Dan Warnick

U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Ward Smith said:

Hahaha Fact check hahaha

National Review is full of Never Trumpers as is well known by all. 

WaPo will still do fact checking. Just not in the form they were doing it. Usually it's the factchecking metadata that's important anyways because it's easier to aggregate claims and third party verifications across platforms.

https://www.facebook.com/journalismproject/programs/third-party-fact-checking/how-it-works

https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/factcheck

 

  • Downvote 1
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, surrept33 said:

Was there progress in trying to reduce the effects of disinformation online? absolutely. I think autolabeling based on trusted fact checking helps: https://www.ifcncodeofprinciples.poynter.org/signatories 

The fact checkers are lying. The medical ones are sent to an organization that has its funds invested in pharma companies. 15% in JnJ alone. 

Al fact checkers are politically biased corporatist fascists with no adherence to facts. Note that the fact checking center looking at the president was disbanded before Biden's address to a tiny fraction of the Union. 

 

  • Great Response! 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/28/2021 at 11:53 PM, turbguy said:

The constitutional process of states submitting certification and congress verifying those certificates, and the inauguration of #46 is done.

By what constitutional process can that process be "reversed"?

The only one I can think of is removal from office via impeachment.

If there is another, please respond with a reference to the Constitution that spells the reversal process out.

An "audit" could provide some assurance, but cannot reverse the past result.

1. Election fraud is a violation of due process. If it is successful in reversing the results against the factual legal outcome then it constitutes an overthrow of the duly elected government. It becomes treason. As House, Presidential and Senate elections were riddled with fraud and the power balance reversed against the actual voter's intentions, the dotting of the constitutional "i" and crossing of "t"s does not make for a constitutional process. All stages must be in good faith. 

2. Fraud vitiates all that follows. 

All decisions are cancelled, all bills passed are rescinded. EO's cancelled. 

3. Military adherence to its constitutional mandate requires it remove a usurper government installed by a foreign power and prosecute that usurper, its partners and promoters. That stretches all the way through the Dem party, the tech companies, the media, the NGOs. 

As General McInerny says, the election was an act of war against the United States; its people and its Constitution. It is the military's duty to remove the occupying power in the civilian institutions of the government. 

Since you are locked into the fraud and the accessories to it in the media and insist on referring to them as sources despite their clear role as propaganda for a treason operation, what does that make you? Do you think there will be a liberal media and a Democrat party after this is done? 

The fake media show of Biden's presidency would have happened regardless of whether the official election results were in his favor or not. The media would have done much as they are doing now and ignoring a real government in favor of promulgating a fake Biden administration. The bureaucracies would tend to ally to their liberal kin and ignore the lawful government under cover of the media support and fakery. Riots would be threatened with any attempt to restore lawful government and the chain of command of the various agencies. The military would have to intervene either way since the only possible outcome accepted by the Biden Junta and its Chinese sponsors and corporate partners was full control. 

Attempting to introduce Federal power into the AZ audit would be constitutionally impossible, as the elections are exclusively within the Legislature's power. The Federal courts would be challenged for grounds and precedent for interfering. The process of overturning the election through audit of the ballots and machines is (1) purely constitutional, (2) completely within the plenary power of the legislatures, (3) by showing the election interference produced false results the states can withdraw their electors or turn them to Trump. Withdraw false winners of all other elected office including senators and congress members. 

Finally, if the audits show Biden won by fraud and others in elected Federal office were installed that same way,  then they will have to resign. If they don't it would be the military's job to remove them physically, and arrest them and their co-conspirators even if that includes most of congress and judiciary, the press, tech companies, etc.. 

 

  • Great Response! 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 0R0 said:

Since you are locked into the fraud and the accessories to it in the media and insist on referring to them as sources despite their clear role as propaganda for a treason operation, what does that make you? Do you think there will be a liberal media and a Democrat party after this is done? 

 

 

When about is "this" happening?

Seems like numerous "storm" dates have passed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

21 minutes ago, 0R0 said:

1. Election fraud is a violation of due process. If it is successful in reversing the results against the factual legal outcome then it constitutes an overthrow of the duly elected government. It becomes treason. As House, Presidential and Senate elections were riddled with fraud and the power balance reversed against the actual voter's intentions, the dotting of the constitutional "i" and crossing of "t"s does not make for a constitutional process. All stages must be in good faith. 

2. Fraud vitiates all that follows. 

All decisions are cancelled, all bills passed are rescinded. EO's cancelled. 

3. Military adherence to its constitutional mandate requires it remove a usurper government installed by a foreign power and prosecute that usurper, its partners and promoters. That stretches all the way through the Dem party, the tech companies, the media, the NGOs. 

