Dan Warnick

U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes

Recommended Posts

(edited)

1 hour ago, SUZNV said:

What you have is the Scissors for papers, and why would you need 5 for? We used exactly the same scissors for cutting foods, and paper, electric wires, and cloth and had people who live on sharpening or repairing it for cents. It was very durable and therefore, much sustainable and save environment resources wise. And many many more examples like this. The environmental costs for extracting raw resources for an expensive iphone and a cheap smartphone are relatively the same but people tend to upgrade the cheap one more regularly. How much your scissors give you more productivity than mine in cutting paper?

 

5 because they were super cheap and I can find a pair when I need to, don't need to drive out and get a new pair when I can't find the last pair. I bought a lifetime supply. So in your model you keep a person in the drudgery of sharpening scissors for cents? Barbaric! In my model we lift that person out of that nightmare.

You are completely wrong about phones. It is the person who buys the $1,000 dollar phone that upgrades every year.  Their point in getting it is to have the latest greatest tech and that only lasts until next year's model comes out. The value buyer is the one who keeps their phone until the software support ends. 

Edited by Jay McKinsey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Department of Homeland Security broke from President Donald Trump's baseless allegations of a "stolen" election on Thursday and said there is no evidence of fraud. 

"The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history," the DHS said in a statement. 

The Department's Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council & the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive Committees found "no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."

https://www.businessinsider.com/dhs-breaks-from-trump-2020-election-most-secure-in-history-2020-11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But Facedrive understands what a tech-driven, ESG ecosystem is.

Branding is everything, and that’s where Facedrive is armed to the hilt in this war for positive branding. 

Facedrive is associated with the community, with benefits for all stakeholders, with sustainability

…  with lifestyle.

Its motto is “people and planet first”, and it has attracted some huge names, including Will Smith. 

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/The-Death-Of-Car-Ownership-The-Tech-Killing-The-3-Trillion-Auto-Industry.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Jay McKinsey said:

The Department of Homeland Security broke from President Donald Trump's baseless allegations of a "stolen" election on Thursday and said there is no evidence of fraud. 

"The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history," the DHS said in a statement. 

The Department's Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council & the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive Committees found "no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."

https://www.businessinsider.com/dhs-breaks-from-trump-2020-election-most-secure-in-history-2020-11

He should have been fired a long time ago. 

You must be the most ignorant person on the planet to publicly declare at this point in time that the November 3 election was the most secure in history? 5 freaking states stopped counting ballots simultaneously, all when Trump is clearly winning and the news channels are hopping around trying to distract the public from the numbers on the freaking screen and why they called Arizona with 10% of the votes counted but waited until Florida was 97% counted to finally give it to Trump? Trump gave a speech at 2:30 AM saying he didn't want the other side to show up with hundreds of thousands of ballots at 4:00 in the morning. Guess what happened at 4:00 in the morning? Hundreds of thousands of phony ballots. Poll watchers chased out of buildings, not allowed to have cameras (even though the other side did) in the very few places they were allowed in, they were ordered to be 120 feet away? Secure my pasty white azz. 

  • Like 1
  • Great Response! 4
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

On 11/9/2020 at 7:48 AM, Wombat said:

You certainly live up to your name. How many "magic mushies" do you eat each day?

 

Regardless of what I choose to injest or in what quanity this election is far from over, despite the best efforts of the MSM and their willfully ignorant cool aid guzzlers.

Edited by crazy trip
Misspell
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

5 hours ago, Ward Smith said:

He should have been fired a long time ago. 

You must be the most ignorant person on the planet to publicly declare at this point in time that the November 3 election was the most secure in history? 5 freaking states stopped counting ballots simultaneously, all when Trump is clearly winning and the news channels are hopping around trying to distract the public from the numbers on the freaking screen and why they called Arizona with 10% of the votes counted but waited until Florida was 97% counted to finally give it to Trump? Trump gave a speech at 2:30 AM saying he didn't want the other side to show up with hundreds of thousands of ballots at 4:00 in the morning. Guess what happened at 4:00 in the morning? Hundreds of thousands of phony ballots. Poll watchers chased out of buildings, not allowed to have cameras (even though the other side did) in the very few places they were allowed in, they were ordered to be 120 feet away? Secure my pasty white azz. 

Yes, it's unbelievable that JoeChina won the election without cheating.  But, isn't the DHS headed by a Trump sycophant?  

 

Edited by Hotone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Jay McKinsey said:

You are completely wrong about phones. It is the person who buys the $1,000 dollar phone that upgrades every year.  Their point in getting it is to have the latest greatest tech and that only lasts until next year's model comes out. The value buyer is the one who keeps their phone until the software support ends.

I agree its the person (consumer) that decides. I disagree on the "value buyer", there is no such thing, it is just the consumer cannot justify the expense of upgrading the tech to the latest model phone. They wait until their current phone is defunct or the battery holds no charge anymore.

If the new tech were free or almost free which is what I think your future economic vision is (no scarcity and oversupply)  then I am presuming you are saying AI would be the inventors and producers of the new tech upgraded phones??

Money becomes obsolete or irrelevant so no businesses exist (as whats the point) 

Question:- What are 10 billion people supposed to do all day long?

Mankind thrives on striving to better himself/herself, this model is something I would dread not welcome.

Although it is interesting in its concept, I just pray it never happens.

  • Like 1
  • Great Response! 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not?  Gloria!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jay McKinsey said:

5 because they were super cheap and I can find a pair when I need to, don't need to drive out and get a new pair when I can't find the last pair. I bought a lifetime supply. So in your model you keep a person in the drudgery of sharpening scissors for cents? Barbaric! In my model we lift that person out of that nightmare.

You are completely wrong about phones. It is the person who buys the $1,000 dollar phone that upgrades every year.  Their point in getting it is to have the latest greatest tech and that only lasts until next year's model comes out. The value buyer is the one who keeps their phone until the software support ends. 

No, that handy man could have the job and he had nothing else to do in a "socialism" market because of his background, back then US cents was a lot in a sanction scenario. With the price you described, your scissors is only for cutting paper, it will break whenever cutting anything more solid.

I am working as a mobile developer. Your observation is in where? Many people around me was using Iphone6, iphone 4s. They locked to Apple because of the ecosystems not the iphone, in the developed works where phones are being used for productivity. Most people in Vietnam rather buy an old iPhone for cheap price than buying a new android phone with higher CPU and RAM. Because they only used for calling+fb+viber (zalo). They used I phone because it is the brand name and to majority of Vietnamese people eyes, there is no different between iphone 6 and 8 (until they remove the middle button). Seriously are you assuming the cheap Android phones sales number every year world wide are for first time buyer? People are more likely to be able to afford upgrading the cheap one.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jay McKinsey said:

You guys keep mistakenly conflating Socialism, Green New Deal and Exponential / Post scarcity economy. 

Here is an example of where Exponitalism is going, and sustainable use of resources is just as much a concern that is going to be tracked and dealt with through technology:

In a new video from Futurism Media and Singularity University’s IdeaFront, we glimpse a very different future. One in which blockchain-based cooperatives replace today’s mega-corporate platform model. The middlemen are out. Users decide the values of their platforms and directly benefit from the gains of growth.

In the shadow of today’s dominant platforms, it may seem like a pipe dream, but there are already examples of successful businesses fighting the current. Will a new model catch on?

https://singularityhub.com/2020/11/12/can-the-ownership-economy-fix-internet-platforms/

 

The social techniques to sugar coating for mob rule are the same.

Tech itself cannot satisfy anyone need for sure. The innovation of any industry from 1.0 to 4.0 based on demand of making money not for ideology. Who gonna use the tech to control all of these resources distribution for innovation this time? Some honest politicians and capitalists working for a better world?

Capitalists are controlled by governments. So they try to corrupt the governments first. 

Governments are controlled by the people. So they try to corrupt the people first (with welfare, fear or ideology). They will work with what they can control, capitalists toward corrupting the people.

People are working for Capitalists, so it is very easy for them to corrupt the people.

Calitalists Goverments and The People are all corruptible people. When a majority of people corrupted, the balance is gone.

What make Exponitalism gonna success this time?

What make them incorruptible? Remember Socialism failed because of government corruption lead to the people corruption. Any ideology or productivity does not change the fundamental of that. The long end of that is war between suppressed people for freedom and the elite ruling classes, not the people and nature live in harmony ideology.

The motivation behind of tech innovation, or wars is because of human greed under promising of a better harmony incorruptible future. Ideologies are just the promising theory part in the far unreachable future and people may die for ideologies and the survivors witness complete different outcomes.

 

  • Great Response! 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jay McKinsey said:

"The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history," the DHS said in a statement. 

I'm beginning to understand the divorce. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Uh, could you guys start another thread about utopia and all your other fairy tales?

This one is supposed to be about the election and electoral votes.  Thanks.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Jay McKinsey said:

The Department of Homeland Security broke from President Donald Trump's baseless allegations of a "stolen" election on Thursday and said there is no evidence of fraud. 

"The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history," the DHS said in a statement. 

The Department's Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council & the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive Committees found "no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."

https://www.businessinsider.com/dhs-breaks-from-trump-2020-election-most-secure-in-history-2020-11

That is not evidence of a functional election. It is evidence of the DHS people involved virtue signaling to Biden so as to keep their jobs. It is part and parcel of the Dem war against the Trump GOP. You are relying on bureaucrats who are distributed 92 vs. 6 Dem to GOP in political affiliation to voice statements of fact that are impartial. There is no way that happens. You are being naive. 

  • Great Response! 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

16 hours ago, Ward Smith said:

 

You must be the most ignorant person on the planet to publicly declare at this point in time that the November 3 election was the most secure in history?

Indeed. 

He did say that! 

 

trump agrees.jpg

Edited by Enthalpic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, 0R0 said:

That is not evidence of a functional election. It is evidence of the DHS people involved virtue signaling to Biden so as to keep their jobs. It is part and parcel of the Dem war against the Trump GOP. You are relying on bureaucrats who are distributed 92 vs. 6 Dem to GOP in political affiliation to voice statements of fact that are impartial. There is no way that happens. You are being naive. 

Butt kissers lining up to lather up the perceived new boss.  In other words.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

21 hours ago, Jay McKinsey said:

The Department of Homeland Security broke from President Donald Trump's baseless allegations of a "stolen" election on Thursday and said there is no evidence of fraud. 

"The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history," the DHS said in a statement. 

The Department's Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council & the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive Committees found "no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."

https://www.businessinsider.com/dhs-breaks-from-trump-2020-election-most-secure-in-history-2020-11

I find it odd for a intellectual person to rely on Rumor Has It to bolster or shape a opinion. Let us look again at such practices..Snopes they seem td deny allegations by one body and yet form a biased opinion under another's biased opinion...Under the guise of FACT CHECK.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/dominion-deleted-trump-votes/

Until a forensics examination of the "original hard drives"are done there are no facts..merely opinions...It would seem this man Donald Trump has undergone more than a few unsubstantiated Rumor Has It opinion's...The true intellect of the progressive left. In fact only a guilty party would call for proof, a person in authority would have already undertaken steps to prove/disprove such allegations..

 

Edited by Eyes Wide Open
  • Great Response! 2
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

1 hour ago, Ward Smith said:

 

That women is one hard hitting attourney, after all she is the person who uncovered the FBI with holding Flynn's exculpatory evidence...To that point the deep state is still trying to save face.

Edited by Eyes Wide Open
  • Like 2
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

That women is one hard hitting attourney, after all she is the person who uncovered the FBI with holding exculpatory evidence...To that point the deep state is still trying to save face.

Aha!  So she's the one?  Didn't know that.  Time to surf around a bit and learn more about her....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dan Warnick said:

Aha!  So she's the one?  Didn't know that.  Time to surf around a bit and learn more about her....

You be the judge...well observer first then judge..

 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

An interview with Sydney Powell from December 18, 2019.  If you listen to nothing else, go to 03:55 to find out why General Flynn was targeted. 

 

Edited by Dan Warnick
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

12 minutes ago, Dan Warnick said:

An interview with Sydney Powell from December 18, 2019:

 

Actually had the case been resolved by the courts Flynn would be set free, the real issue not being disclosed? All the texts would have become a legal precedent...meaning a direct trail to Biden and Obama. The issue was so tenuous and far reaching the DC court of appeals refused a final conclusion after their initial ruling. Absolute disgrace.

Edited by Eyes Wide Open
  • Great Response! 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.