Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 11/27/2017 in Blog Comments

  1. 6 points
    My current WTI portfolio is long and drawn out. I am new to the site and I'm not sure of the interest in options trading from the market makers perspective. If anyone is interested just let me know and I'll post it.
  2. 4 points
  3. 3 points
    I don't have a position in anything now. Unfortunately I'm a newbie and I only trade futures for now. I only understand your strategy partially, sufficient to understand that you make $$$ in a much safer way than me and most others. I knew about your strategy before I ran into you on investing. My intent is to one day do what you do but cannot at the moment due to lack of options understanding. I looked for educational material, institutions where I could learn options but have not found anything yet. I inquired with Online Trading Academy but they did not provide me enough confidence that they could teach me what I want.
  4. 3 points
    Those against Brexit lost the vote. The anti Brexit vote lost despite the entire establishment being very actively anti. The people have spoken. Anything other than a real Brexit is cause for rebellion against the elitist government.
  5. 3 points
  6. 3 points
    And I'm sure they are economically integrated because they wanted to integrate. I'm not sure if economic integration is the cause for moderation or if it is the other way round. Radicals of all sorts are notoriously loathe of changing anything about themselves or their view of the world. Could you please elaborate why you believe integration leads to moderation rather than vice versa? P.S.Large loud minority doesn't sound good. You should be less nice and welcoming. Seriously.
  7. 3 points
    I also consider myself pragmatic but I'm not covering my head and body completely just to protect the religious sensibilities of Muslim immigrants who subscribe to rules that are in stark and irreconcilable opposition to my idea of individual freedoms. We do have to meet in the middle, @Rasmus Jorgensen, that's the only way that I see as fair. Not to mention that the more concessions one side makes, the more demands the other side will have. It's human nature.
  8. 3 points
    Diversity can be a good asset. However, words are important, and the word 'diversity' is often misunderstood. Often, we think it means 'race', but in reality, it simply means 'knowledge'. A diverse group of people are those who have a variety of different backgrounds that has resulted in a diverse base of knowledge. So, for instance, electing a black man, an indian woman, and an adrogynous chinese person provides no real diversity if all three indivudals grew up on the same street and to families in the same social-economic strata. However, electing three white males aged 24-29 would provide diversity if one came from a poor family in the midwest, another from a rich family that does business overseas, and that last from a missionary family out of Africa. Multiculturalism can strength a people when, like Marina says, assimilation does happen. But what do you do when assimilation does not happen. As a case in point, and speaking of... ...I happened across some of articles today. Since I was not intentionally searching for any of these articles (or their subject matter), I can only assume this is just the tip of the iceberg. Also, these articles are all from this week: https://voiceofeurope.com/…/another-day-another-gang-rape-…/ https://voiceofeurope.com/…/14-moroccans-sexually-abuse-g…/… https://voiceofeurope.com/…/sex-attacks-up-70-in-just-one-…/ https://www.dcclothesline.com/…/illegal-alien-released-by-…/ https://www.thesun.co.uk/…/shocking-video-shows-machete-ga…/ ^Are we failing at teaching or are they failing at learning? Education is a two-way street. Sometimes a student deserves that F. ^I feel like you are describing the opening scenes in the movie Idiocracy. ...it was a terrible movie, but a great predictor of the future. ^The key word here is 'can'. Simply because we want them or expect them to be a resource doesn't mean they won't just then go on to choose to become a terrible liability. I do, however, agree with what you said about competition. ^Again, you are making this about you, when, in reality, you have no real say in what someone else chooses to do. Yes, they may decide to do what you want them to do by them choosing to have a positive impact on society, or they may decide to rape your daughter because she was alone at night and without her male escort, which, of course, violates their law. Key word: "their." The early immigrants in America assimilated so well primarily because there were no government handouts waiting for them upon arrival. In order to succeed in America, those immigrants had to interact with the Americans who were already established, and this integration fostered that assimilation. Today, however, huge government handouts make such interaction unnecessary, and this now handicaps both today's immigrants as well as today's taxpayers. The best thing that could be done to help immigrants effectively assimilate would be to immediately end all social programs and aid packages for said immigrants. This would include mandating that hospitals are no longer required to treat illegal immigrants at tax-payer expense. Make crime illegal again! (<--- I feel like that slogan would work well on a hat).
  9. 3 points
    I have been through an ice storm in rural central Illinois. It was brutal. Tried to mop up some water on the floor in the kitchen, finally realized it was coming from a refrigerator ice cube line. Had to go to a motel for a few days. My corn stove let me run a generator but my corn stove wasn't up to heating that old three story uninsulated farmhouse. The natural gas steam heat was worthless without the electrical pump. The generator oil had to be heated by the corn stove before it would work.
  10. 2 points
    Do you currently have a position in WTI ? My Jan and Feb contracts both have 58 calls written against them. My 4 short March contracts at $56.75 are hedged against any loss up until about $57.75 on the March. All contracts have plenty of time left. I sell time. I'm very patient. My orders are placed. If you're drawing a conclusion of where WTI will be just by looking at the current price you're looking in the wrong place. You have to be in it to win it. If Jan contracts expired today at 58.35 my 2Jan contracts would get called away at $58.00 but I would keep the $1.25 I received today from Selling to Open the 2 Jan 58 calls. My net sell price would be $58.00 + 1.25 or 59.25. The net Purchase Price is 50.15 so my profit is $9.10/barrel/ contract or $18,200. I would have $118,500 in my cash account. I am currently short 4 March contracts at 56.75. The March contract closed today at $57.95. I would short 2 March contracts at this price giving me 6 short March contracts at avg of 57.15. Remember I still have 2 long Feb contracts at $53.00 with 58 calls written against them at $3.00 with a target of 75 cents. Feb contracts are about 58.15. I'm not that tied in to contract prices as I am in my strategy. This is not retail trading. I hold my contracts all the way to expiration. So obviously the price of the contract is not that relevant. Retail traders find it nearly impossible to comprehend that. It's all about the options. If WTI continues up and the Feb contract expires at, lets say for example $60, then my Feb contracts get called away from me at $58 but I keep the $3.00 from the 58 call I received giving me a sell price of $58.00 + 3.00 or $61.00. The net purchase price for the Feb contracts is 48.65. The profit on the trade would be $61.00-48.65= $12.35/barrel/contract or $24,700. I would then short 2 more March contracts giving me a total of 8 short March contracts somewhere in the high $57s for an average. If my target of 52.50 is achieved the profit will be in excess of $40,000.
  11. 2 points
    Dec 4 2019 Calculation of the Feb Options Strategy Profit: Bought 2 Feb contracts at $53.00 Sold to Open 2 Feb 54 puts at $4.22 Bought to Close 2 Feb 54 puts at $1.05 Profit per contract: $4.22-1.05= $3.17 Sold to Open 2 Feb 58 calls at $3.00. Target: 75 cents. Currently $1.82 Feb contract currently $56.89 Purchase Price - Put trade profit= Net Purchase Price. $53.00-3.17= 49.83 Subtract the unrealized profit from the short-58 call of $3.00-1.82 that is still working and the Net Purchase Price becomes $49.83-1.18 or 48.65 The Feb contract is currently at $56.89 so the profit per contract at this time is $56.89-48.65 or $8.24/barrel/contract or $16,480 for both Feb contracts so far.
  12. 2 points
    There are a few traders on Investing.com WTI and OVX boards that are seriously missing my trading posts. I got banned for pointing out the deception and fraud of dozens of posters on the WTI board. The OVX board is the Oil Volatilty Index. All my trades are posted there up until a week ago. Post that Gary LeBlanc is at OilPrice.com. I can't. The wolfpack will appreciate it.
  13. 2 points
    Gary, have you read much Ray Dalio?