As General McInerny says, the election was an act of war against the United States; its people and its Constitution. It is the military's duty to remove the occupying power in the civilian institutions of the government. 

Since you are locked into the fraud and the accessories to it in the media and insist on referring to them as sources despite their clear role as propaganda for a treason operation, what does that make you? Do you think there will be a liberal media and a Democrat party after this is done? 

The fake media show of Biden's presidency would have happened regardless of whether the official election results were in his favor or not. The media would have done much as they are doing now and ignoring a real government in favor of promulgating a fake Biden administration. The bureaucracies would tend to ally to their liberal kin and ignore the lawful government under cover of the media support and fakery. Riots would be threatened with any attempt to restore lawful government and the chain of command of the various agencies. The military would have to intervene either way since the only possible outcome accepted by the Biden Junta and its Chinese sponsors and corporate partners was full control. 

Attempting to introduce Federal power into the AZ audit would be constitutionally impossible, as the elections are exclusively within the Legislature's power. The Federal courts would be challenged for grounds and precedent for interfering. The process of overturning the election through audit of the ballots and machines is (1) purely constitutional, (2) completely within the plenary power of the legislatures, (3) by showing the election interference produced false results the states can withdraw their electors or turn them to Trump. Withdraw false winners of all other elected office including senators and congress members. 

Finally, if the audits show Biden won by fraud and others in elected Federal office were installed that same way,  then they will have to resign. If they don't it would be the military's job to remove them physically, and arrest them and their co-conspirators even if that includes most of congress and judiciary, the press, tech companies, etc.. 

 

I must admit, that's a great argument!

The military does indeed have some "final say", in one way.

They decide who gets the nuclear codes.

They decided.

It's over.

Edited by turbguy
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, 0R0 said:

 

As General McInerny says, the election was an act of war against the United States; its people and its Constitution. It is the military's duty to remove the occupying power in the civilian institutions of the government. 

 

 

What part of the military is going to take over? The Kraken division?

https://www.audacy.com/connectingvets/news/origins-of-the-conspiracy-of-the-305th-military-intel-batt

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, surrept33 said:

WaPo will still do fact checking. Just not in the form they were doing it. Usually it's the factchecking metadata that's important anyways because it's easier to aggregate claims and third party verifications across platforms.

https://www.facebook.com/journalismproject/programs/third-party-fact-checking/how-it-works

https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/factcheck

 

DE890A59-3247-46BF-963F-C6AF650057F4.png

49B94C76-D960-4066-9D39-25F62F20A4EE.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

42 minutes ago, Ward Smith said:

 

DE890A59-3247-46BF-963F-C6AF650057F4.png

49B94C76-D960-4066-9D39-25F62F20A4EE.jpeg

Yeah, Boebert misinterpreted WaPo. They just stopped the database compilation, not the actual fact checking activities. 

 

From the article:

 

Quote

In compiling the database of Biden’s claims in his first 100 days, The Fact Checker used the same methodology as the Trump database that counted more than 30,000 claims over the course of Trump’s presidency. Any statement that would merit at least Two Pinocchios — essentially “half true” — was included. Any claim that was repeated was also included, though unlike Trump, Biden generally does not repeat his false claims if they have been fact-checked as false.

 

All they stopped updating was the database. What this database looks like (on WaPo's website):

897877176_ScreenShot2021-04-30at12_25_19PM.thumb.png.6027f1440c5306c85ebc15f15ab28d11.png

The database is an archive with all of the fact checks aggregated with a lot of rich structural events.

In 2021, it doesn't make much sense for a publisher like WaPro to do this (unlike perhaps 2017).

Why? in the intermediate time, this semantic 'claim review' schema came out and was widely used both by publishers of fact checking information and aggregators of fact checking information (for example, search engines, social media networks): https://schema.org/ClaimReview

These days WaPo (which has a great digital publishing platform) just publishes relevant metadata in each article. The metadata is often as important if not more important than the data once you have sufficient scale.

This is a much more efficient way for different groups/companies to focus on different aspects of publishing and information retrieval: https://www.searchenginewatch.com/2019/12/16/the-beginners-guide-to-semantic-search/

Edited by surrept33
  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Ward Smith said:

49B94C76-D960-4066-9D39-25F62F20A4EE.jpeg

I'd say it's not really a "censorship" issue. I think the biggest problem is recommendation algorithms and the incentization structures that make it very profitable to promote misinformation. This has led to genocide elsewhere in the world: https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/myanmar-facebook-hate/

What do you do about it? I dunno, it's a very complex problem that is being debated right now:

https://techcrunch.com/2021/04/27/section-230-bills-algorithms-congress-hearing/

  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/30/2021 at 1:09 AM, turbguy said:

I must admit, that's a great argument!

