Tomasz

 What Russia has reached over three months diplomatic and military pressure on West ?

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Andrei Moutchkine said:

Not the entire Donbass, only the Luhansk region. Parts of Donetsk region still under Ukrainian government control.

I checked and so I stand corrected.  True: the entire Donbass is not yet, but will be soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Ron Wagner said:

A very good point. Turkey is positioned well and strong enough to keep Russia at bay. Especially as they have already made so many enemies. China will be the controlling force though. They have the sheer numbers . 

Turkey will hold Russia?  more lunacy.  proof you know nothing about Turks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Irony is that Putin was at first probably the most-western orientated Russian leader in long time.

The whole problem is West doesn't really like even a prowestern leader. It wants second Gorbi or Yeltsin.

Gorbi thought it's really all about communism - all you need is to drop communism and suddenly all conflicts with West will be resolved.  Yeltsin was a disaster. To understand todays Russia you need to understand first disaster during Yeltsin as president and how it affected people normal decent live.

All you need to do was to help Russian young reformators in 90s. The answer was there is hardly no money to help Russia in road to democracy. There were no money but  there was a NATO expansion. 

And Putin is simple consequence of this.

  • Great Response! 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

33 minutes ago, Tomasz said:

Irony is that Putin was at first probably the most-western orientated Russian leader in long time.

The whole problem is West doesn't really like even a prowestern leader. It wants second Gorbi or Yeltsin.

Gorbi thought it's really all about communism - all you need is to drop communism and suddenly all conflicts with West will be resolved.  Yeltsin was a disaster. To understand todays Russia you need to understand first disaster during Yeltsin as president and how it affected people normal decent live.

All you need to do was to help Russian young reformators in 90s. The answer was there is hardly no money to help Russia in road to democracy. There were no money but  there was a NATO expansion. 

And Putin is simple consequence of this.

Russia has always been a threat to Europe because of its militant moves which can be seen in its nibbling at anyplace it can. Georgia, Transnistra, Chechnya, Kalingrad, and its history in Eastern Europe with the Soviet Union and slaughters of their leaders. They would have been foolish to build up Russia, just as we were foolish to build up China without strict limits and controls over their future. Russia and China are both an assemblage of nations taken over by their Rus or Han majorities. Now Russia is using its minorities to fill the ranks of its soldiers. 

Edited by Ron Wagner
  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/5/2022 at 3:20 PM, Ron Wagner said:

Russia has always been a threat to Europe because of its militant moves which can be seen in its nibbling at anyplace it can. Georgia, Transnistra, Chechnya, Kalingrad, and its history in Eastern Europe with the Soviet Union and slaughters of their leaders. They would have been foolish to build up Russia, just as we were foolish to build up China without strict limits and controls over their future. Russia and China are both an assemblage of nations taken over by their Rus or Han majorities. Now Russia is using its minorities to fill the ranks of its soldiers. 

oh my.  I suppose we = americans?  so you = america?

1/ You built China? You have the right to limit people, to enslave them? So, you are God?

2/ China is an assemblage? I think you mean the USA, no?

3/ Russia fills its forces with minorities?  uh, the USA fills it forces with minoirities: black and hispanics, and only the poorest of these. But even money is insufficient to man the USA forces: now you resort to gays, lesbians, trans, whatever. But even that is insufficient: now you have lowered the recruiting standard to below high school educated, and any obese person. Given about 50% of amurcuns are obese, you should have quite the army. I am quaking in my shoes.

4/ Charlemagne attacked Russia. Turks attacked Russia. Sweden attacked Russia. Naoplean attacked Russia. Hitler attacked Russia. But, you say Russia attacks anywhere it can?

The 1st problem for the world is the entire USA, and much of Europe and Australia, are filled with people like you.  The 2nd is people like you are too cowardly to go to Ukraine and join the other fools at the front lines. 

 

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Ron Wagner said:

Russia has always been a threat to Europe because of its militant moves which can be seen in its nibbling at anyplace it can. Georgia, Transnistra, Chechnya, Kalingrad, and its history in Eastern Europe with the Soviet Union and slaughters of their leaders. They would have been foolish to build up Russia, just as we were foolish to build up China without strict limits and controls over their future. Russia and China are both an assemblage of nations taken over by their Rus or Han majorities. Now Russia is using its minorities to fill the ranks of its soldiers. 

Russia is the last of the powerful empires in in Europe/West Asia. It has defeated all others by smart politics, tough wars and world diplomacy.  (French/British/Habsburg and Prussian Empires, to name a few). The concept of an empire is that it takes over other cultures and countries. The Rus took over Northern Asia, The Han took over Central Asia, The founding fathers took over Northern America. (The USA is an assemblage of at least 51 countries).

What we are left with is a world of 3 empires. Relatively few on a historic scale. And empires don't listen to other empires. They wage war. 

What are those minorities in Russia that they use to fill the ranks? AFAIK, they are Russians, with Russian blood, for many generations. Chechnya has been part of Russia for longer than the whole history of the USA. Kaliningrad has been Russian for longer than Hawaii has been American. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is disappointing that there are so many war mongers.  It is also disappointing that so many people, especially Americans, refuse to look at historical facts of how America has deceived and brainwashed the public.  

If you are an American and you do not know about the following government conspiracy and document (completed before 9/11/01), then you are really really stupid, because you are deliberately deceiving yourself.   https://vdocuments.net/pnac-project-for-the-new-american-century.html?page=1

PNAC
Project for the New American Century

A SECRET blueprint for US global domination...

...the blueprint, uncovered by the Sunday Herald, for the creation of a 'global Pax Americana' was drawn up for Dick Cheney (vice- president), Donald Rumsfeld (defence secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy), George W Bush's younger brother Jeb and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of staff).

The document, entitled Rebuilding America's Defences: Strategies, Forces And Resources For A New Century, was written in September 2000 by the neo-conservative think-tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC).

What was needed for America to dominate much of humanity and the world’s resources, it said, was “some catastrophic and catalysing event – like a new Pearl Harbor”.

Gen Wesley Clark Reveals US Plan To Invade Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Lybia, Somalia, Sudan, And Iran

(2 minutes)  https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=r8YtF76s-yM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jeroen Goudswaard said:

Russia is the last of the powerful empires in in Europe/West Asia. It has defeated all others by smart politics, tough wars and world diplomacy.  (French/British/Habsburg and Prussian Empires, to name a few). The concept of an empire is that it takes over other cultures and countries. The Rus took over Northern Asia, The Han took over Central Asia, The founding fathers took over Northern America. (The USA is an assemblage of at least 51 countries).

What we are left with is a world of 3 empires. Relatively few on a historic scale. And empires don't listen to other empires. They wage war. 

What are those minorities in Russia that they use to fill the ranks? AFAIK, they are Russians, with Russian blood, for many generations. Chechnya has been part of Russia for longer than the whole history of the USA. Kaliningrad has been Russian for longer than Hawaii has been American. 

Goededag.  If I may add to your points...

1/ The Mongols 'took over' central Asia, not the Han. The Mongols were horsemen: without horses, Asia could not be conquered. The Han rarely used horses for anything.

2/ An empire takes over weaker countries to gain resources and wealth. The USA has invaded how many countries since its inception?  Too many to count.  The jewmucans learned from 1940 onwards the power of forcing other countries to use the USD. China is a republic. China has no colonies and the CNY is not forced upon other countries. Many countries would like to use the CNY, but the USA prevents them. Russia is a republic. Russia has no colonies and the ruble is not forced upon other countries. Russia demands rubles for products it exports, which is entirely fair and just. some countries would prefer gold; but look at the fate of Hussain and Ghadafi and others. The USA forces other countries to use the USD for commodities the USA does not export, such as crude. The jewmurcans even kill their own presidents for suggesting any currency other than fed reserve notes. The only empire in the world today is the USA.

 

  • Like 1
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Tom Nolan said:

It is disappointing that there are so many war mongers.  It is also disappointing that so many people, especially Americans, refuse to look at historical facts of how America has deceived and brainwashed the public.  

If you are an American and you do not know about the following government conspiracy and document (completed before 9/11/01), then you are really really stupid, because you are deliberately deceiving yourself.   https://vdocuments.net/pnac-project-for-the-new-american-century.html?page=1

PNAC
Project for the New American Century

A SECRET blueprint for US global domination...

...the blueprint, uncovered by the Sunday Herald, for the creation of a 'global Pax Americana' was drawn up for Dick Cheney (vice- president), Donald Rumsfeld (defence secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy), George W Bush's younger brother Jeb and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of staff).

The document, entitled Rebuilding America's Defences: Strategies, Forces And Resources For A New Century, was written in September 2000 by the neo-conservative think-tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC).

What was needed for America to dominate much of humanity and the world’s resources, it said, was “some catastrophic and catalysing event – like a new Pearl Harbor”.

Gen Wesley Clark Reveals US Plan To Invade Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Lybia, Somalia, Sudan, And Iran

(2 minutes)  https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=r8YtF76s-yM

None is so blind as he will not see. None so deaf as he who will not hear. None so dumb as he who will not speak.  None so ignorant as he who will not learn.  None so despicable as as a learned person who will not act.  None so vile as he who kills a defenceless victim. Such are the amurcuns past, present, and future.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What has Russia accomplished?

The liberation of Lugansk. Soon the entire Donbass. All while being outnumbered 10:1, and against a force that boasted it was the best in Europe.

Sanctions that blow back to the USA and EU, causing increasing inflation, and gas prices in EU to increase 7X.

Crude price to reach $100, AND increased exports of 2mm bbls per day. Plus gas, fertilisers, hundreds of other commodities. All paid in rubles.

Putin laughs at the insanity of the USA and EU... all the way to his bank.

ah, but you say, the west wins by expanding Natostan to include Sweden and Finland. Combined, Swe and Fin are about 1 battallion for the USA. wow, such a force. But ah, USA plans 300,000 more troops into Natostan, and more weapons. Who will pay for these and with what? Europe must pay. How? More income and vat taxes, more money printing, more inflation, more poverty, more crime, more violence. Natostan will become soon a collection of 3rd world countries. Who fears a 3rd world country?

So what has Russia accomplished?  Much more than dumbshit amercuns can comprehend, very much more.

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

See my previous comment about PNAC ... The Neocons ...neoconservatives....

EXCERPTS from this article - https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/luongo-why-joe-biden-refuses-back-ukraine

...The short answer is what I’ve been saying for nearly three years now, The Davos Crowd wants the US destroyed and it is working from within and without our government to achieve that goal. Biden’s staunch support of Ukraine fits that thesis perfectly...

...Between now and the midterms you can expect further acceleration of the Davos agenda in D.C. Spending billions supporting Ukraine is yet another way to try to push the Fed into not raising rates any farther...

...the ongoing conflict in the eastern European nation is nothing more than a “war between civilizations,” in US neoconservatives’ efforts to “forestall Russia taking control of Ukraine.”

Touching on Washington officials’ motives behind the ever-increasing aid to Kiev, Luongo told Sputnik that the American president, “as a proxy for the oligarchs in Davos, is acting on their behalf to ultimately weaken the US by sending weapons overseas and destroying US leadership and credibility.”

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

It's amazing how the narrative changes once there's money for the military industrial complex.

FWwPXSHWAAQubPC.jpg

FWy1kjwXEAE9GQh (1).jpg

Edited by Tomasz
  • Like 1
  • Great Response! 1
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2022/06/21/russias-new-economic-policy-famine-looting-and-stealing/?sh=54441db253b0

Russia’s New Economic Policy: Famine, Looting And Stealing?

 

In the 1920s, despair prompted Soviet leaders to adopt the New Economic Policy (NEP), an attempt at new policies to improve the economy. In 2022, facing sanctions and isolation from Western countries, Russian leaders appear to have adopted another new economic policy. In the 1920s, NEP was based on a greater use of market forces. Today, the policy appears based on force, a combination of stealing from Ukraine, facilitating looting by soldiers and inflicting famine on the world.

 
 

Famine: Since the invasion of Ukraine, Russian forces have blocked more than 20 million tons of grain from being shipped through Black Sea ports. The European Union’s foreign policy chief Josep Borrell has called Russia’s action a war crime. Given the quantity of grain blocked, United Nations personnel have warned a famine could take place in parts of the world. This is not an accident. Russian officials are open about leveraging the prospect of mass starvation to compel Western governments to lift sanctions harming the Russian economy.

 

In June 2022, at the Petersburg Economic Forum, Margarita Simonyan, editor-in-chief of Russian state-controlled RT, said she heard from people several times in Moscow that “All our hope is in the famine.” She continued, “Here is what it means. It means that the famine will start now and they will lift the sanctions and be friends with us, because they will realize that it’s necessary.”

 

PROMOTED

Preventing Ukraine from selling its wheat is not a side effect of the war. It is part of Russia’s economic strategy to leverage widespread hunger to help its economy.

 

Stealing: Russia is not relying on famine alone. It is also stealing wheat and steel from Ukraine. Russian media has openly stated Russia is selling wheat it stole from Kherson in Ukraine.

The Russian government is also stealing or nationalizing land from Ukrainian farmers in a parallel to Stalin’s expropriation of Ukrainian farmers’ property during collectivization in the 1930s, which resulted in millions of deaths from famine and saw the deportation of Ukrainian farmers who resisted.

“Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine has captured some of the most productive agricultural land in what is one of the world’s great breadbaskets, disrupting supplies and pushing up food prices,” reported the Wall Street Journal. “Russian forces have also stolen grain and equipment, the Ukrainian government and farmers say. Now, entire farms are being taken, some farmers say. . . Mr. [Dmitry] Skorniakov said that in May a group arrived at his farm in southeastern Ukraine claiming to represent the government of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic, which broke away from Ukraine with Russian support in 2014. ‘They said, ‘Now it belongs to us and you work for us, everything is our property,’ Mr. Skorniakov said his workers had told him.

 

“Valery Stoyanov, 50, said Chechen soldiers took over his farm near the southern city of Melitopol shortly after the invasion began on Feb. 24, telling his farmhands that it now belonged to the unit’s commander. ‘This collective farm is now mine,’ the Chechen commander told workers whom he had gathered to address, Mr. Stoyanov said his workers told him. In the following days, the soldiers sold valuable equipment and shipped out 2,500 tons of grain that was stored at the farm.”

  • Downvote 1
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Jeroen Goudswaard said:

Russia is the last of the powerful empires in in Europe/West Asia. It has defeated all others by smart politics, tough wars and world diplomacy.  (French/British/Habsburg and Prussian Empires, to name a few). The concept of an empire is that it takes over other cultures and countries. The Rus took over Northern Asia, The Han took over Central Asia, The founding fathers took over Northern America. (The USA is an assemblage of at least 51 countries).

What we are left with is a world of 3 empires. Relatively few on a historic scale. And empires don't listen to other empires. They wage war. 

What are those minorities in Russia that they use to fill the ranks? AFAIK, they are Russians, with Russian blood, for many generations. Chechnya has been part of Russia for longer than the whole history of the USA. Kaliningrad has been Russian for longer than Hawaii has been American. 

Russia has an economy the size of Italy and is now spending billions to fight Ukraine while losing income it could have easily gotten from Europe if it were not so greedy to demand very high prices. Its war against Ukraine has turned the free world against it and increased our concerns about China, so China will not be producing as much as it was thus it will need less fuel from Russia and pay a lower price. 

The war was a very vicious and stupid move by Putin and he will go down in history as another failed leader like Hitler. Russia will be a pawn of China. 

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

On 7/5/2022 at 4:51 AM, Ron Wagner said:

A very good point. Turkey is positioned well and strong enough to keep Russia at bay. Especially as they have already made so many enemies. China will be the controlling force though. They have the sheer numbers . 

Think again. IF Russia stops OIl, Gas and Nuclear Power for Turkey they are out. The economy will crash. That's far bigger as Malta or Bulgaria. Turkey is selling Billions to Russia.

Edited by Starschy
  • Like 2
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://news.yahoo.com/atrocities-committed-russians-reaction-fact-083722204.html

 

"The atrocities committed by the Russians are their reaction to the fact that they are nobody in their own country." Interview with a historian

 
 
Mykhailo Zahorodnii
Wed, July 6, 2022 at 3:37 AM
 
 

The full-scale war that began on 24 February has been, for many Ukrainians, the first experience of hostilities and their consequences. What the cities of the Ukrainian region of Donbas have been experiencing for 8 years, Kyiv, Lviv, Kharkiv and other cities have now also had to go through. 

The greatest tragedy facing the Ukrainian people is the genocidal actions of the Russians, which we had previously only read about in books about the Soviet "Great Terror" [the Great Terror, also known as the Great Purge, was a cruel political campaign by the Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin to kill dissenting members of the Communist Party and anyone else he considered a threat] or the German occupation during the Second World War.

It seems that we have survived everything: shootings, tortures, deportations and sexual violence.

We discussed the crimes committed by Russians in historical perspective with Dr Larysa Yakubova, a researcher in historical sciences specialising in the study of the "Russian world".

- ADVERTISEMENT -

"Ukraine has been able to elude the state that has been destroying Russia"

- The term "Russian world" is not new for you, and you have devoted many publications to it. Did you foresee the war, knowing all that?

- People had feared that something bad would happen, and 24 February was the point when it finally did.

It had already been clear since November that war was coming, and that it was a matter of weeks.

When you are just a scientist who is engaged in studying the "Russian world" and you know enough about it, then this burden completely suffocates you and does not allow you to live fully.

[BANNER1]

- The Russians are trying to use their own historical myths against Ukraine. Before the full-scale war, we listened to a speech by Putin in which he denied Ukrainian statehood. Can we say that Ukrainians already have a certain degree of immunity to this?

- I have been studying Russian propaganda for 8 years - it is quite difficult for an average person to understand it.

In the area they refer to as the "Russian world", people have long been living in a "virtual world" that can’t be called our history, Soviet or Russian history - it is an alternative history in which the same commonly used word forms seem to float around, but they are combined in such a way that we find ourselves immersed in Orwell's reality or that of other outstanding fiction writers.

I believe that for 30 years we, as historians, have been doing things right in Ukraine. Ukraine was able to elude the state that has been destroying Russia, namely, the state of unwillingness to know anything about its real past, of forgetting and erasing it from memory, of refusing to repent of anything and seeing only progress and victories.

As a result, Russian historians ceased to be historians and deprived the people of Russia of understanding where they are and who they are.

The difference between our countries in this sense is enormous. That is, Ukrainians today are people with their own true history, whilst Russians are still wandering through the swamps with their 17th-century hero, Ivan Susani

 
 
 

- Will the Russians ever be able to get out of this state?

- They will not get out of this dead-end for another 50 years, because it is impossible to write a new history just from Wikipedia.

There need to be tens of thousands of professional historians, but they hardly have any left. The current cohort, who were trained in the past 30 years, are propagandists who do not have the tools for professional work.

First, it is necessary to train young professional historians, explain the difference between propaganda and historical science, and then they all have to go to real archives, which are currently closed to researchers, to work and think for a couple of dozen years.

The results should then be published, put into mass circulation, and it will take 10-20 years for society to accept it.

[BANNER2]

"For 30 years, the Russian people were deliberately led by their government into a state of atrocity"

- Why do Russians draw on historical perspective to destroy Ukrainians? The Holodomor [the great famine in Ukraine in 1932-1933 caused by Soviet policy], repression, destruction of culture and memory, and now the public denial of Ukrainian statehood and atrocities committed in the occupied territories.

- It’s all very simple, because the "Russian world" is a virtual picture of an alternative history. Researchers quite often use the cliché that Russians are people with a false self-identification.

There are many examples when families have kept silent about their origins. Russians can go through their whole lives and learn only near old age that they are the descendants of repressed Greeks, Finns, Jews or Ukrainians.

That is, we are talking about negative selection, where Great Russian chauvinism is a necessary prerequisite for being promoted through the levels of internal hierarchy.

Although Stalin was a Georgian by nationality, he was also a Great Russian chauvinist. So was Lenin. Not to mention the tsars, who could not have become imperialists simply by the fact of their birth - they were brought up in the tradition of Russian imperial historiography.

-Were the Bolsheviks also brought up on imperial historiography?

- They also shared an imperial historiography. It could not have been otherwise, from a historical point of view.

The main task of Ukraine at the current stage is to ensure that Russians leave us alone; to separate this two-unit matrix on which the basic historical reflection on the question of origins is based. And where are the origins of historical reflections on Russia?

- Since the time of Kyivan Rus...

- Here's the answer to why they pick on us: because the internal system of coordinates in the personality structure of every Russian dictator takes its starting point in Kyiv.

However, a common starting point and the present-day community are not the same thing.

If that were the logic, then Kyiv could claim that Moscow should become a region of Ukraine. But no - because at some stage, Vasily Klyuchevsky [a 19th-century Russian historian] de facto transferred the emphasis on continuity from the "mother of Russian cities" [Kyiv] to the "dynasty". Thus, the focus switched to the notion that, for some reason, Kyiv should be a province, not Moscow.

Until the Russians accept their true history as part of their mentality, until then there will be a terrible mess that will bring death and war everywhere.

 
 
 

- Most Ukrainians were shocked by the scale of torture and abuse in Bucha and Irpin, but if we open a textbook on the history or study of Soviet terror, we will see that this behaviour is typical of Russians...

- The Russian people have been deliberately brought to a state of brutality by the authorities over the past 30 years. This is a side effect of a totalitarian society as such.

They were deliberately pushed into a totalitarian matrix, although it should be noted that they have never actually left it behind. There was a period that saw a degree of easing, sometime before the First Chechen War.

Russia is moving in the direction of a large Gulag [the government agency that administered the prison camps in the Soviet Union, and also refers to the network of those prison camps] covering the entire territory of the state. And the totalitarian matrix dehumanises every person at every level.

We consider their leaders, we look at Putin: he stands completely stone-faced and proclaims the genocide of the Ukrainian people. Not a single muscle on his face moves, although he must understand that he is condemning an entire nation before the eyes of the whole world.

And with a similar stone face, 70-80% of 140 million [Russian] people say "okay, that's how it should be."

Atrocities are their reaction to the fact that they are nobody in their own country. This is no longer an army, but an armed bunch of scumbags who will do whatever it takes to follow  their orders.

[BANNER3]

- Can this behaviour of Russians be considered the norm for them?

- The civilisation praised by the "Russian world" [mentioned earlier] was brought to such a state by 30 years of work on the mass consciousness of people by the Russian authorities. This was done on purpose, because only in this way can there be a totalitarian state and power that does not change and is cemented. This is a country where historical time and social development have stopped.

But we should understand that this side effect is the norm in totalitarian regimes; the same thing happened in Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, and in post-war China.

When totalitarianism wins as a form of social organisation, mass brutality is its direct consequence. And every war is an atrocity, regardless of who wages it. The exception is the country that defends itself.

Why do Europeans repeat "Never again"? Because they understand that any nation can be brought to such a state, and everyone can turn out to be a victim or an "animal".

We have something to be proud of in this situation: we are holding our ground, and the Russians will have to live with it. Our task is not to lose our humanity. And once we persevere and win, we must ensure that in the end, all the guilty parties are punished. But Russia is playing around with history in order to avoid this.

"The tools of interaction with society are all the same: basements, tortures, mutilations, camps, interrogations"

- If we compare what the Russians are doing now to the Soviet terror of the 1930s and the German occupation during the Second World War, can we say that they have increased the atrocities to a new level?

- Such comparisons are not correct from a historical point of view, because people were different 70 years ago, even if we are talking about your grandfather. The majority of Russians at that time had not completed 4 years of education - we are not talking about the intelligentsia or elites here.

The mass of individuals who lived under the Nazi regime at the time were burghers who had gone bankrupt after the First World War. Moreover, they were people who did not have an average, full-fledged Western European primary education. They were told that a Jew is not a person, and that a physically disabled person can be killed without remorse in order to "purify the race".

It was explained to the Germans that Ukrainian lands are their living space. The Nazis came to Ukraine to get a large piece of land, where they planned to start farms, create a colony where their children and great-grandchildren would rule, and drive Ukrainians into slavery.

And today we see a Russian man, allegedly an educated person, with access to the Internet, raping a girl.

It is possible to compare them, but in making a comparison one should not forget about the internal structures of the countries which commit crimes against the population.

 
 
 

NKVD [The People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs, abbreviated NKVD, was the secret police agency of the Soviet Union 1934-46, subsequently renamed the KGB]

Photo: Istorychna pravda

After all, if we consider that every Russian is capable of doing this, then we will come to a dead end. That's how they think about us, and genocidal practices grow out of such assumptions: when an entire nation is denied every right to remain human.

- Have the working methods of the Russian special services changed since Soviet times?

- The tools of interaction with society are all the same: basements, tortures, mutilations, camps, interrogations. If you look at a study of what was done during the "Great Terror" of 1937-38, you will see that the same thing has been done for 8 years in the basements of the "DPR" [self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic] and "LPR" [self-proclaimed Luhansk People’s Republic].

The only difference is the scale. The only thing is that mass war crimes are the crimes of another structure, the so-called Russian army. It is now not an army, but basically a terrorist organisation.

And it [the Russian army] is doing the same thing to Ukraine as to Syria. That is, it is  technically possible to turn every Ukrainian city into Aleppo. There are orders, there is no honour, there is no dignity, there are no human values.

After all, the Nazis did the same thing. Our catastrophe is that we will have to live with this terrible neighbour for a long time, because I do not see the leaders of Russia radically changing its internal settings in the near future.

The next 30 years will be very difficult for all of us, and in this situation it is very important to be down-to-earth.

[BANNER4]

- Sexual violence is one of the types of terror in Russia today. How common were such cases during the Soviet terror in the 1930s?

- From a purely scientific point of view, sexual violence is a reflection of barbarism. We have to understand that it is present in every war, because all the violent attitudes, the dehumanisation of the enemy are the archetype of the behaviour of a barbarian warrior who comes to the land he has captured.

The first thing a barbarian does before a defeated enemy is to rape women, daughters and sons, kill the master and begin to rule over all those who have been humiliated. After enduring such stress, one must have a very strong inner core not to break down and to continue the struggle, and even to continue to live.

This topic is studied on the basis of what happened in the Second World War, during Soviet occupation, and from Western European material. Let's consider what happened after the capture of Berlin, where wives and daughters were raped in front of the captured officers, after which those officers committed suicide.

Rape in public places is an act of humiliation and moral murder. When all the information is available, we will talk about what we are dealing with today.

Fortunately, now the Ukrainian army is working quite well, and it will be difficult for them [Russian soldiers] to reach the boys, men, and women, and this may hold them back. In the first stage of the war, when they marched in in full uniform, they had a sense that it was open season.

- You have done a great deal of research on the history of Donbas. Is it now symbolic that the fate of Ukraine is being determined there?

- If our border with Russia was in Ternopil Oblast or Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast, then the symbolism would lie there.

We recaptured Kyiv Oblast, Chernihiv Oblast, and Sumy Oblast not because there is less support for the "Russian world" there than in Donbas. The problem is that Donbas has been a stepping-stone for the past 8 years.

Donbas was chosen as the zone that was easiest to "sway". At that time [in 2014], the fugitive president Yanukovych was "the leader of the common man from Donbas", just as the average Russian now identifies with Putin. That is, these slogans worked there because of a high level of social tension, not because of "pure love" for Russia.

Secondly, it was a zone of chronic social depression, and this weakened Kyiv's position. Similar zones of social disaster in Russia are now zones of support for Putin's "special operation". Their residents thus strive to "establish order" in Ukraine, when they have no influence on anything and live on the edge of survival [within their own territory].

We have taken a huge step forward in these 8 years. I don't like it when they write that if it weren't for Putin and the war, there would be no Ukrainian nation.

The symbolism of Donbas is that in 2014, the Russians wanted to "revive" Novorossiya ["New Russia", the historical term for a region that was part of the Russian Empire and included part of present-day Ukraine], but they failed.

After that, they would state, on various platforms, look: Putin's Russia is a nightmare, and we will build a "new, beautiful Russia" in Donbas. So what happened? It turned into a festering cesspool of terrible degradation: intellectual, moral, economic, and social.

These pseudo-republics, like metastases, spread to the mental body of Russia itself. And now we see that the insignificant "LPR/DPR" [self-proclaimed Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics] have turned out to be a projection of the totalitarian future of Russia itself.

But we have different projections: we will retake Ukrainian Donbas and we will "live our own lives", building a future of peace and freedom.

Mykhailo Zahorodnii, Ukrainska Pravda. Zhyttia

  • Great Response! 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ron Wagner said:

Russia has an economy the size of Italy and is now spending billions to fight Ukraine while losing income it could have easily gotten from Europe if it were not so greedy to demand very high prices. Its war against Ukraine has turned the free world against it and increased our concerns about China, so China will not be producing as much as it was thus it will need less fuel from Russia and pay a lower price. 

The war was a very vicious and stupid move by Putin and he will go down in history as another failed leader like Hitler. Russia will be a pawn of China. 

So why are you not in Ukraine, fighting for freedom?. As a former sniper, you could easily kill hundreds of civilians, like the US snipers did in Vietnam, and be paid a significant sum.

  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/6/2022 at 7:08 PM, Ron Wagner said:

Russia has an economy the size of Italy and is now spending billions to fight Ukraine while losing income it could have easily gotten from Europe if it were not so greedy to demand very high prices. Its war against Ukraine has turned the free world against it and increased our concerns about China, so China will not be producing as much as it was thus it will need less fuel from Russia and pay a lower price. 

The war was a very vicious and stupid move by Putin and he will go down in history as another failed leader like Hitler. Russia will be a pawn of China. 

the Free World?  Putin has failed?  China buys crude and gas at a discount. USA buys at a premium. 

 

  • Upvote 1
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ron Wagner said:

https://news.yahoo.com/atrocities-committed-russians-reaction-fact-083722204.html

 

"The atrocities committed by the Russians are their reaction to the fact that they are nobody in their own country." Interview with a historian

 
 
Mykhailo Zahorodnii
Wed, July 6, 2022 at 3:37 AM
 
 

The full-scale war that began on 24 February has been, for many Ukrainians, the first experience of hostilities and their consequences. What the cities of the Ukrainian region of Donbas have been experiencing for 8 years, Kyiv, Lviv, Kharkiv and other cities have now also had to go through. 

The greatest tragedy facing the Ukrainian people is the genocidal actions of the Russians, which we had previously only read about in books about the Soviet "Great Terror" [the Great Terror, also known as the Great Purge, was a cruel political campaign by the Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin to kill dissenting members of the Communist Party and anyone else he considered a threat] or the German occupation during the Second World War.

It seems that we have survived everything: shootings, tortures, deportations and sexual violence.

We discussed the crimes committed by Russians in historical perspective with Dr Larysa Yakubova, a researcher in historical sciences specialising in the study of the "Russian world".

- ADVERTISEMENT -

"Ukraine has been able to elude the state that has been destroying Russia"

- The term "Russian world" is not new for you, and you have devoted many publications to it. Did you foresee the war, knowing all that?

- People had feared that something bad would happen, and 24 February was the point when it finally did.

It had already been clear since November that war was coming, and that it was a matter of weeks.

When you are just a scientist who is engaged in studying the "Russian world" and you know enough about it, then this burden completely suffocates you and does not allow you to live fully.

[BANNER1]

- The Russians are trying to use their own historical myths against Ukraine. Before the full-scale war, we listened to a speech by Putin in which he denied Ukrainian statehood. Can we say that Ukrainians already have a certain degree of immunity to this?

- I have been studying Russian propaganda for 8 years - it is quite difficult for an average person to understand it.

In the area they refer to as the "Russian world", people have long been living in a "virtual world" that can’t be called our history, Soviet or Russian history - it is an alternative history in which the same commonly used word forms seem to float around, but they are combined in such a way that we find ourselves immersed in Orwell's reality or that of other outstanding fiction writers.

I believe that for 30 years we, as historians, have been doing things right in Ukraine. Ukraine was able to elude the state that has been destroying Russia, namely, the state of unwillingness to know anything about its real past, of forgetting and erasing it from memory, of refusing to repent of anything and seeing only progress and victories.

As a result, Russian historians ceased to be historians and deprived the people of Russia of understanding where they are and who they are.

The difference between our countries in this sense is enormous. That is, Ukrainians today are people with their own true history, whilst Russians are still wandering through the swamps with their 17th-century hero, Ivan Susani

 
 
 

- Will the Russians ever be able to get out of this state?

- They will not get out of this dead-end for another 50 years, because it is impossible to write a new history just from Wikipedia.

There need to be tens of thousands of professional historians, but they hardly have any left. The current cohort, who were trained in the past 30 years, are propagandists who do not have the tools for professional work.

First, it is necessary to train young professional historians, explain the difference between propaganda and historical science, and then they all have to go to real archives, which are currently closed to researchers, to work and think for a couple of dozen years.

The results should then be published, put into mass circulation, and it will take 10-20 years for society to accept it.

[BANNER2]

"For 30 years, the Russian people were deliberately led by their government into a state of atrocity"

- Why do Russians draw on historical perspective to destroy Ukrainians? The Holodomor [the great famine in Ukraine in 1932-1933 caused by Soviet policy], repression, destruction of culture and memory, and now the public denial of Ukrainian statehood and atrocities committed in the occupied territories.

- It’s all very simple, because the "Russian world" is a virtual picture of an alternative history. Researchers quite often use the cliché that Russians are people with a false self-identification.

There are many examples when families have kept silent about their origins. Russians can go through their whole lives and learn only near old age that they are the descendants of repressed Greeks, Finns, Jews or Ukrainians.

That is, we are talking about negative selection, where Great Russian chauvinism is a necessary prerequisite for being promoted through the levels of internal hierarchy.

Although Stalin was a Georgian by nationality, he was also a Great Russian chauvinist. So was Lenin. Not to mention the tsars, who could not have become imperialists simply by the fact of their birth - they were brought up in the tradition of Russian imperial historiography.

-Were the Bolsheviks also brought up on imperial historiography?

- They also shared an imperial historiography. It could not have been otherwise, from a historical point of view.

The main task of Ukraine at the current stage is to ensure that Russians leave us alone; to separate this two-unit matrix on which the basic historical reflection on the question of origins is based. And where are the origins of historical reflections on Russia?

- Since the time of Kyivan Rus...

- Here's the answer to why they pick on us: because the internal system of coordinates in the personality structure of every Russian dictator takes its starting point in Kyiv.

However, a common starting point and the present-day community are not the same thing.

If that were the logic, then Kyiv could claim that Moscow should become a region of Ukraine. But no - because at some stage, Vasily Klyuchevsky [a 19th-century Russian historian] de facto transferred the emphasis on continuity from the "mother of Russian cities" [Kyiv] to the "dynasty". Thus, the focus switched to the notion that, for some reason, Kyiv should be a province, not Moscow.

Until the Russians accept their true history as part of their mentality, until then there will be a terrible mess that will bring death and war everywhere.

 
 

- Most Ukrainians were shocked by the scale of torture and abuse in Bucha and Irpin, but if we open a textbook on the history or study of Soviet terror, we will see that this behaviour is typical of Russians...

- The Russian people have been deliberately brought to a state of brutality by the authorities over the past 30 years. This is a side effect of a totalitarian society as such.

They were deliberately pushed into a totalitarian matrix, although it should be noted that they have never actually left it behind. There was a period that saw a degree of easing, sometime before the First Chechen War.

Russia is moving in the direction of a large Gulag [the government agency that administered the prison camps in the Soviet Union, and also refers to the network of those prison camps] covering the entire territory of the state. And the totalitarian matrix dehumanises every person at every level.

We consider their leaders, we look at Putin: he stands completely stone-faced and proclaims the genocide of the Ukrainian people. Not a single muscle on his face moves, although he must understand that he is condemning an entire nation before the eyes of the whole world.

And with a similar stone face, 70-80% of 140 million [Russian] people say "okay, that's how it should be."

Atrocities are their reaction to the fact that they are nobody in their own country. This is no longer an army, but an armed bunch of scumbags who will do whatever it takes to follow  their orders.

[BANNER3]

- Can this behaviour of Russians be considered the norm for them?

- The civilisation praised by the "Russian world" [mentioned earlier] was brought to such a state by 30 years of work on the mass consciousness of people by the Russian authorities. This was done on purpose, because only in this way can there be a totalitarian state and power that does not change and is cemented. This is a country where historical time and social development have stopped.

But we should understand that this side effect is the norm in totalitarian regimes; the same thing happened in Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, and in post-war China.

When totalitarianism wins as a form of social organisation, mass brutality is its direct consequence. And every war is an atrocity, regardless of who wages it. The exception is the country that defends itself.

Why do Europeans repeat "Never again"? Because they understand that any nation can be brought to such a state, and everyone can turn out to be a victim or an "animal".

We have something to be proud of in this situation: we are holding our ground, and the Russians will have to live with it. Our task is not to lose our humanity. And once we persevere and win, we must ensure that in the end, all the guilty parties are punished. But Russia is playing around with history in order to avoid this.

"The tools of interaction with society are all the same: basements, tortures, mutilations, camps, interrogations"

- If we compare what the Russians are doing now to the Soviet terror of the 1930s and the German occupation during the Second World War, can we say that they have increased the atrocities to a new level?

- Such comparisons are not correct from a historical point of view, because people were different 70 years ago, even if we are talking about your grandfather. The majority of Russians at that time had not completed 4 years of education - we are not talking about the intelligentsia or elites here.

The mass of individuals who lived under the Nazi regime at the time were burghers who had gone bankrupt after the First World War. Moreover, they were people who did not have an average, full-fledged Western European primary education. They were told that a Jew is not a person, and that a physically disabled person can be killed without remorse in order to "purify the race".

It was explained to the Germans that Ukrainian lands are their living space. The Nazis came to Ukraine to get a large piece of land, where they planned to start farms, create a colony where their children and great-grandchildren would rule, and drive Ukrainians into slavery.

And today we see a Russian man, allegedly an educated person, with access to the Internet, raping a girl.

It is possible to compare them, but in making a comparison one should not forget about the internal structures of the countries which commit crimes against the population.

 
 

NKVD [The People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs, abbreviated NKVD, was the secret police agency of the Soviet Union 1934-46, subsequently renamed the KGB]

Photo: Istorychna pravda

After all, if we consider that every Russian is capable of doing this, then we will come to a dead end. That's how they think about us, and genocidal practices grow out of such assumptions: when an entire nation is denied every right to remain human.

- Have the working methods of the Russian special services changed since Soviet times?

- The tools of interaction with society are all the same: basements, tortures, mutilations, camps, interrogations. If you look at a study of what was done during the "Great Terror" of 1937-38, you will see that the same thing has been done for 8 years in the basements of the "DPR" [self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic] and "LPR" [self-proclaimed Luhansk People’s Republic].

The only difference is the scale. The only thing is that mass war crimes are the crimes of another structure, the so-called Russian army. It is now not an army, but basically a terrorist organisation.

And it [the Russian army] is doing the same thing to Ukraine as to Syria. That is, it is  technically possible to turn every Ukrainian city into Aleppo. There are orders, there is no honour, there is no dignity, there are no human values.

After all, the Nazis did the same thing. Our catastrophe is that we will have to live with this terrible neighbour for a long time, because I do not see the leaders of Russia radically changing its internal settings in the near future.

The next 30 years will be very difficult for all of us, and in this situation it is very important to be down-to-earth.

[BANNER4]

- Sexual violence is one of the types of terror in Russia today. How common were such cases during the Soviet terror in the 1930s?

- From a purely scientific point of view, sexual violence is a reflection of barbarism. We have to understand that it is present in every war, because all the violent attitudes, the dehumanisation of the enemy are the archetype of the behaviour of a barbarian warrior who comes to the land he has captured.

The first thing a barbarian does before a defeated enemy is to rape women, daughters and sons, kill the master and begin to rule over all those who have been humiliated. After enduring such stress, one must have a very strong inner core not to break down and to continue the struggle, and even to continue to live.

This topic is studied on the basis of what happened in the Second World War, during Soviet occupation, and from Western European material. Let's consider what happened after the capture of Berlin, where wives and daughters were raped in front of the captured officers, after which those officers committed suicide.

Rape in public places is an act of humiliation and moral murder. When all the information is available, we will talk about what we are dealing with today.

Fortunately, now the Ukrainian army is working quite well, and it will be difficult for them [Russian soldiers] to reach the boys, men, and women, and this may hold them back. In the first stage of the war, when they marched in in full uniform, they had a sense that it was open season.

- You have done a great deal of research on the history of Donbas. Is it now symbolic that the fate of Ukraine is being determined there?

- If our border with Russia was in Ternopil Oblast or Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast, then the symbolism would lie there.

We recaptured Kyiv Oblast, Chernihiv Oblast, and Sumy Oblast not because there is less support for the "Russian world" there than in Donbas. The problem is that Donbas has been a stepping-stone for the past 8 years.

Donbas was chosen as the zone that was easiest to "sway". At that time [in 2014], the fugitive president Yanukovych was "the leader of the common man from Donbas", just as the average Russian now identifies with Putin. That is, these slogans worked there because of a high level of social tension, not because of "pure love" for Russia.

Secondly, it was a zone of chronic social depression, and this weakened Kyiv's position. Similar zones of social disaster in Russia are now zones of support for Putin's "special operation". Their residents thus strive to "establish order" in Ukraine, when they have no influence on anything and live on the edge of survival [within their own territory].

We have taken a huge step forward in these 8 years. I don't like it when they write that if it weren't for Putin and the war, there would be no Ukrainian nation.

The symbolism of Donbas is that in 2014, the Russians wanted to "revive" Novorossiya ["New Russia", the historical term for a region that was part of the Russian Empire and included part of present-day Ukraine], but they failed.

After that, they would state, on various platforms, look: Putin's Russia is a nightmare, and we will build a "new, beautiful Russia" in Donbas. So what happened? It turned into a festering cesspool of terrible degradation: intellectual, moral, economic, and social.

These pseudo-republics, like metastases, spread to the mental body of Russia itself. And now we see that the insignificant "LPR/DPR" [self-proclaimed Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics] have turned out to be a projection of the totalitarian future of Russia itself.

But we have different projections: we will retake Ukrainian Donbas and we will "live our own lives", building a future of peace and freedom.

Mykhailo Zahorodnii, Ukrainska Pravda. Zhyttia

big on hate, big on prejudice, small on facts.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/5/2022 at 9:20 PM, Ron Wagner said:

Russia has always been a threat to Europe because of its militant moves which can be seen in its nibbling at anyplace it can. Georgia, Transnistra, Chechnya, Kalingrad, and its history in Eastern Europe with the Soviet Union and slaughters of their leaders. They would have been foolish to build up Russia, just as we were foolish to build up China without strict limits and controls over their future. Russia and China are both an assemblage of nations taken over by their Rus or Han majorities. Now Russia is using its minorities to fill the ranks of its soldiers. 

So, you are pretty much admitting to being an aggressor there? US is also an assemblage of nations taken over by Anglos, which blatantly uses Puerto-Ricans to fill the ranks of its soldiers

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/6/2022 at 12:27 PM, Tom Nolan said:

It is disappointing that there are so many war mongers.  It is also disappointing that so many people, especially Americans, refuse to look at historical facts of how America has deceived and brainwashed the public.  

If you are an American and you do not know about the following government conspiracy and document (completed before 9/11/01), then you are really really stupid, because you are deliberately deceiving yourself.   https://vdocuments.net/pnac-project-for-the-new-american-century.html?page=1

PNAC
Project for the New American Century

A SECRET blueprint for US global domination...

...the blueprint, uncovered by the Sunday Herald, for the creation of a 'global Pax Americana' was drawn up for Dick Cheney (vice- president), Donald Rumsfeld (defence secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy), George W Bush's younger brother Jeb and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of staff).

The document, entitled Rebuilding America's Defences: Strategies, Forces And Resources For A New Century, was written in September 2000 by the neo-conservative think-tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC).

What was needed for America to dominate much of humanity and the world’s resources, it said, was “some catastrophic and catalysing event – like a new Pearl Harbor”.

Gen Wesley Clark Reveals US Plan To Invade Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Lybia, Somalia, Sudan, And Iran

(2 minutes)  https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=r8YtF76s-yM

This stuff is so NOT SECRET anymore! Once retired, old Wesley revealed quite a mouth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Ron Wagner said:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2022/06/21/russias-new-economic-policy-famine-looting-and-stealing/?sh=54441db253b0

Russia’s New Economic Policy: Famine, Looting And Stealing?

 

In the 1920s, despair prompted Soviet leaders to adopt the New Economic Policy (NEP), an attempt at new policies to improve the economy. In 2022, facing sanctions and isolation from Western countries, Russian leaders appear to have adopted another new economic policy. In the 1920s, NEP was based on a greater use of market forces. Today, the policy appears based on force, a combination of stealing from Ukraine, facilitating looting by soldiers and inflicting famine on the world.

 
 

Famine: Since the invasion of Ukraine, Russian forces have blocked more than 20 million tons of grain from being shipped through Black Sea ports. The European Union’s foreign policy chief Josep Borrell has called Russia’s action a war crime. Given the quantity of grain blocked, United Nations personnel have warned a famine could take place in parts of the world. This is not an accident. Russian officials are open about leveraging the prospect of mass starvation to compel Western governments to lift sanctions harming the Russian economy.

 

In June 2022, at the Petersburg Economic Forum, Margarita Simonyan, editor-in-chief of Russian state-controlled RT, said she heard from people several times in Moscow that “All our hope is in the famine.” She continued, “Here is what it means. It means that the famine will start now and they will lift the sanctions and be friends with us, because they will realize that it’s necessary.”

 

PROMOTED

Preventing Ukraine from selling its wheat is not a side effect of the war. It is part of Russia’s economic strategy to leverage widespread hunger to help its economy.

