Reactions to Delaware Basin news shows misunderstanding of petroleum economics (or the end of OPEC) by Dr. Daniel Fine
Entry posted by bluewill ·
7,048 views
- delaware basin
- petroleum
- petroleum economics
- american petroleum institute
- opec
- nopec
- russia
- china
- qater
- lng
- saudi aramco
- saudi arabia
- mbs
- oil demand
- crude oil
- oil glut
- oil consumption
- new mexico
- permian
- permian basin
- wti
- brent
- oil prices
- bakken
- williston basin
- colorado
- san juan basin
- albuquerque
- santa fe
- dr. daniel fine
- republican party
- democrat party
- gop
- president trump
- white house
- energy dominance
- foreign policy
- energy policy
- foreign affairs
- european union
- united kingdom
- british prime minister
- nafta
- fair trade
- geopoltics
- oil and gas
- shale
- u.s. oil producers
- oil and gas association
- oil producers
- free market
- world news
- business news
- oil news
- oil traders
- oil trading
- intelligence community
- israel
- middle east
The full article is here-> https://www.daily-times.com/story/money/industries/oil-gas/2018/12/18/delaware-basin-news-reveals-public-misunderstanding-oil-industry-economics/2282224002/
"This writer has warned that world oil demand is sluggish and imprecise with only references to legacy guesswork that the developing world plus China demand will support prices long term or forever. Yet, world oil consumption has increased only 5 percent in the last 10 years.
OPEC, with Saudi Arabia as its leader, has expired as the world administrator of the price of crude oil. At its December meeting in Austria, Qatar quit after nearly 70 years and announced concentration in LNG production and world export as the existing market leader.
OPEC emerged with a serious factional split between OPEC original and OPEC with Russia. There would have been no agreement without Russia and its old Russian Federation members as producers. Moscow is the new world oil price-setter indirectly while OPEC Original becomes a collaborator in cartel for now. Simply put, Saudi Arabia no longer is the “residual supplier” alone.
Nearing 12 million b/d and over the Permian producers voluntarily will be required by this price to revise capital spending and place production into DUC (non-completions) and storage. There is doubt that the export of tight or shale oil would continue if the Brent price falls lower and loses its premium over WTI. A net cutback of Permian between 500,000 to 750,00 b/d should be a non-OPEC response to an oil glut even more serious than 2014.
Saudi Arabia is untouched as an American strategic ally in confronting Iran in the Middle East as a hegemonic threat."
- 1
2 Comments
Recommended Comments