JM

GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES

Recommended Posts

(edited)

5 minutes ago, Ecocharger said:

The plans call for a huge ramp up of coal production, in line with the need for energy security.

Aided and abetted by your own choice of driving vehicle, that fossil fuel car you drive every day, emitting a ton of material.

You should offer an apology to those who believe that is a problem, Jay.

They plan on increasing coal production to replace imports, not consumption. You have a lot of trouble differentiating those basic concepts.

Edited by Jay McKinsey
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Boat said:

These guys act suprised. For decades now we encouraged trade from Chine despite a huge array of broken international norms. Trump and his troops claimed a spine but did nothing to stop any of Chinas transgressions or trade imbalance. Biden won’t do anything either. The Chinese are better than the rest of world at large scale solar. They do it cheaper. I think Biden is more interested in renewable chops than save the Muslims. Blame Iran and troublemakers in the Middle East. 
give Taiwan thousands of missiles in response for not playing nice. All these boats dragging the South Sea is silly. Give the Ukraine missiles by the thousands capable of taking out Moscow. But I want better solar and bigger tvs in exchange. 

The best TVs come from Japan and South Korea. I think most of us have already bought what we need anyway. Solar is great but we should be automating assembly lines here. Japan and Korean wages are not cheap. We could make TVs too. I have an RCA in name only. Just 50 inch but I had 19 inch TVs most of my life. 

https://www.statista.com/statistics/267095/global-market-share-of-lcd-tv-manufacturers/#:~:text=In 2019%2C Samsung was the,its closest competitor%2C TCL Electronics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jay McKinsey said:

They plan on increasing coal production, not consumption. You have a lot of trouble differentiating those basic concepts.

They would not be planning on coal production increases unless they had demand in view, Jay. That is how a planned economy works, or doesn't work.

Now, to return to the issue at hand, I think that you should at least offer a simple apology to those good and very sensitive eco people for whom you claim to speak, for driving a very old and high emittance fossil fuel vehicle. The difficulty you have in squaring yourself on this issue is a sore and painful annoyance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Ecocharger said:

They would not be planning on coal production increases unless they had demand in view, Jay. That is how a planned economy works, or doesn't work.

Now, to return to the issue at hand, I think that you should at least offer a simple apology to those good and very sensitive eco people for whom you claim to speak, for driving a very old and high emittance fossil fuel vehicle. The difficulty you have in squaring yourself on this issue is a sore and painful annoyance.

No, they are increasing production to replace imports. You just can't understand this basic concept.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Jay McKinsey said:

No, they are increasing production to replace imports. You just can't understand this basic concept.

A planned economy does not increase coal supplies without an end in view, Jay. 

How is that fossil fuel car of yours doing? Still putt-putting along with huge emissions? Sad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and you??? Still putt-putting along with huge emissions? Sad. Please tell us how much you tank up a week.......or are you too embarrassed????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Ecocharger said:

A planned economy does not increase coal supplies without an end in view, Jay. 

How is that fossil fuel car of yours doing? Still putt-putting along with huge emissions? Sad.

Yes, their end in view is reducing imports by increasing domestic production.  Their plan is not to increase overall coal supplies. Such a simple concept that every economist understands.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

6 minutes ago, Ecocharger said:

A planned economy does not increase coal supplies without an end in view, Jay. 

How is that fossil fuel car of yours doing? Still putt-putting along with huge emissions? Sad.

India's coal imports fall 23% during Apr-Jan 2022 as local production rises

"With considerable increase in domestic coal production, India has achieved significant reduction in import of coal despite surge in power demand," the Ministry of Coal said in a statement.

"All efforts are on to further enhance domestic coal production as availability of additional coal will aid in import-substitution," the ministry said.

https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/india-s-coal-imports-fall-23-during-apr-jan-2022-as-local-production-rises-122032600804_1.html

Edited by Jay McKinsey
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Ecocharger said:

Demand for oil and gasoline is so hot that prices are rapidly escalating and will continue to soar into the stratosphere.

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Goldman-Now-Sees-Oil-Hitting-140-This-Summer.html

"Goldman Sachs raised its short-term target for Brent crude from $125 to $140.

Recovery in Chinese demand and a potential drop in Russian production may further lift prices.

Goldman: the global oil market remains in a structural deficit and would need much higher prices to regain its balance."

The future will see many countries and corporations investing in oil and gas due to the enormous profitability. Russia will probably sell throughout most of Asia which is a huge market. I think things will balance out in the next two to three years but fuel will remain high but more affordable. That should help electric vehicle demand, but the electricity will need to be dependable and that will still require oil and natural gas for a long long time. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ron Wagner said:

The future will see many countries and corporations investing in oil and gas due to the enormous profitability. Russia will probably sell throughout most of Asia which is a huge market. I think things will balance out in the next two to three years but fuel will remain high but more affordable. That should help electric vehicle demand, but the electricity will need to be dependable and that will still require oil and natural gas for a long long time. 

No one but the Persian Gulf states use significant oil for electricity. How exactly is Russia going to get all that oil and gas to most of Asia? Details, details. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EU ban on insurance for Russian oil vessels is 'big blow' to Moscow

 

The European Union's (EU) announcement of its sixth package of sanctions, including a partial ban on Russian oil imports, was hugely significant. Foreign policy chief Josep Borrell called it "a big blow to (Vladimir) Putin's war chest." 

One element of the package, a ban on providing insurance on tankers carrying Russian crude oil, looks likely to have a particularly large impact.

After the embargo of Russian oil and tankers, the EU and the United Kingdom agreed to impose a ban on providing insurance to any ships carrying Russian oil imports anywhere in the world.

Officials hope to have this in place by the end of the year, effectively shutting out one of the largest crude oil producers from the maritime export market. Without insurance, tankers would be turned away from global ports. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, notsonice said:

and you??? Still putt-putting along with huge emissions? Sad. Please tell us how much you tank up a week.......or are you too embarrassed????

It is not my problem, it is your problem.

You are the one who believes in the Green nonsense.

Why do you violate your own principles?

You need to live up to your own beliefs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jay McKinsey said:

EU ban on insurance for Russian oil vessels is 'big blow' to Moscow

 

The European Union's (EU) announcement of its sixth package of sanctions, including a partial ban on Russian oil imports, was hugely significant. Foreign policy chief Josep Borrell called it "a big blow to (Vladimir) Putin's war chest." 

One element of the package, a ban on providing insurance on tankers carrying Russian crude oil, looks likely to have a particularly large impact.

After the embargo of Russian oil and tankers, the EU and the United Kingdom agreed to impose a ban on providing insurance to any ships carrying Russian oil imports anywhere in the world.

Officials hope to have this in place by the end of the year, effectively shutting out one of the largest crude oil producers from the maritime export market. Without insurance, tankers would be turned away from global ports. 

This matters because the world runs on oil.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jay McKinsey said:

India's coal imports fall 23% during Apr-Jan 2022 as local production rises

"With considerable increase in domestic coal production, India has achieved significant reduction in import of coal despite surge in power demand," the Ministry of Coal said in a statement.

"All efforts are on to further enhance domestic coal production as availability of additional coal will aid in import-substitution," the ministry said.

https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/india-s-coal-imports-fall-23-during-apr-jan-2022-as-local-production-rises-122032600804_1.html

Exactly, India will increase coal production for energy security.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

56 minutes ago, Ecocharger said:

Exactly, India will increase coal production for energy security.

No you said the increased production was for consumption "They would not be planning on coal production increases unless they had demand in view, Jay. That is how a planned economy works, or doesn't work."

The plan is for coal consumption to decrease thus saving money and provide even more energy security.

 

Edited by Jay McKinsey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jay McKinsey said:

No you said the increased production was for consumption "They would not be planning on coal production increases unless they had demand in view, Jay. That is how a planned economy works, or doesn't work."

The plan is for coal consumption to decrease thus saving money and provide even more energy security.

 

India would not increase coal production without plans to use that coal...what is your problem?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Ecocharger said:

India would not increase coal production without plans to use that coal...what is your problem?

Oh they are going to use it, just less than before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Ecocharger said:

It is not my problem, it is your problem.

You are the one who believes in the Green nonsense.

Why do you violate your own principles?

You need to live up to your own beliefs.

sure its your problem you do not want to take ownership for it. Again how much does it cost to fill up your clunkers, you keep posting about how high the price is. Must really suck for you that your hard earned money keeps get taken from you when you fill up. Not my problem, I am not posting how high oil is. HA HA HA 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

2 hours ago, Ecocharger said:

India would not increase coal production without plans to use that coal...what is your problem?

India would not increase coal production ???yet they are decreasing coal consumption... Peak World Coal happened in 2013/14, yet you keep posting your fantasy that World coal production is at a record now , with no facts. 

Which countries consume the most coal? - Graphically Speaking

Edited by notsonice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the death of coal one windmill at a time, in the case of Ireland, 1000's of windmills

reNEWS

 

Wind energy provided 34% of Ireland’s electricity in May up 9% on May 2021, according to Wind Energy Ireland.

 

This was the most power ever generated by wind in the month of May and over the first five months of 2022 wind has provided 37% of Ireland’s electricity, said the trade group.

 

The results of Wind Energy Ireland’s reporting are based on EirGrid’s SCADA data compiled by MullanGrid and on market data provided by ElectroRoute.

Prices on the wholesale electricity market fell significantly to an average of €143.27 but market analysts believe this was likely a temporary fall due to a combination of an oversupply of gas in Britain, lower than expected demand and better renewable energy performance.

 

Wind Energy Ireland CEO Noel Cunniffe (pictured) said: “Irish wind farms have delivered enormous amounts of clean energy over the first five months of the year, cutting our carbon emissions and helping to insulate Irish consumers from our dependence on expensive imported gas.

 

“We expect to see new wind farms connected before the end of 2022 and with solar farms connecting to the grid this year for the first time too, the two technologies will increasingly be able to work together to push fossil fuels off the Irish electricity system.”

 

The organisation warned that delays in the planning system are slowing the rate of connection of new wind farms.

 

Although An Bord Pleanála has a statutory timeframe to decide applications from wind energy projects in 18 weeks the average time for a decision is over a year.

 

Cunniffe said: “Our planning system must be urgently reformed and properly resourced to ensure that the renewable energy projects needed to cut our carbon emissions and drive down electricity bills can get built as quickly as possible.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, footeab@yahoo.com said:

Talahassee to Miami I take it...😃  Navy?

Close, Orlando to Panama City

Admittedly we had a few stops on the way

Not Navy, good old oil + gas 👍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jay McKinsey said:

Oh they are going to use it, just less than before.

If more is produced, more will be used....you don't need help from Einstein to figure that one out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, notsonice said:

sure its your problem you do not want to take ownership for it. Again how much does it cost to fill up your clunkers, you keep posting about how high the price is. Must really suck for you that your hard earned money keeps get taken from you when you fill up. Not my problem, I am not posting how high oil is. HA HA HA 

No, it is not my problem because the science does not support the CO2 theory of climate change.

You are the one who is violating your own beliefs.

Every time you fill your fossil fuel gas tank, that is good for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

Lithium is being caught up in the web of the environmentalists, the same protesters who are targeting oil and gasoline.

What goes around comes around.

https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Major-Lithium-Producer-Could-Shut-German-Plant-Over-EU-Rule.html

"The European Commission is currently reviewing and assessing a proposal from the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to classify lithium carbonate, lithium chloride, and lithium hydroxide as substances hazardous to human health. An EU committee is meeting early next month to discuss the proposal, while a final decision on the issue is expected toward the end of this year or early next year.

If the EU decides to include the lithium chemicals in the hazardous category, it would deal a blow to its own goals of becoming self-sufficient in batteries this decade and significantly raise the share of electric vehicles on the roads.

 

The decision would change the way lithium producers and processors work and will add costs to their operations."

Edited by Ecocharger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

14 minutes ago, Ecocharger said:

If more is produced, more will be used....you don't need help from Einstein to figure that one out.

No, less will be imported. You really have a problem with this simple concept. Total coal consumption is going down in India.

"All efforts are on to further enhance domestic coal production as availability of additional coal will aid in import-substitution," the ministry said.

Edited by Jay McKinsey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.