Will Variants and Ill-Health Continue to Plague Economic Outlooks?

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

Jessica Rose, MSc, PhD

WEBSITE:  https://www.jessicasuniverse.com/

SubStack:  https://jessicar.substack.com/

 

Dr. Jessica Rose is a Canadian researcher with a Bachelor’s degree in Applied Mathematics and a Master’s degree in Immunology from Memorial University of Newfoundland. She also holds a PhD in Computational Biology from Bar Ilan University and 2 post-doctoral degrees: one in Molecular Biology from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and one in Biochemistry from the Technion Institute of Technology. She was also accepted for a 2-month program as a senior researcher at the Weizmann Institute prior to completion of her latest post doctoral degree at the Technion. 

 

During the first 39 minutes of “The Highwire with Del Bigtree” on Thursday March 24, 2022 “Episode 260: WINNERS, SINNERS, & THE DEATH OF A GENERATION”, Del leads into the interview with Jessica Rose, MSc, PhD while discussing the alarming number of vaccine injuries around the world.  VIDEO:  https://www.bitchute.com/video/hpG3Zc4jyWrv/ or https://thehighwire.com/videos/episode-260-winners-sinners-the-death-of-a-generation/

 

On Jessica’s SUBSTACK, she has the following article with Images.  It is very telling…

What is killing the millenials?

Drugs? Suicide? Injections? Cancer?

https://jessicar.substack.com/p/what-is-killing-the-millenials?s=r

What is killing the millenials?

Drugs? Suicide? Injections? Cancer?

Jessica Rose Mar 16

296

33

 

Please note: you are advised to come back to this article as it will be constantly updated! And you are also most welcome to contribute! This Substack is far from complete.

As y’all are aware, I’ve been doing some looking around in VAERS at young people who have reported dying for a time now and I want to share some data and get some feedback.

On the subject of excess deaths of youths, enter Edward Dowd. He is an interesting fellow. He was a portfolio manager for the multinational investment firm BlackRock and a former analyst and Wall Street executive. We spoke at a meeting together not long ago. He has more recently spoken about the young deaths in a very specific way: in the context of the Vietnam War.

The Millennials, about ages 25 to 40, experienced an 84% increase in excess mortality in the fall, he said, describing it as the “worst-ever excess mortality, I think, in history.” It was the highest increase in excess deaths of any age group last year, seven times higher than the Silent Generation, those who are older than 85.

And the increase coincided with the vaccine mandates and the approval of the booster shots.

“Basically, Millennials experienced a Vietnam War in the second half of 2021,” Dowd said, noting 58,000 people died in the conflict.

He is not wrong. Actually, he is absolutely correct. What is happening on our doorsteps is shocking and everyone needs to pay stop genuflecting and start paying attention.

But wait! There’s more! If you head online to https://www.usmortality.com/excess-percent, prepare to have some fun. You can select ‘Filter’ and then pick the United States and a particular age group. If you select the age group from 25-44 years old you get the chart below. As you can see, this plot confirms what Edward said: there is, in fact, an 80% increase in excess mortality in this young age group in late summer/early fall 2021.

This also confirms the insurance data.

What on earth could have caused this incredible increase? Was it COVID with its Infection Fatality Rate for this age demographic of virtually 0 (“The IFR was zero among people aged 18 to 39 years”)1? Probably not. The timing is off with regard to Delta. Was it opioids? Maybe, but according to CDC, the deaths due to opioids is not sufficient to account for such an excess.2 Was it suicides? Maybe, but according to CDC, the deaths due to suicides is not sufficient to account for such an excess either.3

Was it the injections? Unknown. Can we find out using VAERS data? Maybe. We can look for hints.

Fast and dirty. My ongoing Substack diary. I love it. (I admit I have left out the analysis part of this particular article but I really just wanted to put this out there for now.)

Here’s some VAERS data. I plotted the data in VAERS reported for 25-44 year olds and extracted their death data. Of all of the Domestic deaths reported in VAERS, this age group represents 9.3% of the deaths (Total deaths: N = 12,136; Deaths individuals aged 25-44: N = 1,132). For the combined Domestic and Foreign data sets, the total number of deaths is double that of Domestic alone (Total deaths: N = 25,301; Deaths individuals aged 25-44: N = 1,828) where the 25-44 age group represents 7.2% of the deaths. The following plot includes the data for the combined data sets.

The distribution of death shows that there about twice as many reports for the ages on the elder end of the 25-44 spectrum, which is not surprising. Nothing else too shocking here. Besides dead young people reported to VAERS in the context of the magical COVID-19 injections.

I wanted to know how many deaths were reported per month so that I could compare the distribution to the overt excess in mortality reported by the CDC in late summer 2021. Below is a plot of all deaths in the combined data sets per month in 2021. (1 = January → 12 = December).

There is a peak in death reports (this is according to RECVDATE - date the entry was received to the front-end data set) in April and in August. This accounts for all deaths reported to VAERS regardless of time from injection date. Interestingly, if we only plot the death reports for this age group that were received at least 30 days following injection, we see a shift to a single ‘peak’ in late summer than appears to maintain itself.

This is interesting because it coincides with the same time that we see the excess mortality in the CDC data. This becomes clearer when we the data is superimposed. There is a peak in deaths in this age group at the same time as the peak in deaths overall for this age group as per the CDC excess mortality data.

The question remains, what is killing the millenials? The timing fits for the delayed entries and there’s also a peak in August/September for entries arising within 30 days of the injections. I am not sure if this is significant yet. Still thinking on it.

I believe that drug-related deaths and suicides are accounting for some of the deaths in this age group based on the upward trend from previous years.

Determining the percentages of deaths attributed to all of the different causes for this particular age group is tricky. It might be me and my desire for organization and order in data, but I find these 2 things are lacking in the source data.

From what I can see so far, the suicides and overdoses, even though they have been on the rise for the past 2 years, comprise only a small percentage of the deaths in this age group.4

Surprisingly, malignant neoplasms outrank all other ‘select’ death causes across all age groups and have done so for many years. I am also surprised not to see the overdoses and suicides listed in the select cause of death list as plotted below even though, percentage-wise, neither comprise even 1% of the total death count for this age group.

To be continued…

1

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8689980/

2

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db428.htm

3

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/suicide.htm

4

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db398.htm#fig5

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

Images from above...

 

 

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

January 14, 2022
France: Court rules COVID Vaccine-related Death a Suicide
Businessman’s Multi-Million Dollar Life Insurance Not Paid
[“Experimental Vaccine” – Voluntary – Declared side-effects]
https://en.rua.gr/2022/01/14/france-court-rules-covid-vaccine-related-death-a-suicide/

FULL ARTICLE
In France, the court equated vaccination with suicide, taking the side of an insurance company that refused to pay money to the family of an insured millionaire who died from vaccination.

The case caused a huge resonance in society. An elderly businessman who died from vaccination, which was officially confirmed, insured his life for several million. However, after his death, the relatives were left with nothing, writes Unser Mitteleuropa.

In France, the case of a wealthy elderly Parisian businessman who insured his life for many millions and died from COVID-vaccination caused a great resonance. The insurance company refused to pay money to the relatives of the deceased, and the court found the company to be right. At the same time, the insurance company argued its refusal precisely by the fact that death occurred as a result of the vaccination: taking experimental drugs and treatments (including vaccination against coronavirus) is excluded from the policy. The judge’s verdict is as follows:

“The side effects of an experimental vaccine are being made public, and the deceased could not have professed ignorance when voluntarily taking the vaccine. There is no law or regulation in France requiring him to be vaccinated. Therefore, his death is, in fact, a suicide.
The Court recognizes the qualification of an insurer who legally regards participation in the third phase experiment, the lack of evidence of which has not been proven, as the voluntary assumption of a fatal risk not covered by the contract, taking into account the declared side effects, including death is covered and legally recognized as suicide. “
The family filed an appeal. However, the insurer’s defense is recognized as reasonable and contractually justified, since this well-known risk of death is legally considered suicide, the client was notified and agreed to voluntarily risk his life without being forced to do so.

The insurance company noted that suicide, like death from an experimental drug, is not an insured event. The lawyer for the family of Carlo Alberto Brusa published the case materials on social networks and expressed his outrage at such a decision. It appears that insurers will now stop paying out life insurance policies on a large scale, as the death risk from vaccination effectively blocks their contract, rendering it void.

After the publication of similar cases in France, something similar was heard from the United States.
Paul Graham, Senior Vice President for Policy Development at the American Life Insurers Council, says:

“Life insurance companies may refuse to pay out for vaccinated people because Covid vaccines are “medical experiments”. When deciding on the payment of damages, it is taken into account whether the insured has received a COVID vaccine. Life insurance contracts are very clear on how policies work and what reasons, if any, can lead to a denial of payment.
The COVID-19 vaccine is not one of them. An assessment of an applicant’s insurance capacity is not affected by an individual’s immunization status.”

The publication notes that, upon request, domestic insurance companies promise not to make benefits dependent on the appropriate vaccination status, both for those who have been vaccinated and for those who have not been vaccinated. But everyone knows that vaccination campaigners are calling for the unvaccinated to be penalized in terms of costs if they stay in the hospital. The information from France in the article refers to the referenced sources and to information provided by Nicole Delepin, former Head of Pediatric Oncology Medicine at Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, on the Riposte Laïque website.

Steve Kirsch – If you die from the vaccine, your life insurance company may not pay out
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/if-you-die-from-the-vaccine-your?s=r

VIDEO 2 minutes – Via America’s Frontline Doctors
Dr. Peterson Pierre “Vaccine” Death Insurance Payout Denied
https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/videos/post/frontline-flashtm-daily-dose-vax-death-insurance-payout-denied-with-dr-peterson-pierre/

American Life Insurers Council
https://www.acli.com/consumer-info/covid19

Brian Peckford
DEATH FROM VACCINE RULED SUICIDE – INSURANCE DID NOT PAY THE LIFE POLICY.
https://peckford42.wordpress.com/2022/01/15/well-what-do-you-know-death-from-vaccine-ruled-suicide-insurance-did-not-pay-the-life-policy/

En France, décès après la vaccination d’un grand-père très fortuné, ancien chef d’entreprise parisien de Versailles, avec assurance vie de plusieurs millions d’euro pour le bénéfice de ses enfants et petits-enfants, l’assurance ne rembourse pas et ne paye pas la prime de plusieurs millions d’euro….
https://ns2017.wordpress.com/2022/01/06/en-france-deces-apres-la-vaccination-dun-grand-pere-tres-fortune-ancien-chef-dentreprise-parisien-de-versailles-avec-assurance-vie-de-plusieurs-millions-deuro-pour-le-benefice-de-ses-enfants/

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

More people died who took the drug than those who didn’t take the drug. The Pfizer 6 month study showed that more people died who got the drug than who got the placebo (they conveniently forgot to mention this in the abstract or conclusion). Isn’t it supposed to be the other way around? Where is the RCT showing an all-cause death benefit? See this article for updated numbers in the pre-unblinding phase showing 21 dead who took the drug vs. 17 dead who took the placebo. And how was Pfizer certain that none of the people who got the drug was killed by the vaccine? What tests were done during the autopsies that exonerated the drug? These tests were never revealed and they are still being kept hidden for some odd reason. Since the vaccine wasn’t the cause, why not make the autopsy reports and tests done public that prove this?

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/20-questions-they-dont-want-to-answer?s=r

[TailingsPond + 461]

2 hours ago, Tom Nolan said:

More people died who took the drug than those who didn’t take the drug. The Pfizer 6 month study showed that more people died who got the drug than who got the placebo (they conveniently forgot to mention this in the abstract or conclusion).

 

Actually read the Pifzer study and appendices. You are wrong.

 

But thanks for posting the link which supports the vaccine:

"In this update to the preliminary safety and efficacy report of two 30-μg doses, at 21 days apart, of BNT162b2, 91.1% vaccine efficacy against Covid-19 was observed from 7 days to 6 months after the second dose in participants 12 years of age or older. Vaccine efficacy against severe disease with an onset after receipt of the first dose was approximately 97%. This finding, combined with the totality of available evidence, including real-world effectiveness data,^15-18 alleviates theoretical concerns over potential enhancement of vaccine-mediated disease.¹⁹

https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2110345/suppl_file/nejmoa2110345_appendix.pdf

 

Edited March 27, 2022 by TailingsPond

[Old-Ruffneck + 1,177]

4 hours ago, TailingsPond said:

Actually read the Pifzer study and appendices. You are wrong.

Did you just look at page 16 and 17? There is nothing about death from related real and placebo shots. Tho I coulda misread the charts..but no think so.

Edited March 27, 2022 by Old-Ruffneck
add

[TailingsPond + 461]

3 hours ago, Old-Ruffneck said:

Did you just look at page 16 and 17? There is nothing about death from related real and placebo shots. Tho I coulda misread the charts..but no think so.

I read the whole thing.

The misinformation that Tom is pushing is on page 11.

15 of 21,296 died (of any cause) in the vaccine arm versus 14 of 21,291 in the placebo arm.  That is not statistically significant by a long shot.

What is meaningful is that zero people died of covid in the vaccine arm and two people died of covid in the placebo arm.  There is nothing about deaths from injection adverse events (vax or placebo) because none happened.

People still die of other causes....

 

Edited March 28, 2022 by TailingsPond

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

23 hours ago, TailingsPond said:

Actually read the Pifzer study and appendices. You are wrong.

 

But thanks for posting the link which supports the vaccine:

"In this update to the preliminary safety and efficacy report of two 30-μg doses, at 21 days apart, of BNT162b2, 91.1% vaccine efficacy against Covid-19 was observed from 7 days to 6 months after the second dose in participants 12 years of age or older. Vaccine efficacy against severe disease with an onset after receipt of the first dose was approximately 97%. This finding, combined with the totality of available evidence, including real-world effectiveness data,^15-18 alleviates theoretical concerns over potential enhancement of vaccine-mediated disease.¹⁹

https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2110345/suppl_file/nejmoa2110345_appendix.pdf

 

More people died in the key clinical trial for Pfizer's Covid vaccine than the company publicly reported

Pfizer told the world 15 people who received the vaccine in its trial had died as of mid-March. Turns out the real number then was 21, compared to only 17 deaths in people who hadn't been vaccinated.

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/more-people-died-in-the-key-clinical?s=r

On July 28, Pfizer and its partner BioNTech posted a six-month data update from their key Covid vaccine clinical trial, the one that led regulators worldwide to okay the shot.

At a time when questions about vaccine effectiveness were rising, the report received worldwide attention. Pfizer said the vaccine’s efficacy remained relatively strong, at 84 percent after six months.

It also reported 15 of the roughly 22,000 people who received the vaccine in the trial had died, compared to 14 of the 22,000 people who received placebo (a saline shot that didn’t contain the vaccine).

These were not just Covid deaths. In fact, they were mostly not from Covid. Only three of the people in the trial died of Covid-related illnesses - one who received the vaccine, and two who who received the saline shot. The other deaths were from other illnesses and diseases, mostly cardiovascular.

Researchers call this datapoint “all-cause mortality.” Pfizer barely mentioned it, stuffing the details of the deaths in an appendix to the report.

But all-cause mortality is arguably the MOST important measure for any drug or vaccine - especially one meant to be given prophylactically to large numbers of healthy people, as vaccines are.

(SOURCE: Appendix to “Six Month Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine,” available at https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.28.21261159v1.supplementary-material)

Although the researchers released their update in July, the data was already more than four months old. They had stopped collecting information about deaths as of March 13, the “data cut-off.”

But even at the time, their figures were somewhat troubling.

In their initial safety report to the FDA, which contained data through November 2020, the researchers had said four placebo recipients and two vaccine recipients died, one after the first dose and one after the second. The July update reversed that trend. Between November 2020 and March 2021, 13 vaccine recipients died, compared to only 10 placebo subjects.

Further, nine vaccine recipients had died from cardiovascular events such as heart attacks or strokes, compared to six placebo recipients who died of those causes. The imbalance was small but notable, considering that regulators worldwide had found that the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines were linked to heart inflammation in young men.

(I reported accurately on this study on Twitter on July 29, and the next day Twitter suspended me for a week for doing so, the fourth of my five defamatory “strikes” for Covid “misinformation.”)

At best, the results suggested that the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine - now pushed on nearly a billion people worldwide at a cost of tens of billions of dollars and ruinous and worsening civil liberties restrictions - did nothing to reduce overall deaths.

Worse, Pfizer and BioNTech had vaccinated almost all the placebo recipients in the trial shortly after the Food and Drug Administration okayed the vaccine for emergency use on Dec. 11, 2020.

As a result, they had destroyed our best chance to compare the long-term health of a large number of vaccine recipients with a scientifically balanced group of people who had not received the drug. The July 28 report appeared to be the last clean safety data update we would ever have.

—

But now the FDA has given us one more.

On November 8, the agency released its “Summary Basis for Regulatory Action,” a 30-page note explaining why on August 23 it granted full approval to Pfizer’s vaccine, replacing the emergency authorization from December 2020.

SOURCE: https://www.fda.gov/media/151733/download

And buried on page 23 of the report is this stunning sentence:

From Dose 1 through the March 13, 2021 data cutoff date, there were a total of 38 deaths, 21 in the COMIRNATY [vaccine] group and 17 in the placebo group.

Pfizer said publicly in July it had found 15 deaths among vaccine recipients by mid-March. But it told the FDA there were 21 - at the same data cutoff end date, March 13.

21.

Not 15.

The placebo figure in the trial was also wrong. Pfizer had 17 deaths among placebo recipients, not 14. Nine extra deaths overall, six among vaccine recipients.

Could the discrepancy result from some odd data lag? Maybe, but the FDA briefing book also contains the number of Covid cases that Pfizer found in vaccine recipients in the trial. Those figures are EXACTLY the same as those Pfizer posted publicly in July.

Yet the death counts were different.

Pfizer somehow miscounted - or publicly misreported, or both - the number of deaths in one of the most important clinical trials in the history of medicine.

And the FDA’s figures paint a notably more worrisome picture of the vaccine than the public July numbers. Though the absolute numbers are small, overall deaths were 24 percent higher among vaccine recipients.

The update also shows that 19 vaccine recipients died between November and March, compared to 13 placebo recipients - a difference of almost 50 percent.

Were the extra deaths cardiac-related? It is impossible to know. The FDA did not report any additional details of the deaths, saying only that none “were considered related to vaccination.”

But with tens of thousands of post-vaccine deaths now reported in the United States and Europe - and overall non-Covid death rates now running well above normal in many countries - a fresh look at that vague reassurance cannot happen soon enough.

(NOTE: I initially accidentally swapped the vaccine and placebo Covid deaths - two people who received placebo died of Covid in the trial, and one who received the vaccine. This error does not affect the overall figures.)

Edited March 28, 2022 by Tom Nolan

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/22000-increase-in-deaths-following-covid-vaccines-for-adults-over-50-as-fda-authorizes-2nd-booster-for-this-age-group/

There are currently 14,752 deaths recorded in VAERS for people over the age of 50 following a COVID-19 vaccine, covering a period of 15 months. That’s an average of 983 deaths a month for this age group.

Here are the results for this age group for the previous 30 years following ALL vaccines in VAERS. (Source.) There were 1,590 deaths recorded following ALL vaccines for the previous 30 years for people older than 50. So if we divide that number by 360 months we get a monthly average of 4.4 deaths.

So we have seen a increase in deaths 22,000% for people over the age of 50 following COVID-19 vaccines, and the FDA just authorized another booster for those who are left in this age group.

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/covid-19-vaccine-massacre-68000-increase-in-strokes-44000-increase-in-heart-disease-6800-increase-in-deaths-over-non-covid-vaccines/

• 68,000% increase in strokes
• 44,000% increase in heart disease
• 6,800% increase in deaths
• 5,700% increase in permanent disabilities
• 5,000% increase in life threatening injuries
• 4,400% increase in hospitalizations

 

 

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

“The most potent vaccination is getting infected yourself” - Dr. Fauci

(30 second video)  Fauci emphasizes this point.

https://twitter.com/ElijahSchaffer/status/1509569204638433280

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

https://www.theepochtimes.com/9-in-10-covid-deaths-are-in-vaccinated-people-report_4339503.html?utm_source=Morningbrief&utm_campaign=mb-2022-03-16&utm_medium=email&est=GFCCiwJ8TWRHfSxMbWTHENXi%2BtVifYWeJAzsXJEnC4pyohhnTtM8KFIuvcSjJU5V6Q4%2BQw%3D%3D

9 in 10 COVID Deaths Are in Vaccinated People: Report

A report released by the UK government has confirmed that 9 out of every 10 deaths related to COVID-19 are found in those who are fully vaccinated. Although the virus variant is the same and the UK approved only one different vaccine (AstraZeneca) from the United States, the data in the U.S. are different. This may be due in large part to the CDC definition used to identify who is “vaccinated.”

U.S. data are also likely to become even more sparse in the coming weeks and months. In addition to the CDC hiding data, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) quietly decided in early February to stop recording deaths attributed to COVID-19.

Data Is Essential

Yet, data is the foundation of scientific analysis. Without it, researchers are unable to analyze statistics and draw conclusions, which leaves public health experts unable to make accurate recommendations. Knowledge gives you the power to make informed decisions based on evidence.

Six months into the pandemic, a report revealed that most Americans had significant misconceptions of the COVID-19 risks. Months later, a second survey demonstrated that not much had changed. While analysts blamed “ignorance of fundamental, undisputed facts on who is at risk” for the so-called misconceptions, others said the politicization of the pandemic was also at fault. But there were other factors at play that skewed the data scientists thought they had.

According to a whistleblower who worked on Pfizer’s Phase 3 COVID injection clinical trials, data were falsified, patients were unblinded, the company hired poorly trained people to administer the injections and follow up on reported side effects lagged way behind. Her testimony was published November 2, 2021, in the British Medical Journal by investigative journalist Paul Thacker.

This is yet another indication that the true number of adverse events and deaths from the shots currently identified as COVID vaccines may never be known. The only logical conclusion to draw is that the data don’t support the Warp Speed production and mass vaccination program initiated in early 2020.

In fact, the shot program not only is ineffective, but also has likely damaged and killed far more people than any health agency will ever publicly admit. It is essential to share this information to help prevent more deaths and damaged lives.

UK Government Report: 90 Percent of Deaths Are in Fully Vaccinated

A reporter from The Exposé points out that while the world has been distracted by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the UK government quietly released a report that confirmed 9 in every 10 deaths from COVID-19 in England were in people who were fully vaccinated.

The February 2022 report was from the UK Health Security Agency, which publishes weekly surveillance. The report contains several tables of raw data showing that the vast majority of people who were infected, hospitalized or died from COVID-19 were fully vaccinated.

The Exposé, demonstrated step by step how the data, gathered from Jan. 24, 2022, through February 28, 2022, supported this assertion. In the UK, health authorities differentiate between those who have never received a shot and those who received one, two or three doses. All told, there were 1,086,434 cases of COVID in vaccinated individuals that accounted for 73 percent of all cases during that period.

When children were removed from the equation, vaccinated individuals accounted for 91 percent of all cases. The reporter also compared data taken in 2021 when Delta was the dominant variant against the current report when Omicron is the dominant variant in England. It showed a higher number of children hospitalized for Omicron than for Delta.

Since children have never been at high risk for severe disease from any COVID variant, it begs the question if the current number of children hospitalized with COVID-19 may be due to increased PCR testing—known to have a high false-positive rate—in children hospitalized for other reasons, such as a broken leg or appendicitis.

When children were included in the figures for hospitalization, the data showed 75 percent of those hospitalized with COVID in the current period were vaccinated. But, when children were removed from the equation, 85 percent of the hospitalized individuals were vaccinated. Similar results were found when the data were analyzed for COVID deaths.

During the four-week period in the current report, vaccinated individuals accounted for 89 percent of deaths. Most interestingly, not only are the deaths in vaccinated individuals rising precipitously, but the number of deaths in those who are not vaccinated is dropping.

Vaccinated Deaths Rising in California

Headlines in the March 7, 2022, Mercury News read, “COVID-19 Deaths in California Among Vaccinated Rose Sharply With Omicron.” The corresponding story added that 10 deaths recorded in Santa Cruz County, California, and nine of those were vaccinated. On the surface, this is similar to findings reported from the UK. Yet, the raw numbers in the United States are different.

This is likely because U.S. data do not differentiate between individuals who have had one, two or three shots. In fact, the U.S. CDC clearly states that you can only be considered fully vaccinated two weeks after receiving the final dose in the primary two-shot series from Pfizer and Moderna or the one shot from Johnson & Johnson.

Therefore, as the UK analyzes data that identify individuals on the spectrum of having received one of three shots, the United States only counts vaccination if you’re two weeks after your last dose. Since not all patients who are fully vaccinated are identified on admission, analyzing U.S. numbers is difficult, if not impossible. You must ask yourself if this is intentional.

It probably is safe to assume that if a person in the United States is identified as being vaccinated, they are likely fully vaccinated by CDC standards. However, there are also likely individuals lumped into the unvaccinated group who have had one or two shots or may even be fully vaccinated by CDC standards but were not counted as such on admission.

The Mercury News justified the vaccinated deaths, writing: “Of the vaccinated patients who died, one was in his early 100s, three were in their 90s, two were in their 80s, three were in their 70s and most had underlying health problems. The unvaccinated man who died was in his 50s.”

While age is certainly a significant factor in any infectious disease including COVID, the article did not mention any of the other CDC-identified comorbidities that contribute to COVID deaths. To add to the misinformation, the article quoted Dr. Errol Ozdalga, a hospitalist at Stanford, who told the Mercury News that patients admitted during the Delta wave and earlier infections were otherwise healthy.

The implication is that those with comorbidities the CDC identified as increasing the risk of severe illness, such as heart disease, diabetes, obesity, chronic kidney disease and immunocompromised, were not hospitalized with COVID before Omicron.

““That went away with Omicron,” Ozdalga said. The variant has afflicted those with weakened immune systems, those who were “predisposed in some way” to severe illness, he said.” Additionally, without supporting information, the news report included a simple statement:

“Dr. George Rutherford, an infectious disease expert at UC-San Francisco, said the raw numbers make the deaths among the vaccinated look worse than they are — their rates of dying remain far less than the unvaccinated.”

Economist Survey Reveals Significant Vaccine Injury Rate

Economist Mark Skidmore executed a critical online survey using the U.S. population to estimate damage from the COVID-19 shots. He presented the most recent and significant data²⁰ from the ongoing study at the Doctors for COVID Ethics Symposium 3.

His paper seeks to understand the number of people who have died from the COVID shots that he estimates based on the survey. He used the survey to triangulate information from the general population and what they are experiencing.

The participants were asked to report on the adverse events of people they knew best in their social circle — in other words, good friends or family members. The surveys were close to representative of the general population in age, income and gender in December 2021.

Skidmore first presented a list of adverse events the FDA acknowledged could be possible and compared it against the documented data of injury and deaths from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) published in OpenVAERS.

Some of the most common events on the list were stroke, heart attack, myocarditis, death, thrombocytopenia and venous thromboembolism (blood clots). According to Skidmore, everyone agrees that adverse events can and do occur — the main difference in opinion is how often and how many.

Skidmore then looked at the ratio between COVID illness fatalities and COVID shot fatalities. The ratio in OpenVAERS is 2.6 percent and in VAERS (the number reported by the CDC that doesn’t contain all data originally substantiated) it’s 0.9 percent.

If these numbers reflect reality, the number of people who report injury or death in the survey should be close to zero since the cohort is small enough that it may not capture such a small percentage. Skidmore then asks, if we assume that the survey is a reflection of the true ratio in the population, what is the true population ratio for injury or death after receiving the COVID-19 shot?

From the data collected the ratio reveals there have been 307,997 deaths from the shot. The method used gives a 95 percent confidence interval between 215,018 and 391,410 deaths. Using the same mathematical approach to identify the number of severe adverse events to the general population, the data show there were roughly 1.1 million severe events and 2.3 million less severe events from the shot.

He acknowledges that much of what people see and report is through the lens of their biases. One of those is political affiliation. He showed that people who identified as Democrats reported far fewer shot-related deaths than did Republicans or independents. This likely also affects the number of deaths and adverse events reported to VAERS.

Using the fatality counts by party affiliation, he found that if the Democrat perception was correct, there were 119,000 fatalities compared to 487,000 fatalities if the Republican perception was correct. This gives a potential range of deaths and illustrates the differences in perceptions of people based on how they see the world. However, no matter which number is used, it is still far more than the number of fatalities reported in the VAERS system.

Unprecedented US Death Toll Keeps Rising

While the data from Skidmore and the UK reflect the death rate from COVID-19, it is also important to track the number of all-cause mortality as it’s one of the most reliable data points we have. This statistic is clear-cut. Either a person is dead or they’re not. It does not rely on the reason for death.

In early 2022, mutual insurance holding company OneAmerica announced an increase in the death rate of working Americans, aged 18 to 64, in the third quarter of 2021. Their data show it was 40 percent higher than prepandemic levels.

Other insurance companies have also cited higher mortality rates, including the Hartford Insurance Group that announced mortality increased 32 percent from 2019 and 20 percent from 2020 before the shots. Lincoln National reported death claims have increased 13.7 percent year over year and 54 percent in quarter four of 2021 compared to 2019.

Funeral homes are also posting an increase in burials and cremations in 2021 over 2020. One large German health insurance company reported their company data were nearly 14 times greater than the number of deaths reported by the German government. This data were gathered directly from doctors applying for payment from a sample of 10.9 million people.

The rising death toll that can be linked to the COVID shots is an inconvenient truth for the health agencies that have promoted mass vaccinations with a genetic therapy experiment. In what appears to be a response to this data, Health and Human Services (HHS) have decided to stop the reporting requirements for hospitals and acute care facilities on COVID-19 deaths.

Although the information is published on the HHS website, fact-checkers have claimed the viral social media posts are “false” by simply changing the headline.²⁹ So, while the HHS publicly announced they would no longer require hospitals to report deaths from COVID-19, fact-checkers erroneously report the U.S. government is not ending daily COVID death reporting.

If it helps to sort all this out, an unnamed federal health official actually acknowledged the move to stop reporting COVID-19 hospital deaths when they spoke with a reporter from WSWS, calling the move “incomprehensible.” The official added, “It is the only consistent, reliable and actionable dataset at the federal level. Ninety-nine percent of hospitals report 100% of the data every day. I don’t know any scientists who want to have less data.”

CDC Withholds Data, Fearing Hesitancy and Misinterpretation

When data from multiple sources all reveal the same trends and values, it’s easy to see how the CDC would be unwilling to acknowledge the information or want to release their data for fear it would have a negative impact on the mass vaccination campaign. February 20, 2022, The New York Times reported the CDC still had not published large parts of the data they collected during the pandemic.

While they have published data on the effectiveness of boosters in some individuals, data from people 18 to 49 years were left out. Interestingly, this is also the group who are the least likely to benefit from the shot, since they have some of the lowest rates of severe disease and death as reported by the CDC.

In comments to The New York Times, a CDC spokesperson attempted to justify why the organization had withheld large portions of data since the beginning of the pandemic. She said the data were “not yet ready for prime time,” that the information may be misinterpreted to mean the vaccines are ineffective and that the data they have is based on 10 percent of the U.S. population, which the Times pointed out is the same sample size used to track influenza each year.

Without raw data from the United States, scientists have relied on Israeli data. One study gathered information from 4.6 million people ages 16 and older who had received two doses of the Pfizer vaccine. They compared severe illness and death between those who had the booster and those who did not. The data showed the group from 16 to 29 years had zero deaths whether they were boosted or not.

Likewise, the group from 30 to 39 years had one death whether they were boosted or not. In fact, the difference in death rate did not rise until the participants were 60 to 69 years, at which point the non-boosted group had 44 deaths and the boosted group had 32 deaths.

In an opinion piece, Staten Island Advance’s Tom Wrobleski characterizes the CDC’s decision, writing about what has happened to most people who have been willing to publish data and opinions that go against a national or international health agency’s narrative:

“We’re told to have faith in the CDC, in Dr. Anthony Fauci, in all the experts who are trained to handle public health crises.

But we can’t have trust if vital information is withheld from us. Because then it becomes a case of, “Shut up and do what we say. We’re the experts. You don’t need to know how we come to our decisions. We know what’s best.”

And if you question the received wisdom, you’re suddenly a dangerous person. You’re likened to a terrorist. You’re told you want people to die. You get banned from social media.

If you dare protest, you can have your bank account frozen and your vehicle insurance suspended, as we saw during the Freedom Convoy protest in Canada. You can get trampled by police on horseback.

Withholding information only makes people more skeptical. It breeds suspicion. Or mere doubt. The CDC needs to do better if it wants our trust.”

Originally published March 15, 2022 on Mercola.com

Sources and References

• The Exposé, March 1, 2022
• NHS, Feb. 24, 2022
• Food and Drug Administration, March 8, 2022
• Mercury News, March 6, 2022
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Jan. 16, 2022
• The New York Times, Feb. 20, 2022
• Health Data.gov, Jan. 6, 2022
• Wirepoints, Aug. 19, 2020
• CNN, Feb. 10, 2021
• The BMJ 2021; 375:n2635
• UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report, Feb. 24, 2022
• Mercury News, March 7, 2022
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Jan. 16, 2022, When are you up to date, chart 3 lines down
• Bitchute, Sept. 18, 2021, Min 1:01:30
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Feb. 25, 2022
• Mark Skidmore, How Many People Died from the Covid-19 Inoculations?
• Rumble, Feb. 18, 2022, Minute 3:38:00 starts
• Open VAERS, COVID Data
• The Center Square, Jan. 1, 2022
• Zero Hedge, Feb. 5, 2022
• Health Impact News, Feb. 23, 2022
• Greater Mountain Publishing, Feb. 27, 2022
• MSN, Jan. 28, 2022, Headline and What We Found
• WSWS, Feb. 3, 2022
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Jan. 31, 2022
• NEJM, 2021; 385:2421
•  SI Live, Feb. 27, 2022

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

On 3/24/2022 at 10:33 AM, Tom Nolan said:

https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/41834-dead-3-9-million-injured-following-covid-vaccines-in-european-database-as-u-s-military-deaths-soar-1100/

 

 

 

https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/42507-dead-3984978-injured-following-covid-vaccines-in-european-database-of-adverse-reactions/

42,507 DEAD 3,984,978 Injured Following COVID Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions

 

[TailingsPond + 461]

On 4/3/2022 at 4:29 PM, Tom Nolan said:

9 in 10 COVID Deaths Are in Vaccinated People

 

Your understanding of math is very poor or purposely manipulative (or the math of the people you copy and paste). 

When essentially 100% of the elderly and people with pre-existing conditions are vaccinated you expect most of the covid deaths to come from vaccinated people.  

Get it through your head, when the vast majority of people are vaccinated you can make any dumb stat you want about it.  "Nine out of ten car accidents were caused by vaccinated people." "100% of goals scored in the NHL were by vaccinated players." "99% of university professors are vaccinated."

 

 

Edited April 7, 2022 by TailingsPond

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

3 hours ago, TailingsPond said:

 

Your understanding of math is very poor or purposely manipulative (or the math of the people you copy and paste). 

When essentially 100% of the elderly and people with per-existing conditions are vaccinated you expect most of the covid deaths to come from vaccinated people.  

Get it through your head, when the vast majority of people are vaccinated you can make any dumb stat you want about it.  "Nine out of ten car accidents were caused by vaccinated people." "100% of goals scored in the NHL were by vaccinated players." "99% of university professors are vaccinated."

 

 

TailingsPond, Do you think that the Covid vaccines are completely safe? 

And do you think that the Covid vaccines are effective at stopping infection and stopping transmission of the virus as originally promised by the CDC and other Authoritarians?

[TailingsPond + 461]

2 hours ago, Tom Nolan said:

TailingsPond, Do you think that the Covid vaccines are completely safe? 

And do you think that the Covid vaccines are effective at stopping infection and stopping transmission of the virus as originally promised by the CDC and other Authoritarians?

Nothing is completely safe. Taking a simple bath has a significant risk of death or serious injury (drowning, slips, burns, infection), especially in older populations.

As originally [presented], no. However, there is still significant evidence the vaccine helps.   I admit the vaccines are disappointing.  They certainly do not work like some older vaccines that gave essentially 100% immunity to the pathogen.

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

https://defeatthemandatesus.com/

MUSIC – “Heart of Freedom“

HEART OF FREEDOM. THE WORLD IS WAKING UP AGAINST GLOBAL TYRANNY
(95 second Video)
https://youtu.be/DMk0JWYigRc

“Heart of Freedom”
Lyrics by: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. • Music Produced by: Dicky Barrett • Performed by: Grant Ellman, Prezence Music • Video Produced by: Children’s Health Defense, Brian Burrowes, Dicky Barrett, Aimee Villella McBride • Footage Courtesy of: Oracle Films, Matt Veligdan, Souls of a Movement

Here is the 4 minute FULL VERSION:
“Heart of Freedom” music video for Worldwide Protests Against Medical Tyranny
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vgCO3Jz548Y2/
…and at Odysee…
https://odysee.com/@Truth_Comes_to_Light:6/heart-of-freedom:8

Dicky Barrett (Richard Michael Barrett) was well known as the announcer for ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel Live! until 2022. Barrett has spent the majority of his musical career playing for decades with The Mighty Mighty BosstoneS until the band’s breakup in 2022.
The VAX vs UnVAX issue is what led to the end of both.

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

Pfizer wants the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization for their COVID-19 vaccines to be injected in babies and children under the age of 5.

https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/newly-revealed-document-shows-pfizer-needed-to-hire-an-additional-1800-employees-to-process-adverse-reactions-to-their-covid-19-vaccine/

[ZERO HEDGE featured this article also.]

Newly Revealed Document Shows Pfizer Needed to Hire an Additional 1800 Employees to Process Adverse Reactions to Their COVID-19 Vaccine

EXCERPT:  Pfizer has “taken a multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports,” according to the document. “This includes significant technology enhancements, and process and workflow solutions, as well as increasing the number of data entry and case processing colleagues.”

[Rob Plant + 2,605]

On 4/3/2022 at 11:29 PM, Tom Nolan said:

9 in 10 COVID Deaths Are in Vaccinated People: Report

Tom over 90% of people have been vaccinated in the UK and pretty much every single person alive over 50 has been vaccinated.

Old people die, its a fact. Old people have less chance of fighting off Covid and generally die of something totally unrelated but happen to have Covid when they die.

This story is scaremongering, the vast majority of hospitalizations in the UK from Covid are the unvaccinated most doctors claim at least 90%.

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

Full List at this WEBPAGE.  https://goodsciencing.com/covid/athletes-suffer-cardiac-arrest-die-after-covid-shot/

The number has grown in recent weeks...

910 Athlete Cardiac Arrests, Serious Issues, 595 Dead, After COVID Shot

It is definitely not normal for so many mainly young athletes to suffer from cardiac arrests or to die while playing their sport, but this year it is happening. Many of these heart issues and deaths come shortly after they got a COVID vaccine. While it is possible this can happen to people who did not get a COVID vaccine, the sheer numbers clearly point to the only obvious cause.

The so-called health professionals running the COVID vaccine programs around the world keep repeating that “the COVID vaccine is a normal vaccine and it is safe and effective.”...

...Initially, many of these were not reported. We know that many people were told not to tell anyone about their adverse reactions and the media was not reporting them. They started happening and ramping up after the first COVID vaccinations. The mainstream media still are not reporting most. ...We also note that many posts in Facebook, Instagram, twitter, forums and news stories are being removed. So now we are receiving some messages saying there is no proof of the event or of vaccination status. That is partly because this information is being hidden.

[ARTICLE CONTINUES followed by list of people.]

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

"You Use Lockdowns To Get People Vaccinated" ????!

When discussing lockdowns in China, Dr. Anthony Fauci says:  “You use lockdowns to get people vaccinated so that when you open up, you won’t have a surge of infections.  Because you’re dealing with an immunologically naive [not exposed to the virus and thus obtaining natural immunity] population of the virus because they’ve not been exposed because of the lockdown.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/watch-fauci-admits-you-use-lockdowns-get-people-vaccinated

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

Why the Vaccinated Are MUCH More Likely To Support a No-Fly Zone in Ukraine…

https://youtu.be/HmvI58xhrUI

https://www.thedailybell.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/0000-4.png

You might think the number of COVID vaccines a person has taken has nothing to do with their support for NATO military intervention in Ukraine…
UNLESS something else is going on.
Could it be the same people susceptible to media fear propaganda about COVID are just as taken in by the propaganda that says the US should be involved militarily in Ukraine?

 

Edited April 15, 2022 by Tom Nolan

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

7,500% Increase in Recorded Cases of Cancer Following COVID-19 Vaccines on VAERS Report

https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/7500-increase-in-recorded-cases-of-cancer-following-covid-19-vaccines/

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

Walgreens Covid VAX Tracker Exposes the Vaccination Fallacy

Dr. Paul Alexander shows GRAPHS in this short substack article.
Notice the Covid-19 positivity rate in the Unvaccinated (6.9%) compared to those who had a third shot (17.1%).
Thus, this could demonstrate that a person is almost 2 1/2 times more likely to get Covid-19 if they had a booster shot.
Walgreens COVID-19 Index; new data and it mirrors the UK data; one week data; but shows what we have been arguing, those vaccinated and by increased dose, are at increased risk of infection
https://palexander.substack.com/p/walgreens-covid-19-index-new-data?s=r

At the 45:23 minute mark, Jefferey Jaxen walks viewers through the Walmart data (and more) on “The Highwire” of April 21st…
EPISODE 264: FORCE OF NATURE
https://thehighwire.com/videos/episode-264-force-of-nature/

https://palexander.substack.com/p/walgreens-covid-19-index-new-data?s=r

Walgreens COVID-19 Index; new data and it mirrors the UK data; one week data; but shows what we have been arguing, those vaccinated and by increased dose, are at increased risk of infection

I updated the infection chart 6th to the 12th April...see the 2nd chart

Dr. Paul Alexander

Walgreens data source

 

 

Edited April 25, 2022 by Tom Nolan

[Tom Nolan + 2,441]

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/04/no_author/moderna-knew-vaccinated-people-will-never-acquire-proper-immunity-after-breakthrough-infections/

Moderna Knew Vaccinated People Will Never Acquire Proper Immunity After Breakthrough Infections

`Ever wondered why some vaccinated people seem to be having endless Covids? An interesting study came out.

This study looked at two sides of the Moderna Phase 3 vaccine trial: the vaccinated group and the control group. They looked at unvaccinated people having Covid, versus vaccinated people having so called “break-through Covid infections”.

The question that they asked, was: do the vaccinated acquire the same full-spectrum immunity as the unvaccinated?

The answer was no. Vaccinated people were much LESS likely to develop broad natural immunity, compared to unvaccinated people.

Broad Natural Immunity and Nucleocapsid Antibodies

I discuss the definition of broad spectrum immunity and explain nucleocapsid antibodies in my Nov 18 article “UK Week 42-45”. I am going to plagiarize myself and copy the text right here to make it easy for my readers:

What are these N antibodies and why am I talking about them? What’s so important?

The Covid coronavirus presents numerous “epitopes” to our immune system. Those are similar to body parts in people, those are things that the virus presents to our body just as we “present” our eyes, mouths and nose.

After defeating an infection, our immune system learns to recognize these “epitopes” and reacts later, when the pathogen is reintroduced, fighting it off easier than the first time. This is the whole point of immunity.

Skipping some details, our natural, unvaccinated immunity learns to recognize the “spikes” (S-protein), the “nucleocapsid” (N-Protein) and other pieces of the virus, and develops antibodies and immune memory reacting to all of those.

This multifaceted memory also provides broader protection against “variants”.

In contrast, vaccination with any existing Covid vaccine, floods our cells with only S-protein (the “spike protein”) from a virus that only existed around January 2020. As an aside, this spike protein is extremely toxic, it causes numerous side effects that we have heard about. Its effects depend on many things such as how exactly you were jabbed and how much of the vaccine entered the blood stream. S-protein can also penetrate cell nuclei and interfere with DNA repair.

Continuing, the point of “Covid vaccine” is that our immunity learns to recognize this S-protein and develops antibodies. This allows the vaccinated to fight off Covid-19 infection in the first few months post-vaccination. Then these S-antibodies decline, immunity wanes, and we end up with no immunity in the vaccinated.

What is important is that vaccine immunity ONLY creates antibodies for S-protein, but not for other proteins of the real virus, such as the N-protein. This is what the Roche N test is about: it detects presence of N-antibodies, which can only appear in survivors of actual Covid-19, which has N protein, which Covid vaccine lacks.

Thus, unvaccinated survivors of Covid19 develop a variety of antibodies, including S-antibodies (like the vaxxed), N-antibodies (never seen in vaxxed who did not have covid), etc.

Read the Whole Article