Dan Warnick

U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes

Recommended Posts

(edited)

2 minutes ago, QuarterCenturyVet said:

You'll be similarly going after CNN, MSNBC, Pelosi, Shumer and Hillary then? 

No. You're a pussy, and double standards are your only standards. 

The cult went after them every time.

I won't do their job for them just like they failed to point out all trumps crimes themselves.

 

 

Edited by Symmetry
  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Symmetry said:

The cult went after them every time.

I won't do their job for them just like they failed to point out all trumps crimes themselves.

 

 

 

tenor.gif

  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

4 minutes ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

 

tenor.gif

You fight for your side, I fight for mine.

I win, you lose.

Simple.

Edited by Symmetry
  • Haha 2
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

I think that it's pretty clear that Trump's primary motivation for pushing the Stolen Election Big Lie--no matter what the damage to our constitutional republic--was a desperate attempt to keep his rear end out of jail, but it's pretty clear that a secondary objective was $$$.  

A pretty good article on his predatory behavior regarding small donors follows, but of course, Trump is not alone in trying to raise money off the Stolen Election Big Lie. 

Trump’s Millions

https://amgreatness.com/2021/03/28/trumps-millions/

Excerpt:

Former President Donald Trump continues to rake in huge piles of cash, but very little of that money has gone toward the causes for which donors believe they are giving. At the heart of various fundraising projects are misleading solicitations that appear primarily to target desperate and loyal middle and lower-income Trump supporters. . . .

The fine print in some fundraising emails stated that a donor would have to give over $8,000 before any funds went to an account created to finance election challenges, including recounts and lawsuits over alleged fraud. As a result, large sums would go instead to Trump’s Save America PAC. Trump supporters were encouraged to sign up for recurring donations to “protect the results and keep fighting even after Election Day.” . . . .

It is difficult to overstate the impropriety of Trump’s leadership PAC fundraising. The $8,000 “Election Defense Fund” threshold meant that those solicitations preyed directly upon working-class constituents, as only wealthier donors could easily clear that figure to actually contribute to anything election-related. Indeed, the former president pulled in vast sums of money from crucial small donors—something he appears to be aware of and is willing to use as leverage against the GOP.

The “why,” “how,” and “what” comes into view as a nebulous labyrinth of shell companies, fronts, PACs, and vendors served by an army of cronies. The latest fundraising apparatus appears to be a proposed Trump-branded social media network, which Jason Miller told Fox News will launch “in probably about two or three months.” If the Save America PAC is any indicator, users should think twice before allowing Trump’s team to harvest their data, and always remember to read the fine print.

How do you milk sheep?.png

Edited by Jeffrey Brown
  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Symmetry said:

You can not repeatedly claim the government is not legitimate after court vetting.

The Law - it sucks for the losers.

Not just doubling down on stupid, you're all in. 

BD4B05BA-0181-493C-AD07-045A324E0B92.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Great Response! 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

13 hours ago, Ward Smith said:

Not just doubling down on stupid, you're all in. 

BD4B05BA-0181-493C-AD07-045A324E0B92.jpeg

Yes, because so many of those "witnesses", "experts", "lawyers" and "lawsuits" were so credible (I say this in quotes because people like Giuliani, Sidney Powell, and Lin Wood were at one time fairly respectable but seemed to get more deranged over time as they went deep down the potential well. a cautionary tale to alice!)

For example, "star" witness CueCat guy: 

https://sos.ga.gov/index.php/elections/fact_check_georgia_senate_masquerades_failed_treasure_hunter_as_hacker_and_election_security_expert

That guy became infamous (originally) because his company's lawyers (around 2000) carpetbombed the interwebs with DMCA Section 1201 cease and desists that these days would be considered "a joke": https://www.securityfocus.com/news/89    https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/10/new-exemptions-dmca-section-1201-are-welcome-dont-go-far-enough

Ironically, that type of action slowed down security research for years, at least in the United States and let our frenemies (the Russians and Chinese catch up). Of course, one must think back to Shannon's maxim: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Shannon#Shannon's_maxim 


Let's take the "words" of a well known actual security expert - someone who has been actually examining voting machines ever since the Help America Vote Act. Of course, his "words" were apparently used in some of these frivolous lawsuits, but you should ask, where did they get those words from? not surely from asking the actual security expert in question, but from listening to Sean f'n Hannity, "opinion" (not news) commentator, who misquoted him anyways.

EoCEJh3VkAAI1u3.thumb.jpeg.f07530d40311bf60451d174a05af1469.jpeg

To add some color on what he said:

https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2020/11/13/did-sean-hannity-misquote-me/

 

Quote

 

Mr. Hannity proposes a solution: “If we want to have as a country, election results with integrity, that the people of this country will have confidence in, we can easily and absolutely have a system forensically checked–and by the way, I’ll even argue, allowing both Republican and Democratic engineers to do the forensic check together.”

That’s a well-intentioned idea, but it does not really solve the problem. Yes, absolutely the source code and software of voting machines should be made public so that citizens of any party can examine it for design mistakes. But what happens if the voting machine is hacked after that examination?

The U.S. mostly uses paper ballots now, and that’s how we can trust the election results even though there are some computer vulnerabilities.

The best solution is to use paper ballots, marked by hand, counted by computers, and recountable by hand. Those computers might be hacked, but the ballots personally marked by the voters are the same pieces of paper that can be recounted by humans. That’s what Michigan does, along with more than 40 other states. That is the state-of-the-art most-secure-known way of conducting elections.

Georgia, on the other hand, uses touch-screen ballot-marking devices to mark the ballots, which are then counted by optical scanners and recountable by hand. If the optical scanners are hacked, then a recount will detect and correct the problem. But if the touch-screens are hacked, then (on a small fraction of the ballots) they can print the wrong vote on to the ballot. The recount can’t detect and correct that hack, because it can only see what’s printed on the ballots. Still, hacks and glitches in the election-management computers, in the optical scanners, and in other parts of the system have been detected and corrected by audits and examination of those paper ballots.

 

 

Edited by surrept33
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, surrept33 said:

Yes, because so many of those "witnesses", "experts", "lawyers" and "lawsuits" were so credible (I say this in quotes because people like Giuliani, Sidney Powell, and Lin Wood were at one time fairly respectable but seemed to get more deranged over time as they went deep down the potential well. a cautionary tale to alice!)

For example, "star" witness CueCat guy: 

https://sos.ga.gov/index.php/elections/fact_check_georgia_senate_masquerades_failed_treasure_hunter_as_hacker_and_election_security_expert

That guy became infamous (originally) because his company's lawyers (around 2000) carpetbombed the interwebs with DMCA Section 1201 cease and desists that these days would be considered "a joke": https://www.securityfocus.com/news/89    https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/10/new-exemptions-dmca-section-1201-are-welcome-dont-go-far-enough

Ironically, that type of action slowed down security research for years, at least in the United States and let our frenemies (the Russians and Chinese catch up). Of course, one must think back to Shannon's maxim: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Shannon#Shannon's_maxim 


Let's take the "words" of a well known actual security expert - someone who has been actually examining voting machines ever since the Help America Vote Act. Of course, his "words" were apparently used in some of these frivolous lawsuits, but you should ask, where did they get those words from? not surely from asking the actual security expert in question, but from listening to Sean f'n Hannity, "opinion" (not news) commentator, who misquoted him anyways.

EoCEJh3VkAAI1u3.thumb.jpeg.f07530d40311bf60451d174a05af1469.jpeg

To add some color on what he said:

https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2020/11/13/did-sean-hannity-misquote-me/

I have forgotten more than you'll Ever know about security, data transmission, error correction, Nyquist, Shannon, Hamming and the rest. The best you can do is spend hours on wiki reading dumbed down versions of the real McCoy. I lived it, created it, encoded it into hardware and delivered it by the billions of devices. You're just a consumer. The states are obligated by Federal Law to retain ballots, but the law was flawed and the states were not obligated to submit those ballots for review! You and the chattering class pretend those never to be examined ballots are proof the election was "the most secure in history", rather than the obvious fustercluck the whole world observed. The Deep State is so terrified of Pulitzer they've taken the extraordinary step of shredding ballots, which I've documented here multiple times and when he said he could scan that anyway, they proceeded to burn them. All in flagrant defiance of Federal Law. This rot goes far and deep, as one should expect for a cancer that has plagued this nation for so long. 

Pulitzer might be an odd duck, but he's got patents you aren't smart enough to understand, while you wait for the readers digest condensed and dumbed down wiki explanation. He like me has hardware on 10's of Billions of devices. You've got nothing, nowhere. But hey, keep talking down to your betters. I know you're just another Eejit account, you can't help yourself. The rot always shows thru. 

  • Great Response! 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Ward Smith said:

 which I've documented here multiple times

Why didn't you publish that someplace meaningful?

Also "your" documentations are just links to other peoples' work. You are a worker bee of the cult, not a leader.

 

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

5 hours ago, Ward Smith said:

I have forgotten more than you'll Ever know about security, data transmission, error correction, Nyquist, Shannon, Hamming and the rest. The best you can do is spend hours on wiki reading dumbed down versions of the real McCoy. I lived it, created it, encoded it into hardware and delivered it by the billions of devices. You're just a consumer. The states are obligated by Federal Law to retain ballots, but the law was flawed and the states were not obligated to submit those ballots for review! You and the chattering class pretend those never to be examined ballots are proof the election was "the most secure in history", rather than the obvious fustercluck the whole world observed. The Deep State is so terrified of Pulitzer they've taken the extraordinary step of shredding ballots, which I've documented here multiple times and when he said he could scan that anyway, they proceeded to burn them. All in flagrant defiance of Federal Law. This rot goes far and deep, as one should expect for a cancer that has plagued this nation for so long. 

Pulitzer might be an odd duck, but he's got patents you aren't smart enough to understand, while you wait for the readers digest condensed and dumbed down wiki explanation. He like me has hardware on 10's of Billions of devices. You've got nothing, nowhere. But hey, keep talking down to your betters. I know you're just another Eejit account, you can't help yourself. The rot always shows thru. 

Which one of the conspiracy theories are you referring to? The Maricopa "ballots" case?

 

Gee: 

http://www.tucsonsentinel.com/local/report/030921_maricopa_ballots_dumpster/maricopa-county-dumpster-divers-didnt-find-bags-shredded-voted-2020-ballots/

Sounds like mass brainwashing promoted by our former "great leader":

https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/laurieroberts/2021/03/11/arizona-senator-says-ag-cant-trust-shredded-ballots/4654862001/

Keep in mind that many states do validate ballots, they just take a tiny random sample, just like polls do. Law of large numbers, if the randomization is done properly, it becomes a representative sample, and there is enough data sufficiency.

 

 

A random sampling of some other cases:

https://archive.is/WUmrO ->  https://twitter.com/OKelections/status/1325910154907439104

https://www.newsweek.com/tiktok-bigchoppadoe-faked-video-destroying-trump-ballot-1546234

GA: https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-georgia-poll-worker-in-hiding-aa0f256ec21de96fd5a41da703c4b443

GA: https://twitter.com/BrendanKeefe/status/1324779631229227008

PA: https://delcopa.gov/publicrelations/releases/2020/ballotvideoresponse.html

PA: https://factcheck.thedispatch.com/p/did-a-poll-worker-in-pennsylvania?fbclid=IwAR2A9grazzJ3XXlaRmJIZ3HnxhbWZf5v7oWYcgSNd1Abg0Rib93a67tDMhg

The great conspiracy that Trump was going to win LA County: https://twitter.com/LACountyRRCC/status/1324393951105744896

MI: https://texasscorecard.com/federal/video-wagons-suitcases-and-coolers-roll-into-detroit-voting-center-at-4-am/

MI: https://archive.is/eFul7 -> https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2020/11/04/watch-live-benson-speak-michigans-ongoing-vote-count/6159650002/

https://twitter.com/rossjonesWXYZ/status/1324213924250660869

 

Of course, I could go on. But maybe you should do your own due diligence about what you pass on. 

Who is going to be in the right side of history? 

The only widespread fraudulent activity seemed to be social media-based infections by disinformation after "psyops" (whatever this means to you) social engineering (priming) by our former president (confidence artistry) and his enablers (including Kremlin amplification botnets). 

https://imrussia.org/media/pdf/Research/Michael_Weiss_and_Peter_Pomerantsev__The_Menace_of_Unreality.pdf

Edited by surrept33
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, surrept33 said:

Which one of the conspiracy theories are you referring to? The Maricopa "ballots" case?

 

Gee: 

http://www.tucsonsentinel.com/local/report/030921_maricopa_ballots_dumpster/maricopa-county-dumpster-divers-didnt-find-bags-shredded-voted-2020-ballots/

Sounds like mass brainwashing promoted by our former "great leader":

https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/laurieroberts/2021/03/11/arizona-senator-says-ag-cant-trust-shredded-ballots/4654862001/

Keep in mind that many states do validate ballots, they just take a tiny random sample, just like polls do. Law of large numbers, if the randomization is done properly, it becomes a representative sample, and there is enough data sufficiency.

 

 

A random sampling of some other cases:

https://archive.is/WUmrO ->  https://twitter.com/OKelections/status/1325910154907439104

https://www.newsweek.com/tiktok-bigchoppadoe-faked-video-destroying-trump-ballot-1546234

GA: https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-georgia-poll-worker-in-hiding-aa0f256ec21de96fd5a41da703c4b443

GA: https://twitter.com/BrendanKeefe/status/1324779631229227008

PA: https://delcopa.gov/publicrelations/releases/2020/ballotvideoresponse.html

PA: https://factcheck.thedispatch.com/p/did-a-poll-worker-in-pennsylvania?fbclid=IwAR2A9grazzJ3XXlaRmJIZ3HnxhbWZf5v7oWYcgSNd1Abg0Rib93a67tDMhg

The great conspiracy that Trump was going to win LA County: https://twitter.com/LACountyRRCC/status/1324393951105744896

MI: https://texasscorecard.com/federal/video-wagons-suitcases-and-coolers-roll-into-detroit-voting-center-at-4-am/

MI: https://archive.is/eFul7 -> https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2020/11/04/watch-live-benson-speak-michigans-ongoing-vote-count/6159650002/

https://twitter.com/rossjonesWXYZ/status/1324213924250660869

 

Of course, I could go on. But maybe you should do your own due diligence about what you pass on. 

Who is going to be in the right side of history? 

The only widespread fraudulent activity seemed to be social media-based infections by disinformation after "psyops" (whatever this means to you) social engineering (priming) by our former president (confidence artistry) and his enablers (including Kremlin amplification botnets). 

https://imrussia.org/media/pdf/Research/Michael_Weiss_and_Peter_Pomerantsev__The_Menace_of_Unreality.pdf

Maricopa county refused to acknowledge a court order because? Ah gee, can't find someone else who did your thinking for you on that? Fulton county senior executive fired because? Oh, again, no answer. Shooting fish in a barrel

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 3/29/2021 at 5:15 PM, surrept33 said:

Because Trump was at best a useful idiot to the Kremlin. He failed to push back against Putin's meddling, and if anything, encouraged it. 

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/03/russia-studied-how-get-americans-make-mistakes/618328/

He also let the country's cybersecurity infrastructure atrophy. It'll be a very looooong tail in the recent SolarWinds hack, one of the most technically sophisticated in history:

https://www.rpc.senate.gov/policy-papers/the-solarwinds-cyberattack

of which we are still going to find out more details, probably for a very long time:

https://apnews.com/article/solarwinds-hack-email-top-dhs-officials-8bcd4a4eb3be1f8f98244766bae70395

The atrophy:

 

There is more to the cybersecurity hacking fest that is going on. NSA and DIA at war with CIA=China/CCP and FBI are eyeballs deep in the Russian and Chinese hacks. They identify them and use them as cover to infiltrate and collect communications and documents from other departments, corporations and individuals. 

Trump made a large effort to strengthen the cyberagencies selectively. Weaken relative SAP capacities of CIA FBI and DHS Chinese/Democrat criminal sedition organizations  Strengthen DIA and some of NSA. The DIA and spaceforce now have their own satellite communications network that does not need to go through the compromised internet backbone where CIA sniffs out everything. They are now taking down satellites controlled by the CIA MI6 etc. They aren't even trying to hide it. They are shooting the satellites down quickly and crudely so that they fall into the atmosphere and burn up in populated areas where they are visible and caught on camera. 

The departments  complaining are the target for dismantling by a next Trump administration. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, 0R0 said:

There is more to the cybersecurity hacking fest that is going on. NSA and DIA at war with CIA=China/CCP and FBI are eyeballs deep in the Russian and Chinese hacks. They identify them and use them as cover to infiltrate and collect communications and documents from other departments, corporations and individuals. 

Trump made a large effort to strengthen the cyberagencies selectively. Weaken relative SAP capacities of CIA FBI and DHS Chinese/Democrat criminal sedition organizations  Strengthen DIA and some of NSA. The DIA and spaceforce now have their own satellite communications network that does not need to go through the compromised internet backbone where CIA sniffs out everything. They are now taking down satellites controlled by the CIA MI6 etc. They aren't even trying to hide it. They are shooting the satellites down quickly and crudely so that they fall into the atmosphere and burn up in populated areas where they are visible and caught on camera. 

The departments  complaining are the target for dismantling by a next Trump administration. 

The deeper your posting go only bring me more annoying thoughts...Space warfare how absurd.. yet we have this 5 days ago. I think you will find Oregon is not below any of Space X orbital pathways...just a incident that has never occurred in Oregon history.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/likely-rocket-debris-lights-skies-over-pacific-northwest-n1262128

Likely rocket debris lights up skies over the Pacific Northwest

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

42 minutes ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

The deeper your posting go only bring me more annoying thoughts...Space warfare how absurd.. yet we have this 5 days ago. I think you will find Oregon is not below any of Space X orbital pathways...just a incident that has never occurred in Oregon history.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/likely-rocket-debris-lights-skies-over-pacific-northwest-n1262128

Likely rocket debris lights up skies over the Pacific Northwest

Sometimes "stuff" happens accidently with enough 'space junk' up there.

For example Iridium 33: http://www.stuffin.space/?search=1993-036

https://www.thespacereview.com/article/2023/1

or less dramatically: https://www.thespacereview.com/article/4150/1

Edited by surrept33
  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

The deeper your posting go only bring me more annoying thoughts...Space warfare how absurd.. yet we have this 5 days ago. I think you will find Oregon is not below any of Space X orbital pathways...just a incident that has never occurred in Oregon history.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/likely-rocket-debris-lights-skies-over-pacific-northwest-n1262128

Likely rocket debris lights up skies over the Pacific Northwest

The media cover up with an impossible story is an indication of their trying to hide something of significance. Media denials and misdirection Should be considered supporting evidence of the reality of conspiracy rumors. Media is now all advertising with nothing but PR for content to go between the ads. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, surrept33 said:

Sometimes "stuff" happens accidently with enough 'space junk' up there.

For example Iridium 33: http://www.stuffin.space/?search=1993-036

https://www.thespacereview.com/article/2023/1

or less dramatically: https://www.thespacereview.com/article/4150/1

Well as things go in this grand universes chit happens I will give you that..yet had you read that article things go beyond occasional speed bumps. More like on going occurrences...Ohh well.

Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer at Harvard University, labelled the sighting “space junk,” saying it was the 14th piece of debris, “with a mass over one tonne that has reentered since Jan 1st this year.”

img_0538_8e12bbd2b144047c478936b147002302.focal-100x100.jpgYasmine Salam
  • Great Response! 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

Spreading ideas that the armed forces are not operating under and reporting intel to the Commander and Chief.

The Constitution dictates that the President is Commander in Chief and is the supreme military commander.  Spreading any rumour against that is treasonous. Fact.

https://www.fbi.gov/tips

Edited by Symmetry
  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 3/30/2021 at 3:10 AM, Ward Smith said:

The Eejit is counting on the tens of millions of infants up to the teen ages, all smarter than him BTW and he's hoping against hope they don't support Trump. The infantile brains don't count for much, hence no one polls them, but the Eejit is expert in goo goo ga ga 

There's a reason the democrats, just like the communists, recruit the young:

A CIA REPORT ON THE ROLE OF THE RED GUARDS (1968)

Emerging in the middle months of 1966, the Red Guards were politically-mobilised young students who provided both momentum and muscle to Mao Zedong‘s Cultural Revolution. This American intelligence briefing, prepared by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and released on November 1st 1968, outlines the origins and objectives of Mao’s young “shock troops”:

“Mao Zedong’s ‘Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution’ can best be understood as the ageing dictator’s reaction to real and imagined opposition to his will within the Chinese Communist Party and Chinese society at large. In the purge, which has convulsed China for the past two years and more, certain members of the party elite were clearly pre-targeted and beyond saving, no matter how ‘correctly’ they responded to later developments. Others were purged because they failed the ‘test’ by responding incorrectly to Mao’s vague and ill-defined directives. Still others, much fewer in number, survived by effecting an early mea culpa [confession], turning against Liu Shaoqi and scourging themselves of bourgeois traits with a heavy application of the ‘thought of Mao Zedong’.

The shock troops of this purge have been the Red Guards, [who] publicly surfaced at a Beijing mass rally on August 18th 1966, and the Revolutionary Rebels, who swung into action later in the year as reinforcement for the youthful fanatics. These groups, from whose ranks some new party and government cadres were to be selected, were themselves deliberately led to be steeled and purified in the course of this artificial revolution…

“A unit [of Red Guards] was established on August 1st [1966]. The unit had a membership of 152 students and four teachers. The parents of those accepted had to belong to one of the so-called ‘five Red classes’: workers, poor or lower-middle peasants, soldiers, revolutionary cadres or revolutionary martyrs… The first Red Guard recruits, generally in their late teens or early 20s, were hand-picked by the CRGs [Cultural Revolution Groups] of certain schools during early summer and were to serve at the core when their ranks were greatly expanded in August and September… During the spring and early summer of 1966, certain future Red Guards were sent to Peking for secret classes in ‘Cultural Revolution tactics’…

On August 18th, the Red Guards were publicly consecrated as the shock troops of the Cultural Revolution, at a mass rally in Tiananmen Square. Dressed in a baggy green military uniform replete with Red Guard armband, Mao reviewed his minions – a phantasmagoria of hysterical marchers, banners, ‘little red books’ and balloons… The assembled throng of some one million persons was addressed first by Lin Biao, then by Zhou Enlai. Lin, speaking on behalf of Mao and the Central Committee, called for a “general offensive” against “bourgeois ideas and all other exploiting classes”…

Lin’s call evoked an immediate and ugly response throughout China. Timed to coincide with the rally, Red Guards from the Number Two Middle School issued a “declaration of war against the old world” on August 18th. This ‘ultimatum’, which enumerated the early victims of Red Guard outrages, was directed against barbers and tailors who ostensibly specialised in Hong Kong [Western] styles, bookdealers that stocked “pornography” and “degenerate” photographers. Declaring that they would “show no mercy” toward their opponents, the ultimatum concluded:

“You bourgeois rascals, you hooligans. We give you one week to destroy your Hong Kong-style clothing, to change your odd hairdos and throw away your pornographic books and degenerate photographs. Those hoodlums who have financials difficulties may trim their cowboy pants and make them into shorts… The pointed tips of the shoes may be cut off… and high-heeled shoes may be cut down to flats. Bad books and photographs should be thrown away. We won’t stand on ceremony with those who violate these orders. Mend! Cut! Destroy! Burn!”

red guards performing 1966 A contingent of Red Guards delivering a political performance for workers in 1966
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Symmetry said:

Spreading ideas that the armed forces are not operating under and reporting intel to the Commander and Chief.

The Constitution dictates that the President is Commander in Chief and is the supreme military commander.  Spreading any rumour against that is treasonous. Fact.

Defense secretary orders 60-day stand-down to confront extremism in the military

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 3/29/2021 at 5:18 PM, Symmetry said:

The cult went after them every time.

I won't do their job for them just like they failed to point out all trumps crimes themselves.

 

 

Not a issue, they CNN are on the Cuspid of greatness.

Alan Dershowitz Files $300 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against CNN

https://www.newsweek.com/alan-dershowitz-files-300-million-defamation-lawsuit-against-cnn-1532165

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

4 minutes ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

Not a issue, they CNN are on the Cuspid of greatness.

Alan Dershowitz Files $300 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against CNN

https://www.newsweek.com/alan-dershowitz-files-300-million-defamation-lawsuit-against-cnn-1532165

Smaller lawsuit than your friends who use "[only a moron would have believed that]" as a defence.

Of course, the regular morons continue to defend the mythical Kraken despite the acknowledgement from their leader it was a farce. 

 

Edited by Symmetry
  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Symmetry said:

Smaller lawsuit than your friends who use "[only a moron would have believed that]" as a defence.

Of course, the regular morons continue to defend the mythical Kraken despite the acknowledgement from their leader it was a farce. 

 

118885989_3190450467717064_4770794189654633645_n.jpg

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

 

118885989_3190450467717064_4770794189654633645_n.jpg

Guess my age. 

  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

Defense secretary orders 60-day stand-down to confront extremism in the military

The all were re confirmed in an oath to the Constitution for these United States. Of which Biden is not president 

  • Upvote 2
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, surrept33 said:

Which one of the conspiracy theories are you referring to? The Maricopa "ballots" case?

 

Gee: 

http://www.tucsonsentinel.com/local/report/030921_maricopa_ballots_dumpster/maricopa-county-dumpster-divers-didnt-find-bags-shredded-voted-2020-ballots/

Sounds like mass brainwashing promoted by our former "great leader":

https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/laurieroberts/2021/03/11/arizona-senator-says-ag-cant-trust-shredded-ballots/4654862001/

Keep in mind that many states do validate ballots, they just take a tiny random sample, just like polls do. Law of large numbers, if the randomization is done properly, it becomes a representative sample, and there is enough data sufficiency.

 

 

A random sampling of some other cases:

https://archive.is/WUmrO ->  https://twitter.com/OKelections/status/1325910154907439104

https://www.newsweek.com/tiktok-bigchoppadoe-faked-video-destroying-trump-ballot-1546234

GA: https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-georgia-poll-worker-in-hiding-aa0f256ec21de96fd5a41da703c4b443

GA: https://twitter.com/BrendanKeefe/status/1324779631229227008

PA: https://delcopa.gov/publicrelations/releases/2020/ballotvideoresponse.html

PA: https://factcheck.thedispatch.com/p/did-a-poll-worker-in-pennsylvania?fbclid=IwAR2A9grazzJ3XXlaRmJIZ3HnxhbWZf5v7oWYcgSNd1Abg0Rib93a67tDMhg

The great conspiracy that Trump was going to win LA County: https://twitter.com/LACountyRRCC/status/1324393951105744896

MI: https://texasscorecard.com/federal/video-wagons-suitcases-and-coolers-roll-into-detroit-voting-center-at-4-am/

MI: https://archive.is/eFul7 -> https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2020/11/04/watch-live-benson-speak-michigans-ongoing-vote-count/6159650002/

https://twitter.com/rossjonesWXYZ/status/1324213924250660869

 

Of course, I could go on. But maybe you should do your own due diligence about what you pass on. 

Who is going to be in the right side of history? 

The only widespread fraudulent activity seemed to be social media-based infections by disinformation after "psyops" (whatever this means to you) social engineering (priming) by our former president (confidence artistry) and his enablers (including Kremlin amplification botnets). 

https://imrussia.org/media/pdf/Research/Michael_Weiss_and_Peter_Pomerantsev__The_Menace_of_Unreality.pdf

These refute nothing. The math of the data stream from the precincts and from the reported data are entirely clear in documenting massive voter fraud.  If the data purported to be leaks from military intel/NSA, which correlate to the documented data are truly what they claim to be, Knowing that the IP addresses of the data injections into the vote counts were largely Chinese and and from several NATO countries and Iran, then the military must presume Biden is not President, but a foreign occupying force that has captured HQ. His appointments must be treated like radioactive material or a biohazard; and a plan of action adhering to the law of war manual must be provided and followed to remove him and all who conspired with him from office and put them in military tribunals for treason with as little loss of life and interruption of civilian life as possible. 

So far as I can tell, there is no indication that Biden is in the chain of command for a great number of US military flag officers and their units. Even those that appear to be following WH or Sec of Def orders may very well be doing so for other reasons regardless of the orders. 

As Ward and others noted, there has been hardly any access at all to ballots in disputed counting centers. Their chain of custody has been largely disrupted, thus unknown and significant numbers of ballots were destroyed in those locations.  All of which is violation of Federal law. Essentially, there is no way to confirm that there was an actual election till the ballots are forensically examined. All other claims can not be confirmed As others indicated, the legal threshold for disqualifying a ballot has to be particular to that ballot. Otherwise the court will not take any kind of statistical or computer record evidence of fraud regardless of how clear cut and definitive it is. Even going one by one and checking the entries in the voter registries against physical addresses and actual people showing anywhere from 20% to 54% (Maricopa AZ) of registries being fake in the swing states will not be enough because it does not directly tie to a particular ballot The court's insistence on rejecting anything other than particulars of individual or a narrow set of ballots as evidence has to be challenged. The precedent is wrong and has been challenged successfully before.

 

  • Great Response! 2
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Symmetry said:

Informing operators that crime is occurring on their website is not a threat; in fact, many places have a "report" function for obscenities.

Oilprice can choose to distribute criminal information, or not - but remember even pornhub etc. follows rules.

@Selva

 

 

 

In any case, no information I am providing is "criminal" as I am reporting what I have observed in myriad discussions of what other people are doing. Supporting one side or another is not "criminal". 

The reality of it is that there are two governments claiming legitimacy, one is highly visible and came into place by easily discernible blatant fraud assisted by enemies of these United States, and one military government operating a psyop to bring to light the treasonous criminal organization calling itself the Biden administration and its doings as they prepare to remove them and likely their entire organizations from power. 

The winner will decide who is criminal. I would venture a guess that you would be on the wrong side of history. If you are on the winning side I am certain I would have been disappeared some time ago. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.