The military does indeed have some "final say", in one way.

They decide who gets the nuclear codes.

They decided.

It's over.

Yes, they decided, and Biden doesn't have them.

Biden flies a parks dept plane unless he is on AF2 with Harris. Not on AF1 nor any of the other 747 planes used for that purpose. He does not have the clearance to be on an AF1. His Defense dept appointees do not have clearance to enter most installations of importance. 

Last confrontation reported from the spook rumor mill was a little over a week ago when "Biden" showed up at the Pentagon and was not allowed in. He and his CIA mock Secret Service guard were threatened with live fire.  (not meaning that shots were fired)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/30/2021 at 12:58 AM, -trance said:

When about is "this" happening?

Seems like numerous "storm" dates have passed.

The "storm" will come when they are satisfied that China's control system in the US is sufficiently weakened so that they can't form a real civil war out of it. 

At the moment, watch Iran and Myanmar as to what may be coming to DC.

It is still weird to me that anons are stuck on specific dates that are deciphered from what was stated to be a disinformation campaign to force the Chinese and their domestic partners into stupid actions of desperation. The stated timing considerations are of a sequence of events. The event of the audit has not concluded yet, the response of the Dem's has not been taken to extremes so far, Antifa are at Phoenix hotels rather than converging on the Arena (didn't check the new yet).

The information from the mass declassification and the document dump from the Maxwell trial is being brought to attention in bits as the media are goaded into responding to it. 

So things appear in sequence as projected by cryptic Q posts. 

For all we know, the "address" by "Biden" could have been in front of a "joint session" of prisoners brought up to the Capitol for the show. I am having a hard time finding clear evidence that it is not the case. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@0R0

you might like

https://www.historicalblindness.com/blogandpodcast//the-illuminati-illuminated-part-two-the-order-in-america

I think the rise of neo-bircherism is interesting to ponder:

Quote

The John Birch Society made clear from the beginning that they believed the threat of Communism was far more than an economic model or political ideology. One quote from their founding meeting clarifies their view of Communism as a worldwide conspiracy, as there at the start of things, they asserted that “both the U.S. and Soviet governments are controlled by the same furtive conspiratorial cabal of internationalists, greedy bankers, and corrupt politicians. If left unexposed, the traitors inside the U.S. government would betray the country's sovereignty to the United Nations for a collectivist New World Order, managed by a ‘one-world socialist government.’”

The problem is that the JBS society saw marxists everywhere. Bill Buckley would be rolling in his grave.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, surrept33 said:

@0R0

you might like

https://www.historicalblindness.com/blogandpodcast//the-illuminati-illuminated-part-two-the-order-in-america

I think the rise of neo-bircherism is interesting to ponder:

The problem is that the JBS society saw marxists everywhere. Bill Buckley would be rolling in his grave.

JBS were right. 

Communists WERE and ARE everywhere. It was modified from its original form into a merging of Fascism and Cultural communism. That tent holds more powerful people, thus makes the takeover and incorporation into a United Nation more likely to succeed. 

The actual United Nation had its assets seized a couple of years ago. 

The CCP took over from the failed Soviets ("The Best Enemy Money Can Buy") in the 1990s in steering the US Communist party, which transformed into the "new left" during the 1960s and steadily took over academia, media, the parties, government, NGOs and corporations. They continued in what Khrushchev declared in his infamous speech while pounding his shoe on the podium; the infiltration and gradual takeover of the US by communism. The observation of this and of the common interests of money center banks and their Bolshevik Billionaire overlords and Communist dictatorships led the McCarthy era Pentagon and Congress to build a standing plan to remove the civilian government if it were taken over by Communists directly or through agents. 

We are seeing that plan implemented. 

That is being done in parallel with other militaries around the world who properly read the UN/WEF/IMF Rockefeler Rothschild Soros "great reset" as a war crimes and treason conspiracy and took pains to separate their control from the traitor governments this global cabal installed in their countries. It has been over a decade that military intelligence across the world has been at war with political intelligence (CIA MI6 etc. which had been founded and run by the fascist-communist continuum behind which stand the same moneyed interest).

Military organizations tend to be nationalist. When the "war on terror" psyop of the "cabal" started in order to install total surveillance, the  first item on the list of targets of each military intelligence organization having this extraordinary capacity thrown into their laps, was the leadership of the Bolshevik Billionaires club and unearthing of their networks and their structure, methods, and location of their meaningful financial and political assets and infiltrating their secret organizations.  One of the first observations was that it was not the KGB that invented the pedophilia blackmail method to keep control over political actors, but the Banker's method practiced for centuries and incorporated into the likes of  the CIA and its counterparts across the globe. Once this was clear, the blackmail material could be seized and used to steer the participants as needed. Actually prosecuting it as criminal activity had to take a back seat to the cleanup of the justice system. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some here REALLY might benefit from additional lithium in their diet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How extraordinary, even Bill Maher can no longer stand the "stench" of this newly formed Democratic party.

Bill Maher now admits Russiagate was 'reported erroneously' after years of pushing Trump collusion narrative

'We, like, thought that it had to be more of a conspiracy,' Maher said

Liberal author Thomas Frank suggested the Giuliani raid wasn't "unprecedented," citing the Nixon administration and how "a lot of those guys went to jail."

"But did they involve themselves with other countries?" Maher asked. "I feel like, yes, we play dirty politics, but we always had one rule: no ringers, keep it in the family, do what you do, but don't bring in the guy from Russia. ... Look, a lot of this stuff we found out or we're finding out was reported erroneously."  

"You mean Russiagate?" Frank asked. 

"Yes," Maher exclaimed. 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/bill-maher-admits-russiagate-was-reported-erroneously-after-years-of-pushing-trump-collusion-narrative

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

It is time to move toward 2024.

Anybody for Tucker Carlson for #47?

His show is highly ranked in the ratings, Trump loves him and if Reagan and Trump could come from entertainment to be President why not Tucker? I think he would be a formidable opponent.

Edited by turbguy
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/30/2021 at 11:58 AM, -trance said:

When about is "this" happening?

Seems like numerous "storm" dates have passed.

Not as many as climate "storm" dates that have passed.  I do wish they'd been right about New York being under water by now, but, alas, they got that one wrong too.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Dan Warnick said:

Not as many as climate "storm" dates that have passed.  I do wish they'd been right about New York being under water by now, but, alas, they got that one wrong too.

Beauty of climate change is that current adults will feel essentially none of the effects (if it is real).

I don't have children so should just give no facks whatsoever. Set the world on fire, watch it burn.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, -trance said:

Beauty of climate change is that current adults will feel essentially none of the effects (if it is real).

I don't have children so should just give no facks whatsoever. Set the world on fire, watch it burn.

Yes, the panic salesmen of the world are utilizing the element of fire to get their narrative some traction, presumably since they couldn't win with their brilliance, charm or obvious good looks (everybody's beautiful now, right?), that other elements are actually going to flood cities, blow cities over, block the Sun's rays (or let too many through, depending on who you listen to and what decade it is).  The snake oil salesmen are just more insistent nowadays.  Somebody let them into government, and now they want to mandate the snake oil.

You say "set the world on fire, watch it burn."  They'd better hurry up!  Climate change is going to submerge the cities, and then it will be hard to riot and burn things.  :) 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

3 minutes ago, Dan Warnick said:

 

You say "set the world on fire, watch it burn."  They'd better hurry up!  Climate change is going to submerge the cities, and then it will be hard to riot and burn things.  :) 

 

Only coastal cities. In-land cities will become drier and more flammable.

I wonder who is buying up all land that could potentially become "beachfront."

Edited by -trance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, -trance said:

 

Only coastal cities. In-land cities will become drier and more flammable.

I wonder who is buying up all land that could potentially become "beachfront."

If you say so.

Mr. Gates is reportedly buying up a great deal of farmland.  Chinese interests have bought more than a bunch, including large amounts of livestock and fruit/vegetable production.  Hmm......

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2021 at 8:04 PM, turbguy said:

It is time to move toward 2024.

Anybody for Tucker Carlson for #47?

His show is highly ranked in the ratings, Trump loves him and if Reagan and Trump could come from entertainment to be President why not Tucker? I think he would be a formidable opponent.

Carlson would be a very formidable candidate. Not sure if he'd run.

He needs to bring back the bow tie though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, surrept33 said:

Hillary was apparently executed at Gitmo by a military tribunal last week, I think this is part of the storm: 

https://realrawnews.com/2021/04/hillary-clinton-hanged-at-gitmo/

The comments are more disturbing than the article, which was well written. Better than the 40 other times Hillary has died. 

They also argue that the Giuliani raid was about getting his copy of the HRC hanging so he can't publish it. 

The Biden show must go on. The major players need to be kept alive in the public eye. Actors and doubles can be substituted but you can't undo video of an execution. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.