  14. 2 points
    a bachelor's degree in finance and a master's degree in economics are also complete shit for trading ... I laugh when morons from banks and companies require this garbage from workers ... a trader with a system is a gift from God😍
  15. 2 points
    I'm not riled up at all; I just find the topic interesting after my experiences with both the mainland and Taiwan (and U.S. rhetoric where it concerns both). I will say that the support given to Taiwan up to present day has not been for altruistic reasons such as democracy, freedom and the rule of law. Here is a good timeline that was posted on Reuters some years ago: Timeline: Taiwan's road to democracy U.S. interests in Taiwan are blatantly defensive and controlling in nature, at least that's the way I see it. Similar to South Korea, if not exactly the same. The cost benefit ratio? For military purposes alone the benefits far outweigh the costs. I have outlined in other posts some time back how China, by and large, have been the victims of expansionism and militarism by other nations for the past 1-200 years or more. They have not, as yet, invaded militarily in modern times, although they have every reason to want to get back at the people/nations that mercilessly raped and murdered their people and and took whatever else they wanted along the way (as occupying militaries are wont to do). The day will come, and the U.S., in my opinion, will rant and rave and try to get the rest of the world to rant and rave, but in the end there won't be much they can practically do, give the cost to benefit ratio of any such actions. The time will come and, if Taiwan is smart, they will blend back together relatively seamlessly. Similar to Hong Kong, Tibet and Mongolia; there has been some pain, but by and large it went seamlessly and the world did little else but rant and rave.
  16. 2 points
    A comment on the OP: Taiwan to China is every bit as much a part of China as Hawaii is a part of the United States. The island was controlled at different times by different rulers, some that claimed national sovereignty; some that were basically pirates and rogues, but the Chinese were there from as early as 1683 when the Qing dynasty took control. The Kuomintang fled to Taiwan in 1945 when Chiang Kai-Shek lost to Mao Tse Dong and, as such, to China it is nothing more than unfinished internal business that needs to be cleaned up and returned one day. I believe that day will come, when the time is right and the world is distracted elsewhere. Note: there is a lot to this question, but I believe the above is true from a territorial perspective, no matter what other countries would like things to be or how they know the power of the location of this island and its resources and "friendly" occupants (who are Chinese, by the way.).
  17. 2 points
    So now the real question arises: is there going to be some technical breakthrough in fractionation (the distillation process)? It would seem that oil refining is pretty much using the same principles and technology as it did a hundred years ago. OK, some of the equipment has been tuned up, but no fundamental changes in the technology. Let us suppose, as the mind wanders, that some genius develops a totally new method for fractionating oil. The design is so cheap that drillers now put these fractionaters right out next to the pump, and take-offs of finished products can be made right there. Now, how does that change the economics of the oil industry? For one thing, local consumption of certain distillates, such as diesel, implies that crude does not have to be piped to some remote refinery a thousand miles away, and then trucked or railed back. That seriously cuts costs. For another, it implies that heavy oils such as tar sands can be upgraded and distilled in the tar fields, resolving the big bugaboo in Canada, transporting the stuff out of there. Never underestimate what technology can accomplish.
  18. 2 points
    in trading crude 2 elements are necessary. 1] Belief in your system, and not worrying about it, no matter what. 2] Patience
  19. 2 points
    Thank you very much, Jan. People may read some of my posts and think it's BS, but it is reality where I come from. That's why it pains me when I read comments that group all Americans into some kind of perception, learned from afar. For most of America, from coast to coast and top to bottom, people are like the ones I talk about. Black, white, yellow, and yes, even some of the orange ones!
  20. 2 points
    Dan, a major tip of the hat to you! A five-star post. America; ya gotta love the spirit!
  21. 2 points
    I drove a snow plow starting about 5 years after that storm system moved through. Buried cars were not uncommon, but common people knew to move them before the storm started, or during at least, and plows didn't have too much to worry about. Having said that, the township only had one dump truck that was used as a snow plow in winter and it took a few days for us to get everywhere. We first had to help clear the town together with the town's one truck and then moved to the country roads and lanes and driveways (farmers would treat snow plow drivers like me with a great breakfast if you did their long driveways! Hey, we plowed all night!). Every able bodied resident got out the snow shovels and dug everybody out. One really bad problem, especially in ice when the phone lines went down too, was people with snow drifted against all the doors and windows to their house! We had to be aware of this and identify such houses so we could get them dug out fast. I remember getting to some old folks who thought they were ended under the snow! Nobody, and I mean nobody, accepted money for any that. A cup of something hot, a glass or two of water, maybe a piece of home cooked pie or cake, and we were on our way. Idyllic, really.
  22. 2 points
    Large apartment buildings typically have dual-fuel furnaces: they can switch over from oil to gas depending on which is cheaper. However, they still need a small amount of electricity to operate the boiler feed motors and the water circulating pump motors, and when the power goes out then you have zero heat. I remember some decades back there was a particularly nasty ice storm in the Northern wilds of Quebec, and some 17 miles of high-voltage tower lines were pulled down. To rebuild those towers and string new lines into the City of Montreal and suburbs took I think three weeks. In the meantime vast numbers of homes had frozen pipes which then burst and caused lots of water damage. What this teaches you is that you cannot take electric power supply for granted in the winter, so if you want to keep your house protected, you need either a big hefty battery bank, and a generator, and a stove for either wood or coal. And you need lots of insulation!
  23. 2 points
    Now that was seriously cold! The way to have a "back-up" is to install a battery bank and a hefty inverter, something on the order of 3.5 KW, enough to start and run the well pump, so that you can keep water pressure up in the heating system. I have discovered that (some) fire departments change out their fire-truck batteries, huge ones known as "D-9," also used in tour buses, every two years as a safety precaution. Those big batteries have years of life in them. String a number together and you have a great power supply! If your well motor draws too much power on the start, there is a ramping device known as a "soft-start" that limits the inrush current and extends the start ramp time, so that you do not overload the inverter. Once you figure it all out, you can have a nice system that makes you independent of either the generator (which may not start or work) or the power grid. All that said, I am still a fan of the coal stove. Coal is cheap enough, it does not spoil, you can light it up with a little diesel on top and a match, and it will produce great concentrated heat. You can bank down a coal fire to keep it running at a low output overnight, then toss on more coal in the morning. I saw a mansion down in Newport, Rhode Island (USA) where the owners were terrified of a coal boiler fire, so they built the coal furnace in a separate, remote building and ran steam lines underground to the mansion. No fires at all in the house! That system worked great, but you do have to trudge out to the boiler room to keep it operating (unless you build a sheltered hallway out to it!).
  24. 2 points
    The extra energy required certainly wont be by renewables as they are only a tiny percentage of world energy production. WTF. Have you actually had a look at the data? How much of new generation this year will be renewables? Look at the Lazard analysis at the cost of renewables. Look at the lead Spain is taking. Look how much of Scotlands electricity comes from wind. Look at the percentage of cars sold are EV's in the UK, Canada and California. The elephant in the room is those in the fossil fuel religion that don't accept the facts that renewables are increasingly becoming the cheapest source of electricity and EV's are rapidly becoming better than ICE vehicles. Come on it's the 21st century, fossil fuel was the king of the last century that's gone, now the new king is renewables. If the west doesn't keep up it will become the under dog to those that do go with the best technology.
  25. 2 points
    Just a small interjection here, if you don't mind: The differences in society and the populations involved factor heavily into the points about health care. The VA reference is absolutely valid in the U.S., but in relatively small countries with little global military commitments, not so much. Please continue, your conversation is fleshing out some good details. I don't know if they can be applied each to the other, but they are good points nonetheless.
  26. 2 points
    I think a lot of women in Europe simply have other interests they would rather pursue than raising children. Also, a lot of women are delaying having children in favour of career building and some delay it too long. You're free to blame radical feminism for that. I probably would if I thought it's appropriate to lay blame. Also, I think reproductive problems are on the rise at least in certain parts of Europe. Not sure about the factors at play but there's probably a multitude of them. Isn't the "terrible world" argument old? I so thought it was.
  27. 2 points
    I don't deny any of questions / points you raise. I think we agree on more than we disagree. Where we seem to disagree is that you seem to be leaning towards "zero sum thinking", whereas I am the opposite. I honestly believe that regulated economic growth (regulated so as to avoid things like child labour, trade imbalances i.e. things any reasonable person can agree is horrible) through the free market and innovation can lift people out of poverty. Everywhere I have travelled in Africa and South America I have encountered people that want to work and make a living for their families. That means the basis is alrigth. There is something to build on. Now, I am not naive - the world will not change over nigth and nor will peoples attitude.
  28. 2 points
    When was the last time the dow jones closed down 800 points, and the nasdaq 300? As i pointed out in the first post, many fundamental principles of a healthy economy are lacking in the USA. First and most importantly is science. Even within our political sphere, religion ends up dictating a large percentage of how the government is run. Philosophically speaking, if a state,or society, are choosing political leaders based on religion, rather then economic and scientific abilities, then consequently, such officials, who are campaigning on religious principles,fail at executing proper strategies of governance. A stong economy demands proper public private partnership, but the private will destroy itself, and the public will too. Both parties must be intelligent and capable. A weak pillar will only allow the place to collapse. Although the US has just as much potential as every other nation, its degraded culture and systems will surely interfere in its true prosperity. For example, Immigration. Immigration has and always will be the back bone to developing societies. Without human migration, the world would have been even more fractuered then it is now. Racism is a sign of a weak and fragile economy. Any human being who feels entitled to any one portion of planet earth has another thing coming. WE have become so ignorant about what life actually is. This is a sign of a weak economy. obviously we have pride in our homeland, and our families home, but we become complacent inside our own boring culture. Until you understand that human beings are human beings are k, no matter how they speak or look. Diversity is a precious element of a strong economy.
  29. 1 point
    It always looks bleakest before a turn around. Every bit of news in regard to oil gets overblown in the futures market. Long 8 WTI contracts with 8 54 puts shorted against them. Mar contract expires on Feb 20th. Plenty of time. Huge imbalance in the options market suggests higher prices for WTI. Expecting a sideways trading pattern for the rest of the week.
  30. 1 point
    OilProspector + 1, Congratulations.
  31. 1 point
    RBOB will always lead WTI around like a puppy on a leash. RBOB headed lower.
  32. 1 point
    Dec 16 Today is options expiration. Currently short 2 Jan 58 calls at $1.25. As of now the 2 Jan contracts are trading at $60.00 and the contracts will get called away at $58.00 netting a Net Sale Price of $58.00 + 1.25 or 59.25. If that's the case I will be rolling the position into 2 more short March contracts giving me a total of 6 short March contracts.
  33. 1 point
  34. 1 point
    I talked to management about the situation and this is what they said in a nutshell. Having experienced traders on Investing.com only has a negative influence on Investing.com ad revenues. That's how investing.com makes money. They make it from novice traders using their sponsors and thus generating revenue for their sponsors who in turn continue to advertise on Investing.com. I do not utilize any of their sponsors. Traders with my experience do not "pay" for systems/advice. It's all a gimmick. If all traders on Investing.com were elite traders Investing.com would go out of business in a matter of months unless it went to a pay site. I go back every few days and see new IDs asking "Up or down" with IDs I've never seen either giving them advice. Massive turnover. Not at all what interests me. It's better to have quality as compared to quantity in everything you do. I added a discussion today in " Latest Duscussions".
  35. 1 point
    Dec 6 2019 Today the Jan WTI contract is trading at $59.58. If today was options expiration ( but it's not ) my Jan contracts would get called away from me at $58.00 since I am short Jan 58 calls against them at $1.25. As a result I get to keep the entire $1.25 call premium I received netting a Sale Price of $58.00 + 1.25 or 59.25. The net purchase price for the Jan contracts is 50.15 so the profit on the Jan Options strategy is $59.25 - 50.15 or $9.10/barrel/contract or $18,200 profit on the pair. If today was options expiration and I had closed my Jan contracts I would then short 2 March contracts at the current price of $59.16. This trade would be averaged in to 4 March contracts at $56.75 thus giving me 6 short March contracts at an avg of 57.55. At 6 × ( 59.16-57.55) this would be a current loss of $9,660. When the Feb options expire I will do the same as to roll over 2 more March contracts giving me 8 short March contracts.
  36. 1 point
    Gary, I am here too. I found you! Btw nobody posted you were gonna be here but I do not blame them... I tried leading a petition to get your account back but my posts keep getting deleted (your "fans" must have reported my posts obviously). If you wanna go elsewhere like stocktwits or slack, just let us know. I have been posting my analysis over there but tired of the swine who mock me and then profit off it.
  37. 1 point
    Dec 4 2019 Order to Sell to Open 2 Jan 58 calls at $1.25 executed when the Jan contract got to $57.75. Target to Buy to Close: 25 cents.
  38. 1 point
    Evaluation of Feb WTI Option Strategy: Bought to Close my 2 Feb 54 puts on Tuesday Nov 26th at $1.05. These 54 puts were Sold to Open at $4.22 at the time when the Feb contracts were purchased at $53.00. The profit from the short-put trade ( $3.17/ barrel ) reduces the purchase price to $53.00-3.17 or 49.83. I Sold to Open 2 Feb 58 calls at $3.00 which are still active. The Feb 58 calls closed at 1.27 on Friday 29. The target is 75 cents and a Buy to Close order has been placed at 75 cents for the 2 Feb 58 calls. I have also placed a Sell to Open for 2 Feb 54 puts at $3.00. They closed at $2.06 on Friday. The Feb WTI contract will have to be close to $52.50 for this trade to execute. The Feb WTI contract closed at $55.37 on Friday the 29th.
  39. 1 point
    Nov 29 2019 Jan WTI closed down $2.67 to 55.42 today. My 4 short March contracts at $56.75 closed at 55.42 turning a $3,800 loss into a $6,120 gain overnight. The 3,000 share- position of DWT closed up 55 cents ( 12.88% ) to $4.82. The trade is currently in loss of $1,440 which is a reduction of more than half in one day. Very pleased. My 11,500 short position in RIG was down 4 cents to 4.98. I expected more to the downside. The current loss on the RIG trade is $2,070. This portion of my portfolio is $2,610 in profit. If all three targets for these financial instruments are achieved the profit will be $39,535. Dividing my current profit by my target profit $2,610÷39,535 = 6.6%. So...my score on this portfolio is a 6.6. Flunking. But it went profitable today. Baby steps.
  40. 1 point
    Nov 26 2019 Today WTI is currently $58.38. Up about 40 cents. My 2 Jan 54 puts which I "Sold to Open" at $2.86 are now trading at 39 cents. The 2 Feb puts which I "Sold to Open" at $4.22 are now trading at 1.00. I will "Buy to Close" both positions. I will do both trades at approximately 10:30 EST. The trading logic behind doing this is I've captured 80-85% of the original premium and by closing these short-put positions it allows me to put the same trade on if an opportunity arises. I am by no means obligated to close these trades out at this point. The 58 short-call position for both months caps my profit on the contracts at $58.00, but remember I collected $3.00 for each call so if the contracts get called away due to being above $58.00 my net sell price will be $58.00 + 3.00 but that's a few weeks away. Good luck trading today. If you are thinking of buying WTI puts or calls I would highly advise against doing that, because you'll be on the opposite side of me and my kind ( traders with 40+ years experience )
  41. 1 point
    Before oil humans may have had a brief vibrant life and then died at an average age of 35. You can celebrate the winning. I’ll take the losing with all its faults. As far as Iran goes ask them to act like Sweden and they to could join the free world instead of having to cultivate relationships with Russia, China, N Korea, Syria and other countries where humans have few rights and are dominated by a handful. Democracies are far from perfect and are still a work in progress. Our leaders are rejected on a routine basis. But hey, there is hope eternal for more cooperation and common sense. Just being able to type this on a public forum without fear should be a worldwide right. One that Iran and those other countries don’t have.
