footeab@yahoo.com + 2,129 October 16, 2019 9 minutes ago, remake it said: And when the people who are trained to work why these measurements change over time, and you disagree, their measurements become fraudulent ... part of a big scam, a conspiracy. Dear fraud, when there is an error band and someone arbitrarily moves the "data" to the top of the error band, and then removes the mean and minus portion this is called FRAUD. Not a conspiracy. FRAUD. You can lie all you wish. It does not change the facts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest October 16, 2019 hahhaha 'dear fraud...' Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remake it + 288 October 16, 2019 7 minutes ago, footeab@yahoo.com said: Dear fraud, when there is an error band and someone arbitrarily moves the "data" to the top of the error band, and then removes the mean and minus portion this is called FRAUD. Not a conspiracy. FRAUD. You can lie all you wish. It does not change the facts. Why are you persisting here and not opening another thread if this is a concern to you, as your views reflect those of climate change conspiracy theorists who latch onto the claims of people who do not actually publish anything on climate because they do not undertake any scientific research. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
footeab@yahoo.com + 2,129 October 16, 2019 6 minutes ago, remake it said: Why are you persisting here and not opening another thread if this is a concern to you, as your views reflect those of climate change conspiracy theorists who latch onto the claims of people who do not actually publish anything on climate because they do not undertake any scientific research. In other words, your blatant blind adherence to fraud which YOU brought up in the thread(not anyone else, YOU), is being called out. According to you basic science/logic/statistics need not apply to YOUR position, Eh? You are demonstrating exactly why the climate fraudsters are lying and committing blatant fraud hopping they can keep their lies rolling long enough to retire. EGO. Loss of face. Being proven wrong and unwilling to admit it when their theory has been utterly demolished by their own models, so instead they change the data hoping everyone is a lazy gullible douche. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remake it + 288 October 16, 2019 4 minutes ago, footeab@yahoo.com said: In other words, your blatant blind adherence to fraud which YOU brought up in the thread(not anyone else, YOU), is being called out. This is not true as can be seen from this time stamp on YOUR earlier post: On 10/16/2019 at 3:03 AM, footeab@yahoo.com said: If one uses the old stations or EVERY single station by itself, they all show a constant, uh hem, CONSTANT sea level rise, no rise, or falling sea levels all at a CONSTANT rate. To see the fraud in action: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cK8wHwm7oWU Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest October 16, 2019 Boris Johnson speech in Parliament, in reference to Shadow Chancellor's reaction towards Brexit related issue ... ''And I see the gentleman there already... recoiling like a Transylvanian in the sunlight'' Gold Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
footeab@yahoo.com + 2,129 October 17, 2019 3 hours ago, DayTrader said: Boris Johnson speech in Parliament, in reference to Shadow Chancellor's reaction towards Brexit related issue ... ''And I see the gentleman there already... recoiling like a Transylvanian in the sunlight'' Gold Maybe said Transylvanian can now eat fish fished by UK fishermen in their own waters instead of the fishing rights being given to other countries... Don't forget all the marine mechanics who will now have jobs again as well. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
footeab@yahoo.com + 2,129 October 17, 2019 3 hours ago, remake it said: This is not true as can be seen from this time stamp on YOUR earlier post: What are you 2 years old and cannot read page 1 where you go whining on about Antarctica. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remake it + 288 October 17, 2019 1 hour ago, footeab@yahoo.com said: What are you 2 years old and cannot read page 1 where you go whining on about Antarctica. That's two transparent lies from you in a row, so do want to go for the trifecta? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest October 17, 2019 So ... you're not 2 years old? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest November 5, 2019 https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-eu-cohesion-summit/richer-will-get-more-poorer-states-say-eu-spending-proposals-unfair-idUKKBN1XF1P8 A link, copied and pasted, with no commentary. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Most Active Members
Recently Online
Popular Members
Most Active Members
Recently Online
Popular Members
