LAOIL + 33 OS February 22, 2018 New study says there has been a dramatic increase in earthquakes in Kansas since 2012, attributing it to oil and gas operations. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rodent + 1,424 February 22, 2018 This article wasn't about that specifically, but it mentioned fracking studies as it relates to earthquakes, and the oil and gas industry's "contribution" to the studies, among other things. https://www.texasobserver.org/oil-gas-lobbyist-claims-texas-drone-law-meant-deter-bad-journalists/ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TraderTate + 186 TS February 22, 2018 saw that. 6,845 earthquakes between March 2014 and December 2016? Is this real? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Seleskya + 50 AS February 22, 2018 it's not the fracking, though. It's not the oil production at all, as far as I can see by the latest research. It's the saltwater injections ... so it's down to the EOR, not the original frackers. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TraderTate + 186 TS February 22, 2018 all the same ... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Seleskya + 50 AS February 22, 2018 no, it's not the same ... if you want to get a handle on the problem you have to know where it's really coming from. So, as we advance our technology and try to get all the oil that's left in the ground from conventional means, we are consistently improved EOR (enhanced oil recovery) methods. That improves production efficiency. But we don't really know what the consequences are. In this case, in Kansas, they are attributing it to an increase in the injections of wastewater back into the Earth. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blockchainbull + 26 CM February 23, 2018 in a way it IS all the same. It's still 'fracking' for all intents and purposes Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Seleskya + 50 AS February 23, 2018 I'm not cheerleading for fracking here or trying to redirect blame; I'm simply saying that we can't get vague if we want it to be seriously examined. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aspoerl + 28 AS February 23, 2018 51 minutes ago, Seleskya said: I'm not cheerleading for fracking here or trying to redirect blame; I'm simply saying that we can't get vague if we want it to be seriously examined. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rodent + 1,424 February 23, 2018 I agree, specificity is important here. It's impossible to fix a problem if we don't even know what it is. The solution is likely not "just don't frack". But something more measured. But we will never find that measured fix if we're either a) afraid to admit there is a problem or b) blame the problem on something else entirely or c) exaggerate the problem so that it sucks some of the credibility out of it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites