Dan Warnick

U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes

Recommended Posts

The Maricopa county audit is running with the highly objective A-Team: https://www.michiganadvance.com/2021/04/06/arizona-senate-hires-expert-witness-in-antrim-county-fraud-suit-to-lead-2020-election-audit/

Pulitzer (whose quantity not quality approach to patents seem to be all about exploiting the Texas patent troll gravy train: https://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/article/Texas-regains-title-capitol-patent-litigation-15473273.php) is running the forensic audit with CueCat 2.0 (the "kinematic artifact detector") 

It will be interesting to see what they claim. 

  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

10 hours ago, Ward Smith said:

What's it like @Enthalpic to be so ignorant? What tragic deaths again? Officer died of natural causes victim? Or this victim? 

87E90F36-9DC9-4F24-8A5C-C6E4ADF401D4.jpeg

 

First off Floyd was murdered.  The cop was found guilty.

Second, you guys have repeatedly claimed that the people who stormed the Capitol were not Trumps supporters.   Now you are portraying a known Trump supporter as some sort of heroic martyr.

 

 

Edited by -trance
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Ward Smith said:

What's it like @Enthalpic to be so ignorant? What tragic deaths again? Officer died of natural causes victim? Or this victim? 

87E90F36-9DC9-4F24-8A5C-C6E4ADF401D4.jpeg

Facing that reality is almost beyond comprehension.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, surrept33 said:

The parting words of Chris Krebs, a Republican, whose agency was put into the unfortunate position of denying the (conspiracy theories) of the leader of our own government:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzBJJ1sxtEA

You can't bury the truth. Please explain why the democrats were furiously trying to stop this audit? Hired Perkins Coie (the same firm behind the Russian hoax) to try and throw up roadblocks to the tune of tens of millions in legal fees. Why pray tell spend all that money? They've had months to bury the evidence, why are they so worried they missed something? Is it because they missed something?

Chris Krebs is a joke. People around the planet saw this election for what it was, a sham. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, -trance said:

 

First off Floyd was murdered.  The cop was found guilty.

Second, you guys have repeatedly claimed that the people who stormed the Capitol were not Trumps supporters.   Now you are portraying a known Trump supporter as some sort of heroic martyr.

"Guilty"? Jurors getting doxxed by the news media with actual mobs waiting outside? You call that a fair trial? You understand that Floyd had a 98% oxygen reading at the hospital in his blood, after death? That was the prosecutor serving up that little nugget, not even the defense. I realize you're not too bright, but do try and explain why a man who was supposedly asphyxiated still has a 98% spox post mortem? Clown world, like you. 

Whether Babbitt was a Trump supporter or an antifa operative, she was murdered and her murderer has never been charged. He's black, she's white. If she was such a threat, couldn't the dozen police right behind her have stopped her? I've seen the video, haven't you? Or since you require the MSM to do your thinking for you, do you just wait until they tell you what to believe? 

075F1467-D02B-4957-9B31-158F8AF32974.jpeg

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Ward Smith said:

What's it like @Enthalpic to be so ignorant? What tragic deaths again? Officer died of natural causes victim? Or this victim? 

87E90F36-9DC9-4F24-8A5C-C6E4ADF401D4.jpeg

The Big E Wins again, your ignorance shines again. Love your posts, they show that you are the worlds biggest loser. Even bigger than Trump. PS Comrade Putin is overpaying you.

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, notsonice said:

The Big E Wins again, your ignorance shines again. Love your posts, they show that you are the worlds biggest loser. Even bigger than Trump. PS Comrade Putin is overpaying you.

I know I've hit the trifecta when I get all your sock puppets out Enthalpic. And you're still psychotic enough to believe you're playing me when I'm the one pulling your strings. I snap my fingers, you jump. If you really do live in Canada, can't you receive free mental health care? I recommend you look into it, asap. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

2 hours ago, surrept33 said:

 

Floyd died because of a banana. 

Babbitt, a reservist of the "Capital Guardians", the branch of the national guard whose role is to protect the capital from civil unrest, took a forward leadership role in front of what she described as a mob. She was in the midst of breaching the door to a bunch of lawmakers. Babbitt was a traitor to the democracy and to her uniform and her story should be a cautionary tale: https://www.bellingcat.com/news/2021/01/08/the-journey-of-ashli-babbitt/

We get it.  She deserved to die because she protested.  You're very clear here.    

 

Edited by Bob D
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

Anyone who believes Chauvin was found "not guilty" is living a life of denial.

He was found guilty.

There is no other truth in this matter.

You don't like this finding?  You wish to add doubts or reasons otherwise?  Go right ahead.  Won't change a thing, but might may you "feel better".

Bottom line. Guilty.

Edited by turbguy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who said he was found "not guilty"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bob D said:

Who said he was found "not guilty"?