  42. 1 point
    The oil price drop to $50 last October 2018 thru Jan 2019 and subsequent rebound has nothing to do with your reasoning. ALL that price action was the algorithms from program trading where oil mirrored the S&P 500 index. The correlation is obvious. S&P dropped due to Fed action and shortly after oil folowrd tick by tick.
  43. 1 point
    What if Humanity did not lust after power and money..... Is essentially what this drivel is saying. Reason people want equity stake for capital is because they want CONTROL. Because they all think they know better than YOU, or just want the POWER. They think if they have money(hard work, inherited, or someone else's AKA investment portfolios), they are superior. It is how humanity is wired. Yes, world would be wonderful if it was a Utopia. It is not and never will be.
  44. 1 point
    If the opec produced more than 50% of worldwide oil like it did in the 60s to 80s it would work But this map of shale fields change how things are done when you have in the World nearly 250 trillion -possible- barrells of oil things are done differently
  45. 1 point
    Jan, Great story. Really. I have some good ones too from small towns in the Southern states. However, this is not exclusively American. I have seen people that didn't know where their next pay-check was going to come from share a meal with their neighbour, because the Neighbour was in an equally bad position. You get this type of kindness all over the world. Seriously.
  46. 1 point
    Now here's the scary part: there are probably autos buried underneath those snowbanks! So the State cannot run a snowplow through there, or one of those huge Sicard snow-throwers, or you will be chewing up auto fenders and spitting them onto the house lawns. That actually happened to a buddy of mine in Montreal, he had one of those Volkswagen Beetles, it had a nice round mound of snow on it, the Sicard driver took it for a windblown snow mound, and hit it with the chew blades. I think the machine stopped chopping when it hit the engine block. Oh, well.
  47. 1 point
    On a lighter note, do you actually realise what a feat of courage and hard work this is? You were born with it but let me tell you, Danish for non-native speakers is so hard I'm increasingly thinking I'd need surgical intervention to be able to speak it. I've no migration plans, I just love this language, so I'm struggling on. On a serious note, I'm with you on that: most people are not radicals and yes, poverty breeds radicalism as noted by Noam Chomsky and George Clooney in Syriana. But it's precisely these radicals that mess up all that's good about migration in terms of workforce and, I don't know, cultural diversity, I guess. On a further serious note, this failure of existing immigration policies has reached Sweden, I just found out yesterday. They have been unable to form a government since September because a nationalist party (a nationalist party in Sweden!) got too many votes, if we are to believe Bloomberg. It boggles the mind how Europe allowed this. On a last serious note, the UK has gone way too far: it refused asylum to the Pakistani Christian woman who was acquitted in a trial there. Downing Street was worried it would make some groups unhappy. We can all guess what kind of groups these are. I am deeply appalled at this idiotic tolerance to radicalism at the expense of all other groups. Of all things to be tolerant towards, they pick radicals! Stunning.
  48. 1 point
    Agree 110%. I would not want my daughter to have to cover herself either. All I am saying that, at least in Denmark, there is a very large and loud minority that does not want to move at all. And that is not helping. Thankfully, in my life I have meet many moderate muslims. The common denominator for all of them is that they are economically integrated, which leads me to believe economic inclusion is the only real remedy.
  49. 1 point
    Ah, but dispassionate is so out. Hyperemotional is in. And we do it voluntarily. What a ridiculous species. But lovable, let's not forget. We're lovable.
  50. 1 point
    Of course I could. I'll leave that for another day, however. It's going to be long because I will need to incorporate the latest deliberate change in how we see history.