JM

GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Ecocharger said:

However, there has been very little response to reduced outdoor particulates, indicating that indoor solid fuels is the major contributor to health issues. Reduced indoor pollution has resulted in major reductions of morbidity and probably mortality (one follows the other).

So there is no indication that PM2.5 is a significant driver of mortality or morbidity statistics.

You contradict yourself in your own post.  An outdoor PM2.5 particle from solid fuels is essentially the same as an indoor particle from solid fuels.  Incomplete combustion from any form of hydrocarbon (be it wood, coal, oil, etc.) will make similar pollutants.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

8 hours ago  As the 2024 election approached and climate disasters piled up, over 200,000 Climate Voters worked together to push climate and nature up the ...
Jun 24, 2024  Explore the latest YouGov polling, survey results and articles about Climate Change & the Environment.
Missing: agenda ‎| Show results with: agenda
5 hours ago  The new government's climate plans are bolder and more radical than many people realise - it now has a duty to put them into action.
23 hours ago  As the polls close, Green Party Co-leader Adrian Ramsay, who is standing in Waveney Valley, said: “Tonight, Greens are on the brink of new ...
 
Edited by notsonice
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The story of EVs,

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/EV-Maker-Polestar-Struggles-With-Hefty-Import-Tariffs-on-Chinese-made-Cars.html

"Polestar, like other EV makers, faces declining demand due to a price war initiated by Tesla last year, causing many to struggle with unsold inventory. In the second quarter, Polestar delivered around 13,000 cars, missing Bernstein's forecast of 15,500."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/4/2024 at 2:29 PM, TailingsPond said:

You contradict yourself in your own post.  An outdoor PM2.5 particle from solid fuels is essentially the same as an indoor particle from solid fuels.  Incomplete combustion from any form of hydrocarbon (be it wood, coal, oil, etc.) will make similar pollutants.

 

There is  different decline profile, as I showed above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ecocharger said:

There is  different decline profile, as I showed above.

You did not, you may have think you did.

You still dodge the question.  What forms of pollution would you accept regulatory restrictions?  You seem to support all forms of pollution.

Oh also what day is the reckoning happening and what is going to happen. I still can't "mark your words" as you predicted nothing. 

Pretty simple questions bud.  Try answering some.

Are you and Eyes shut the same account or something? Any day now...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

Just think of some forms of pollution you dislike.  A really simple question.

For example, can I dump a sharp waste container full of used needles and a truckload of liquid pig waste on your lawn?  Would you require a longitudinal study to know that is a bad idea? Probably not.  You could wait until the diseases present themselves in your family but that would be silly.  Common logic is all that is needed here.

Things that make you cough are bad, simple.  Go breathe some smoke and get back to me. 

Edited by TailingsPond

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eco logic says that if you like bacon you should allow some pig shit to be put on your lawn.  However, do not concern yourself because shit emissions are trending down and your family won't immediately get sick.

If you eat bacon and don't allow the pig shit externality from the pork industry you are a hypocrite.  That is the way fossil fuels work except people can choose not to eat pork - and should be exempt from their share of the pig shit. Most people have no choice but to breathe polluted air. 

Sadly, the best way to avoid polluted air is to stay inside with closed windows and run filtered air conditioning which makes more air pollution.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, TailingsPond said:

Eco logic says that if you like bacon you should allow some pig shit to be put on your lawn.  However, do not concern yourself because shit emissions are trending down and your family won't immediately get sick.

If you eat bacon and don't allow the pig shit externality from the pork industry you are a hypocrite.  That is the way fossil fuels work except people can choose not to eat pork - and should be exempt from their share of the pig shit. Most people have no choice but to breathe polluted air. 

Sadly, the best way to avoid polluted air is to stay inside with closed windows and run filtered air conditioning which makes more air pollution.

 

 

Read the data.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, notsonice said:
8 hours ago  As the 2024 election approached and climate disasters piled up, over 200,000 Climate Voters worked together to push climate and nature up the ...
Jun 24, 2024  Explore the latest YouGov polling, survey results and articles about Climate Change & the Environment.
Missing: agenda ‎| Show results with: agenda
5 hours ago  The new government's climate plans are bolder and more radical than many people realise - it now has a duty to put them into action.
23 hours ago  As the polls close, Green Party Co-leader Adrian Ramsay, who is standing in Waveney Valley, said: “Tonight, Greens are on the brink of new ...
 

A recipe for Green Bankruptcy, which will bring the revolution to a jarring halt.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/4/2024 at 1:15 PM, Polyphia said:

Scientific consensus is what the majority of scientists agree on at a particular point in time given the existing evidence. It is not a political term. And in no way is it true that the consensus cannot be/should not be challenged. We need to keep searching for better and more complete explanations, and good scientists do exactly that.

No, there is no science "consensus" on climate or any science issue, things are in flux all the time.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

3 hours ago, Ecocharger said:

A recipe for Green Bankruptcy, which will bring the revolution to a jarring halt.

you sound upset with the election results in the UK...........

 

Luddite........you keep dreaming that the clock is going to be turned back to 1970 

did you notice that Coal is no longer used in the UK???? and Nat Gas use is declining rapidly........

Enjoy the Green Revolution 

 

Sunak's Government was dissolved yesterday..........your dream is dead..and Buried

Edited by notsonice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Ecocharger said:

No, there is no science "consensus" on climate or any science issue, things are in flux all the time.

 

As others have noted, either your reading/general comprehension skills are lacking or you just enjoy gaslighting the crap out of everyone. Either way, you are wrong, almost everyone else knows it (with the exception of your fellow gas-lighters), and I am happy to leave it at that.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Ecocharger said:

A recipe for Green Bankruptcy, which will bring the revolution to a jarring halt.

Any day now!

What and when will happen again?  I still can't "mark your words" if you predict nothing.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

22 hours ago, Ecocharger said:

Read the data.

Look at real-time air pollution numbers, look at the research.  The air is dirtiest in oil and gas territory and there is zero doubt that PM2.5 causes a whole slew of illness.

You can't win the toxins argument bud, argue about climate change all you want, but the toxic data is very clear.  

Fossil fuels --> air pollution --> air pollution related deaths.

https://www.iqair.com/ca/usa/texas

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=PM+2.5+human+health

Look at smog, you can see the pollution with your own eyes.  Do you deny your own eyes?

smog 6.jpg

Edited by TailingsPond
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, TailingsPond said:

Look at real-time air pollution numbers, look at the research.  The air is dirtiest in oil and gas territory and there is zero doubt that PM2.5 causes a whole slew of illness.

You can't win the toxins argument bud, argue about climate change all you want, but the toxic data is very clear.  

Fossil fuels --> air pollution --> air pollution related deaths.

https://www.iqair.com/ca/usa/texas

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=PM+2.5+human+health

Look at smog, you can see the pollution with your own eyes.  Do you deny your own eyes?

smog 6.jpg

Ah, scum on the pond is burning strawmen again... 

Post a picture of an Indian coal plant that has a Sulpher/particulate filter on it... Good Luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

1 hour ago, footeab@yahoo.com said:

 

Post a picture of an Indian coal plant that has a Sulpher/particulate filter on it... Good Luck

You can find plenty of pictures of pollution made in the USA.  Not my job to be your Google image search. 

Also remember, Eco and others want to emulate India and China.  It's like he is jealous of their terribly polluted air. 

Scrubbers do not fix everything despite your fantasies.  There is a reason why even "modernized" coal power plants are being retrofitted to gas or closed down, as gas plants outperform the even the best coal plants. 

According to some here natural gas is essentially free so it should be a no-brainier to stop using coal. Natural gas won't stop CO2 but at least it cuts down on toxic emissions drastically.

This is Texas:

texas air.jpg

Particulates-Map-2.jpg

Edited by TailingsPond

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

22 hours ago, TailingsPond said:

Look at real-time air pollution numbers, look at the research.  The air is dirtiest in oil and gas territory and there is zero doubt that PM2.5 causes a whole slew of illness.

You can't win the toxins argument bud, argue about climate change all you want, but the toxic data is very clear.  

Fossil fuels --> air pollution --> air pollution related deaths.

https://www.iqair.com/ca/usa/texas

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=PM+2.5+human+health

Look at smog, you can see the pollution with your own eyes.  Do you deny your own eyes?

smog 6.jpg

Read the data, the reduction in mortality results is due to the reduction in indoor solid fuels , not the reduction in PM2.5.

It would seem that some other variable is involved, perhaps smoking, so the extreme elimination of PM2.5 has not resulted in mortality reduction.

Strange how you continually fail to see that. Agenda based science always fails.

Edited by Ecocharger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Polyphia said:

As others have noted, either your reading/general comprehension skills are lacking or you just enjoy gaslighting the crap out of everyone. Either way, you are wrong, almost everyone else knows it (with the exception of your fellow gas-lighters), and I am happy to leave it at that.

You are obviously unaware of how science works. It is on the edges of science where the new theories and research are tested.

Darwin was on the fringe for decades, but that is how science changes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, TailingsPond said:

Any day now!

What and when will happen again?  I still can't "mark your words" if you predict nothing.

You tell me what future government policy will be, and I will give you a firmer date.

Go ahead, I am listening!

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

23 hours ago, TailingsPond said:

Any day now!

What and when will happen again?  I still can't "mark your words" if you predict nothing.

It would seem quite apparent Doomsday has arrived.

The Supreme Court Overturns the Chevron Doctrine, Gutting Federal Environmental Protections

Scrapping the legal precedent could send a "convulsive shock" to decades of federal environmental, financial, and health-care regulations

The Supreme Court on Friday threw into question the future of climate and environmental regulation in the United States, scrapping a decades-old legal precedent that gave federal agencies leeway to interpret laws according to their expertise and scientific evidence. The impact of the decision to scrap the so-called Chevron deference will take years to become clear, but it could allow for far more legal challenges against regulations by agencies like the EPA and the Department of the Interior that have a huge role in the climate fight. 

 

https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/supreme-court-overturns-chevron-doctrine-gutting-federal-environmental-protections

tenor.gif

Edited by Eyes Wide Open
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

15 minutes ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

It would seem quite apparent Doomsday has arrived.

The Supreme Court Overturns the Chevron Doctrine, Gutting Federal Environmental Protections

 

Do you think that ruling will change the rest of the world?

Edited by TailingsPond
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

11 minutes ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

It would seem quite apparent Doomsday has arrived.

So at least we know what your "any day now means."   Jack crap.

Release the Kraken!

Edited by TailingsPond
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

 The impact of the decision to scrap the so-called Chevron deference will take years to become clear, but it could allow for far more legal challenges against regulations by agencies like the EPA and the Department of the Interior that have a huge role in the climate fight.

If you read that doomsday is at best years away. 

Any day now!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Gutting Federal Environmental Protections"

Only fools who don't care about their families well-being would be happy about gutting of environmental protections.

Do you understand that you live in the environment? More pollution for you, your kids, and grand kids!  Yay!

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.