Dan Warnick

U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Gerry Maddoux said:

I had determined to stay above the fray but when I read these gleeful little quips from the, what, the "Biden Camp," I have to wonder: what exactly is it that you're so excited about? 

Joe Biden was clearly the poorest candidate in the history of presidential elections. He was bereft of charisma or talent, absent of history, and most importantly, clearly in cognitive decline. Under cover of a pandemic, he was kept in the basement of his home, learning historical facts that most of us here already know, reciting sharp little quips and jabs, trying to get it all together. We saw with our own eyes tens of thousands of people at the Trump rallies in such places as Kenosha and Lansing, then a frail, mentally lapsed Joe Biden holler at a few cars at his rallies and they pathetically honked back. 

After that amazing dichotomy we're supposed to believe that this poor wretch, this wisp of a man, this forgetter of Mitt Romney's name (the, the, you know, the Mormon man), actually won the most votes in presidential history? When voting irregularity after voting irregularity was pointed out and taken to court, Democrat-run courts refused to hear the allegations. The Supreme Court--that great and grand arbiter of fairness--refused to even sign a denial of record. This could well go down as their greatest mistake since the Dred Scott Decision, which by the way has yet to be reversed by the SC. 

But what I wonder about most is what you glib fellows, you handy-with-the-word men, really think you have to celebrate. Is the getting rid of a president who is hard to love but produced one victory after another for the United States of America and for the world? Was it worth the subterfuge to get such a man out of office? And what do you propose to replace him with? A Manchurian Candidate, one whose son enriched himself massively doing deals with companies with ties to the Chinese Communist Party? 

Maybe you don't believe that, and that is clearly your right. But get this: Hunter Biden joined up at age 43. He had to get his first waiver because of his age, but he stated clearly that he wanted to become involved in "naval intelligence." He had to get a second waiver because of a history of cocaine use. No one asked then why it was so important to become an expert in naval intelligence. Be that as it may, he became an ensign, only to get promptly bounced out on "administrative" discharge because of failing a cocaine test. Then he became involved with his dead brother's widow, at the same time refusing to assume responsibility for a child born to a stripper--until the DNA test came back positive. It's true, what they say about sins of your father, but it is equally true what they say about sins of your son. Joe Biden isn't his son. But he damn well knew his son was grifting on his coattails, if not benefiting personally from said grifting. 

It is quite possible--if the stories are correct--that we are electing as president the most compromised and corrupt man to ever occupy the chair behind the Resolute desk. It is almost a certainty that he is not cognitively intact. The election is in dispute: roughly 80 million people feel that the election was rigged, and some of them are Independents and Democrats. 

So I ask again, just what is it you're so gleeful about? What exactly about this particular situation leads you to make silly statements that are presupposed to be funny and clever? And that leads me to the next question, just how long do you think this charade can go on? 

I would say weeks to months. And then we are left with the charming Ms. Harris, who was so accomplished that she didn't survive the first debate in the Democrat primary against a dozen of her (clearly superior) peers. This is an oil and gas forum. Many of us have a spiritual and financial attachment to oil and gas. We recognize that some of you do not, have declared fossil fuels evil and the "last buggy whip factory." The rest of us pretty much tolerate that and actually try to learn from you: some of what you say carries some weight. The great wars could not have been won without oil and gas. I would wager than not one of us would be alive were it not for oil and gas--the pharmaceuticals, the surgical equipment, the heat in the winter and the cool in the summer. If oil and gas were to have its collective spigot turned off, the world would go hard and cold and unforgiving. The result would make the Covid pandemic seem like a sore throat. But still we let you spout, and we listen, and then we spout and you should listen. 

I doubt that you would treat us so shabbily if we were conversing over a gin and tonic, and mentioned in passing that we'd lost sleep worrying about Mr. Biden saying that he'd shut down fracking on federal lands the first day in office. It surely hasn't dawned on you that the person you're gloating over just vomited over the statement by Ms. Harris--soon to be President Harris--that she'd ban ALL fracking on the first day in office. Surely it didn't bother you that the livelihood of many of us here depends on oil and gas. And Selva, I'm not blaming you for this mess but I am calling you out to run an oilprice.com forum. You could sometimes open this forum and believe that you'd entered some sort of progressive workshop. We shouldn't all nod our heads the same direction but we shouldn't have to tolerate a giddy in-your-face because of an election of a pathetic candidate either. 

After this, I'm out of here: I can't stand the stench. And the attitude of people from all around the world who inhabit an oil and gas forum to satiate some wanton hunger to hurt someone. But I got off-track. I have to ask you again. 

What are you celebrating? The death of a king? The rise of a corrupt president? Tell me, what is it you're so proud of?

 

We’re happy to be independent and not loyal. We think it was wrong to give tax breaks to the rich and business while over 20 trillion in debt. We think it’s dumb to support coal and ship our oil and nat gas overseas. Dumb to import FF and refine it here just to make a few bucks while killing off US citizens. Dumb to flare, like real dumb, like external dumb. Is that what Republicans have become. 
Now law and order along with the Constitution have gone the way of the Tea Party. Are there any principals left?

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 0R0 said:

Not all election machines were connected to the internet all the time, just the fraud machines in MI WI PA GA AZ VA IL NY MN in central counting facilities in the big cities. The vast majority of the machines in most precincts were not connected to the net throughout but were preprogrammed with varying weights the day before the election, when a "patch" was issued by Dominion for their tabulators and management software. The weighting per county was determined by algorithm to reduce the Trump vote by proportion of the 2016 Trump win so that the more heavily Rep a precinct was, the more votes would transfer from Trump to Biden, though would not flip the county or precinct. Dr Shiva Ayyadurai did this analysis for several states, starting with MI.

The internet traffic between the Dominion servers in the several counting centers and state level going to Scytl in Spain and to Germany was so big in volume that it was noticed by EU backbone operators along with US networking people and was collected by NSA and several other private and govt. actors. Powell is the point person on this as the DIA and "Kracken" code crackers of the 305th (hence the nickname) are feeding her team with civilianized material as they go along decrypting the packets and reverse compiling the software, along with internal Dominion documents seized in Toronto and Colorado that are being "leaked by Dominion insiders" to Powell.

I suggest you don't presume that anything in any election in the US was other than fraudulent to some extent..Biden may not have reached 60 mil. votes. Could have been worse. The 2016 election was felt to be a "sure thing" by the Clinton team because they thought they "fixed it good", as it worked for Obama before. But their transfer of Trump votes to Hilary, of about 7 million + 1 mil of ballot stuffing was insufficient. Hilary did not have the popular vote nor the EC. Biden's fraud is estimated at 11.4 million votes added to him from 3rd parties and Trump's count and ballot stuffing on the order of 5 mil. Trump had 70 mil actual votes (leaked NSA estimate) in 2016 and likely 81 mil this time. don't know how reliable those numbers were. But the fraud was tracked in real time since the digital systems were installed. After the 2012 Obama election fraud, It was Flynn and a group of DOD NSA and mil intel folks who convinced Trump to run with the purpose of "draining the swamp" to re-establish real elections. But they had a problem getting it done into 2018, where the Dems defrauded their way into control of Congress. 

I don't know if a completely reliable record of the unperturbed election tally can be restored from the data, but what has leaked out does not have Dems controlling the House and having no gains in the Senate and having lost governors and state legislatures and mayoral races even in Dem heavy cities. The fraud is heavy and broad, but I have not seen the numbers for all of the fraudulent races.

I can say that the entire digital voting system trend was deliberately installed bipartisanly to squash 3rd parties after the Perot debacle as both main parties realized that a fringe of their party may run a separate ticket and knock their party off from a win. You found off establishment legislators criticizing it, like Klobuchar and Warren and Parett (Parent?) in MI Sen. Dominion ran a nationwide fraud for hire scheme.at all levels on the ballot. It was used by both Dems and Reps and in primaries.

@Jay McKinsey This is called a smoking gun. The Michigan Attorney General (D) tried to squelch this report getting out. Apparently failed. A 68% failure rate is unacceptable. This is only these 22 machines, which they (the bad guys) attempted to wipe multiple times and Did destroy the error logs. Just like in Georgia. 

Now you're looking at traffic and (correctly) saying there's no way a few vote counts equals that much data. You're right. What Was happening is far more pernicious. Because the original cheat codes were insufficient to steal the election, they needed to basically update the application itself, multiple times (too many real votes for Trump for the shaving to work). Those updates were the real data flow, and it was going the wrong way. They used bogus traffic out to camouflage the incoming traffic (which shouldn't have been there). The application code is in the gigabytes plus they had to disguise it, then encrypt it, then send it over a VPN (which encrypts it again). 

Someone I've been working with has reverse engineered their algorithm. It's complex and designed to escape detection. Unfortunately for them, this guy is a savant and can look at massive streams of numbers and spot the ones that don't belong. He's written the basic code and has complete proof, as in mathematics proof, which can be easily validated by other mathematicians. 

The function needed is similar to Office Space where the programmers wanted to shave the round off errors in banking transactions where they were working. Unfortunately there are so many that their misdeed is sure to be discovered. It's a (great) comedy but had its roots in real life. I was taking a night class in Numerical Analysis while an undergrad (it was a graduate level course). We learned all the things coming up in this election including Benford's Law and Euler's Totient Function among others. One of my classmates, an older gentleman going for his Master's couldn't quite follow the math, so I tutored him. He worked for a large bank and was seeing suspicious numbers but couldn't figure it out. Turns out their own programmers were running a sophisticated Theft operation involving interest calculations and cycling the "winnings" through multiple phantom accounts. It was extremely exciting to play detective when I was about 19 years old. We did end up proving what they did, how they did it and even wrote a sample program to demonstrate it. 

I was supposed to testify in that case, but it never happened. A lot like this election, the bank was horrified that the rot within would be exposed, so they buried the entire thing. They closed down the programming group and quickly arranged a sale to a bigger bank which knew all about the theft. 6 months later they were a new bank and all the culprits got off Scott free. My friend got a cushy job with the new bank. One thing he could never do was speak about what had happened. He offered me a job, but working for a bank didn't excite me much. 

  • Great Response! 2
  • Upvote 3
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to vote by internet. It’s how I got my drivers license. It’s how I shop, it’s how I pay the bills. Could you imagine how many more would vote if it was easy and convenient? I can hear the screaming and wailing now. We can’t win now, it’s so unfair. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LiamP said:

60 convictions for an instance in just one precinct?? Wow. Then I hope and expect if anything has truly happened this time around, and on a much larger scale, it is exposed similarly. There may be more yet to come, but doesn't seem to be going that direction at the moment. If nothing indeed happens, it surely has to point to the fraud having not actually taken place, or the US is truly rotten to the very core - like to the point of making China look like a model of a fair democracy. Can't actually be that bad, can it?

Incidentally, when having a quick look into the example above to see if I could find anything about it, out of interest, I came across a long article about how the 2004 election was 'stolen'. Swap the parties around and change names and it could literally have been, well, this thread! It was all there - effort to rig the results starting prior to election day, irregularities on voting day, voting machines being tampered with, switching votes etc, wrongdoings by election officials, down-ballot candidates 'impossibly' outperforming the presidential candidate, a rigged recount, etc etc. Overall fraud impacting millions of votes - more than enough to flip the result. The death of democracy. All seemed rather familiar!

So I wonder - does this in fact just happen all the time? The loser trying it on and claiming fraud? Just Trump being Trump doing it bigger and better than ever before? Genuinely curious. I also wonder - would, or did, republican supporters and aligned media argue that all the claims in 2004 were 'baseless' and 'debunked' just as Democrats are arguing in 2020? Had Kerry not followed conventional decorum and instead refused to concede, would 2004 have been as big a deal as 2020? Is there something fundamentally different this time around other than the reversal of the parties?

Various frauds have been going on for decades in this country. Every close election between a Democrat and Republican has gone the Demoncrat's way after enough "recounts" and "found ballots". In Gregoire vs Rossi recount scam, they "recounted" 5 times and when Rossi sued, the (democrat) Washington State Supreme Court said, paraphrasing, "Yes, clearly fraud occurred in this election. Now the burden is on you, the Republican Party to show us which exact ballots were fraudulent, so we can remove them from the count". This of course after all the ballots are commingled, anonymous and chain of custody destroyed. Look at the "recount" between a Saturday Night Live actor and a politician for the Senate seat. Al Franken won by the slimmest of margins and only after the usual shenanigans such as districts submitting 350% of registered voters ballots. This corruption is nothing new, it's been getting progressively worse, as Progressives accumulate more and more power. 

The constitution gives too much power to the states, so once they're corrupted they can't be recovered. California is this way now, Washington, New York and others. Before there's even an election they get filled in Blue because that's how it's supposed to come out. Culprits is suing in Washington right now, we'll see how that goes. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, El Nikko said:

God that thing is a horror show.

The adjudication record was not on the machines because it was done offsite on the Scytl servers, where the data and the logs would be. The results were sent back to the DVS (DeViouS)  EMS software and tabulated without leaving an adjudication log.

Since the entire Biden "win" comes from his "outperformance" by 6% on Dominion machine precincts vs .non Dominion then it should be obvious that there is no room for Biden to have obtained the stated results by anything other than fraud.

This forensic analysis provides the manner and indicates it was done offsite, thus creating a two way traffic as Ward had pointed out, that includes ballot images and returns entire file updates to the Dominion software.

No election result should be certified where a Dominion machine has been used.

They and all other digital voting equipment should be banned indefinitely In future, no proprietary software should be used in any stage of digital voting systems. They should not be capable of any communication but the push reporting by physical media.

  • Great Response! 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Boat said:

I want to vote by internet. It’s how I got my drivers license. It’s how I shop, it’s how I pay the bills. Could you imagine how many more would vote if it was easy and convenient? I can hear the screaming and wailing now. We can’t win now, it’s so unfair. 

I'm all for any method that is fair, transparent and verifiable. Unfortunately the democrats have fought against all of those for years. Show ID? Poppycock! Audit the votes? Racist! Like Athens, Tennessee the democrats likely haven't won legitimately for years. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Boat said:

I want to vote by internet. It’s how I got my drivers license. It’s how I shop, it’s how I pay the bills. Could you imagine how many more would vote if it was easy and convenient? I can hear the screaming and wailing now. We can’t win now, it’s so unfair. 

I agree.  Sort it out and let's get on with it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"As we speak, today, an alternate slate of electors in the contested states is going to vote and we're going to send those results up to Congress," Stephen Miller

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sfdsfs.PNG

  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, El Nikko said:

"As we speak, today, an alternate slate of electors in the contested states is going to vote and we're going to send those results up to Congress," Stephen Miller

 

Technically this is a high treason or a circus , whichever approach the court would take. I do not know whether 1st Amendment allows actions to overthrow US democracy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Marcin2 said:

Technically this is a high treason or a circus , whichever approach the court would take. I do not know whether 1st Amendment allows actions to overthrow US democracy.

It won't happen, just like everything else they say.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Marcin2 said:

Technically this is a high treason or a circus , whichever approach the court would take. I do not know whether 1st Amendment allows actions to overthrow US democracy.

No this is in the US constitution and it appears that there are Americans (not you) that don't apparently understand this which is quite funny.

I put a video up many pages back explaining that there were several paths to victory (I believe from Alan Dershowitz and maybe others) which may have seemed unlikely but were still possible.

Instead of this being over today like some clowns 🤡🤡 assured us yesterday it could and probably will go down to the wire, the 6th of Jan at least.

 

 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Enthalpic said:

It won't happen, just like everything else they say.

 

Like there being no evidence 😂🤣

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ward Smith said:

I'm all for any method that is fair, transparent and verifiable. Unfortunately the democrats have fought against all of those for years. Show ID? Poppycock! Audit the votes? Racist! Like Athens, Tennessee the democrats likely haven't won legitimately for years. 

Actually there is some credence to what he states, with that being said e-verify and the social security system and perhaps the irs combine data bases to verify the population and voter eligibility needs to be done. Then and only then it is time to move on.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Marcin2 said:

Technically this is a high treason or a circus , whichever approach the court would take. I do not know whether 1st Amendment allows actions to overthrow US democracy.

Might you explain your reasoning, or is your statement merely a opinion?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

Actually there is some credence to what he states, with that being said e-verify and the social security system and perhaps the irs combine data bases to verify the population and voter eligibility needs to be done. Then and only then it is time to move on.

Yes it's funny how when money comes in to it everything can be 'verified' to the penny

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

2 minutes ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

Actually there is some credence to what he states, with that being said e-verify and the social security system and perhaps the irs combine data bases to verify the population and voter eligibility needs to be done. Then and only then it is time to move on.

Watch the movie "the Circle."  Basically Facebook accounts are used to vote, and are mandatory.

Edited by Enthalpic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

😂

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EpNo1AqWEAYdd3K.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Great Response! 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Marcin2 said:

Technically this is a high treason or a circus , whichever approach the court would take. I do not know whether 1st Amendment allows actions to overthrow US democracy.

The high treason has been occurring since 2015. First a sitting President spied on his replacement using bogus intel that a child could see through. Then Obama and Biden concocted a pretext to end the career of a decorated general on charges that were likewise fictitious. Remember the pretext to interview Flynn was because he was supposedly in violation of the Logan Act, which has never been codified in our current laws and had never been successfully prosecuted. All to create a "perjury trap" which only succeeded in showing the FBLie agents perjured themselves.

That was terrible enough, but then a phony Russia collusion narrative was spun out of whole cloth, and Mueller ruined people's lives trying to get them to lie to support his (phony) case. That cost over 3 years, then on pure Heresay a "whistle-blower" concocted what became a 100% political impeachment farce, which utterly fell flat on its face. Dozens of rules and procedures were broken, but by then Nancy was all in on her coup de etat attempt. 

In point of fact, the Trump admin has been plagued from day one with lifer politicians who couldn't stand that an outsider was elected by the free will and votes of the population. I have zero doubt that Hillary didn't even get anywhere near the votes attributed to her in 2016 either. They did the same things then they did now, but failed. This time they didn't mess around, they went all in on the fraud, essentially daring the other branches of government to call them out on it. So far the other branches are hiding in their basements with Joe Sniffy Biden. 

The MSM will now go down as thoroughly corrupted also. Their viewership has cratered and only morons believe them anymore. Sad state of affairs. 

So Marcin, which part of treason do you not understand? The part where unelected bureaucrats conspire with unelected Big Tech and Big Media to overturn the Democratic will of the people? 

  • Great Response! 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

3 minutes ago, El Nikko said:

EpNo1AqWEAYdd3K.jpg

Michigan EC voted. That ship sailed.

Edited by Enthalpic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.