Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, remake it said:

And when the people who are trained to work why these measurements change over time, and you disagree, their measurements become fraudulent ... part of a big scam, a conspiracy.

Dear fraud, when there is an error band and someone arbitrarily moves the "data" to the top of the error band, and then removes the mean and minus portion this is called FRAUD.  Not a conspiracy.  FRAUD.  You can lie all you wish.  It does not change the facts. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hahhaha 'dear fraud...' 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, footeab@yahoo.com said:

Dear fraud, when there is an error band and someone arbitrarily moves the "data" to the top of the error band, and then removes the mean and minus portion this is called FRAUD.  Not a conspiracy.  FRAUD.  You can lie all you wish.  It does not change the facts. 

Why are you persisting here and not opening another thread if this is a concern to you, as your views reflect those of climate change conspiracy theorists who latch onto the claims of people who do not actually publish anything on climate because they do not undertake any scientific research.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, remake it said:

Why are you persisting here and not opening another thread if this is a concern to you, as your views reflect those of climate change conspiracy theorists who latch onto the claims of people who do not actually publish anything on climate because they do not undertake any scientific research.

In other words, your blatant blind adherence to fraud which YOU brought up in the thread(not anyone else, YOU), is being called out.  According to you basic science/logic/statistics need not apply to YOUR position, Eh?  

You are demonstrating exactly why the climate fraudsters are lying and committing blatant fraud hopping they can keep their lies rolling long enough to retire.  EGO.  Loss of face.  Being proven wrong and unwilling to admit it when their theory has been utterly demolished by their own models, so instead they change the data hoping everyone is a lazy gullible douche. 

  • Great Response! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, footeab@yahoo.com said:

In other words, your blatant blind adherence to fraud which YOU brought up in the thread(not anyone else, YOU), is being called out. 

This is not true as can be seen from this time stamp on YOUR earlier post:

On 10/16/2019 at 3:03 AM, footeab@yahoo.com said:

  If one uses the old stations or EVERY single station by itself, they all show a constant, uh hem, CONSTANT sea level rise, no rise, or falling sea levels all at a CONSTANT rate. To see the fraud in action: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cK8wHwm7oWU

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Boris Johnson speech in Parliament, in reference to Shadow Chancellor's reaction towards Brexit related issue ...

''And I see the gentleman there already... recoiling like a Transylvanian in the sunlight''

Gold

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DayTrader said:

Boris Johnson speech in Parliament, in reference to Shadow Chancellor's reaction towards Brexit related issue ...

''And I see the gentleman there already... recoiling like a Transylvanian in the sunlight''

Gold

Maybe said Transylvanian can now eat fish fished by UK fishermen in their own waters instead of the fishing rights being given to other countries...  Don't forget all the marine mechanics who will now have jobs again as well.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, remake it said:

This is not true as can be seen from this time stamp on YOUR earlier post:

 

What are you 2 years old and cannot read page 1 where you go whining on about Antarctica. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, footeab@yahoo.com said:

What are you 2 years old and cannot read page 1 where you go whining on about Antarctica. 

That's two transparent lies from you in a row, so do want to go for the trifecta?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So ... you're not 2 years old?

  • Great Response! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.