Dan Warnick

U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes

Recommended Posts

(edited)

1 hour ago, Bob D said:

Probably, Likely, Gibberish. Smacks of something LiamP.  You're right there.  🙄   Do you want or care to know why this is??

Could it be a mechanism to distribute votes based on an algorithm rather than simply tallying the votes??  LiamP casts a vote for a candidate and finds his vote distributed to three candidates.  You're OK with that??  I'm not!  

Do you think Trump won California? Considering that Biden won the state by 30% (inline with numbers since 2004 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_elections_in_California), the algorithm would have to have an very interesting "rigging strategy".

If you look at states that were much closer, for example, Georgia, where there were by hand recounts done, how did the mysterious algorithm not get caught? https://sos.ga.gov/index.php/elections/historic_first_statewide_audit_of_paper_ballots_upholds_result_of_presidential_race

It is "interesting" watching the GQP tear itself apart, but who is on the right side of history? Trumq or people who followed the law?

https://www.ajc.com/politics/politics-blog/the-jolt-gov-brian-kemp-censured-by-two-county-republican-parties/N3ZB3ZTX5JCCBIIXLWDVHNT5WA/

Edited by surrept33

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  

My Question ... How does Biden only get 0.659 of one vote recorded in the Dominion system???

You never stay on topic.  Your response is very Enthalpic.

How does Biden only get 0.659 of a vote??  The ballot was cast for 1 candidate yet three candidates got partial votes??  That's the question.

You know, you can answer "I don't know" or "Something's not right" and still not loose your far left wacho status.  But your deflection and misdirection is sad.  You gain no benefit from it.  Hiding is not attractive.

So ... your answer to my question is??

 

 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, surrept33 said:

Do you think Trump won California? Considering that Biden won the state by 30% (inline with numbers since 2004 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_elections_in_California), the algorithm would have to have an very interesting "rigging strategy".

If you look at states that were much closer, for example, Georgia, where there were by hand recounts done, how did the mysterious algorithm not get caught? https://sos.ga.gov/index.php/elections/historic_first_statewide_audit_of_paper_ballots_upholds_result_of_presidential_race

It is "interesting" watching the GQP tear itself apart, but who is on the right side of history? Trumq or people who followed the law?

https://www.ajc.com/politics/politics-blog/the-jolt-gov-brian-kemp-censured-by-two-county-republican-parties/N3ZB3ZTX5JCCBIIXLWDVHNT5WA/

So many posts, so much crap. I've got better things to do than constantly correct you. 

Xiden received the most ballots in California, now if only there were voters attached. 

"Georgia, where there were by hand recounts done" no there weren't "by hand recounts done". What happened was a spot check "audit" by non qualified highly partisan academics. Governor Kemp said there was going to be a recount, then his future son in law was murdered and he reneged. I posted about this in this very topic area months ago, with pictures. Three cars blown up, but it was "a fender bender". 

GQP? Kemp and Raffensberger are compromised, without a doubt. Doesn't matter what letter you've got by your name, if blackmailed you're just another puppet. 

  • Great Response! 2
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

1 hour ago, Bob D said:

  

My Question ... How does Biden only get 0.659 of one vote recorded in the Dominion system???

You never stay on topic.  Your response is very Enthalpic.

How does Biden only get 0.659 of a vote??  The ballot was cast for 1 candidate yet three candidates got partial votes??  That's the question.

You know, you can answer "I don't know" or "Something's not right" and still not loose your far left wacho status.  But your deflection and misdirection is sad.  You gain no benefit from it.  Hiding is not attractive.

So ... your answer to my question is??

 

 

How do you know "Biden only get 0.659 of a vote"? How do you know that is the mechanism that is used to tally votes?

If it were, why would hand counts of paper match? It goes without saying that disseminating spurious conspiracies after it has been refuted by numerous sources itself is a civic harm. These types of conspiracies eat away at democracies and encourage extralegal action, for example an insurrection, and discourage legitimate security researchers. I never thought I would see it in the United States. 

Edited by surrept33
  • Downvote 1
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, surrept33 said:

How do you know "Biden only get 0.659 of a vote"? How do you know that is the mechanism that is used to tally votes?

If it were, why would hand counts of paper match? It goes without saying that disseminating spurious conspiracies after it has been refuted by numerous sources itself is a civic harm. These types of conspiracies eat away at democracies and encourage extralegal action, for example an insurrection, and discourage legitimate security researchers. I never thought I would see it in the United States. 

The "hand counts of ballots" when they are allowed do not match. Antrim county is the poster child for this. The only reason a recount was allowed there was because of the down ballot races! The heavily Republican county had a ridiculous number of votes go to the Demoncrats there. The math matches what happened elsewhere, what shows up as fractional voting and a clear algorithmic manipulation. But no one wants to admit the presidential election was stolen. It's like the proverbial tree falling in the forest. As long as no one gets to hear, we can keep pretending it didn't make a sound. 

The bad guys are losing. CNN caught with their pants down. They make a (fraudulent) statement, then veritas releases the next video. Hilarious. That's your team

  • Great Response! 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Ward Smith said:

The "hand counts of ballots" when they are allowed do not match. Antrim county is the poster child for this. The only reason a recount was allowed there was because of the down ballot races! The heavily Republican county had a ridiculous number of votes go to the Demoncrats there. The math matches what happened elsewhere, what shows up as fractional voting and a clear algorithmic manipulation. But no one wants to admit the presidential election was stolen. It's like the proverbial tree falling in the forest. As long as no one gets to hear, we can keep pretending it didn't make a sound. 

The bad guys are losing. CNN caught with their pants down. They make a (fraudulent) statement, then veritas releases the next video. Hilarious. That's your team

CNN is in a very bad spot right now, currently there are two major defamation lawsuits against them. Let us not forget they have already lost one. These videos being disclosed have some very complicated issues in them, not only civil liabilities but very damaging FCC rules in regards to election laws. Losing three civil cases would greatly damage the networks ability to defend themselves in a legal case.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Ward Smith said:

The "hand counts of ballots" when they are allowed do not match. Antrim county is the poster child for this. The only reason a recount was allowed there was because of the down ballot races! The heavily Republican county had a ridiculous number of votes go to the Demoncrats there. The math matches what happened elsewhere, what shows up as fractional voting and a clear algorithmic manipulation. But no one wants to admit the presidential election was stolen. It's like the proverbial tree falling in the forest. As long as no one gets to hear, we can keep pretending it didn't make a sound. 

The bad guys are losing. CNN caught with their pants down. They make a (fraudulent) statement, then veritas releases the next video. Hilarious. That's your team

It did nearly match. It looks like there were some human errors and no mysterious "weighted voting" (not to mention in California!)

A full report here from an expert:

https://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,4670,7-127-93094-555635--,00.html

(From Bailey vs Antrim County)

Note, the report (from an actual security expert) refutes an earlier "expert" (who wasn't allowed to run Maricopa's audit because of rookie mistakes -> https://archive.is/a7lUc)


Page 40:

Quote

 

I have reviewed the “Antrim Michigan Forensics Report—Revised Preliminary
Summary, v2”, dated December 13, 2020, prepared by Russell James Ramsland,
Jr. of Allied Security Operations Group (the “ASOG Report”, redacted version
available at [1]). The report contains an extraordinary number of false, inaccurate,
or unsubstantiated statements and conclusions, the most serious of which I refute
below. Paragraph numbers that follow refer to the unredacted report.

Mr. Ramsland claims that Antrim’s scanners exhibited a high rate of errors during
ballot processing as a means of enabling systemic fraud (¶¶B.2, B.12). Some
errors did occur during scanning, as I explained in Section 4, but they affected
only specific contests in a small number of precincts, and there is no reason
to believe they were intentional. However, Mr. Ramsland is largely referring to
others kinds of errors that he believes occurred on the basis of his mistaken
interpretations of the forensic evidence.

Mr. Ramsland further claims that the scanner log shows that “RCV or Ranked
Choice Voting Algorithm was enabled” which “allows the user to apply a weighted
numerical value to candidates and change the overall result
” (¶J.2). In reality,
although some log entries reference the voting system’s RCV feature, they do not
indicate that it was enabled. The EMS and memory card data data show that RCV
was not in use, as do the results of the hand recount of the presidential contest.

 


Another rebuttal, from someone else who was familiar with Dominion's system:
https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Rebuttal_ASOG-Antrim_Report.pdf

Quote

11. Paragraph 3 of Section J mentions “an algorithm used that will weight one
candidate greater than another (for instance, weight a specific candidate at a 2/3 to approximately
1/3 ratio). In the logs we identified that the RCV or Ranked Choice Voting Algorithm was enabled 
(see image below from the Dominion manual).” The version of D-Suite (version 5.5) used in
Antrim County does not have the capability to run the RCV algorithm – the screenshot provided
is for the D-Suite 5.11 voting system.

 

 

  • Upvote 1
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Bob D said:

  

My Question ... How does Biden only get 0.659 of one vote recorded in the Dominion system???

You never stay on topic.  Your response is very Enthalpic.

How does Biden only get 0.659 of a vote??  The ballot was cast for 1 candidate yet three candidates got partial votes??  That's the question.

You know, you can answer "I don't know" or "Something's not right" and still not loose your far left wacho status.  But your deflection and misdirection is sad.  You gain no benefit from it.  Hiding is not attractive.

So ... your answer to my question is??

 

 

Here are the Results by county in Calif.

 

What are you babbling about .659 of a vote? There are no fractional votes in Calif. Now stay on topic, your answer to the question of where are you getting .659 vote ? from some other crackpot?

County Joe Biden Donald Trump Other Total
Votes % Votes % Votes %
Total 11,110,250 63.48% 6,006,429 34.32% 384,202 2.20% 17,500,881
Alameda 617,659 80.23% 136,309 17.71% 15,896 2.06% 769,864
Alpine 476 64.24% 244 32.93% 21 2.83% 741
Amador 8,153 36.56% 13,585 60.91% 564 2.53% 22,302
Butte 50,426 49.42% 48,730 47.75% 2,886 2.83% 102,042
Calaveras 10,046 36.98% 16,518 60.81% 600 2.21% 27,164
Colusa 3,234 40.67% 4,554 57.28% 163 2.05% 7,951
Contra Costa 416,386 71.64% 152,877 26.30% 11,967 2.06% 581,230
Del Norte 4,677 40.84% 6,461 56.42% 314 2.74% 11,452
El Dorado 51,621 44.45% 61,838 53.25% 2,679 2.30% 116,138
Fresno 193,025 52.91% 164,464 45.08% 7,320 2.01% 364,809
Glenn 3,995 35.38% 7,063 62.55% 234 2.07% 11,292
Humboldt 44,768 65.04% 21,770 31.63% 2,290 3.33% 68,828
Imperial 34,678 61.14% 20,847 36.76% 1,193 2.10% 56,718
Inyo 4,634 48.88% 4,620 48.73% 227 2.39% 9,481
Kern 133,366 43.69% 164,484 53.89% 7,376 2.42% 305,226
Kings 18,699 42.64% 24,072 54.89% 1,087 2.47% 43,858
Lake 14,941 51.88% 13,123 45.57% 736 2.55% 28,800
Lassen 2,799 23.35% 8,970 74.84% 216 1.81% 11,985
Los Angeles 3,028,885 71.04% 1,145,530 26.87% 89,028 2.09% 4,263,443
Madera 23,168 43.13% 29,378 54.69% 1,176 2.18% 53,722
Marin 128,288 82.34% 24,612 15.80% 2,901 1.86% 155,801
Mariposa 4,088 39.77% 5,950 57.88% 242 2.35% 10,280
Mendocino 28,782 66.42% 13,267 30.61% 1,287 2.97% 43,336
Merced 48,991 54.11% 39,397 43.51% 2,153 2.38% 90,541
Modoc 1,150 26.51% 3,109 71.67% 79 1.82% 4,338
Mono 4,013 59.57% 2,513 37.30% 211 3.13% 6,737
Monterey 113,953 69.53% 46,299 28.25% 3,631 2.22% 163,883
Napa 49,817 69.07% 20,676 28.67% 1,629 2.26% 72,122
Nevada 36,359 56.16% 26,779 41.37% 1,600 2.47% 64,738
Orange 814,009 53.49% 676,498 44.46% 31,218 2.05% 1,521,725
Placer 106,869 45.47% 122,488 52.12% 5,660 2.41% 235,017
Plumas 4,561 40.52% 6,445 57.26% 250 2.22% 11,256
Riverside 527,945 53.00% 448,702 45.04% 19,509 1.96% 996,156
Sacramento 440,808 61.37% 259,405 36.11% 18,077 2.52% 718,290
San Benito 17,628 61.16% 10,590 36.74% 603 2.10% 28,821
San Bernardino 455,859 54.21% 366,257 43.55% 18,815 2.24% 840,931
San Diego 964,650 60.23% 600,094 37.47% 36,978 2.30% 1,601,722
San Francisco 378,156 85.27% 56,417 12.72% 8,885 2.01% 443,458
San Joaquin 161,137 55.86% 121,098 41.99% 6,208 2.15% 288,443
San Luis Obispo 88,310 55.30% 67,436 42.23% 3,935 2.47% 159,681
San Mateo 291,410 77.91% 75,563 20.20% 7,085 1.89% 374,058
Santa Barbara 129,963 64.89% 65,736 32.82% 4,589 2.29% 200,288
Santa Clara 617,967 72.66% 214,612 25.23% 17,943 2.11% 850,522
Santa Cruz 114,246 78.90% 26,937 18.60% 3,613 2.50% 144,796
Shasta 30,000 32.29% 60,789 65.43% 2,111 2.28% 92,900
Sierra 730 37.82% 1,142 59.17% 58 3.01% 1,930
Siskiyou 9,593 40.91% 13,290 56.67% 567 2.42% 23,450
Solano 131,639 63.95% 69,306 33.67% 4,886 2.38% 205,831
Sonoma 199,938 74.53% 61,825 23.05% 6,489 2.42% 268,252
Stanislaus 105,841 49.26% 104,145 48.47% 4,890 2.27% 214,876
Sutter 17,367 40.73% 24,375 57.16% 898 2.11% 42,640
Tehama 8,911 31.03% 19,141 66.64% 669 2.33% 28,721
Trinity 2,851 45.56% 3,188 50.94% 219 3.50% 6,258
Tulare 66,105 45.02% 77,579 52.84% 3,148 2.14% 146,832
Tuolumne 11,978 39.40% 17,689 58.19% 734 2.41% 30,401
Ventura 251,388 59.47% 162,207 38.37% 9,103 2.16% 422,698
Yolo 67,598 69.50% 27,292 28.06% 2,374 2.44% 97,264
Yuba 11,230 37.70% 17,676 59.34% 881 2.96% 29,787
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/13/2021 at 2:52 PM, Eyes Wide Open said:

 

52mo81.jpg

I bet you are (and Trump) are waiting for Mexico to pay for the wall.......2015

"Mark my words," Donald Trump said when he launched his presidential campaign on June 16, 2015.

Trump had just promised to "build a great wall," on the U.S.-Mexico border, "very inexpensively."

"And I will have Mexico pay for that wall," he said.

 

2021.... and you are still waiting???? I bet you also still believe in the tooth fairy

 

 

  • Haha 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

7 hours ago, notsonice said:

I bet you are (and Trump) are waiting for Mexico to pay for the wall.......2015

"Mark my words," Donald Trump said when he launched his presidential campaign on June 16, 2015.

Trump had just promised to "build a great wall," on the U.S.-Mexico border, "very inexpensively."

"And I will have Mexico pay for that wall," he said.

 

2021.... and you are still waiting???? I bet you also still believe in the tooth fairy

 

 

It is good to see you paying attention...I will give him a pass, however i do believe Biden will cut Mexico a check back for the 7000 troops guarding their southern border against illegal immigrants  for the first time in history?

 

52422291_2064474396975653_2888970847840632832_n.jpg

Edited by Eyes Wide Open
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

7 hours ago, notsonice said:

Here are the Results by county in Calif.

 

What are you babbling about .659 of a vote? There are no fractional votes in Calif. Now stay on topic, your answer to the question of where are you getting .659 vote ? from some other crackpot?

County Joe Biden Donald Trump Other Total
Votes % Votes % Votes %
Total 11,110,250 63.48% 6,006,429 34.32% 384,202 2.20% 17,500,881
Alameda 617,659 80.23% 136,309 17.71% 15,896 2.06% 769,864
Alpine 476 64.24% 244 32.93% 21 2.83% 741
Amador 8,153 36.56% 13,585 60.91% 564 2.53% 22,302
Butte 50,426 49.42% 48,730 47.75% 2,886 2.83% 102,042
Calaveras 10,046 36.98% 16,518 60.81% 600 2.21% 27,164
Colusa 3,234 40.67% 4,554 57.28% 163 2.05% 7,951
Contra Costa 416,386 71.64% 152,877 26.30% 11,967 2.06% 581,230
Del Norte 4,677 40.84% 6,461 56.42% 314 2.74% 11,452
El Dorado 51,621 44.45% 61,838 53.25% 2,679 2.30% 116,138
Fresno 193,025 52.91% 164,464 45.08% 7,320 2.01% 364,809
Glenn 3,995 35.38% 7,063 62.55% 234 2.07% 11,292
Humboldt 44,768 65.04% 21,770 31.63% 2,290 3.33% 68,828
Imperial 34,678 61.14% 20,847 36.76% 1,193 2.10% 56,718
Inyo 4,634 48.88% 4,620 48.73% 227 2.39% 9,481
Kern 133,366 43.69% 164,484 53.89% 7,376 2.42% 305,226
Kings 18,699 42.64% 24,072 54.89% 1,087 2.47% 43,858
Lake 14,941 51.88% 13,123 45.57% 736 2.55% 28,800
Lassen 2,799 23.35% 8,970 74.84% 216 1.81% 11,985
Los Angeles 3,028,885 71.04% 1,145,530 26.87% 89,028 2.09% 4,263,443
Madera 23,168 43.13% 29,378 54.69% 1,176 2.18% 53,722
Marin 128,288 82.34% 24,612 15.80% 2,901 1.86% 155,801
Mariposa 4,088 39.77% 5,950 57.88% 242 2.35% 10,280
Mendocino 28,782 66.42% 13,267 30.61% 1,287 2.97% 43,336
Merced 48,991 54.11% 39,397 43.51% 2,153 2.38% 90,541
Modoc 1,150 26.51% 3,109 71.67% 79 1.82% 4,338
Mono 4,013 59.57% 2,513 37.30% 211 3.13% 6,737
Monterey 113,953 69.53% 46,299 28.25% 3,631 2.22% 163,883
Napa 49,817 69.07% 20,676 28.67% 1,629 2.26% 72,122
Nevada 36,359 56.16% 26,779 41.37% 1,600 2.47% 64,738
Orange 814,009 53.49% 676,498 44.46% 31,218 2.05% 1,521,725
Placer 106,869 45.47% 122,488 52.12% 5,660 2.41% 235,017
Plumas 4,561 40.52% 6,445 57.26% 250 2.22% 11,256
Riverside 527,945 53.00% 448,702 45.04% 19,509 1.96% 996,156
Sacramento 440,808 61.37% 259,405 36.11% 18,077 2.52% 718,290
San Benito 17,628 61.16% 10,590 36.74% 603 2.10% 28,821
San Bernardino 455,859 54.21% 366,257 43.55% 18,815 2.24% 840,931
San Diego 964,650 60.23% 600,094 37.47% 36,978 2.30% 1,601,722
San Francisco 378,156 85.27% 56,417 12.72% 8,885 2.01% 443,458
San Joaquin 161,137 55.86% 121,098 41.99% 6,208 2.15% 288,443
San Luis Obispo 88,310 55.30% 67,436 42.23% 3,935 2.47% 159,681
San Mateo 291,410 77.91% 75,563 20.20% 7,085 1.89% 374,058
Santa Barbara 129,963 64.89% 65,736 32.82% 4,589 2.29% 200,288
Santa Clara 617,967 72.66% 214,612 25.23% 17,943 2.11% 850,522
Santa Cruz 114,246 78.90% 26,937 18.60% 3,613 2.50% 144,796
Shasta 30,000 32.29% 60,789 65.43% 2,111 2.28% 92,900
Sierra 730 37.82% 1,142 59.17% 58 3.01% 1,930
Siskiyou 9,593 40.91% 13,290 56.67% 567 2.42% 23,450
Solano 131,639 63.95% 69,306 33.67% 4,886 2.38% 205,831
Sonoma 199,938 74.53% 61,825 23.05% 6,489 2.42% 268,252
Stanislaus 105,841 49.26% 104,145 48.47% 4,890 2.27% 214,876
Sutter 17,367 40.73% 24,375 57.16% 898 2.11% 42,640
Tehama 8,911 31.03% 19,141 66.64% 669 2.33% 28,721
Trinity 2,851 45.56% 3,188 50.94% 219 3.50% 6,258
Tulare 66,105 45.02% 77,579 52.84% 3,148 2.14% 146,832
Tuolumne 11,978 39.40% 17,689 58.19% 734 2.41% 30,401
Ventura 251,388 59.47% 162,207 38.37% 9,103 2.16% 422,698
Yolo 67,598 69.50% 27,292 28.06% 2,374 2.44% 97,264
Yuba 11,230 37.70% 17,676 59.34% 881 2.96% 29,787

Poor Enthalpic, can't stay away can you? No friends, no job, no prospects, only a matter of time until this sock puppet gets banned. 

The Edison system from which the state releases "certified" election results is where my previous fractional vote appeared. Because for that small county, for that window in time, there was only one vote and it showed up as fractional. Your pathetic attempt at misdirection will fail as all your attempts fail, until you go off on another psychotic rant and get this ID banned. Your goal isn't discussion among adults, your goal is and always has been distortion disruption and denial. 

3A9627A8-F24D-4F29-81F3-BCF66E0C32BD.jpeg

Edited by Ward Smith
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

2 hours ago, Ward Smith said:

Poor Enthalpic, can't stay away can you? No friends, no job, no prospects, only a matter of time until this sock puppet gets banned. 

The Edison system from which the state releases "certified" election results is where my previous fractional vote appeared. Because for that small county, for that window in time, there was only one vote and it showed up as fractional. Your pathetic attempt at misdirection will fail as all your attempts fail, until you go off on another psychotic rant and get this ID banned. Your goal isn't discussion among adults, your goal is and always has been distortion disruption and denial. 

3A9627A8-F24D-4F29-81F3-BCF66E0C32BD.jpeg

Where did the "internet sleuths" acquire the data? It looks like they scraped it:

http://securitydebrief.com/2020/11/14/seeming-discrepancies-in-voter-data-fuel-for-disinformation/

That type of data stream is suitable for drawing a dynamic choropleth map on for example, a live elections results page (all you care is relative ratios with a low degree of precision). e.g, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choropleth_map#Classification

It is *not* precise enough for either tallying (counting votes) or forensics, and it doesn't appear that the actual voting system was doing this anyways. 

Typically web services (for example Edison, the data aggregator), in order to avoid "free rider" problems, do not give out the good stuff for free (the "tick" data, if it exists) with the least quantization error. 

Note that the_donald was a conduit of massive amounts of disinformation (and/or amplified by foreign propaganda), which then spread to other sites often by Trump's own social media team: https://www.dailydot.com/debug/dan-scavino-reddit-donald-trump-disinformation/

Edited by surrept33
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

16 hours ago, Ward Smith said:

Poor Enthalpic, can't stay away can you? No friends, no job, no prospects, only a matter of time until this sock puppet gets banned. 

The Edison system from which the state releases "certified" election results is where my previous fractional vote appeared. Because for that small county, for that window in time, there was only one vote and it showed up as fractional. Your pathetic attempt at misdirection will fail as all your attempts fail, until you go off on another psychotic rant and get this ID banned. Your goal isn't discussion among adults, your goal is and always has been distortion disruption and denial. 

3A9627A8-F24D-4F29-81F3-BCF66E0C32BD.jpeg

I see you are babbling again, as usual. The Big E owns you. Get back on your meds and maybe you will stop babbling. Trump lost and your master Putin is very upset. You have failed as new sanctions landed on your bosses desk. Once again where are your from? You have not yet mastered American English. As for Banning me? please go cry to Selva, it is what a puss like you does when you are defeated.

Edited by notsonice
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/15/2021 at 12:51 PM, surrept33 said:

Where did the "internet sleuths" acquire the data? It looks like they scraped it:

http://securitydebrief.com/2020/11/14/seeming-discrepancies-in-voter-data-fuel-for-disinformation/

That type of data stream is suitable for drawing a dynamic choropleth map on for example, a live elections results page (all you care is relative ratios with a low degree of precision). e.g, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choropleth_map#Classification

It is *not* precise enough for either tallying (counting votes) or forensics, and it doesn't appear that the actual voting system was doing this anyways. 

Typically web services (for example Edison, the data aggregator), in order to avoid "free rider" problems, do not give out the good stuff for free (the "tick" data, if it exists) with the least quantization error. 

Note that the_donald was a conduit of massive amounts of disinformation (and/or amplified by foreign propaganda), which then spread to other sites often by Trump's own social media team: https://www.dailydot.com/debug/dan-scavino-reddit-donald-trump-disinformation/

While the precision of the publicly available Edison data may be in question, the official tally is composed of this data. 

 

Second, several teams actually purchased the raw precinct data feed files for several swing states and they reveal a far larger vote count flipping, erasure and systemic algorithmic manipulation of the counts. 

The claim of disinformation is self descriptive. The data stands. The disinformation claims don't.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, 0R0 said:

While the precision of the publicly available Edison data may be in question, the official tally is composed of this data. 

 

Second, several teams actually purchased the raw precinct data feed files for several swing states and they reveal a far larger vote count flipping, erasure and systemic algorithmic manipulation of the counts. 

The claim of disinformation is self descriptive. The data stands. The disinformation claims don't.

Does the data from those teams match this revised data from the NYT?

They scraped the precinct canvassed data from the websites of the secretary of states of various states, whenever the states made them available:

https://github.com/TheUpshot/presidential-precinct-map-2020/blob/main/README.md

In general, there was many more states offering up the data online than previously. 

If there was risk limiting audits, they would have flagged the "algorithmic manipulation", 

This is a good summary of the vote counting, election night return, vote flipping, tabulation, cybersecurity issues, etc. It was published before the election: https://www.stephenpettigrew.com/articles/2020-pettigrew-stewart-ostlj.pdf

They say (page 49):

Quote

 

We assume that in the 2020 election, as in every election, some anomaly in the vote-count will emerge in some jurisdiction. Such an anomaly will require the responsible officials to respond by reconstructing what the true election count is, and by demonstrating to the public that the correct results have been included in the official tally.

Although anomalies in both the informal and formal vote tallies will probably create doubt among the public in whether the vote count is correct, and officials need plans to respond to both, in the end, the most important vulnerabilities to respond to are those that infect the official vote process. The manipulation of official vote tallies has the potential to install the wrong person into office. For that reason, it is important that among the responses to anomalies that are available to election officials is the ability to overturn the presumed results of an election, in light of evidence that the original count was fraudulent or based on a counting error.

The new kid on the block with respect to post-election auditing is risklimiting audits (RLAs). RLAs are designed to be implemented before the certification of the results, and to inform election officials whether they should be confident in the results—or if they should bump the audit up to a full recount.  RLAs conducted as part of the certification process currently provide the best mechanism through which the manipulation of election returns at the precinct level can be detected and, most importantly, remedied. State legislatures should not only adopt RLAs, they should write legislation that includes RLAs as part of the canvass.

 

Keep in mind that the "stop the steal" movement (which probably only had an effect on turnout and mistrust) was heavily amplified by a certain state actor.

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/declassified-us-spies-reveal-how-russia-iran-tried-manipulate-us-2020-elections-180913

 

Meanwhile, the China Ministry of "Truth" was pretty mum about the election: https://chinadigitaltimes.net/2020/11/beijing-stays-silent-as-u-s-awaits-election-results/ (though they were active earlier in 2020: https://chinadigitaltimes.net/2020/07/russia-and-china-join-forces-to-amplify-disinformation-and-propaganda/)

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

1 hour ago, turbguy said:

I have been seriously attempting to refrain from commenting on this subject, but you gotta wonder...

https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/548447-treasury-manafort-russian-intelligence-trump-campaign-2016

Y i do understand that sentiment, had i not watched the 16 election with some interest i believe i would write all the rumor has it chit off. But what happened still has me in disbelief and no matter what is disclosed i will still be in disbelief. Was Trump guilty of anything? I guess if one considers rubbing the nose of a body of politicians in a pile of bison dung being guilty you would be correct he is guilty....

There is so much going on behind the scenes it almost staggers the mind, and the accusations will only get stronger and louder until the midterms are done and over. If the conservative party wins...there will be a small and short civil war. That is the way the world swings..the penduluem swings...big swings and this time...

All over this little victory dance....what a world.

https://youtu.be/HHckZCxdRkA

Edited by Eyes Wide Open
  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump uses the tactics and has the morals of a third world dictator like Saddam Husain. Saddam had plenty of supporters that bought into the madman’s vision and cheered demands of loyalty, lack of respect for opposing views and a driving policy of the end justifies the means. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/16/2021 at 10:06 PM, surrept33 said:

Does the data from those teams match this revised data from the NYT?

They scraped the precinct canvassed data from the websites of the secretary of states of various states, whenever the states made them available:

https://github.com/TheUpshot/presidential-precinct-map-2020/blob/main/README.md

In general, there was many more states offering up the data online than previously. 

If there was risk limiting audits, they would have flagged the "algorithmic manipulation", 

This is a good summary of the vote counting, election night return, vote flipping, tabulation, cybersecurity issues, etc. It was published before the election: https://www.stephenpettigrew.com/articles/2020-pettigrew-stewart-ostlj.pdf

They say (page 49):

Keep in mind that the "stop the steal" movement (which probably only had an effect on turnout and mistrust) was heavily amplified by a certain state actor.

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/declassified-us-spies-reveal-how-russia-iran-tried-manipulate-us-2020-elections-180913

 

Meanwhile, the China Ministry of "Truth" was pretty mum about the election: https://chinadigitaltimes.net/2020/11/beijing-stays-silent-as-u-s-awaits-election-results/ (though they were active earlier in 2020: https://chinadigitaltimes.net/2020/07/russia-and-china-join-forces-to-amplify-disinformation-and-propaganda/)

Yes, the swing states eventually took down the precinct data, but it was captures and analyzed. Furthermore, people bought the official precinct data from Edison directly ($25k per state). As pointed out before, the data shows MORE manipulation when analyzed on the precinct level rather than state level data. 

Stop the steal was run by a Soros operative on the right side. Soros tends to foment violent friction by funding extreme activity on both sides. The attempts to create a civil war in the US are driven by the continuum of bank centered business interests the CCP and DNC CIA FBI. Their large variety of on the ground organizations at all levels were clearly evident in the Jan 6 Capitol false flag event where a sociopolitical operations expert turned journalist spotted 5 teams of his colleagues running the event. Given that these are extremely costly people to hire, only large foundations and the CIA/FBI can afford them. There was no "grass roots insurrection", and the "breach" was over just after the first people from Trump's speech could have made it over there. There was a large number of intel assets run by handlers of different organizations, particularly notable being Soros' Ukrainian Nationalists and including Antifa and BLM. 

The Chinese were quiet after the fact but were highly active during the setup and execution of the Election fraud, supplying much of the funding. Their propaganda throughout the election and controversy that followed joined with Soros and Zuckerberg's and CIA's operations in trying to create a civil war. 

If you take the Q postings seriously, then there has been an Intelligence civil war going on worldwide between nationalist military intel and globalist spy agencies (CIA MI6) or, if you like, the Nazis and the patriots. It was ongoing in the US since the late 1960s and intensified in the 1980s and was ready to pull down the globalists in 2015. The Anons talk about an Alliance vs. Cabal WWIII having gone hot since before Trump's election. it is within each major country. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/14/2021 at 7:46 PM, surrept33 said:

It did nearly match. It looks like there were some human errors and no mysterious "weighted voting" (not to mention in California!)

A full report here from an expert:

https://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,4670,7-127-93094-555635--,00.html

(From Bailey vs Antrim County)

Note, the report (from an actual security expert) refutes an earlier "expert" (who wasn't allowed to run Maricopa's audit because of rookie mistakes -> https://archive.is/a7lUc)


Page 40:


Another rebuttal, from someone else who was familiar with Dominion's system:
https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Rebuttal_ASOG-Antrim_Report.pdf

 

Neither of your sources are reliable. Fact Check is a disinformation service staffed by Marxists who are charged with discrediting information and approving lies. 

The Michigan expert is just plain lying. The Forensic examination done by the plaintiff''s expert is truthful and shows several layers of fraud including reprogramming of the machine overnight during the examination period. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2021 at 11:18 AM, 0R0 said:

Yes, the swing states eventually took down the precinct data, but it was captures and analyzed. Furthermore, people bought the official precinct data from Edison directly ($25k per state). As pointed out before, the data shows MORE manipulation when analyzed on the precinct level rather than state level data. 

Stop the steal was run by a Soros operative on the right side. Soros tends to foment violent friction by funding extreme activity on both sides. The attempts to create a civil war in the US are driven by the continuum of bank centered business interests the CCP and DNC CIA FBI. Their large variety of on the ground organizations at all levels were clearly evident in the Jan 6 Capitol false flag event where a sociopolitical operations expert turned journalist spotted 5 teams of his colleagues running the event. Given that these are extremely costly people to hire, only large foundations and the CIA/FBI can afford them. There was no "grass roots insurrection", and the "breach" was over just after the first people from Trump's speech could have made it over there. There was a large number of intel assets run by handlers of different organizations, particularly notable being Soros' Ukrainian Nationalists and including Antifa and BLM. 

The Chinese were quiet after the fact but were highly active during the setup and execution of the Election fraud, supplying much of the funding. Their propaganda throughout the election and controversy that followed joined with Soros and Zuckerberg's and CIA's operations in trying to create a civil war. 

If you take the Q postings seriously, then there has been an Intelligence civil war going on worldwide between nationalist military intel and globalist spy agencies (CIA MI6) or, if you like, the Nazis and the patriots. It was ongoing in the US since the late 1960s and intensified in the 1980s and was ready to pull down the globalists in 2015. The Anons talk about an Alliance vs. Cabal WWIII having gone hot since before Trump's election. it is within each major country. 

But Edison mainly does election night tabulation for their clients (which is big media outlets) as well as exit poll firms. Presumably, the Upshot's most recent data dumps (which it looks like they've automated) that come from the secretary of state's websites are a better source of truth. Many are precinct based.

I think Soros is a very interesting guy, his general theory of reflexivity (which is also a reflexive theory) is interesting. He was definitely early in behavioral finance. He used what people recognize as elements of game theory today, but he was also in the game. 

His application to the social sciences is very Popperian:

From Soros on Soros: Staying Ahead of the Curve

Quote

 

> Q: How would you define an open society?

I wouldn't define it. Popper taught me that concepts shouldn't be defined; they should be explained. In my philosophy, open society is based on the recognition that we all act on the basis of imperfect understanding. Nobody is in possession of the ultimate truth. Therefore, we need a critical mode of thinking; we need institutions and rules that allow people with different opinions and interests to live together in peace; we need a democratic form of government that ensures the orderly transfer of power; we need a market economy that provides feedback and allows mistakes to be corrected; we need to protect minorities and respect minority opinions. Above all, we need the rule of law. Ideologies like fascism or communism give rise to a closed society in which the individual is subjugated to the collective, society is dominated by the state, and the state is in the service of a dogma that claims to embody the ultimate truth. In such a society, there is no freedom.

The great boon of open society, and the accomplishment that qualifies it to serve as an ideal, is the freedom of the individual. The most obvious attraction of freedom is a negative one: the absence of restraint. But freedom has a positive aspect, too, which is even more important. It allows people to learn to think for themselves, to decide what they want and to translate their dreams into reality. They can explore the limits of their capabilities and reach intellectual, organizational, artistic, and practical achievements that otherwise they might not have even suspected were attainable. That can be an intensely exciting and satisfying experience.

 

 

  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, 0R0 said:

Neither of your sources are reliable. Fact Check is a disinformation service staffed by Marxists who are charged with discrediting information and approving lies. 

The Michigan expert is just plain lying. The Forensic examination done by the plaintiff''s expert is truthful and shows several layers of fraud including reprogramming of the machine overnight during the examination period. 

Welcome back, you've been gone awhile. You might enjoy this

9A3DB414-CB61-4825-A6AD-F88F4BF79CF6.jpeg

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Peon of traitor faction praises return of middle management and presents an offering.

This is 2 or more plotting.

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

Mike Lindell has launched the website "Frank".  It was immediately attacked, but Mike had a backup plan and has gone live for 48 hours.

The entire reason for the website is to show the evidence of the cheating, lies and fraud of the election.

17 Million people have tuned in so far.

Edit: It's over 20 million so far today.  Over 90 million yesterday.

Check it out if you care about the truth.

Frank: The Voice of Free Speech

About Frank

Free speech is one of the hallmarks of our Constitutional Republic, as enshrined in the Bill of Rights. It is no coincidence that nations that have free speech also have a free enterprise system and freedom of religion. Inversely, nations that deny free speech tread upon the free enterprise system and freedom of religion. Americans want to remain free. Americans are craving news and information that is not filtered through the radical worldview of today’s liberal media intelligentsia, or deep state actors.

Frank, the voice of free speech, will be the platform for Americans who want to defend life, liberty, and all the freedoms that have marked America as the longest running Constitutional Republic in the world. On this platform you will find a home where you can post videos, livestream television, distribute news and information, and find community and fellowship with likeminded Americans. Frank will be a home for major influencers, to micro influencers, to average Americans wanting to share in the constitutional right of freedom of speech and freedom of expression. We hope you will join our community and let freedom ring.

Edited by Dan Warnick
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankspeech.com will air a documentary to show the evidence on the election at 10 a.m. CST in the U.S.

It will be interesting to see if the cyber attacks ramp up and try to knock the broadcast off the air.

Tune in, and let's talk about it after.  Yes.  Talk about it.  Novel idea, isn't it?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.