Dan Warnick

U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes

Recommended Posts

Everyone, there is going to be a recount in battleground States.  Does anyone out there think Biden won the election?   Except the propagandists?  Biden is and has been a DDDDeeeep state guy?

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LANDMAN X said:

Everyone, there is going to be a recount in battleground States.  Does anyone out there think Biden won the election?   Except the propagandists?  Biden is and has been a DDDDeeeep state guy?

Unless irregularities are found (like a rogue computer with a glitch programmed into its software), the two candidates must be within 1% for a recount request to be honored. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ward Smith said:

The leftists tell you the SAME government that can't count votes needs to be in charge of EVERYTHING?

No one else sees a problem with this? 

@Gerry Maddoux is right, the US Democratic Party strongholds "vote counting" has made the USA the laughingstock of the world. 

Why is it states right next door to these battleground states were fully finished with vote counts the night of the election? Why is it the only states which can't count votes were the exact states needed for Biden to steal this election? 

The MSM has crowned Biden the victor. The MSM is not the final authority on elections as they well know. They don't like that, they don't like their viewers and readers cancelling them by the millions either. They're not the king makers they believe they are. 

I will be watching other options whenever Fox News has annoying liberals on. They still have my favorites though. Tucker Carlson, Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Varney, Lou Dobs, Maria Bartirimo, etc. I will also watch OANN, Newsmax, listen to Rush, and many other great commentators. Then there are podcasts and videos etc. All that while surfing the net. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

Essentially all polls predicted a Biden win... consider the possibility that the majority of people just don't like trump.

Edited by Enthalpic
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Move on boys, you lost, Trump got fired. The big question is the two runoff Senate races in GA. How much power the Dems will  have hindges on these races. Will the Republicans trust Trump to campaign for control or is would it be smarter to have other leaders support their candidates.

  • Upvote 1
  • Rolling Eye 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, specinho said:

 

 

 

It has been so obvious crime has been committed with glitch, blackout 🤭🤭🤭  or shutdown-switchon trick, and new software a  day before.................. Election  committee should be standing up by now, declaring void and start persecuting......... of those involving in glitchies and such.................... Vote again with more stringent measures could be applied. Penalty is normally jail term and/or confiscation of all assets for the guilty parties, or no??

Tom N posted an analysis....... According to it, votes obtained between senator and the presidential candidate supposed to be very close, except that of Biden, in various states........... Hence, the out of norm differences should be reexamined and reconfirmed too??

A quick check could be easy............ total number of people registered to vote in a county vs total number of votes counted and announced? Tally the sum of counties to get a state count?

 

image.png.b38f4fc1e6213e006efcd9585b986370.png

Someone ought to be made responsible for the glitchies, no?? If obvious fraud committed not corrected, election would lose its meaning, like the blackout- to- win nation somewhere remote?? Foreseeable out of hands conditions would follow, a great dent would occur, social regression, and other negative impacts would emerge...

Twitter and Facebook threatened too further reduce the visibility of my accounts if I posted information on the computer glitches and also the stories on Hunter Biden. They also posted warnings on many posts at the same time. The censorship by these two giants, alone, were sufficient to turn the election from where it would have been. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Enthalpic said:

Essentially all polls predicted a Biden win... consider the possibility that the majority of people just don't like trump.

 The polls were so far off that the race is still in question until after the lawsuits and certification of the results. The consensus opinion among those in the know is that the polls have been used, in the last few elections, to discourage people from voting. The pollsters are paid well and they are also liberals that are available to serve the purposes of liberals  when asked for favors. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, specinho said:

Someone ought to be made responsible for the glitchies, no?? If obvious fraud committed not corrected, election would lose its meaning, like the blackout- to- win nation somewhere remote?? Foreseeable out of hands conditions would follow, a great dent would occur, social regression, and other negative impacts would emerge...

But the execs and shareholders are related to Pelosi and Feinstein. Good luck getting to them with that protection.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Gerry Maddoux said:

The 12th Amendment--kicking the election back to the House of Representatives--has only been used once in the history of the Constitution. That was to decide between Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams, in the election of 1824. Coincidentally, there are great similarities between Andrew Jackson and Donald J. Trump. 😊

Really loved Jackson. Won the war with the first central bank (Bank of America), Hamilton's construct. Shut it down for 90 years.

  • Like 4
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another interesting video of recorded training sessions for Michigan/Detroit counting center workers establishing how to count illegal ballots and prevent challengers (observers) from seeing the envelopes nor the ballots and are instructed to process challenged ballots anyway.

 

 

  • Great Response! 2
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jay McKinsey said:

The truth is that Trump lost and it seems to be making conservatives very angry and the left very happy.

As an economist, your definition of "truth" is suspect

  • Great Response! 3
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^

From T. R. Malthus to Thomas Carlyle, the "Dismal Science" has remained really good at one thing: counting dead people. 

We need dead people counters all over the land but especially in Nevada, where it is said that so many Joe Biden voters were of the dearly departed: either having moved out of the state or, more likely, to the grave. 

Economists, come one and all to Nevada, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. As Alfalfa Bill Murray was said to have commented, "Dead people have always voted in elections, just not in these numbers."

HaHaHa. 

Time will tell, but as a fan of the day of the dead, I'm betting we had a good turnout this year.  

  • Haha 4
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ronwagn said:

Essentially all polls predicted a Biden win... consider the possibility that the majority of people just don't like trump.

@Enthalpic said?  BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! The guy has the IQ of cardboard. 

3 hours ago, ronwagn said:

 The polls were so far off that the race is still in question until after the lawsuits and certification of the results. The consensus opinion among those in the know is that the polls have been used, in the last few elections, to discourage people from voting. The pollsters are paid well and they are also liberals that are available to serve the purposes of liberals  when asked for favors. 

^^^^This. Quite typical that Eejit uses the excuse of flagrantly false "polls" to justify what is happening. His puny intellect can't comprehend that when the pollsters Co claimed that Biden was going to win Florida by 15% when Trump wins by almost 5% their error bar is now over 20%! Statistical malpractice of the highest order. They did the exact same thing in 2016, claimed they fixed it then came right back and did it again? Ask yourself if you'd still have a job if your performance was that miserable? @Enthalpic can relate, back before he got fired from that job as a janitor in some laboratory (the basis of his fake claims of being some kind of "researcher") his performance was so sub-par that they had to create a new scale with a bigger basement to hold his scores. 

But you're right Ron, this was never about predictions this was always about giving cover to the flagrant fraud and trying to suppress the turnout and more importantly the donations. While leftists like Biden and Harris pretend they're going to tax the rich, the super rich like Bloomberg spent over a billion donating and directly interfering in local elections including Bloomberg spending $100million each on 4 different Senate races and losing every single one. But the pollster's results said otherwise didn't they? Makes you wonder why the super rich would want to shoot themselves in the foot like that doesn't it? Pay billions to elect someone who promised to take more from them? Like that's gonna happen? Only an Eejit would be stupid enough to fall for that. Luckily we have our very own useful idiot right here on this site, blathering away daily with all the self awareness and equivalent intellect of a hermit crab. 

  • Great Response! 2
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Gerry Maddoux said:

Unless irregularities are found (like a rogue computer with a glitch programmed into its software), the two candidates must be within 1% for a recount request to be honored. 

The computer "irregularities" were well known and exploited just like Ron's kids'cheat codes. Exactly the same in fact

 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Enthalpic said:

Essentially all polls predicted a Biden win... consider the possibility that the majority of people just don't like trump.

Anyone who just watches and reads mainstream media without thinking things through, and without good ethics might think Trump was a bad leader or president. The popular vote proves that IMHO.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

This video tells you EXACTLY what our voting problem is! 

 

Edited by ronwagn
add
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

26 minutes ago, ronwagn said:

This video seems very important. 

 

It is although it does seem primitive as compared to what i have seen, but the trail is on the drive. Actually here is a pattern to a lot of the questions surrounding Trump, the FBI loss of text messages only to show up a yr later and damming texts. The one that is still not been answered is the study done on HCQ. A rather prestigious medical journey came out a basically discounted HCQ as witchcraft..THe entire medically community clapped hands.....only to find out the data given to them was corrupted by some goofball science fiction writer....It made that community look like fools...Below...and not a word since.

Thursday's retraction doesn't mean that the drug is helpful — or harmful — with respect to the coronavirus. Rather, the study authors were unable to confirm that the data set was accurate

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/lancet-retracts-large-study-hydroxychloroquine-n1225091

Edited by Eyes Wide Open
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, ronwagn said:

Anyone who just watches and reads mainstream media without thinking things through, and without good ethics might think Trump was a bad leader or president. The popular vote proves that IMHO.

this is rich.... you commenting upon people who watch and read without thinking...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

6 minutes ago, frankfurter said:

this is rich.... you commenting upon people who watch and read without thinking...

Ohh put a fork it in Charlie....were discussing inside trading here. Unless you wish to discuss the fine arts of hacking...that is.

Edited by Eyes Wide Open
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More applications of Newcomb Benford law for 2020 elections.

Biden's votes in Philadelphia Milwaukee and Detroit Pittsburgh and Chicago are obviously artificial, generated by a mechanical process rather than human voting.

https://lenbilen.com/2020/11/07/benfords-law-and-the-2020-election-a-limerick-on-fraud/

 

image.thumb.png.511f571181ed58092c4d8f819febde08.png

Allegheny county (Pittsburgh)

image.thumb.png.668d37a5a1531a56649117262c0d5801.png

image.png.3308f4aef861032356e3292a1a57e9c1.png

Another interesting state to look into would be New York.

It had a similar low early vote turnout like PA with a heavy Democrat lean.

 

  • Great Response! 1
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

It is although it does seem primitive as compared to what i have seen, but the trail is on the drive. Actually here is a pattern to a lot of the questions surrounding Trump, the FBI loss of text messages only to show up a yr later and damming texts. The one that is still not been answered is the study done on HCQ. A rather prestigious medical journey came out a basically discounted HCQ as witchcraft..THe entire medically community clapped hands.....only to find out the data given to them was corrupted by some goofball science fiction writer....It made that community look like fools...Below...and not a word since.

Thursday's retraction doesn't mean that the drug is helpful — or harmful — with respect to the coronavirus. Rather, the study authors were unable to confirm that the data set was accurate

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/lancet-retracts-large-study-hydroxychloroquine-n1225091

I agree on the HCQ. They were incompetent IMO. 

From what I see on this video, we need a complete recount using all this information. Possibly a revote, recount or whatever. I actually think that Trump won. We need to change this whole system. It is obviously full of holes. 

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ronwagn said:

From what I see on this video, we need a complete recount using all this information. Possibly a revote, recount or whatever. I actually think that Trump won. We need to change this whole system. It is obviously full of holes. 

Never going to happen, Ron, unless a good nonpartisan analyst swears that there is unequivocal proof that the computer in Antrim County Michigan was malwared. To legitimately request a recount, the vote has to be within 1%. Wisconsin would qualify. But Wisconsin is not really the questionable state. A GOP guard should have been put on that computer as soon as the 6,000 vote irregularity was discovered. God knows what has happened to it by now. I'm not saying give up, but it is going to be very, very hard to prove voter fraud without a smoking computer. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.