.

[surrept33 + 612]

50 minutes ago, 0R0 said:

I didn't say that, but it is not out of the realm of what Obama plans look like, just that it would not have been military but his Brownshirt college indoctrination products who believe meritocratic accomplishment is "racist" like getting the right answer on a math problem . Obama was trying to tell the military to take an oath to the UN and to him as the UN's governor of the US. They told him he no longer affects military decisions and showed him a dossier of his treason + pedophilia and I presume promised him that he is headed to GITMO before anyone takes an oath to the UN.  As you have seen, Flynn was still there at the end of Obama's term. If he couldn't get rid of Flynn as president, what control did he have over the Pentagon?

The weather manipulation technology is called chemtrails, cloud seeding and HAARP. All are well documented all over the web. The actual condition being fought by cloud seeding and the beneficial use of HAARP was the reduction in Pacific evaporation and cloud travel by the particulate plume blanket coming out of China and weather systems that drain cloud moisture caused by vessels using high sulfur bunker fuel. The TX "dark winter" was a Biden team creation run by CIA that seeded clouds on the North Pacific moisture corridor to bring the jet stream down the prairie into TX. DIA hacked HAARP control computers and special forces captured the chemtrails material and stopped them. NSA captured some of the CIA money that funded it. HAARP equipment is no longer in CIA Ag Dept and NASA control. Think Obama = Biden = Bush = CIA = DNC. And yes, the RINO establishment is run out of the CIA, who also run the  DNC. 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WDp6GXB7-RjlBNnna1_zQtapzniwlCTI/view

How is HAARP and TWA-800 linked?

[Roch + 537]

On 4/17/2021 at 10:57 PM, Boat said:

 

Do you know where I can buy one ?

I looked on Amazon with no success.  

Edited April 20, 2021 by Roch

[Roch + 537]

4 hours ago, Boat said:

Analysis: Beijing huddles with friends, seeks to fracture U.S.-led 'clique'
 

BEIJING (Reuters) - China is shoring up ties with autocratic partners like Russia and Iran, as well as economically dependent regional countries, while using sanctions and threats to try to fracture the alliances the United States is building against it.

So old slow Joe is showing some balls building a financial/trade team of countries to finally put XI and Putin where they belong? Is our list of weak past presidents gonna be shown how real politics work? 
It’s time to cut off their financial nuts from the rest of the world who doesn’t want the Ukrainian or the South China Sea. Isolate, these Authoritative regimes and let them play Alfa dog with each other. 

Sounds great.  Cut them off economically. (Isn't that what Trump did with sanctions/tariffs on China, North Korea, Iran and Russia ? ? ?)

Another Obama/Biden Coalition of the Willing is worthless.  Putin and Xi will just laugh.  

Ex. Germany: Germany wants the Russian natural gas.  Hell, German companies are investors in the actual pipeline.  Angela has already sold out to China.  German's number 1 industry is auto industry.  China is Germany's #1 world auto market.  

Italy has totally sold out to China years ago. 

Sure , U.S. "Allies" will sign anything to placate naive  U.S. officials so Joe doesn't put reciprocal tariffs on their vehicles and auto parts and pay for their NATO Defense.  

No world leader takes Joe seriously .  Do you ?

Edited April 19, 2021 by Roch

[0R0 + 6,251]

47 minutes ago, surrept33 said:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WDp6GXB7-RjlBNnna1_zQtapzniwlCTI/view

How is HAARP and TWA-800 linked?

I don't know that they are. Never looked into it. 

[0R0 + 6,251]

5 hours ago, Roch said:

Do you know where I can buy one ?

I looked on Amazon with no success.  

My gun control program is to distribute guns to high school seniors gratis if they successfully complete a gun safety class. Adults pay their own way but each Sheriff will have an armory sufficient to equip a large portion of the county's population. 

We parachute a billion guns  in major Chinese urban centers using the tech of multiple device bombs. Each gun and ammo pack on a parachute. 

Require broad gun distribution as a condition for membership in NATO. If they refuse, Chuck them out and parachute drop guns for their populations. 

[surrept33 + 612]

5 hours ago, Roch said:

Do you know where I can buy one ?

I looked on Amazon with no success.  

Try alibaba. The Chinese will make almost anything. 

https://patents.google.com/?q=A01M27%2f00&num=100&sort=old&clustered=true

https://www.alibaba.com/

[-trance + 114]

2 hours ago, 0R0 said:

Require broad gun distribution as a condition for membership in NATO. If they refuse, Chuck them out and parachute drop guns for their populations. 

There are numerous members of NATO, do you think one member can dictate terms to the rest? 

Then if they do refuse you want illegally smuggle guns into their nations?

What would be your desired goal from this illegal gun distribution?  To attempt to destabilize foreign governments?  

 

Just an FYI

"U.S. Code Title 22 Chapter 38, Section 2656f(d) defines terrorism as: "Premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents".[41]

18 U.S.C. § 2331 defines "international terrorism" and "domestic terrorism" for purposes of Chapter 113B of the Code, entitled "Terrorism":

"International terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics:[42]

Involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;

Appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and

occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S., or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum"

 

Edited April 20, 2021 by -trance

[Strangelovesurfing + 737]

8 hours ago, Roch said:

Do you know where I can buy one ?

I looked on Amazon with no success.  

Look under the "Suicide Equipment" area.

[Roch + 537]

Former U.S. Defense Secretary Gates, ". . . he (Biden) has been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades."

 

Joe is an embarrassment.

 

 

Edited April 20, 2021 by Roch

[surrept33 + 612]

37 minutes ago, Roch said:

Former U.S. Defense Secretary Gates, ". . . he (Biden) has been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades."

 

Joe is an embarrassment.

 

 

Was Gates or Biden right on Afghanistan?

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/joe-biden-robert-gates_n_4564678

Quote

Joe Biden had a question. During a long Sunday meeting with President Obama and top national-security advisers on Sept. 13, the VP interjected, “Can I just clarify a factual point? How much will we spend this year on Afghanistan?” Someone provided the figure: $65 billion. “And how much will we spend on Pakistan?” Another figure was supplied: $2.25 billion. “Well, by my calculations that’s a 30-to-1 ratio in favor of Afghanistan. So I have a question. Al Qaeda is almost all in Pakistan, and Pakistan has nuclear weapons. And yet for every dollar we’re spending in Pakistan, we’re spending $30 in Afghanistan. Does that make strategic sense?” The White House Situation Room fell silent. But the questions had their desired effect: those gathered began putting more thought into Pakistan as the key theater in the region.

Biden fired McChrystal soon after as well. McChrystal did a fine job in Iraq, but Afghanistan was a hot mess.

Oh yeah, I forgot the guy who rode on McChrystal's coat tails- Mike Flynn. That guy apparently didn't know the phone lines to the Russian Embassy would be bugged?

Edited April 20, 2021 by surrept33

[Roch + 537]

9 hours ago, surrept33 said:

 

Biden fired McChrystal soon after as well. McChrystal did a fine job in Iraq, but Afghanistan was a hot mess.

 

Former U.S. Defense Secretary Gates, ". . . he (Biden) has been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades."

 

Joe is an embarrassment.

[Roch + 537]

On 4/19/2021 at 10:21 PM, Strangelovesurfing said:

Look under the "Suicide Equipment" area.

I Googled "Suicide Equipment"

It linked to a page with three pictures .  .  .  .  Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton and good friend Vince Foster with the quote "Travelgate" .

Whatsup ? Can you explain. 

Does this have anything to do with the 29 document visits of Bill Clinton "traveling" to Epstein's Pedophile Island ?

Foster and Epstein both close friends and associates of The Clintons commit suicide (or so they say) .  Is there a correlation here ?

 

Edited April 21, 2021 by Roch

[0R0 + 6,251]

On 4/19/2021 at 9:12 PM, -trance said:

There are numerous members of NATO, do you think one member can dictate terms to the rest? 

Then if they do refuse you want illegally smuggle guns into their nations?

What would be your desired goal from this illegal gun distribution?  To attempt to destabilize foreign governments?  

 

Just an FYI

"U.S. Code Title 22 Chapter 38, Section 2656f(d) defines terrorism as: "Premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents".[41]

18 U.S.C. § 2331 defines "international terrorism" and "domestic terrorism" for purposes of Chapter 113B of the Code, entitled "Terrorism":

"International terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics:[42]

Involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;

Appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and

occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S., or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum"

 

Distributing guns is not a terror action. It has no victims. 

It allows the population of  a NATO member nation to protect itself against invaders and mount a resistance if their military or political leaders fail to protect the country. 

The vast majority of gun uses are defensive. 

Delivering guns to a nation's population is not a crime as it is a universal right to have firearms. Nobody has to take the gun or keep it. There is no intimidation or coercion involved. Just the enforcement of the right to be free to carry firearms that is being infringed by illegal legislation in those countries.

US is 70% of NATO's fire power and soldiers. The US is always the majority of NATO. 

[-trance + 114]

1 hour ago, 0R0 said:

Delivering guns to a nation's population is not a crime as it is a universal right to have firearms.

Really?  By what universal decree is that?

Can other NATO nations drop stuff on the USA?    

Edited April 21, 2021 by -trance

[-trance + 114]

1 hour ago, 0R0 said:

 

It allows the population of  a NATO member nation to protect itself against invaders and mount a resistance if their military or political leaders fail to protect the country. 

 

So to support a militia coup?

 

[0R0 + 6,251]

20 minutes ago, -trance said:

Really?  By what universal decree is that?

Can other NATO nations drop stuff on the USA?    

The basic right to self defense. "we hold these rights to be self evident" if you believe someone issues decrees to establish your rights, you must be waiting for someone to issue the law of gravity by a supreme legal authority. 

[0R0 + 6,251]

 

21 minutes ago, -trance said:

1 hour ago, 0R0 said:

 

It allows the population of  a NATO member nation to protect itself against invaders and mount a resistance if their military or political leaders fail to protect the country. 

 

So to support a militia coup?

 

Mainly against foreign invaders, but this country overthrew its government before for doing what todays government is threatening to do. Then the founders of the US called the government of King George a usurper. 

[Bob D + 562]

Bloomberg Headline

Putin Warns Rivals Not To Cross Russia

Joe is in over his head

[surrept33 + 612]

2 hours ago, Bob D said:

Bloomberg Headline

Putin Warns Rivals Not To Cross Russia

Joe is in over his head

Putin has been great for Germany's greens lately (Merkel is retiring): https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-of-polls/germany/

If the greens join the governing coalition, it'll almost assuredly seal Nord Stream's fate and hurt Russia's options to have any misadventures in the Ukraine (until they reduce Russia's dependency on exports to the EU by increasing their dependency on China).

Quote

In the end, German voters could seal the pipeline’s fate. The Green Party has vowed that if it helps to form the next coalition government after the fall election, it’ll block Nord Stream 2. And the Greens are riding very high in the polls.

https://www.marketplace.org/2021/04/19/germany-under-u-s-pressure-over-russian-pipeline/