Tom Nolan + 2,441 TN June 7, 2022 In 2022, Google has dramatically censored its search results for alternative narratives to the "official Climate Change narrative". Many great alternative websites and information is available, but the "Powers That Should Not Be" don't want you to investigate them. Governments and the MainstreamMedia are all in alignment with the offical Climate Change narrative. Famous author Michael Crichton categories the new era environmentalism as a religion. The Godfather of enironmentalism is Maurice Strong, and if you have not heard of him, then you need to watch "How and Why Big Oil Conquered the World" with emphasis on "Why Big Oil Conquered the World." VIDEO - 37 minutes FLASHBACK: Feudalism 2.0 (2007) https://odysee.com/@corbettreport:0/ep006-feudalism2:c Description:Today we examine the implications of a fearful new religion that is being promoted in the mainstream media to introduce a new feudal society to the public. Documentation - https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-006-feudalism-2-0/ For more on Maurice Strong, see... Many people became informed about this ESG and Digital ID and Technocracy approach in 2017. It was all laid out with sourced document transcripts for those who WATCHED... How & Why Big Oil Conquered The World with transcriptshttps://www.corbettreport.com/bigoil/Episode 310 – How Big Oil Conquered The World – 12/28/2015https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-310-rise-of-the-oiligarchs/Episode 321 – Why Big Oil Conquered the World – 10/06/2017https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-321-why-big-oil-conquered-the-world/ 1 1 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
markslawson + 1,042 ML June 9, 2022 On 6/8/2022 at 5:00 AM, Tom Nolan said: In 2022, Google has dramatically censored its search results for alternative narratives to the "official Climate Change narrative". Many great alternative websites and information is available, but the "Powers That Should Not Be" don't want you to investigate them. Governments and the Mainstream Media are all in alignment with the official Climate Change narrative. Famous author Michael Crichton categories the new era environmentalism as a religion. I thoroughly agree with Crichton, and is explanation is amusing for those who care to look at the links. One point that should be noted is that Crichton died the year after the featured video, aged 66, and might even have known that he had cancer when he gave that explanation. I make this point only to head off any attempts to dismiss his point, simply by saying that the author is long gone. His words are still relevant. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RichieRich216 + 454 RK June 9, 2022 Michael Crichton Is the biggest fraud pushing on climate change since Al Gore! Both of these assclowns can take turns kissing each other's asses! DSAF kill each other! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TailingsPond + 468 GE June 9, 2022 (edited) Micheal Crichton is a fiction writer with little grasp on reality. Is he still saying second-hand smoke is safe? "I can tell you that second hand smoke is not a health hazard to anyone and never was, and the EPA has always known it.“ - Michael Crichton. You probably believe Jurassic park is real just like the Matrix and Fight Club (your favs). Do not listen to fiction writers, they spend all day making up believable lies - it is literally their job. FYI Crichton died of cancer. Edited June 9, 2022 by TailingsPond Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
notsonice + 1,068 DM June 9, 2022 On 6/7/2022 at 1:00 PM, Tom Nolan said: In 2022, Google has dramatically censored its search results for alternative narratives to the "official Climate Change narrative". Many great alternative websites and information is available, but the "Powers That Should Not Be" don't want you to investigate them. Governments and the MainstreamMedia are all in alignment with the offical Climate Change narrative. Famous author Michael Crichton categories the new era environmentalism as a religion. The Godfather of enironmentalism is Maurice Strong, and if you have not heard of him, then you need to watch "How and Why Big Oil Conquered the World" with emphasis on "Why Big Oil Conquered the World." VIDEO - 37 minutes FLASHBACK: Feudalism 2.0 (2007) https://odysee.com/@corbettreport:0/ep006-feudalism2:c Description:Today we examine the implications of a fearful new religion that is being promoted in the mainstream media to introduce a new feudal society to the public. Documentation - https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-006-feudalism-2-0/ For more on Maurice Strong, see... Many people became informed about this ESG and Digital ID and Technocracy approach in 2017. It was all laid out with sourced document transcripts for those who WATCHED... How & Why Big Oil Conquered The World with transcriptshttps://www.corbettreport.com/bigoil/Episode 310 – How Big Oil Conquered The World – 12/28/2015https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-310-rise-of-the-oiligarchs/Episode 321 – Why Big Oil Conquered the World – 10/06/2017https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-321-why-big-oil-conquered-the-world/ Google has dramatically censored its search results for alternative narratives?????? then start up an alternative....we will flock to it in droves...ha ha ha 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TailingsPond + 468 GE June 9, 2022 (edited) 3 hours ago, markslawson said: I thoroughly agree with Crichton, and is explanation is amusing for those who care to look at the links. One point that should be noted is that Crichton died the year after the featured video, aged 66, and might even have known that he had cancer when he gave that explanation. I make this point only to head off any attempts to dismiss his point, simply by saying that the author is long gone. His words are still relevant. Not really... "I can tell you that second hand smoke is not a health hazard to anyone and never was, and the EPA has always known it.“ - Michael Crichton. Edited June 9, 2022 by TailingsPond Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boat + 1,315 RG June 9, 2022 On 6/7/2022 at 2:00 PM, Tom Nolan said: In 2022, Google has dramatically censored its search results for alternative narratives to the "official Climate Change narrative". Many great alternative websites and information is available, but the "Powers That Should Not Be" don't want you to investigate them. Governments and the MainstreamMedia are all in alignment with the offical Climate Change narrative. Famous author Michael Crichton categories the new era environmentalism as a religion. The Godfather of enironmentalism is Maurice Strong, and if you have not heard of him, then you need to watch "How and Why Big Oil Conquered the World" with emphasis on "Why Big Oil Conquered the World." VIDEO - 37 minutes FLASHBACK: Feudalism 2.0 (2007) https://odysee.com/@corbettreport:0/ep006-feudalism2:c Description:Today we examine the implications of a fearful new religion that is being promoted in the mainstream media to introduce a new feudal society to the public. Documentation - https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-006-feudalism-2-0/ For more on Maurice Strong, see... Many people became informed about this ESG and Digital ID and Technocracy approach in 2017. It was all laid out with sourced document transcripts for those who WATCHED... How & Why Big Oil Conquered The World with transcriptshttps://www.corbettreport.com/bigoil/Episode 310 – How Big Oil Conquered The World – 12/28/2015https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-310-rise-of-the-oiligarchs/Episode 321 – Why Big Oil Conquered the World – 10/06/2017https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-321-why-big-oil-conquered-the-world/ What do you expect from Putin propaganda. Turns out Republicans have become a front for Putin policies and Fossile Fuel support. Congress was right. Putin did interfere in US elections and is responsible for much of the fake posting by bots in all American media. Bots can’t google and can’t read charts. A known weakness for Russians and Republicans alike. Let’s all thank Musk for bringing the proliferation of bots to public discussion. Bots need not respond. Lol 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tom Nolan + 2,441 TN June 9, 2022 It is easy to notice that some people did not watch the full video "Feudalism 2.0" nor "How and Why Big Oil Conquered the World", because they entirely missed the points... the full concepts being relayed. Ha!...Like claiming that one sees, when one does not thoroughly look. 1 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
markslawson + 1,042 ML June 10, 2022 20 hours ago, TailingsPond said: Not really... "I can tell you that second hand smoke is not a health hazard to anyone and never was, and the EPA has always known it.“ - Michael Crichton. I didn't look at the smoke stuff, wasn't aware that he said it and was talking about climate snot smoking. But, sorry about this, he's probably closer to the truth than the many "find anything at all we can to blame on smoking" brigade. I'm not going to engage in an old debate so it will do you no good to complain to me about it - I just won't respond - but I thought at the time that the secondary smoke demon was over-sold. Much like climate a possibly useful precaution got distorted out of all recognition by activists and lunatics, and a mass of dodgy research. In other words, Crichton is still more right than wrong. Leave it with you. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TailingsPond + 468 GE June 10, 2022 10 minutes ago, markslawson said: In other words, Crichton is still more right than wrong. Leave it with you. Dead of cancer at 66 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ecocharger + 1,375 DL June 11, 2022 On 6/9/2022 at 8:50 PM, TailingsPond said: Dead of cancer at 66 Classic "change the subject" technique, move the spotlight away from the problem at hand. In other words, you have no comeback for the issue being dicussed. 1 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TailingsPond + 468 GE June 11, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, Ecocharger said: Classic "change the subject" technique, move the spotlight away from the problem at hand. In other words, you have no comeback for the issue being dicussed. No, it was an example of the guy's delusional thinking; it sets a precedent. The guy who thought climate change is overblown also thought second-hand smoke was harmless. The fact he died of cancer is just funny. Next you will think he brought dinosaurs back from extinction... The cult loves fiction. Edited June 11, 2022 by TailingsPond Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TailingsPond + 468 GE June 11, 2022 On 6/9/2022 at 6:40 PM, markslawson said: I didn't look at the smoke stuff, wasn't aware that he said it and was talking about climate snot smoking. But, sorry about this, he's probably closer to the truth than the many "find anything at all we can to blame on smoking" brigade. I'm not going to engage in an old debate so it will do you no good to complain to me about it - I just won't respond - but I thought at the time that the secondary smoke demon was over-sold. Much like climate a possibly useful precaution got distorted out of all recognition by activists and lunatics, and a mass of dodgy research. In other words, Crichton is still more right than wrong. Leave it with you. Classic right wing cult - ignore the truth. There is no debate, smoke is bad. At least "I thought at the time" suggests some learning occurred since then. You now probably accept second-hand smoke is bad. If you have children or grandchildren I doubt you would let me blow smoke in their faces - fancy that. Yet car exhaust is still perfectly okay by you... "breathe deep from the tailpipe kids, don't believe the liberals" Fast forward to the future and you will look back and see more false beliefs. Isn't better to error on the side of safety? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Michael Sanches + 187 June 13, 2022 On 6/8/2022 at 9:05 PM, RichieRich216 said: Michael Crichton Is the biggest fraud pushing on climate change since Al Gore! Both of these assclowns can take turns kissing each other's asses! DSAF kill each other! The interesting thing is that Crichton's anti climate change novel comes with a huge bibliography documenting everything he says in his book. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Michael Sanches + 187 June 13, 2022 On 6/11/2022 at 12:20 PM, TailingsPond said: Classic right wing cult - ignore the truth. There is no debate, smoke is bad. At least "I thought at the time" suggests some learning occurred since then. You now probably accept second-hand smoke is bad. If you have children or grandchildren I doubt you would let me blow smoke in their faces - fancy that. Yet car exhaust is still perfectly okay by you... "breathe deep from the tailpipe kids, don't believe the liberals" Fast forward to the future and you will look back and see more false beliefs. Isn't better to error on the side of safety? Your argument is not with Crichton. He references every scientific statement in the book. Your argument is with all the peer reviewed articles in Science and Nature and dozens of other Scientific journals he references. They are the ones who you think are stupid and you are smarter than. You need to demand Science and Nature submit all their articles to you for approval, since you believe you are smarter than all those scientists. 2 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TailingsPond + 468 GE June 13, 2022 16 minutes ago, Michael Sanches said: Your argument is not with Crichton. He references every scientific statement in the book. Your argument is with all the peer reviewed articles in Science and Nature and dozens of other Scientific journals he references. They are the ones who you think are stupid and you are smarter than. You need to demand Science and Nature submit all their articles to you for approval, since you believe you are smarter than all those scientists. Forget papers and peer review for a second. Would you allow people to smoke around your loved ones? He was spewing shit and knew it. A large percentage of scientific papers are eventually refuted, that doesn't mean any of it was bad science. "Stand on the shoulders of giants." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Michael Sanches + 187 June 13, 2022 10 hours ago, TailingsPond said: Forget papers and peer review for a second. Would you allow people to smoke around your loved ones? He was spewing shit and knew it. A large percentage of scientific papers are eventually refuted, that doesn't mean any of it was bad science. "Stand on the shoulders of giants." He also breathed oxygen. Since you say everything he did was corrupt, what do you breathe? For the record I agree with him that breathing oxygen is life saving and I do it myself. Are you planning on refuting him by breathing pure carbon monoxide? 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TailingsPond + 468 GE June 13, 2022 44 minutes ago, Michael Sanches said: He also breathed oxygen. Since you say everything he did was corrupt, what do you breathe? For the record I agree with him that breathing oxygen is life saving and I do it myself. Are you planning on refuting him by breathing pure carbon monoxide? Where did I say that? My main point is that science fiction writers are not scientists. Do not look to them for knowledge. I pointed out a example of him misleading people in the past. If you still think his opinion on second-hand smoke is correct then go ahead and believe his ideas on climate change. Why are you even defending him? Do you work for big tobacco or just love imaginary dinosaurs? Perhaps you smoke and don't want to feel guilty for poisoning others around you? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tom Nolan + 2,441 TN June 14, 2022 On 6/13/2022 at 11:53 AM, TailingsPond said: My main point is that science fiction writers are not scientists. TailingsPond, You demonstrate that you don't know Crichton's background. And you also demonstrate that you have not even watched the full video and context to the concepts presented. 1 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TailingsPond + 468 GE June 14, 2022 1 hour ago, Tom Nolan said: TailingsPond, You demonstrate that you don't know Crichton's background. And you also demonstrate that you have not even watched the full video and context to the concepts presented. I know of his background, obviously, as I demonstrated misinformation he spread in the past. Do you think second hand smoke is harmless? There really is no reason to read past that statement of his before discrediting him. I admit his books are entertaining... he writes good fiction. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tom Nolan + 2,441 TN June 14, 2022 On 6/13/2022 at 11:53 AM, TailingsPond said: My main point is that science fiction writers are not scientists. Many of his novels have medical or scientific underpinnings, reflecting his medical training and scientific background. Crichton received an M.D. from Harvard Medical School in 1969 but did not practice medicine, choosing to focus on his writing instead. He obtained his bachelor's degree in biological anthropology summa cum laude in 1964[15] and was initiated into the Phi Beta Kappa Society.[15] He received a Henry Russell Shaw Traveling Fellowship from 1964 to 1965 and was a visiting lecturer in Anthropology at the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom in 1965.[15] Crichton later enrolled at Harvard Medical School. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andrei Moutchkine + 828 June 15, 2022 On 6/9/2022 at 2:02 PM, Boat said: What do you expect from Putin propaganda. Turns out Republicans have become a front for Putin policies and Fossile Fuel support. Congress was right. Putin did interfere in US elections and is responsible for much of the fake posting by bots in all American media. Bots can’t google and can’t read charts. A known weakness for Russians and Republicans alike. Let’s all thank Musk for bringing the proliferation of bots to public discussion. Bots need not respond. Lol Putin is also the root cause of orphan kittens! (this actually rhymes in Russian) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TailingsPond + 468 GE June 16, 2022 On 6/14/2022 at 4:34 PM, Tom Nolan said: Many of his novels have medical or scientific underpinnings, reflecting his medical training and scientific background. Crichton received an M.D. from Harvard Medical School in 1969 but did not practice medicine, choosing to focus on his writing instead. He obtained his bachelor's degree in biological anthropology summa cum laude in 1964[15] and was initiated into the Phi Beta Kappa Society.[15] He received a Henry Russell Shaw Traveling Fellowship from 1964 to 1965 and was a visiting lecturer in Anthropology at the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom in 1965.[15] Crichton later enrolled at Harvard Medical School. I've read many of his books. He was smart, and a great writer. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
specinho + 440 February 5, 2023 On 6/8/2022 at 3:00 AM, Tom Nolan said: In 2022, Google has dramatically censored its search results for alternative narratives to the "official Climate Change narrative". Many great alternative websites and information is available, but the "Powers That Should Not Be" don't want you to investigate them. Governments and the MainstreamMedia are all in alignment with the offical Climate Change narrative. Famous author Michael Crichton categories the new era environmentalism as a religion. The Godfather of enironmentalism is Maurice Strong, and if you have not heard of him, then you need to watch "How and Why Big Oil Conquered the World" with emphasis on "Why Big Oil Conquered the World." VIDEO - 37 minutes FLASHBACK: Feudalism 2.0 (2007) https://odysee.com/@corbettreport:0/ep006-feudalism2:c Description:Today we examine the implications of a fearful new religion that is being promoted in the mainstream media to introduce a new feudal society to the public. Documentation - https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-006-feudalism-2-0/ For more on Maurice Strong, see... Many people became informed about this ESG and Digital ID and Technocracy approach in 2017. It was all laid out with sourced document transcripts for those who WATCHED... How & Why Big Oil Conquered The World with transcriptshttps://www.corbettreport.com/bigoil/Episode 310 – How Big Oil Conquered The World – 12/28/2015https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-310-rise-of-the-oiligarchs/Episode 321 – Why Big Oil Conquered the World – 10/06/2017https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-321-why-big-oil-conquered-the-world/ It's a great video. Would like to highlight a few points probably missed by many of us: 1. "Rising level of CO2 was having a 800 years lag from increase in temperature." "Increase in temperature is probably causing the rise in CO2. Not the other way round." 2. "The sun is causing climate change across the galaxy, i.e.in Pluto, Jupiter, mars etc." 3. "There is a direct relation between sunspot activities and temperature." ***** Would like to highlight the lag similar to that of first statement in the graph shown i.e.the highest sunspot activities brought temperature to the lowest. Reduction in sunspot activities increases temperature. As mentioned in one of the discussion, if sunspots represent cooler areas at the sun, then less radiation is expected to be radiated. Hence, cooler temperature on earth. 4. Political agenda "plug CO2 to destroy industries...... By claiming CO2 the culprit, the targets would be on industries and businesses." 5. "Anthropogenic emission is much less than that from volcano eruptions, animal fart, decay of material etc." *** Climate change might be a multifactorial issue. Both natural factors and Anthropogenic contribution are responsible. But the political agendas might be what mess things up...... ****** If we do not have politicians from any party, whose resumes shall we look at to make the pick? Old tradition of choosing grocers or farmers who know the price of your daily expenditure? Government, after all is administering toiletry list of affairs of citizens..... Those that never had experience of buying their own food, going to market themselves, queing to buy toilet paper etc should be disqualified. 'o' +~+ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eyes Wide Open + 3,539 February 5, 2023 On 6/11/2022 at 10:20 AM, TailingsPond said: Classic right wing cult - ignore the truth. There is no debate, smoke is bad. At least "I thought at the time" suggests some learning occurred since then. You now probably accept second-hand smoke is bad. If you have children or grandchildren I doubt you would let me blow smoke in their faces - fancy that. Yet car exhaust is still perfectly okay by you... "breathe deep from the tailpipe kids, don't believe the liberals" Fast forward to the future and you will look back and see more false beliefs. Isn't better to error on the side of safety? You are quite correct...better to safe than sorry... 1 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Most Active Members
Recently Online
Popular Members
Trending Discussions