedoms. How dare those evil communists copy our standards and compete with us amurcuns.