Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Douglas Buckland said:

The polls have been discredited since before the last election. Was that a gand conspiracy?

Considering that just about every "news" organization conducts polls these days, and the fact that they only cite polls that agree with their narrative, there is no reason to blindly accept what the media says "the polls indicate"!

You want facts on this, UNC?  Here is what The Pew Research Center has to say about it.  And they directly address how the public's perception of the 2016 was so wrong.

Key things to know about election polling in the United States

(Excerpt)

After the 2016 presidential election, some observers understandably questioned whether polling in the United States is still up to the task of producing accurate information. Errors in 2016 laid bare some real limitations of polling, even as clear-eyed reviews of national polls in both 2016 and 2018 found that polls still perform well when done carefully.

One way to help avoid a repeat of the skepticism about surveys that followed the last presidential election is to narrow the gap between perception and reality when it comes to how polling works. People have many notions about polling – often based on an introductory statistics class, but sometimes even less – that are frequently false. The real environment in which polls are conducted bears little resemblance to the idealized settings presented in textbooks.  

With that in mind, here are some key points the public should know about polling heading into this year’s presidential election.  The real environment in which polls are conducted bears little resemblance to the idealized settings presented in textbooks.  

Different polling organizations conduct their surveys in quite different ways. Survey methodology is undergoing a period of creative ferment. Currently, CNN and Fox News conduct polls by telephone using live interviewers, CBS News and Politico field their polls online using opt-in panels, and The Associated Press and Pew Research Center conduct polls online using a panel of respondents recruited offline. There is even a fourth group of pollsters that combine methods like robocalls and online surveying with opt-in samples. These different approaches have consequences for data quality, as well as accuracy in elections.

The barriers to entry in the polling field have disappeared. Technology has disrupted polling in ways similar to its impact on journalism: by making it possible for anyone with a few thousand dollars to enter the field and conduct a national poll. As with journalism, there are pluses and minuses to this democratization. There has been a wave of experimentation with new approaches, but there has also been a proliferation of polls from firms with little to no survey credentials or track record. In 2016, this contributed to a state polling landscape overrun with fast and cheap polls, most of which made a preventable mistake: failing to correct for an overrepresentation of college-educated voters, who leaned heavily toward Hillary Clinton. Some newcomer polls might provide good data, but poll watchers should not take that on faith.

A poll may label itself “nationally representative,” but that’s not a guarantee that its methodology is solid. When applied to surveys, the phrase “nationally representative” sounds like a promise of a poll’s trustworthiness. But the term doesn’t convey any specific technical information or come with any guarantees. Surveys can be sampled and adjusted to represent the country on certain dimensions, so any person can make this claim about any poll, regardless of its quality. Unfortunately, this is part of a broader trend in which the lingo used to promote surveys (“organic sampling,” “next-gen sampling” or “global marketplace,” for example) can on some occasions obscure flawed methodologies that lead to bias. Poll watchers would do well to focus on key questions for vetting polls, such as those included in this guide for reporters published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science’s SciLine, or Pew Research Center’s own field guide to polling.

The real margin of error is often about double the one reported. The notion that a typical margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points leads people to think that polls are more precise than they really are. Why is that? For starters, the margin of error addresses only one source of potential error: the fact that random samples are likely to differ a little from the population just by chance. But there are three other, equally important sources of error in polling: nonresponse, coverage error (where not all the target population has a chance of being sampled) and mismeasurement. Not only does the margin of error fail to account for those other sources of potential error, it implies to the public that they do not exist, which is not true.

Several recent studies show that the average error in a poll estimate may be closer to 6 percentage points, not the 3 points implied by a typical margin of error. While polls remain useful in showing whether the public tends to favor or oppose key policies, this hidden error underscores the fact that polls are not precise enough to call the winner in a close election.

  • Great Response! 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Ward Smith said:

The only way the democrats could act this blatantly, when they know full well their popularity is hitting an all time low, is if they have counting the votes gamed. Everyone will come out and vote the bastards out, but amazingly, when the votes get counted (or the mail in ballots keep showing up) the conservatives who clearly won will see their 10 and 20 point leads vanish. This is exactly what happened in Orange County election fraud 2018. You're talking about neighborhoods where everyone works at defense contractors like Lockheed suddenly going rogue and voting in liberal democrats? Never happened, but that's how the votes got counted. I fear for our democracy, the Demoncrats have flushed it down the toilet. We'll turn into a banana republic before they're done. Then I fear for the world. 

Agreed. Americans have every reason to fear. Your enemies are within.

uh, USA is not a democracy. It is a republic. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

21 hours ago, Douglas Buckland said:

I honestly believe that conservative America has simply had enough of the adolescent mentality and tantrums, gone ‘dark’ and they are simply waiting until November to express their disgust.

 

What conservative America? Trump is a vote buying socialist. All he does is roll out money he doesn't have. I find it funny that rich people I know are getting some free US cash.  Yep, trump mails money to people living in Canada with dual citizenship.

 

Nobody has "gone dark."  People are getting quiet because they are losing.  They don't want to eat their words so they shut up and go away.  Look at the forum, butt hurt losers shut up and leave. 

 

Why does everyone give you a pass as an American? You choose not to live there.

 

Edited by Enthalpic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, UNC12345 said:

How can you write this?  Pretty much every poll that comes out says this is not true, quite the opposite in fact.  I am sure you will discredit all polls except the ones Trump refers to.

Are all the pollsters crooked too in this grand conspiracy of yours?

Ward lives in an alternate reality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

13 hours ago, Ward Smith said:

The only way the democrats could act this blatantly, when they know full well their popularity is hitting an all time low, is if they have counting the votes gamed. Everyone will come out and vote the bastards out, but amazingly, when the votes get counted (or the mail in ballots keep showing up) the conservatives who clearly won will see their 10 and 20 point leads vanish. This is exactly what happened in Orange County election fraud 2018. You're talking about neighborhoods where everyone works at defense contractors like Lockheed suddenly going rogue and voting in liberal democrats? Never happened, but that's how the votes got counted. I fear for our democracy, the Demoncrats have flushed it down the toilet. We'll turn into a banana republic before they're done. Then I fear for the world. 

You "vote out" the incumbent... you elect a new leader.

Your delusions are getting out of hand, in no way is trump leading.

COVID is real and is killing the stupid faster than anyone else. Go to a trump rally without a mask, please.

 

it is what it is.jpg

Edited by Enthalpic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, UNC12345 said:

How can you write this?  Pretty much every poll that comes out says this is not true, quite the opposite in fact.  I am sure you will discredit all polls except the ones Trump refers to.

Are all the pollsters crooked too in this grand conspiracy of yours?

To turn the question, do you believe any number of years of Biden/Harris would do any better? The policies they suggest would make worse every item the US population marked as a concern. And the existential threat to the world at large from China would not be addressed by Biden as it was not addressed by Obama, during who's term, China had the resurgence of the hardliner CCP leadership, the creation of the Xi dictatorship and massive security breaches into all civilian and military tech.companies with massive technology theft.

The actual question, considering how intertwined the Dem narrative and the CCP's are, whether there is any choice other than Trump that would not end up with the US being attacked with its own technology.

  • Great Response! 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, ronwagn said:

All you have to do is look at the proposed Demoncrat platform agreed on by Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden. Guess who had the most say in that. 

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-bernie-sanders-unity-task-forces-release-dnc-platform-recommendations/ar-BB16v3Iw?li=BBnb7Kz

 

Please see my work: Vetting Joe Biden and Kamala Harris 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/19dWQ1ucBsPQyj0WuVMfXmr6DTTeG8TwKbVuWE9_Rswg/edit

Do you mean Dumbocrat?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

13 hours ago, frankfurter said:

Agreed. Americans have every reason to fear. Your enemies are within.

uh, USA is not a democracy. It is a republic. 

U.S. is changing.  Neither a democracy or republic .  US is turning into a one party country in partnership with a cooperating media companies that support their narrative. If you disagree you're a racist , misogynist hater.  Your job and reputation will be compromised. 

The great America Experiment is coming to an end.  

 

Wall treet  contributed  $26 million to Biden as soon as they saw they have another another politician in their pocket on the ticket that will continue their "Carried Interest" income tax loophole . 

Kamala do u support Carried Interest ? 

Edited by BLA
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, UNC12345 said:

How can you write this?  Pretty much every poll that comes out says this is not true, quite the opposite in fact.  I am sure you will discredit all polls except the ones Trump refers to.

Are all the pollsters crooked too in this grand conspiracy of yours?

Read what @Dan Warnickabove had to say about poll's accuracy. All correct and all points I independently argued elsewhere before and after the 2016 election. I'd love to point back there and save typing but they disabled comments and wiped the site. 

But there is a poll that matters, having been replicated numerous times by numerous entities. That poll concerns Congress approval ratings. Given that democrats control the House, that 8% approval doesn't sound good does it?

Meanwhile in actual elections, I'm always amazed how democrats keep winning in locations where their politicians are hated. Makes me wonder just how many dead people are voting. This is of course why democrats are so focused on getting people registered to vote. They don't care if those people actually go out and vote, once Acorn got your name, even if it was Daffy Duck, come election day Daffy will duly vote from cartoon land for the Democratic ticket. It's just the way they roll. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

2 hours ago, Ward Smith said:

 .   .   .   .vote, once Acorn got your name, even if it was Daffy Duck, come election day Daffy will duly vote from cartoon land for the Democratic ticket. It's just the way they roll. 

In 2016 election pollsters believe there were 3% to 4% of Trump .supporters that hid their vote for Trump from polling firms.

Some believe that number has doubled today to 6% to 8%.

Wallsreet gave $26 million  to campaign as soon as they saw kalamala on ticket, who will support their "Carried interest"  tax loophole .

Kamala do you support carried interest ?

Nobody has the balls to ask Joe or Kam this question. 

Edited by BLA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Y'all seem terribly confused about this very pragmatic step from the democrats. Let Beau explain it for you:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Dan Warnick said:

And because they were so wrong the last time, we will simply wait until the election decides the actual winner.  My bets are clearly on Donald Trump winning and 4 more years of rooting out the evils of the Left.

Perhaps if you stick your head deep enough when you try to escape reality, you will see a world where Trump wins the 2020 elections, but it will be quite a different planet from the rest of us inhabit. He has shown too many people how grossly incompetent he is, he angered almost everyone and now stands alone like plonk plank. 

  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yoshiro Kamamura said:

Y'all seem terribly confused about this very pragmatic step from the democrats. Let Beau explain it for you:

 

Terribly boring and had to stop listening when he said liberals were "Center Right". Glad to hear he's reading from the 1984 Newspeak playbook. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All i can think is what ticket combination....While im not sure how many see this i find Humor will win the day

 

LADIES AND GENTLEMAN OF AMERICA I GIVE YOU THE MESSENGERS OF HOPE&CHANGE

DEMENTIA  JOE & MENOPAUSE KAMALA.... "UNCHAINED"

 

Bringing you the energy of ANTIFA

The Visionary's of The GREEN ENERGY REVOLUTION

The Freedom OF No LAW ENFORCEMENT

 

As i see it when asked how that all works out a deafening reply of "ILL GET BACK TO YOU ON THAT"...

What a time in the US...the next 90 day's will be a demonstration of Thee Worlds Greatest Chit Show...hence ..."UNCHAINED"

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She hurts him. Tulsi Gabbard destroyed her in the primary debates and laid out the line of attack that will be used. Here is her argument.

"There are too many examples to cite, but…she blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so. She kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as cheap labor for the state of California. And she fought to keep cash bail system in place that impacts poor people in the worst kind of way.”

On top of that she had to sleep with former Gov Jerry Brown to become senator which should turn off some women's rights advocates.

 

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

45 minutes ago, shadowkin said:

She hurts him. Tulsi Gabbard destroyed her in the primary debates and laid out the line of attack that will be used. Here is her argument.

.  .  .  . And she fought to keep cash bail system in place that impacts poor people in the worst kind of way.”

On top of that she had to sleep with former Gov Jerry Brown to become senator which should turn off some women's rights advocates.

 

Did she really sleep with Brown ?

Edited by BLA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BLA said:

Did she really sleep with Brown ?

Willie Brown, mayor of San Francisco. Yes. 

Governor Brown? Who knows? 

  • Like 1
  • Great Response! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, shadowkin said:

She hurts him. Tulsi Gabbard destroyed her in the primary debates and laid out the line of attack that will be used. Here is her argument.

"There are too many examples to cite, but…she blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so. She kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as cheap labor for the state of California. And she fought to keep cash bail system in place that impacts poor people in the worst kind of way.”

On top of that she had to sleep with former Gov Jerry Brown to become senator which should turn off some women's rights advocates.

 

I watched her in an interview, and 3 points caught my attention and really turned me off:

1.  Illegal immigrants should never face ANY jail time, even while processing to deport.  Period.  Ever.

2.  She prosecuted and jailed over 1,500 people for marijuana possession.

3.  California does not have a drug problem; California has a homeless problem.  California should provide housing for the homeless 

So on the one hand, she jails people for the petty crime of smoking pot, while on the other hand she will give free housing to "homeless" people (pssst, 98% of the homeless in California do have a drug problem).

She made those statements only minutes apart, and was solid on them.  Let me think on that.....Nah, I don't think I'll be voting for her anytime soon.

  • Like 1
  • Great Response! 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

I wonder why no MSM reported this?

Source:https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/ilhan-omar-must-resign-new-evidence-from-nearly-three-dozen-somalis-reveals-a-probable-spree-of-felonies

Ilhan Omar must resign: New evidence from nearly three dozen Somalis reveals a probable spree of felonies

 

The "open secret" is now simply open. Yet the media cowardice continues.

 
Photo by Stephen Maturen/Getty Images
 

According to the media's general judgment, 2020 U.S. voters are most concerned with purportedly complex issues of crime and justice. Voters should place no trust in this. This same media forbade itself to investigate a simple, yet objectively historic corruption scandal of national interest.

 

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) has almost certainly committed the most extensive spree of felonies by a congressperson in U.S. history. As a criminal, she also appears to be historically inept. Scores of verified items of evidence against her are in the public record. Omar has never challenged their authenticity and has never produced a single piece of evidence to support her version of events.

She faces a primary on Tuesday. She again won her party's endorsement. She again won House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's endorsement — and her funding.

The mainstream media judges this remarkable situation to be irrelevant to Minnesota voters, let alone the dominant concern. Editorial malpractice on issues of crime, justice, and the 2020 election spreads everywhere this summer; by no coincidence, the spread can be traced to irresponsible media coverage of a deadly riot in Rep. Omar's district.

 

 

Below are 32 new, verifiable, archived pieces of evidence of Omar's historic crime spree.

* * * * *

image.png.68402f6d685ebe8abb3964651a69acff.png

* * * * *

Above: One of many Somali-language tributes to "Colonel Nur Said Elmi," Rep. Ilhan Omar's father, sent from around the world by family, friends, and contacts following his tragic June 2020 death from a COVID-19 infection. As a high-ranking officer in Somalia's (U.S.-backed) military from the 1970s until 1991, he was well known by this name and title.

* * * * *

In mid-June, Ilhan Omar's father tragically died from a COVID-19 infection. Expressions of grief, condolences, and prayers arrived from around the world, but particularly from the Somali-speaking immigrant community of Minneapolis and from the U.K. By all accounts, he earned his reputation as a gentle, kind neighbor, well known and beloved within Cedar-Riverside, as he had been in Somalia.

 

 

His relevance to Rep. Omar's landmark scandal is, of course, his birth name. Upon arriving in the United States in 1995, he claimed to be "Nur Omar Mohamed" and received a Social Security number with this name. However, all appeared to know him as Nur Said. He presented himself as Nur Said. Both Ilhan and her sister Sahra Noor referred to their father as Nur Said (prior to deleting the evidence). He is identified on-screen as "Nur Said, Ilhan's father" in the 2018 documentary film "Time for Ilhan" and again as "Nur Said" in the credits. Twice.

Most importantly, British citizen Leila Nur Said Elmi declared her father to be "Nur Said Elmi, military officer" on her 1997 marriage application. (Click the link to see the application and a photo of Leila Nur Said Elmi with both Ilhan and Nur Said.)

From 2009 until 2017, Ilhan Omar was married (by a Christian minister) to British citizen Ahmed Nur Said Elmi. Somali naming customs are patrilineal and do not use family surnames. For example, "Ahmed Nur Said Elmi" implies that Ahmed's father is "Nur," his grandfather is "Said," and his great-grandfather is "Elmi."

Also from 2009 until 2017, Ilhan Omar lived with, raised three kids with, and illegally filed multiple joint tax returns with a second man — not Ahmed Nur Said Elmi.

Just a couple months after marrying, Ilhan and her legal husband both enrolled at North Dakota State University and received federal financial aid. Married couples are not required to submit evidence of their respective parents' assets on FAFSA applications and thus likely receive much more favorable loan terms.

Almost certainly, Rep. Omar fraudulently married her brother, a British citizen, in the service of immigration fraud, education fraud, and federal student loan fraud. Along the way, she filed at least two years of fraudulent tax returns, and possibly eight. She lived in several different subsidized housing units during this time. She likely received subsidized health care and child care during this time. For eight years, every application she signed for state and federal aid was likely fraudulent. During her 2017 divorce from Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, Ilhan submitted a nine-question statement to the court signed under penalty of perjury. Literally — she signed just below the statement of acknowledgment. Eight of her nine answers appear to be perjurious. Each instance is punishable by up to five years' imprisonment.

The paperwork she signed for her successful 2016 run and two-year tenure as a Minnesota state representative may contain instances of perjury as well.

It appears that the media may be waiting for verifiable references to her father as "Nur Said Elmi" rather than "Nur Said." Logically, this should not be considered necessary, considering the following:

  1. Ilhan's father and her father-in-law would have been named "Nur Said."
  2. Only one "Nur Said" in the necessary age range appears in publicly available archives in either the U.S. or U.K.

However, here these references are. Below are dozens of new, verifiable, archived references to father as "Nur Said Elmi" from family, friends, and contacts. You will also find many new references to his daughter Leyla Nur Said Elmi, his son Mohamed Nur Said Elmi, and even to his son Ahmed Nur Said Elmi.

Further, you will find the first-ever public references as to why Ilhan's father was well known by this name. He is referred to as Colonel Nur Said Elmi, who led the U.S.-backed "54th reserve brigade in the 60th division" during the 1982 Ethiopian-Somali Border War. Colonel Nur is also said to have "led a regiment" in the 1977-1978 Ogaden War.

1.

image.png.7fc83bf945606f904a054884765096c4.png

Note the mention of the children of "Nuur Siciid Cilmi," especially Mohamed Nur Dhay-Lule (Facebook address contains "mohamednursaid"), Layla, Sahra, and Ilhan Omar. The fifth child, Ahmed, is not mentioned.

2.

Active link. Archived link. image.png.a9dd1fa725357a4041b074ad972939ed.pngimage.png.96319a06fbfe3d57ed2c94ded5375c0f.pngFor For the above two, a professional translation was provided by a Somali/Arabic/English translator who worked in the Middle East with U.S. military:

Col. Nur Said Elmi, do you know him? He worked in Gedo region, he became the commander of a brigade several times, the most famous brigade was called the 54th reserve brigade in the 60th division, many men who died were part of that brigade Among them was Col Shire Mohamed Siyad Barre of the 54th reserve brigade in the 60th division 1982 in the district war when the Majeerten rebels invaded with the help of Ethiopia, the 54 reserve brigade was moved from 60th division of Bay region, in Burdaale village with all their equipment, then the commander of the 54 brigade was Col. Salad Diini from Sanaag region, Col. Nur Said Elmi was a social person, very funny and all the officers liked him… May god have mercy on the soul of Col Nur Said Elmi and give the parliament member [congresswoman] Ilwan patience and faith

...

It was the war that happen in Balanbale district, it was commanded by Col Salad Diini from Sanaag region who was killed there, the three who held the command, and the first one who died being Col Shire Mohamed Siyaad, Col Salad Diini, and Col Nuur Said Elmi, all died, I ask god to grant them the Fardowz Heaven

 

3.

image.png.c2021594b1f21b03bcd43b9e482f700e.png

Note the mention of "Nuur Siciid Cilmi ex. Col. "XDS". "XDS" refers to the Somali military. Friends of this account include Nur Said and Mohamed Nur Dhay-Lule. Here's the active link. Here's the archived link.

4.

image.png.dfd3a832d3dcc6e2e1e89d66392bbc8c.png

Note "Nuur Saciid Cilmi." Also note that all five children are named: Layla (Nur Said Elmi), Sahra, Ilhan, Mohamed, and Ahmed (Nur Said Elmi). Here's the active link. Here's the archived link.

5.

image.thumb.png.5facc77bd8412513ae093fe733343dde.png

Note that this is a blue-check account. He is photographed with Ilhan here (archived link), endorsing her re-election on July 16.

Friends of this account include Mohamed Nur Dhay-Lule and several key members of Ilhan's team. Several other verifiable friends and contacts who posted condolence messages shared the text of this blue-check account (see below). Here's the active link. Here's the archived link.

6.

image.thumb.png.a5905dfffcc19bd965b0abcbd119c4ba.pngActive link

Archived link.

Abdirahman Issa Kahin owns and operates Afro Deli in Minneapolis. He is well known as a friend of the family — so much so that the Minnesota Star-Tribune interviewed him for its obituary:

He held several positions in civil service in the Somali government and worked for the postal service in Minneapolis after he came to the U.S. His nicknames in Cedar-Riverside were "Colonel" and "Superdad." Mohamed had a "huge" concept of family and was a father figure to many people in Cedar-Riverside, said Abdirahman Kahin, the owner of Afro Deli. "He was the father that everyone wanted to have," Kahin said. "Open-minded, listening, taking your phone number."

Note that Abdirahman Issa Kahin, like the Star-Tribune, is careful to refer to Ilhan's father as "Nur Omar."

However, he then referred to "Ilhan Omar, Leyla, and Sahra Nur." Leyla, of course, is Leyla Nur Said Elmi and had attested on her marriage application that her father is "Nur Said Elmi, military officer."

Also note the continued, transparent absurdity of the Star-Tribune's coverage. "Colonel" is said to only be his "nickname." And he simply worked in "civil service."

Meanwhile, Sahan Journal — an outlet founded in 2019 by a former Star-Tribune reporter in partnership with Minnesota Public Radio — filed a much different story, putting the Star-Tribune to shame. Though it also did not mention "Nur Said Elmi," it was the first outlet anywhere to finally confirm his former prominence in Somalia was due to his military career:

image.png.347b889efa1517225659f39ad9616932.png

 

The article went on to bemoan the fact that "news stories about Nur's death have for the most part obscured his legacy, painting him as little more than Rep. Ilhan Omar's father. But Nur was a leader in his own right, and those who knew him well hailed him as a national treasure for Somalis at home and in the diaspora."

Clearly, there's an incredible amount of information worth unpacking in the Sahan Journal article. Since 2016, the Star-Tribune — and national media in general — chose to conceal this historic scandal from U.S. voters.

Their malfeasance is the only reason Rep. Omar is on the ballot this week in Minnesota. Our deadly national wave of riots began in this ill-served, media-neglected district.

* * * * * *

Below, find links to numerous additional posts referring to Colonel Nur Said Elmi, Leyla Nur Said Elmi, or Mohamed Nur Said:

  1. Abdiqani Carabay: Active link. Archived link.
  2. Adam Ali: Active link. Archived link.
  3. Abdikani Hayir: Friends with Ilhan Omar campaign manager Ali Isse. "Member of Puntland [region of Somalia] Government." Active link. Archived link.
  4. Fuaad Yusuf Sharmarke: Active link. Archived link.
  5. Cabdi Rashiid Cabdi Qadir. Comment on #4. Mentions "col nuur saciid colmi."
  6. Bille Warsame: Active link. Archived link.
  7. Said Aden Suujino: Active link. Archived link.
  8. Mohamed Isse Husein: Shares text from the blue-checked Abukar Awale post. Screenshot available.
  9. Abdulkadir Hersi: Shares text from the blue-checked Abukar Awale post. Comment can be found on the Elmi Jamac Dhagaweyne post.
  10. Burhan Omar: Comment can be found on the Elmi Jamac Dhagaweyne post.
  11. Abdi Gulled: Comment can be found on the Elmi Jamac Dhagaweyne post.
  12. Isku Filan Jama Farey: Comment can be found on the Elmi Jamac Dhagaweyne post. Also communicates with Leyla Cilmi, here: Active link, archived link.
  13. Shukri Issa Haji Ahmad: Active link. Archived link.
  14. Ali Abdi Said: Comment can be found on the Shukri Issa Haji Ahmad post.
  15. Said A. Farah: Active link. Archived link.
  16. Asho Mohamed Farah: Shares text from the blue-checked Abukar Awale post. Active link. Archived link.
  17. Shanka Ali: Shares text from the blue-checked Abukar Awale post. The mention of Nur Said Elmi is "liked" by friend Mohamed Nur Dhay-lule, Nur Said Elmi's son. Active link. Archived link.
  18. Ahmed Musa: Mention of Nur Said Elmi is "liked" by friend Mohamed Nur Dhay-lule, Nur Said Elmi's son. Active link. Archived link.
  19. Abdulkadir Yusuf: Comments on Sharmarke Elmi post. Adds "Cilmi" to the post's mention of "Nur Said." Active link. Archived link.
  20. Safiya Moumin Ahmed: Comments on post by Ali Isse, Ilhan's campaign manager. Abdulkadir Yusuf comments here as well. Active link. Archived link.
  21. Ali Xirsi: Comments on post by "Faraton Jaajuur," who appears to be the Somali military source Yusuf Ismail Faraton from the Sahan Journal article. Active link. Archived link.
  22. Marwan Shirwa: Family member in U.K. Mentions meeting Nur Said in 2016. Active link. Archived link.
Edited by SUZNV

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She is dangerous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BLA said:

Did she really sleep with Brown ?

 

6 hours ago, Ward Smith said:

Willie Brown, mayor of San Francisco. Yes. 

You're right it was Willie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Dan Warnick said:

She prosecuted and jailed over 1,500 people for marijuana possession

My theory is most if not all politicians are cynical and opportunists but Harris is on another level when it comes to this. When asked whether she smoked marijuana she laughed. So she had no issues prosecuting people for things which she herself did. Her actions as AG of California were totally unnecessary if not criminal. She wasn't running for AG of Texas or some other conservative state where she would need to appear tough on crime. She would have been elected anyway in blue California. But no, she chose to keep people in prison longer than their sentences so they could be used as slave labor a la China. It really comes off as sadism and not simple cynicism.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, shadowkin said:

My theory is most if not all politicians are cynical and opportunists but Harris is on another level when it comes to this. When asked whether she smoked marijuana she laughed. So she had no issues prosecuting people for things which she herself did. Her actions as AG of California were totally unnecessary if not criminal. She wasn't running for AG of Texas or some other conservative state where she would need to appear tough on crime. She would have been elected anyway in blue California. But no, she chose to keep people in prison longer than their sentences so they could be used as slave labor a la China. It really comes off as sadism and not simple cynicism.

The number of lives ruined for smoking a little weed, by the enforcement of laws made by politicians, and the amount of money spent needlessly for pursuing pot as a dangerous drug is incredible.  Stupid even.  NOW they legalize it.  Uh, ok.

And yet alcohol has been allowed, promoted, taxed and regulated since prohibition, and it ruins far more lives than pot ever could. 

At least that's what a friend told me.  :) :( 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back on topic.  Kamala Harris has a new video out within which she employs a new comedic tactic against her and Joe Biden's opponents: Take all actions, tactics and concerns for the American people, reverse them and say they're yours.

After watching this fine specimen of a video you will KNOW that Joe Biden is a visionary, a risk taker, and that she and Joe represent "the real America" and the "real Americans" and the "working man and woman", and, oh the list goes on and on.

Meanwhile, Donald Trump announces peace deal between the UAE and Israel.  Such small-mindedness!  In fact, depending on how you look at it, it is most likely a RACIST deal (sarcasm note, for idiots).

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

On 8/12/2020 at 8:29 PM, frankfurter said:

Agreed. Americans have every reason to fear. Your enemies are within.

uh, USA is not a democracy. It is a republic. 

Pay attention to what is about to evolve...a republic is by far different than a democracy...Hint: The needs of the whole rather than the needs of the many. While that may seem a contradiction in terms it is a profound way to govern. To that point  the US only democratic Republic on this Earth.

It is sad that a intellect such a van Eck will no longer expound on such matters. His depth was astounding.

Edited by Eyes Wide Open
  • Great Response! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.