hemanthaa@mail.com + 64 February 10, 2021 (edited) Both the UAE and Saudi Arabia, two countries without an issue of crude oil supply, are in an accelerated mode to embrace renewable energy, something we never heard of, up until recently. According to an article by Rystad Energy on oilprice.com, the UAE hopes to increase the contribution by the renewables to its energy needs to an impressive 21% by 2030; the UAE is rapidly expanding the installation of solar panels in the desert to achieve the targets and unlike in Europe, it’s a reliable renewable source to generate energy most of the year for the region. The article also highlights the impressive fact that in the UAE, the consumers enjoy the lowest electricity tariffs in the world. Having seen the article, I asked a friend of mine, who is on the same wavelength when it comes to the subject, as to why these two nations, with estimated vast oil reserves, embark on a highly ambitious renewable mission: “Because, they will run out of it much earlier than they say it will,” came the reply. Of course, he was tongue-in-cheek. Almost all the residents of the UAE have to use air-conditioning all day throughout the year and the air pollution at the sources of power may have become an unbearable burden on the country while meeting the exponential rise in demand; the emission of the most hated gas, carbon dioxide and its accumulation in the atmosphere on an uncontrollable scale does not help the UAE – or any country in the region for that matter – in bringing down soaring temperatures. In short, it is a local, burning issue that got to be addressed soon, apart from pledging to commit to achieving long-term global goals. In addition, the UAE is investing vastly on Carbon Capture methods too. Judging by these developments, the UAE and Biden administration are on the same page when it comes to reaching the ultimate green goal – a key promise by them that needs committed partners to implement. Yet, the US under the new president is not keen on accepting the UAE as one of their own: one of the first acts carried out by the new administration is to block the arms sales to the UAE; then it wanted the UAE or its proxies – along with other players – out of Yemen and Libya. The UAE is the most progressive group of nations in the Middle East; it defied critics and established full diplomatic relations with Israel in August, last year, something unthinkable a year ago; people to people contacts, despite the lockdowns, are growing rapidly; it wants to benefit from Israel’s enviable technological feats; at culinary level, Abu Dhabi doughnuts have already become a hit among the Israelis. In fact, the move by the UAE set a precedent to other Arab nations in the region and some started to follow suit by establishing diplomatic relations with the Jewish nation. Moreover, the UAE recently relaxed its culture code as well, even allowing couples to cohabit – a serious diversion from the rigid, conservative norms; it now even offers citizenship for expatriates who meet certain requirements, having been residents for a certain period of time in any of its emirates. These things do not happen suddenly like lightning; a human being or a group of them have to initiate them, sometimes invoking the wrath of the hardliners, in order to swim against the tide. In this context, the Emirati rulers – and President Trump too – deserve the credit for making history and turning the UAE into a tolerant society in a very volatile region, where the combination of hatred and revenge is not in short supply. When a journalist asked Benjamin Netanyahu, the beleaguered Israel prime minister, about the potential repercussions of the UAE being cold-shouldered by the US for the UAE-Israel deal, he said the deal was irreversible; he may be right. Despite the major diplomatic breakthrough, the military involvement of the UAE - and the bombing raids – in Yemen is a disaster; you can’t destroy a determined enemy by air raids alone; if the US has read the riot act to the UAE over this, it is perfectly understandable. However, maintaining usual relations with an important ally and staying in the moral high ground are not mutually exclusive; a gentle slap on the wrist must have sorted out the unacceptable things in order to keep the alliance alive. The UAE should be credited with what they deserve – for the peace in the region and beyond. Edited February 11, 2021 by hemanthaa@mail.com Changed the title Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
John Foote + 1,135 JF February 24, 2021 UAE is faux progressive. See what happens to an Emirati if they co-habitat openly, or renounce Islam. The hired help is given more leeway, partly for global press, partly to attract/keep talent. KSA has a real challenge in trying to become a financial center because talent doesn't want to live there. Last I noticed the UAE has never waged any war against Israel, so I don't know how the Abraham agreement is a peace treaty in the classic sense of stopping a war. I do view the normalization as good and even somewhat bold. But UAE and KSA have been privately been playing nice with each other for a while. King Faisal is doing somersaults in his grave. UAE (and KSA) not funding Palestinians as was historically done, especially in Arafat's time, that is a big deal. The Palestinians I met had little use for Shia-ism, they are pretty much all Sunni, and yet viewed Iran as the only country fighting for them. These same Palestinians were less than complimentary of UAE and KSA. Although I think they are simplistic thinking KSA could just buy the peace. It doesn't work that way. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites