Marina Schwarz + 1,576 October 31, 2018 Lead is the worst performer in terms of price on the LME this year despite conditions that would suggest a truly bull market, such as a widening deficit and bad production growth prospects. But apparently, everyone hates not just Chris but also lead because of its sad, toxic past and its role in ICE batteries. The logic seems to be as EVs rise, ICEs, complete with their batteries, will fall and so will lead demand. But I think ICEs won't fall so quickly or so thoroughly anytime soon, so it's kind of unfair on lead. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guillaume Albasini + 851 October 31, 2018 But there are perhaps some hope for lead use in new products like the promising perovskite solar cells... Perovskite solar cells could be as efficient as current solar cells but much cheaper and could be easily created by simply applying a sort of paint on a glass. https://www.printedelectronicsworld.com/articles/15554/perovskite-solar-cells-leap-towards-commercialization https://www.printedelectronicsworld.com/articles/15565/painting-solar-cells-provides-new-path-to-market https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perovskite_solar_cell Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guillaume Albasini + 851 November 1, 2018 16 hours ago, mthebold said: Do they have a plan to recycle these? You can't throw them in landfills because of the lead, and they're not as easily reprocessed as a Pb battery's simple chemistry. In fact this is a huge concern. The significant lead content of metal halide perovskites is imposing a great strain on their public perception and acceptance. Therefore the research is focusing on finding lead-free perovskites. In fact, the concentration of lead in the currently working perovskite solar cells (PSC) falls short of the limit adopted in all the countries that regulate the use of heavy metals in electronics. For example, the European Union adheres to the “Directive on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment,” RoHS1 in 2003 and the subsequent RoHS2 in 2011, which are also known as the “lead-free directives.” The RoHS takes into account the more recent understanding of long-term risks associated with continuous exposure to low levels of toxic heavy metals. Specifically, it restricts to 0.1% in weight the maximum concentration of lead in each homogeneous material contained in any electronic devices, i.e., the perovskite within a PSC. Unfortunately, all the halide perovskites that have been so far demonstrated as effective photovoltaic materials contain more than 10% lead in weight. But it's not easy to find a substitute to lead., most attempt having shown critical stability issues. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542435117300806 Solving the stability and toxicity issue is the key to develop this new generation of solar cells. But some promising results are emerging... https://phys.org/news/2018-06-lead-free-efficient-perovskite-photovoltaic-cells.html https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00871 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Most Active Members
Recently Online
Popular Members