 

Stealing: Russia is not relying on famine alone. It is also stealing wheat and steel from Ukraine. Russian media has openly stated Russia is selling wheat it stole from Kherson in Ukraine.

The Russian government is also stealing or nationalizing land from Ukrainian farmers in a parallel to Stalin’s expropriation of Ukrainian farmers’ property during collectivization in the 1930s, which resulted in millions of deaths from famine and saw the deportation of Ukrainian farmers who resisted.

“Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine has captured some of the most productive agricultural land in what is one of the world’s great breadbaskets, disrupting supplies and pushing up food prices,” reported the Wall Street Journal. “Russian forces have also stolen grain and equipment, the Ukrainian government and farmers say. Now, entire farms are being taken, some farmers say. . . Mr. [Dmitry] Skorniakov said that in May a group arrived at his farm in southeastern Ukraine claiming to represent the government of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic, which broke away from Ukraine with Russian support in 2014. ‘They said, ‘Now it belongs to us and you work for us, everything is our property,’ Mr. Skorniakov said his workers had told him.

 

“Valery Stoyanov, 50, said Chechen soldiers took over his farm near the southern city of Melitopol shortly after the invasion began on Feb. 24, telling his farmhands that it now belonged to the unit’s commander. ‘This collective farm is now mine,’ the Chechen commander told workers whom he had gathered to address, Mr. Stoyanov said his workers told him. In the following days, the soldiers sold valuable equipment and shipped out 2,500 tons of grain that was stored at the farm.”

Tired old tripe, again.

1. Russia is not blocking any Ukrainian ports, Ukraine mined them themselves.

2. Ukraine considers any cooperation with Russians theft. In all actuality, has the grain usually remained under the same ownership, but now under Russian jurisdiction and is exported using Russian ports or ports under Russian control. The payments are, increasingly, in rubles.

3. There is no famine. Russia is by far the world's largest exporter of grain and got enough for everybody. If somebody in the 3rd world cannot get Russian/Ukrainian grain, it is going to be due to your sanctions. So, it is not about the 3rd world. Europe needs Ukrainian grain themselves, as livestock feed, as it turns out.

Absolutely nobody outside the West believes in Westerners moving one finger for humanitarian reasons.

 

  • Like 1
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Ron Wagner said:

https://news.yahoo.com/atrocities-committed-russians-reaction-fact-083722204.html

 

"The atrocities committed by the Russians are their reaction to the fact that they are nobody in their own country." Interview with a historian

 
 
Mykhailo Zahorodnii
Wed, July 6, 2022 at 3:37 AM
 
 

The full-scale war that began on 24 February has been, for many Ukrainians, the first experience of hostilities and their consequences. What the cities of the Ukrainian region of Donbas have been experiencing for 8 years, Kyiv, Lviv, Kharkiv and other cities have now also had to go through. 

The greatest tragedy facing the Ukrainian people is the genocidal actions of the Russians, which we had previously only read about in books about the Soviet "Great Terror" [the Great Terror, also known as the Great Purge, was a cruel political campaign by the Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin to kill dissenting members of the Communist Party and anyone else he considered a threat] or the German occupation during the Second World War.

It seems that we have survived everything: shootings, tortures, deportations and sexual violence.

We discussed the crimes committed by Russians in historical perspective with Dr Larysa Yakubova, a researcher in historical sciences specialising in the study of the "Russian world".

- ADVERTISEMENT -

"Ukraine has been able to elude the state that has been destroying Russia"

- The term "Russian world" is not new for you, and you have devoted many publications to it. Did you foresee the war, knowing all that?

- People had feared that something bad would happen, and 24 February was the point when it finally did.

It had already been clear since November that war was coming, and that it was a matter of weeks.

When you are just a scientist who is engaged in studying the "Russian world" and you know enough about it, then this burden completely suffocates you and does not allow you to live fully.

[BANNER1]

- The Russians are trying to use their own historical myths against Ukraine. Before the full-scale war, we listened to a speech by Putin in which he denied Ukrainian statehood. Can we say that Ukrainians already have a certain degree of immunity to this?

- I have been studying Russian propaganda for 8 years - it is quite difficult for an average person to understand it.

In the area they refer to as the "Russian world", people have long been living in a "virtual world" that can’t be called our history, Soviet or Russian history - it is an alternative history in which the same commonly used word forms seem to float around, but they are combined in such a way that we find ourselves immersed in Orwell's reality or that of other outstanding fiction writers.

I believe that for 30 years we, as historians, have been doing things right in Ukraine. Ukraine was able to elude the state that has been destroying Russia, namely, the state of unwillingness to know anything about its real past, of forgetting and erasing it from memory, of refusing to repent of anything and seeing only progress and victories.

As a result, Russian historians ceased to be historians and deprived the people of Russia of understanding where they are and who they are.

The difference between our countries in this sense is enormous. That is, Ukrainians today are people with their own true history, whilst Russians are still wandering through the swamps with their 17th-century hero, Ivan Susani

 
 
 

- Will the Russians ever be able to get out of this state?

- They will not get out of this dead-end for another 50 years, because it is impossible to write a new history just from Wikipedia.

There need to be tens of thousands of professional historians, but they hardly have any left. The current cohort, who were trained in the past 30 years, are propagandists who do not have the tools for professional work.

First, it is necessary to train young professional historians, explain the difference between propaganda and historical science, and then they all have to go to real archives, which are currently closed to researchers, to work and think for a couple of dozen years.

The results should then be published, put into mass circulation, and it will take 10-20 years for society to accept it.

[BANNER2]

"For 30 years, the Russian people were deliberately led by their government into a state of atrocity"

- Why do Russians draw on historical perspective to destroy Ukrainians? The Holodomor [the great famine in Ukraine in 1932-1933 caused by Soviet policy], repression, destruction of culture and memory, and now the public denial of Ukrainian statehood and atrocities committed in the occupied territories.

- It’s all very simple, because the "Russian world" is a virtual picture of an alternative history. Researchers quite often use the cliché that Russians are people with a false self-identification.

There are many examples when families have kept silent about their origins. Russians can go through their whole lives and learn only near old age that they are the descendants of repressed Greeks, Finns, Jews or Ukrainians.

That is, we are talking about negative selection, where Great Russian chauvinism is a necessary prerequisite for being promoted through the levels of internal hierarchy.

Although Stalin was a Georgian by nationality, he was also a Great Russian chauvinist. So was Lenin. Not to mention the tsars, who could not have become imperialists simply by the fact of their birth - they were brought up in the tradition of Russian imperial historiography.

-Were the Bolsheviks also brought up on imperial historiography?

- They also shared an imperial historiography. It could not have been otherwise, from a historical point of view.

The main task of Ukraine at the current stage is to ensure that Russians leave us alone; to separate this two-unit matrix on which the basic historical reflection on the question of origins is based. And where are the origins of historical reflections on Russia?

- Since the time of Kyivan Rus...

- Here's the answer to why they pick on us: because the internal system of coordinates in the personality structure of every Russian dictator takes its starting point in Kyiv.

However, a common starting point and the present-day community are not the same thing.

If that were the logic, then Kyiv could claim that Moscow should become a region of Ukraine. But no - because at some stage, Vasily Klyuchevsky [a 19th-century Russian historian] de facto transferred the emphasis on continuity from the "mother of Russian cities" [Kyiv] to the "dynasty". Thus, the focus switched to the notion that, for some reason, Kyiv should be a province, not Moscow.

Until the Russians accept their true history as part of their mentality, until then there will be a terrible mess that will bring death and war everywhere.

 
 

- Most Ukrainians were shocked by the scale of torture and abuse in Bucha and Irpin, but if we open a textbook on the history or study of Soviet terror, we will see that this behaviour is typical of Russians...

- The Russian people have been deliberately brought to a state of brutality by the authorities over the past 30 years. This is a side effect of a totalitarian society as such.

They were deliberately pushed into a totalitarian matrix, although it should be noted that they have never actually left it behind. There was a period that saw a degree of easing, sometime before the First Chechen War.

Russia is moving in the direction of a large Gulag [the government agency that administered the prison camps in the Soviet Union, and also refers to the network of those prison camps] covering the entire territory of the state. And the totalitarian matrix dehumanises every person at every level.

We consider their leaders, we look at Putin: he stands completely stone-faced and proclaims the genocide of the Ukrainian people. Not a single muscle on his face moves, although he must understand that he is condemning an entire nation before the eyes of the whole world.

And with a similar stone face, 70-80% of 140 million [Russian] people say "okay, that's how it should be."

Atrocities are their reaction to the fact that they are nobody in their own country. This is no longer an army, but an armed bunch of scumbags who will do whatever it takes to follow  their orders.

[BANNER3]

- Can this behaviour of Russians be considered the norm for them?

- The civilisation praised by the "Russian world" [mentioned earlier] was brought to such a state by 30 years of work on the mass consciousness of people by the Russian authorities. This was done on purpose, because only in this way can there be a totalitarian state and power that does not change and is cemented. This is a country where historical time and social development have stopped.

But we should understand that this side effect is the norm in totalitarian regimes; the same thing happened in Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, and in post-war China.

When totalitarianism wins as a form of social organisation, mass brutality is its direct consequence. And every war is an atrocity, regardless of who wages it. The exception is the country that defends itself.

Why do Europeans repeat "Never again"? Because they understand that any nation can be brought to such a state, and everyone can turn out to be a victim or an "animal".

We have something to be proud of in this situation: we are holding our ground, and the Russians will have to live with it. Our task is not to lose our humanity. And once we persevere and win, we must ensure that in the end, all the guilty parties are punished. But Russia is playing around with history in order to avoid this.

"The tools of interaction with society are all the same: basements, tortures, mutilations, camps, interrogations"

- If we compare what the Russians are doing now to the Soviet terror of the 1930s and the German occupation during the Second World War, can we say that they have increased the atrocities to a new level?

- Such comparisons are not correct from a historical point of view, because people were different 70 years ago, even if we are talking about your grandfather. The majority of Russians at that time had not completed 4 years of education - we are not talking about the intelligentsia or elites here.

The mass of individuals who lived under the Nazi regime at the time were burghers who had gone bankrupt after the First World War. Moreover, they were people who did not have an average, full-fledged Western European primary education. They were told that a Jew is not a person, and that a physically disabled person can be killed without remorse in order to "purify the race".

It was explained to the Germans that Ukrainian lands are their living space. The Nazis came to Ukraine to get a large piece of land, where they planned to start farms, create a colony where their children and great-grandchildren would rule, and drive Ukrainians into slavery.

And today we see a Russian man, allegedly an educated person, with access to the Internet, raping a girl.

It is possible to compare them, but in making a comparison one should not forget about the internal structures of the countries which commit crimes against the population.

 
 

NKVD [The People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs, abbreviated NKVD, was the secret police agency of the Soviet Union 1934-46, subsequently renamed the KGB]

Photo: Istorychna pravda

After all, if we consider that every Russian is capable of doing this, then we will come to a dead end. That's how they think about us, and genocidal practices grow out of such assumptions: when an entire nation is denied every right to remain human.

- Have the working methods of the Russian special services changed since Soviet times?

- The tools of interaction with society are all the same: basements, tortures, mutilations, camps, interrogations. If you look at a study of what was done during the "Great Terror" of 1937-38, you will see that the same thing has been done for 8 years in the basements of the "DPR" [self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic] and "LPR" [self-proclaimed Luhansk People’s Republic].

The only difference is the scale. The only thing is that mass war crimes are the crimes of another structure, the so-called Russian army. It is now not an army, but basically a terrorist organisation.

And it [the Russian army] is doing the same thing to Ukraine as to Syria. That is, it is  technically possible to turn every Ukrainian city into Aleppo. There are orders, there is no honour, there is no dignity, there are no human values.

After all, the Nazis did the same thing. Our catastrophe is that we will have to live with this terrible neighbour for a long time, because I do not see the leaders of Russia radically changing its internal settings in the near future.

The next 30 years will be very difficult for all of us, and in this situation it is very important to be down-to-earth.

[BANNER4]

- Sexual violence is one of the types of terror in Russia today. How common were such cases during the Soviet terror in the 1930s?

- From a purely scientific point of view, sexual violence is a reflection of barbarism. We have to understand that it is present in every war, because all the violent attitudes, the dehumanisation of the enemy are the archetype of the behaviour of a barbarian warrior who comes to the land he has captured.

The first thing a barbarian does before a defeated enemy is to rape women, daughters and sons, kill the master and begin to rule over all those who have been humiliated. After enduring such stress, one must have a very strong inner core not to break down and to continue the struggle, and even to continue to live.

This topic is studied on the basis of what happened in the Second World War, during Soviet occupation, and from Western European material. Let's consider what happened after the capture of Berlin, where wives and daughters were raped in front of the captured officers, after which those officers committed suicide.

Rape in public places is an act of humiliation and moral murder. When all the information is available, we will talk about what we are dealing with today.

Fortunately, now the Ukrainian army is working quite well, and it will be difficult for them [Russian soldiers] to reach the boys, men, and women, and this may hold them back. In the first stage of the war, when they marched in in full uniform, they had a sense that it was open season.

- You have done a great deal of research on the history of Donbas. Is it now symbolic that the fate of Ukraine is being determined there?

- If our border with Russia was in Ternopil Oblast or Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast, then the symbolism would lie there.

We recaptured Kyiv Oblast, Chernihiv Oblast, and Sumy Oblast not because there is less support for the "Russian world" there than in Donbas. The problem is that Donbas has been a stepping-stone for the past 8 years.

Donbas was chosen as the zone that was easiest to "sway". At that time [in 2014], the fugitive president Yanukovych was "the leader of the common man from Donbas", just as the average Russian now identifies with Putin. That is, these slogans worked there because of a high level of social tension, not because of "pure love" for Russia.

Secondly, it was a zone of chronic social depression, and this weakened Kyiv's position. Similar zones of social disaster in Russia are now zones of support for Putin's "special operation". Their residents thus strive to "establish order" in Ukraine, when they have no influence on anything and live on the edge of survival [within their own territory].

We have taken a huge step forward in these 8 years. I don't like it when they write that if it weren't for Putin and the war, there would be no Ukrainian nation.

The symbolism of Donbas is that in 2014, the Russians wanted to "revive" Novorossiya ["New Russia", the historical term for a region that was part of the Russian Empire and included part of present-day Ukraine], but they failed.

After that, they would state, on various platforms, look: Putin's Russia is a nightmare, and we will build a "new, beautiful Russia" in Donbas. So what happened? It turned into a festering cesspool of terrible degradation: intellectual, moral, economic, and social.

These pseudo-republics, like metastases, spread to the mental body of Russia itself. And now we see that the insignificant "LPR/DPR" [self-proclaimed Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics] have turned out to be a projection of the totalitarian future of Russia itself.

But we have different projections: we will retake Ukrainian Donbas and we will "live our own lives", building a future of peace and freedom.

Mykhailo Zahorodnii, Ukrainska Pravda. Zhyttia

Problem is, Russia significantly outperformed Ukraine in every conceivable development in those 30 years...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/5/2022 at 3:33 PM, frankfurter said:

The words of a raving lunatic.  True, you are in a battle. A battle of your own making, for this is your mentality.  But, China is winning.

 

Not his making. Ron's still fighting the culture war against Communism bankrolled by the CIA

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/act-four/wp/2018/08/22/the-cia-funded-a-culture-war-against-communism-it-should-do-so-again/

I reckon, by now, he should demand additional pay

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.