Some here feel that he is not guilty, and post reasons why the jury improperly reached that conclusion.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You think people can't have a difference of opinion without you stepping in to chastise the opposing view?
The fact was the jury found him guilty.  A jury found OJ innocent.  Am I not allowed to disagree with the OJ jury without your consent or approval.  Get off your high horse.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://rumble.com/vfmt25-mi-court-documents-reveal-expert-has-uncovered-a-6th-degree-polynomial-algo.html

Data analysis of several states shows methodical algorithmic cheating in all 9 counties tested and all states tested The ballot count outcomes are predetermined by a weighting of the registry approximated to a 6 degree polynomial. The county results are identical from one to the next within each state. The weightings differ by state. 

Note that the registries in many of the counties in question  are well above the population, 2010 census data, and are 125% in Antrim MI.

 https://www.depernolaw.com/uploads/2/7/0/2/27029178/collective_response_to_motions_for_protective_order_040921.pdf

The consistent bias in election results is throughout the US. The ESS Heart and Dominion machines and software share the same programming and show direct determination of election outcomes by algorithm. One algorithm per state. 

BTW each machine has a SIM card in its circuit boards and will latch onto whatever connection is available to the net and log into the Dominion network. 

There are few states, if any, that are not affected. The fraud is nationwide. 

Registry fraud is key. Fake voters are entered in counties where ballot stuffing and/or digital counting fraud can be implemented. This ranges from 20-54% of the registry in densely populated urban Dem counties.There are no exceptions, only a matter of degree. The scale is 20-30 mil  

Ballot fraud is then put on top of that as ballot stuffing without a corresponding registry entry, i.e. books that don't balance. That is on the order of 8 mil ballots, Some of which may be double counted as ballots from fake voters on the registry. These gaps between the registry entries and ballot counts come to hundreds of thousands per state. 

Finally, digital fraud by deletion and swapping or switching of votes on the order of 10 mil in the count.

Without inspection of the ballots, the election data stream can be reverse engineered to obtain the digital frad portion of the overall fraud campaign. That alone brings the results to 81 mil Trump, 66 mil Biden.

Of Biden's 66 mil count entries, about 8 mil are fake ballots known to have been printed and delivered. That leaves Biden with 58 million votes. However, a large portion of that figure is from fake voter registrations that are voted by activists and election workers. So that should be considered an upper bound to Biden's vote not the estimated value. The estimated value would be well below that figure depending on the number of fake votes exercised from the registry. That has the potential to place the estimated Biden vote at below 50 million and as little as 40 million. 

That would account for Biden's and Harris' pathetic showing on their video likes. The reality is that of the few that voted for them, most were simply negating Trump rather than supporting their agenda. 

 

I expect that had we done a complete forensic investigation of the elections since 2000, The US is far more Red than it is Blue, even in the bluest states. That Obama only won the 2008 election, and that congress has been red throughout the period. The governors and state wide officials in MI PA WI CA NY VA among many other "blue" states were elected by fake ballots and manipulated digital counts. 

 

  • Like 1
  • Great Response! 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bob D said:

We get it.  She deserved to die because she protested.  You're very clear here.    

I thought Babbitt should have known better given her background - she served 6 years in the national guard unit tasked to protect the capital from civil unrest. 

I think it is tragic when anyone gets shot, but it was also tragic for our country that it came to this, especially consider it stemmed from lies and deceit. The situation here was fluid and volatile, she was about to breach a locked barricaded door that would have let a mob close to a bunch of (democratically elected) congress people from both parties: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/tasneemnashrulla/congress-members-describe-pro-trump-riot-capitol

At some point, the closer the mob gets to highly guarded senior members of congress, the more likely the people in arms would likely use some sort of lethal force. It's a continuum of force. 

As all of the joint chiefs said to service members:

Quote

"The violent riot in Washington, D.C. on January 6, 2021 was a direct assault on the U.S. Congress the Capitol building, and our Constitutional process. We witnessed actions inside the Capitol building that were inconsistent with the rule of law. The rights of freedom of speech and assembly do not give anyone the right to resort to violence, sedition and insurrection. As Service Members, we must embody the values and ideals of the Nation. We support and defend the Constitution, any act to disrupt the Constitutional process is not only against our traditions, values, and oath; it is against the law."


 

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, turbguy said:

Anyone who believes Chauvin was found "not guilty" is living a life of denial.

He was found guilty.

There is no other truth in this matter.

You don't like this finding?  You wish to add doubts or reasons otherwise?  Go right ahead.  Won't change a thing, but might may you "feel better".

Bottom line. Guilty.

He was found guilty. He will be found "not guilty" on appeal for a multitude of reasons, or there's no justice in this country anymore. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bob D said:

You think people can't have a difference of opinion without you stepping in to chastise the opposing view?
The fact was the jury found him guilty.  A jury found OJ innocent.  Am I not allowed to disagree with the OJ jury without your consent or approval.  Get off your high horse.

By definition, OJ is not guilty, no matter how high a horse is.

You may feel free to disagree. Many do.

It changes nothing, but might make you feel better.

Too bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ward Smith said:

He was found guilty. He will be found "not guilty" on appeal for a multitude of reasons, or there's no justice in this country anymore. 

Possibly.  We shall see.  Such case are routinely reviewed on appeal.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 0R0 said:

https://rumble.com/vfmt25-mi-court-documents-reveal-expert-has-uncovered-a-6th-degree-polynomial-algo.html

Data analysis of several states shows methodical algorithmic cheating in all 9 counties tested and all states tested The ballot count outcomes are predetermined by a weighting of the registry approximated to a 6 degree polynomial. The county results are identical from one to the next within each state. The weightings differ by state. 

 

 

Yeah, so they just found a high variance estimator with a high degree polynomial. No surprise. 

This (usually) is indicative of data snooping. aka one of the ways to lie with statistics. Usually people look down on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, surrept33 said:

I thought Babbitt should have known better given her background - she served 6 years in the national guard unit tasked to protect the capital from civil unrest. 

I think it is tragic when anyone gets shot, but it was also tragic for our country that it came to this, especially consider it stemmed from lies and deceit. The situation here was fluid and volatile, she was about to breach a locked barricaded door that would have let a mob close to a bunch of (democratically elected) congress people from both parties: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/tasneemnashrulla/congress-members-describe-pro-trump-riot-capitol

At some point, the closer the mob gets to highly guarded senior members of congress, the more likely the people in arms would likely use some sort of lethal force. It's a continuum of force. 

As all of the joint chiefs said to service members:


 

Such Bullshit. What's going on right now in this country? Civil disobedience? Peaceful protests? 

854A0EAD-6B28-4105-B818-2282865FF6C2.jpeg

  • Great Response! 1
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, turbguy said:

Possibly.  We shall see.  Such case are routinely reviewed on appeal.

 

The sitting judge brought up appeal, multiple times. If this were a black man on trial with crowds of KKK outside burning crosses and threatening people you'd be all over this being an unfair trial. That you can't or won't demonstrates a disturbing lack of discernment. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

23 minutes ago, Ward Smith said:

The sitting judge brought up appeal, multiple times. If this were a black man on trial with crowds of KKK outside burning crosses and threatening people you'd be all over this being an unfair trial. That you can't or won't demonstrates a disturbing lack of discernment. 

A significant  consideration operating a court of law, by any judge, is the maintaining a decision that cannot be appealed.  That judge did well to keep the court within reasonable bounds.  He recognized, and vocalized, the potential for appeal..

Just what point(s) of law can be brought up for reconsideration is really quite vast.   I'm not going to go into them here.  You probably can add more, anyway.

Was the jury influenced by external forces or events?

ALL juries are. 

Does that influence cause an incorrect verdict?

No.

I have sat on juries for two capital cases.   

Edited by turbguy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

8 hours ago, Ward Smith said:

You can't bury the truth. Please explain why the democrats were furiously trying to stop this audit? Hired Perkins Coie (the same firm behind the Russian hoax) to try and throw up roadblocks to the tune of tens of millions in legal fees. Why pray tell spend all that money? They've had months to bury the evidence, why are they so worried they missed something? Is it because they missed something?

Chris Krebs is a joke. People around the planet saw this election for what it was, a sham. 

I would not be surprised if Perkins Coie is working (at least partially) pro bono so that an Arizona senate which appears to have gone over the deep end don't do anything crazy.

Why are journalists so restricted from observing the audit? Well, except for OANN.ru, of course, which happened to raise money to perform the audit.  https://www.pinalcentral.com/politics/senate-gop-won-t-commit-to-letting-reporters-cover-its-election-audit/article_cf8326e2-6596-5af2-824f-7d3806a49989.html

What are they afraid of? Is :cueCat 2.0 going to have a ton of false positives? 

Krebs is way more well versed in the likely attack surfaces than anyone running this audit. Or was CISA involved in the vast algorithmic conspiracy (since 2017) to "rig the vote"?

I hope for a speedy and transparent audit, but given that they already conducted risk limiting audits, I don't think it's necessary. 

 

Edited by surrept33
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, surrept33 said:

Yeah, so they just found a high variance estimator with a high degree polynomial. No surprise. 

This (usually) is indicative of data snooping. aka one of the ways to lie with statistics. Usually people look down on it.

The fit goes perfectly across counties in the same state, but varies from state to state. 

This is not a result of "data snooping" 

I suggest you cease trying to pick up excuses for not taking election fraud seriously or come clean and say that you are for it or took part in it.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.