Freeze dried mule + 10 TM March 6, 2018 'S&P 500 companies expected to buy back $800 billion of their own shares' I stand by my original comment: Publicly traded companies reducing shares outstanding is a good thing. For those that want to participate, save your money and buy stocks! The conservative person, who buys a $500 phone, rather than the $1000 state-of-the-art' latest model, and saves and/or invests that money, will have a lot more than the person that squanders it. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TraderTate + 186 TS March 7, 2018 But then nothing's going into R&D, increased production capacity, etc. ... it's not good for growth. It's a stock boost usually--but even now when I look at all the announcements of buybacks both done and planned, stocks are really moving on this. Berkshire got a bit of a boost when Buffett said he might consider it, but that's about it. It reminds me of the growing trend of activist investors trying to takeover boards to stop long-term growth plans for quick bucks. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meanwhile + 49 PT March 7, 2018 It wasn’t until July 2017, when the prospect of tax reform became visible, that buybacks started to gain traction again, recording five straight months of increase. https://safehaven.com/article/45039/How-Are-Corporations-Using-Their-Tax-Savings Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Freeze dried mule + 10 TM March 8, 2018 Buybacks don't necessarily use R&D funds. Many are using tax-cuts. Why shouldn't the people who put money at risk be rewarded? XOM, Exxon-Mobil was one of the majors that did not announce a share back-back and was punished for it yesterday! 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rodent + 1,424 March 8, 2018 35 minutes ago, Freeze dried mule said: Buybacks don't necessarily use R&D funds. Many are using tax-cuts. Why shouldn't the people who put money at risk be rewarded? XOM, Exxon-Mobil was one of the majors that did not announce a share back-back and was punished for it yesterday! Right. When the rewards are no longer flowing, people will stop putting up their money for risk. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rodent + 1,424 March 12, 2018 On 3/8/2018 at 10:46 AM, Freeze dried mule said: Buybacks don't necessarily use R&D funds. Many are using tax-cuts. Why shouldn't the people who put money at risk be rewarded? XOM, Exxon-Mobil was one of the majors that did not announce a share back-back and was punished for it yesterday! And so, completely off topic. But I have to ask. Why "freeze dried mule"? I feel there must be some story behind this. Please share. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
claudiomelo2005 + 2 CM March 12, 2018 On 3/5/2018 at 10:51 AM, Meanwhile said: JP Morgan said that S&P 500 companies will buy back a record $800 billion of their own shares in 2018, funded by savings on tax, strong earnings and the repatriation of cash held overseas. The analysis far exceeds the $530 billion in stock buybacks the firm recorded in 2017, MarketWatch notes. That will far exceed the $530 billion in share buybacks that was recorded in 2017. Companies buying your' s own stocks in a bull market? Why? To maintain a bull market? 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Johnecon + 19 JS March 21, 2018 Buying back your own shares is a sign that you cannot find any projects with adequate returns to invest in. You are either in the wrong business or have no imagination. It gives a share price boost that may fool the short term shareholder but should be a red flag to the long term one. Â 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites