GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES

[TailingsPond + 1,013]

17 minutes ago, specinho said:

?? Not sure if you have confused education/academic lecturers and lecturer cum research scientists ?

You are confused. 

How do you think new research on cancer treatment, heart disease treatment is published?  It is done by practising oncologists, cardiologists and surgeons.  You can do studies on rats in the lab but the most important studies are done on real humans by doctors practising real medicine. 

How do you think a new surgeon learns? From a textbook?

I grow weary of spoon feeding you stuff while you pretend I am the one confused.

Edited Friday at 04:53 AM by TailingsPond

[Ecocharger + 1,506]

Oil prices are soaring on bullish factors, with the prospect of a new Trump administration coming into the White House and a new Secretary of Energy about to turf out the junk science which has gripped the previous Washington chumps.

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/The-Oil-Bulls-Are-Back-as-Brent-Breaks-80.html

"Bullish sentiment is well and truly back in oil markets, with Brent breaking $80 and WTI trading at $77.46."

"Oil prices have started the year rallying aggressively, with Brent breaking $80 per barrel for the first time since October 7 last year. The rally has been driven by the Biden Administration’s eleventh-hour sanctions on Russia, cold temperatures across the Atlantic Basin, widening backwardation in all crude futures, and continued concerns about inflation. For the first time in months, the oil market is feeling very bullish."

[TailingsPond + 1,013]

2 hours ago, Ecocharger said:

Oil prices are soaring on bullish factors, with the prospect of a new Trump administration coming into the White House and a new Secretary of Energy about to turf out the junk science which has gripped the previous Washington chumps.

 

More of this "Trump can change science" nonsense.

How quickly Eco forgets that Trump already had a term in office. Climate science easily survived his first term...

The oil price bump is due to war (no surprise) https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Oil-Prices-Skyrocket-45-as-US-Targets-Russian-Tankers.html

Edited Friday at 10:57 PM by TailingsPond

[specinho + 480]

On 1/10/2025 at 12:51 PM, TailingsPond said:

You are confused. 

How do you think new research on cancer treatment, heart disease treatment is published?  It is done by practising oncologists, cardiologists and surgeons.  You can do studies on rats in the lab but the most important studies are done on real humans by doctors practising real medicine. 

How do you think a new surgeon learns? From a textbook?

I grow weary of spoon feeding you stuff while you pretend I am the one confused.

🤔....... Things might not be what you have written.

1. Practising specialists

- they learn from

a) text books and lectures when they are in first year ( basic medical sc)

b) personal experience of lecturers when they are in second and third year ( specific fields of medical sc)

c) when they are interning in the wad, they learn from lecturer or doctor leading the group by watching ( too many intake of students from too many universities to allow hands on). Fourth year, fifth year would be more specialized medical subjects e.g. surgery, gyne & child labouring,  endocrine, ear & throat, guts, bones etc.

d) upon graduation, they have 2 years of housemanship ( government here prolongs it from one year because the quality of graduates has been consistently very poor. It will increase to 3 years soon). This period, they learn from senior doctors assigned to them.

Hence, we could deduce that their primary sources of info are 

a) text book and

b) lecturers & supervisors.

If supervisors learn no special  experience or outside textbook knowledge  from their lecturers, senior doctors, heads of division and personal handling, they will have no additional info on field. Consequently nothing new to teach to their juniors and every new badge thereafter. 

In addition, in a competitive world for progress and arrogant of some young doctors, seniors likely won't say anything unless relevant or similar condition of case emerge. Or they might be labelled as lengthy or talking too much by juniors. Yet face competition from some smarter juniors for permanent placement or job.

 

2. Doctors undertake master, phD or fellow in research after graduation or practising medical doctors who supervise research students from another course e.g. biomed, bioscience etc. 

( As mentioned, tuition fees they pay would suffice for few badges of rats etc, or private fund secured or government allowance when application is submitted)

- if not mistaken, doctors used to be very busy ( now, they have overstaff until they want to make themselves look busy or pretend to be, if they are not. E.g.

in the old days, when doctors were real busy, they would find out your history of visit, treatment done, diagnosis and current situation before prescribing. They hoped to heal you completely so that you need not return.

Nowadays, those young genious never need patients history, past treatment, diagnosis etc. They don't even interested to know what's wrong with you before they prescribe the same medication, sometimes overdoze, sometimes for 3 months, on every similar symptoms. And request you to go back every week or month... @#$_&-?!*)

- owing to their busy schedule, they rarely have time for research.

How do they have new discovery? 

a) clinical phase of drug testing ( not their research, they just watch and confirm it. Results owned and published by related pharma firm under a name in the research lab they established)

b) hear about it from presentors of other countries in conferences and ask research students to try it back home.

c) from research students they supervise...

- new surgeons learned by working on dummies until they sweat no more... Therefore, permanent contract issuance rate is very low nowadays.

 

Conclusion: cutting this automatic payout for a few years would be alright. 

 

 

[Ecocharger + 1,506]

7 hours ago, specinho said:

🤔....... Things might not be what you have written.

1. Practising specialists

- they learn from

a) text books and lectures when they are in first year ( basic medical sc)

b) personal experience of lecturers when they are in second and third year ( specific fields of medical sc)

c) when they are interning in the wad, they learn from lecturer or doctor leading the group by watching ( too many intake of students from too many universities to allow hands on). Fourth year, fifth year would be more specialized medical subjects e.g. surgery, gyne & child labouring,  endocrine, ear & throat, guts, bones etc.

d) upon graduation, they have 2 years of housemanship ( government here prolongs it from one year because the quality of graduates has been consistently very poor. It will increase to 3 years soon). This period, they learn from senior doctors assigned to them.

Hence, we could deduce that their primary sources of info are 

a) text book and

b) lecturers & supervisors.

If supervisors learn no special  experience or outside textbook knowledge  from their lecturers, senior doctors, heads of division and personal handling, they will have no additional info on field. Consequently nothing new to teach to their juniors and every new badge thereafter. 

In addition, in a competitive world for progress and arrogant of some young doctors, seniors likely won't say anything unless relevant or similar condition of case emerge. Or they might be labelled as lengthy or talking too much by juniors. Yet face competition from some smarter juniors for permanent placement or job.

 

2. Doctors undertake master, phD or fellow in research after graduation or practising medical doctors who supervise research students from another course e.g. biomed, bioscience etc. 

( As mentioned, tuition fees they pay would suffice for few badges of rats etc, or private fund secured or government allowance when application is submitted)

- if not mistaken, doctors used to be very busy ( now, they have overstaff until they want to make themselves look busy or pretend to be, if they are not. E.g.

in the old days, when doctors were real busy, they would find out your history of visit, treatment done, diagnosis and current situation before prescribing. They hoped to heal you completely so that you need not return.

Nowadays, those young genious never need patients history, past treatment, diagnosis etc. They don't even interested to know what's wrong with you before they prescribe the same medication, sometimes overdoze, sometimes for 3 months, on every similar symptoms. And request you to go back every week or month... @#$_&-?!*)

- owing to their busy schedule, they rarely have time for research.

How do they have new discovery? 

a) clinical phase of drug testing ( not their research, they just watch and confirm it. Results owned and published by related pharma firm under a name in the research lab they established)

b) hear about it from presentors of other countries in conferences and ask research students to try it back home.

c) from research students they supervise...

- new surgeons learned by working on dummies until they sweat no more... Therefore, permanent contract issuance rate is very low nowadays.

 

Conclusion: cutting this automatic payout for a few years would be alright. 

 

 

In the new White House, the discredited climate science based on CO2 will be exposed and the reality of factual science revived based on atmospheric H2O and solar variables. The old models which have been excluding the most important variables will be overhauled.

The realities are that by excluding the most important variables, biased correlation coefficients have been falsely promoted. Any statistical model for climate change which excludes such basic variables as atmospheric H2O or solar variables is without serious merit. Any advanced undergraduate student in mathematical statistics should know that. Further, a statistical relationship is not enough, there needs to be an organic relationship detailed, which fails in the case of atmospheric CO2, due to the low levels of the gas. H2O is by far the predominant greenhouse gas.

The standard CO2 model excludes atmospheric H2O and solar variables. Without a complete model the results for the correlation coefficients are biased and the model without value. Anyone who has studied university mathematical statistics knows that.

https://www.scribbr.com/research-bias/omitted-variable-bias/#:~:text=Omitted variable bias occurs when,important factor in your analysis.

"Omitted variable bias occurs when a statistical model fails to include one or more relevant variables. In other words, it means that you left out an important factor in your analysis." "In this case, excluding causes omitted variable bias. This may lead to an overestimation or under-estimation of the effect of your other variables.
As a result, the model mistakenly attributes the effect of the missing variable to the included variables. Exclusion of important variables can limit the validity of your study findings."

Climate scientists freely abandon the rules of statistical models, as if they do not exist. Apparently they believe that the rules are an inconvenience which can be blithely ignored. The models produced by this thinking produce worthless results.

Specification error is the major debilitating factor for the vast majority of climate models, it appears that the difficulties of constructing a well-defined model are beyond the capacities of most climate scientists, most of whom have only a cursory training in statistical models.

Most climate studies focus only on one or two variables and do not attempt to work with comprehensive models, with catastrophic results.

 

Edited Saturday at 02:09 PM by Ecocharger

[Ecocharger + 1,506]

Oil prices are soaring in the new year and there is nowhere for them to go but upwards.

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Oil-Prices-Skyrocket-45-as-US-Targets-Russian-Tankers.html

"New US sanctions targeting Russian oil tankers and maritime insurance providers have caused oil prices to surge to a three-month high.

Dwindling US crude stockpiles, cold weather, and uncertainty over the Trump administration's stance on Iranian crude flows have also contributed to the price rally.

The surge in oil prices has raised concerns about inflation as Trump's term begins"

There is also the drop off the cliff with cold weather gripping the world. I guess global warming is over-hyped.

""Sentiment remains positive on the back of colder weather across parts of the Northern Hemisphere, which is likely to boost oil demand.""

 

 

 

Edited Saturday at 02:10 PM by Ecocharger

[TailingsPond + 1,013]

6 hours ago, Ecocharger said:

In the new White House, the discredited climate science based on CO2 will be exposed and the reality of factual science revived based on atmospheric H2O and solar variables.

Why didn't Trump do that during his last term? Hint it is because he can't - global leaders and real scientists laugh at Trump.

Regardless, politicians do not get to decide the science - If they did it would not be science.

[TailingsPond + 1,013]

6 hours ago, Ecocharger said:

Oil prices are soaring in the new year and there is nowhere for them to go but upwards.

You got a war bump but the real economists and bankers predict falling oil prices.

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Standard-Chartered-US-Oil-Production-Growth-To-Decline-In-2025.html

"The survey of 26 bankers showed that they expect WTI prices to drop to $58.62 a barrel by 2027"

Also there is a large increase in refined product inventories.

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Large-Jump-in-Fuel-Inventories-Outweighs-Crude-Draw.html

[specinho + 480]

7 hours ago, TailingsPond said:

Why didn't Trump do that during his last term? Hint it is because he can't - global leaders and real scientists laugh at Trump.

Regardless, politicians do not get to decide the science - If they did it would not be science.

 

Remember this?

It is true. Politicians cum policy makers can not decide science.

But, they can, somehow, influence the direction of science.......

For better, or for worse... >~<

[Ecocharger + 1,506]

Oil demand remains strong in Norway despite the uptake of EVs. It makes no real difference.

https://www.investing.com/news/commodities-news/norways-oil-demand-steady-despite-rise-to-ev-superpower-ubs-says-3399266

"...a record 92.1% of all new cars sold were purely electric in Norway, UBS said in Wednesday note, a trend that has been gaining momentum since the rise in EV sales in 2010. But so far, the impact on oil demand in Norway "has been negligible," UBS adds, noting the plunge gasoline demand has been more than offset by other oil products."

[Ecocharger + 1,506]

The cancellation of the unnecessary and foolish CO2 removal projects is a positive development in the oil sector, there is absolutely no need to reduce CO2 levels, which clearly do not contribute to global warming.

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Canadas-165B-Carbon-Capture-Project-In-Jeopardy-After-Trudeaus-Resignation.html

"Exxon CEO Darren Woods told investors that the company’s low-carbon business has the potential to outperform its legacy oil and gas business within a decade and generate hundreds of billions in revenues. According to Woods, the business has the potential to hit hundreds of billions after the initial 10-year ramp-up. However, Ammann said that whether Exxon is able to actualize its dream will depend on regulatory and policy support for carbon pricing and the cost of abating greenhouse gas emissions, among other changes. Exxon believes that the Low Carbon segment will be "much more stable, or less cyclical" and also less prone to commodity price swings through predictable, long-term contracts with customers aiming to lower their own carbon footprint."

Only by bankrupting national government budgets could these ideas ever be brought to fruition, and now with Trudeau out of  business, there is no head of government prepared to risk this enterprise.

[Ecocharger + 1,506]

22 hours ago, specinho said:

 

Remember this?

It is true. Politicians cum policy makers can not decide science.

But, they can, somehow, influence the direction of science.......

For better, or for worse... >~<

Scientists supported by government can institute a ban on real science, such as has currently happened in the climate change sector, and can fund some considerable science itself.

Trump will no doubt recruit a body of climate scientists who will undertake a reappraisal of the literature, knock out the unspported and incomplete climate models which the current Biden folks are relying upon, and set a new course for real science. Genuine variables such as atmospheric H2O and solar variables can be introduced into functional models with better results and without catastrophic alarms. Some of this science could even be publicly released to make the case for a change in strategy.

Exciting times are ahead.

[TailingsPond + 1,013]

55 minutes ago, Ecocharger said:

Scientists supported by government can institute a ban on real science, such as has currently happened in the climate change sector, and can fund some considerable science itself.

Trump will no doubt recruit a body of climate scientists who will undertake a reappraisal of the literature, knock out the unspported and incomplete climate models which the current Biden folks are relying upon, and set a new course for real science. Genuine variables such as atmospheric H2O and solar variables can be introduced into functional models with better results and without catastrophic alarms. Some of this science could even be publicly released to make the case for a change in strategy.

Exciting times are ahead.

You still think the USA can dictate science.  It is super funny - keep up the entertainment.

You also keep failing to acknowledge Trump already had a term in office and didn't do anything you want and now you have "no doubt" he will reverse climate science.

Edited yesterday at 04:24 AM by TailingsPond

[TailingsPond + 1,013]

59 minutes ago, Ecocharger said:

Trump will no doubt recruit a body of climate scientists who will undertake a reappraisal of the literature, knock out the unspported and incomplete climate models which the current Biden folks are relying upon, and set a new course for real science.

Just to be clear you support Trump ramping up government funding for climate change researchers?  If so that is awesome but don't be sad when they report data you do not like.

[TailingsPond + 1,013]

The USA will never own science, Canada, or Greenland.  How epic stupid do you have to be to think that a change in administration is going to cause global change in climate science? 

[TailingsPond + 1,013]

The DOGE will get rid of all climate scientists.  Absolutely no way will he hire biased "scientists" that work against his interests.

Epic stupid.

[specinho + 480]

2 hours ago, Ecocharger said:

Scientists supported by government can institute a ban on real science, such as has currently happened in the climate change sector, and can fund some considerable science itself.

Trump will no doubt recruit a body of climate scientists who will undertake a reappraisal of the literature, knock out the unspported and incomplete climate models which the current Biden folks are relying upon, and set a new course for real science. Genuine variables such as atmospheric H2O and solar variables can be introduced into functional models with better results and without catastrophic alarms. Some of this science could even be publicly released to make the case for a change in strategy.

Exciting times are ahead.

Judging from choices of consultants suggested to him and a few more jokers buying their way into top few posts, do not be too trusting things will change...

In addition, climate change is not a field Trump familiar with. And, People who live in places that use air-con all the time are in no way suitable to help him.

As mentioned, if Trump still has not found his aim and guts, and whatever announced during his term before is being reannounced, then, it would be pretty sure, those few german-german jews founders &/or offsprings -relatives of G7, saudi, indians/ africans & in- law of williams etc will make him and america a laughing stock.

Do not like to be the one pouring cold water over your excitement, but it has to be done so that we will stick to "what is real" , not 'what we think is real'.

Edited yesterday at 05:48 AM by specinho

[Ron Wagner + 716]

On 1/11/2025 at 12:24 AM, specinho said:

🤔....... Things might not be what you have written.

1. Practising specialists

- they learn from

a) text books and lectures when they are in first year ( basic medical sc)

b) personal experience of lecturers when they are in second and third year ( specific fields of medical sc)

c) when they are interning in the wad, they learn from lecturer or doctor leading the group by watching ( too many intake of students from too many universities to allow hands on). Fourth year, fifth year would be more specialized medical subjects e.g. surgery, gyne & child labouring,  endocrine, ear & throat, guts, bones etc.

d) upon graduation, they have 2 years of housemanship ( government here prolongs it from one year because the quality of graduates has been consistently very poor. It will increase to 3 years soon). This period, they learn from senior doctors assigned to them.

Hence, we could deduce that their primary sources of info are 

a) text book and

b) lecturers & supervisors.

If supervisors learn no special  experience or outside textbook knowledge  from their lecturers, senior doctors, heads of division and personal handling, they will have no additional info on field. Consequently nothing new to teach to their juniors and every new badge thereafter. 

In addition, in a competitive world for progress and arrogant of some young doctors, seniors likely won't say anything unless relevant or similar condition of case emerge. Or they might be labelled as lengthy or talking too much by juniors. Yet face competition from some smarter juniors for permanent placement or job.

 

2. Doctors undertake master, phD or fellow in research after graduation or practising medical doctors who supervise research students from another course e.g. biomed, bioscience etc. 

( As mentioned, tuition fees they pay would suffice for few badges of rats etc, or private fund secured or government allowance when application is submitted)

- if not mistaken, doctors used to be very busy ( now, they have overstaff until they want to make themselves look busy or pretend to be, if they are not. E.g.

in the old days, when doctors were real busy, they would find out your history of visit, treatment done, diagnosis and current situation before prescribing. They hoped to heal you completely so that you need not return.

Nowadays, those young genious never need patients history, past treatment, diagnosis etc. They don't even interested to know what's wrong with you before they prescribe the same medication, sometimes overdoze, sometimes for 3 months, on every similar symptoms. And request you to go back every week or month... @#$_&-?!*)

- owing to their busy schedule, they rarely have time for research.

How do they have new discovery? 

a) clinical phase of drug testing ( not their research, they just watch and confirm it. Results owned and published by related pharma firm under a name in the research lab they established)

b) hear about it from presentors of other countries in conferences and ask research students to try it back home.

c) from research students they supervise...

- new surgeons learned by working on dummies until they sweat no more... Therefore, permanent contract issuance rate is very low nowadays.

 

Conclusion: cutting this automatic payout for a few years would be alright. 

 

 

Pioneering physicians are very unpopular and often fired for not going along with the false teachings that they are forced to use in large medical groups. 

Shawn Baker has a great book out on the Carnivore diet. He was a top practice builder for a large group before being fired. I highly recommend his book.

Diabetics are being given misguided treatment by many physicians. 

Statin users are often suffering muscle pains needlessly. 

Psychiatric patients are not given the nutritional information that may be vital to recovery.

Covid patients were prevented from getting proper information on many helpful supplements and helpful medications. Children should never have received any Covid MRNA shots. They were called vaccines but are not.

These are just some of the faults of organized medicine brought to us by our malign medical authorities. 

 

[Ron Wagner + 716]

On 1/8/2025 at 1:17 PM, notsonice said:

you need to stop using drugs.....

EV market is not in decline.....far from it

 

Mr Magoo get some new glasses or stop using drugs or both 

from your article 

..........Porsche's parent company, is facing challenges in the competitive EV market amid a price war with Tesla and Chinese automakers

reality is overpriced EVs are getting the crap beat out of them by price cutting at the same time EV sales are booming

 

looks like NEV sales in China will take the entire market by the end of 2027...................from no sales in 2020 to over 50 percent of the market now.....oh my ...........enjoy

enjoy the  article and the Chart 

CnEVPost

China NEV retail at record 1.38 million in Dec, preliminary CPCA data show

China's NEV retail penetration was 52.6 percent in December and 47.97 percent in 2024, according to preliminary CPCA data.

.

9 hours ago

 

Probably true, but not in the United States. 

[notsonice + 1,270]

1 hour ago, Ron Wagner said:

Probably true, but not in the United States. 

Probably true, but not in the United States??????????? this is what happens when your only source of news is Fox news

are you Mr. Magoo's Twin brother??????

you should also get a new pair of glasses ....and stop sole sourcing your news from a site that is dedicated to  sucking up to a senile convicted politician ..you also are so out of touch with what is happening

EV market is not in decline  in the US .....far from it

Cox Automotive Inc.

Electric Vehicle Sales Jump Higher in Q4, Pushing U.S. Sales to a Record 1.3 Million

Sales of electric vehicles (EVs) in the U.S., according to the latest counts from Cox Automotive's Kelley Blue Book, jumped 15.2% year over...

.

4 hours ago

Edited 23 hours ago by notsonice

[specinho + 480]

7 hours ago, Ron Wagner said:

Pioneering physicians are very unpopular and often fired for not going along with the false teachings that they are forced to use in large medical groups. 

Shawn Baker has a great book out on the Carnivore diet. He was a top practice builder for a large group before being fired. I highly recommend his book.

Diabetics are being given misguided treatment by many physicians. 

Statin users are often suffering muscle pains needlessly. 

Psychiatric patients are not given the nutritional information that may be vital to recovery.

Covid patients were prevented from getting proper information on many helpful supplements and helpful medications. Children should never have received any Covid MRNA shots. They were called vaccines but are not.

These are just some of the faults of organized medicine brought to us by our malign medical authorities. 

 

May be the authorities do not have enough basic knowledge themselves. They are there because they are related to somebody with status or so.

Attended a course offered by HK  University of medicine and another one on food nutrition by another university online. It was horrendous to find out how poor the level of basic proficiency one of the best universities could be at professor and specialist level.... And  info provided on insulin resistance and cholesterol are probably wrong.

Without the right basic info, targeted treatment will produce unwanted and unforeable side effects. That's how many more subsequent medication will be prescribed. That's how they make money......

A friend of a friend has high cholesterol. The medication prescribed causes swelling. The doctor then prescribes another pill to reduce swelling. This pill later causes kidney problem...

An otherwise healthy person is made unhealthy by the doctors and medication prescribed. 

Suggested sometimes ago, all doctors and pharmacists must have a taste of medication they will commonly used, write reports on each, before they are qualified to prescribed. Same with medical procedure, diagnostic methods that they will commonly use. Unless they themselves going through the process of taking medicine they commonly prescribed and diagnostic procedure or surgery they commonly perform, and write report and their feedback for those, they can not learn correctly or properly.

Pharma companies the same, everyone in the team and company, including those in c suits, must have a test on themselves before clinical trial is allowed. The best few Jews doctors did that during WWII.

In addition, all government servants, from top to bottom, must use hospital services provided by government.

Hope all  governments will put this into policy and practice so that healthcare efficiency would improve with this change. Costs / expenditure would be reduced by much and many other related problems can be solved consequently.

 

Edited 17 hours ago by specinho

[TailingsPond + 1,013]

9 hours ago, specinho said:

Pharma companies the same, everyone in the team and company, including those in c suits, must have a test on themselves before clinical trial is allowed. The best few Jews doctors did that during WWII.

In addition, all government servants, from top to bottom, must use hospital services provided by government.

You want the executives to do a clinical trial on themselves before a clinical trial?  That makes no sense.

Government servants must use hospital services provided by government?  What if you live in a country where the government provides no hospital services? Private health care.

[Ecocharger + 1,506]

EV sales have dropped precipitously over the past year in terms of market share, as the numbers make clear.

https://www.coxautoinc.com/market-insights/q4-2024-ev-sales/

EV "...sales in 2023 were revised upward to 1,212,758 units, a 49% gain from 2022. Sales in 2024 (1,301,411) were higher by 7.3% and accounted for 8.1% of total sales.."

World EV sales have slowed including a disastrous fall in German sales. As a percent of total vehicle sales, EV sales in the U.S. are still only 8.1% of the total, meaning that fossil fuel vehicle sales are now at about 92% of the market, so fossil fuel vehicle fleets are increasing much faster than EV contributions.This is despite the trillions of dollars wasted on subsidizing the consumer choices in favor of EVs.

The American people have voted with their wallets.

[Ecocharger + 1,506]

15 hours ago, specinho said:

May be the authorities do not have enough basic knowledge themselves. They are there because they are related to somebody with status or so.

Attended a course offered by HK  University of medicine and another one on food nutrition by another university online. It was horrendous to find out how poor the level of basic proficiency one of the best universities could be at professor and specialist level.... And  info provided on insulin resistance and cholesterol are probably wrong.

Without the right basic info, targeted treatment will produce unwanted and unforeable side effects. That's how many more subsequent medication will be prescribed. That's how they make money......

A friend of a friend has high cholesterol. The medication prescribed causes swelling. The doctor then prescribes another pill to reduce swelling. This pill later causes kidney problem...

An otherwise healthy person is made unhealthy by the doctors and medication prescribed. 

Suggested sometimes ago, all doctors and pharmacists must have a taste of medication they will commonly used, write reports on each, before they are qualified to prescribed. Same with medical procedure, diagnostic methods that they will commonly use. Unless they themselves going through the process of taking medicine they commonly prescribed and diagnostic procedure or surgery they commonly perform, and write report and their feedback for those, they can not learn correctly or properly.

Pharma companies the same, everyone in the team and company, including those in c suits, must have a test on themselves before clinical trial is allowed. The best few Jews doctors did that during WWII.

In addition, all government servants, from top to bottom, must use hospital services provided by government.

Hope all  governments will put this into policy and practice so that healthcare efficiency would improve with this change. Costs / expenditure would be reduced by much and many other related problems can be solved consequently.

 

Well, no, the governments and universities are currently trying their best to suppress real climate science, and with Trump just opening a window on actual research will bring about a revelation of new insights.

[Ron Wagner + 716]

18 hours ago, specinho said:

May be the authorities do not have enough basic knowledge themselves. They are there because they are related to somebody with status or so.

Attended a course offered by HK  University of medicine and another one on food nutrition by another university online. It was horrendous to find out how poor the level of basic proficiency one of the best universities could be at professor and specialist level.... And  info provided on insulin resistance and cholesterol are probably wrong.

Without the right basic info, targeted treatment will produce unwanted and unforeable side effects. That's how many more subsequent medication will be prescribed. That's how they make money......

A friend of a friend has high cholesterol. The medication prescribed causes swelling. The doctor then prescribes another pill to reduce swelling. This pill later causes kidney problem...

An otherwise healthy person is made unhealthy by the doctors and medication prescribed. 

Suggested sometimes ago, all doctors and pharmacists must have a taste of medication they will commonly used, write reports on each, before they are qualified to prescribed. Same with medical procedure, diagnostic methods that they will commonly use. Unless they themselves going through the process of taking medicine they commonly prescribed and diagnostic procedure or surgery they commonly perform, and write report and their feedback for those, they can not learn correctly or properly.

Pharma companies the same, everyone in the team and company, including those in c suits, must have a test on themselves before clinical trial is allowed. The best few Jews doctors did that during WWII.

In addition, all government servants, from top to bottom, must use hospital services provided by government.

Hope all  governments will put this into policy and practice so that healthcare efficiency would improve with this change. Costs / expenditure would be reduced by much and many other related problems can be solved consequently.

 

The information is widely available for free on YouTube.com Many true pioneering experts give pioneering information on most medical subjects if not all. 

Medicine has to become democratized. Not just run by Big Pharma, and federal or state governments. Every person should learn all they can and teach what they have learned. Having maladies yourself may help you to do so. 

I am nearing eighty and have lived well through a hip replacement, an aortic valve replacement, back pain that I got physical therapy for to avoid surgery, atrial fibrillation, and continue to learn about all aspects of health and longevity. I work out twice a week at the gym and at home. 

The food industry has been teaching us to eat the wrong foods, so that we can become addicted to sugar and cheap starches from childhood. We use cooking oils that are dangerous and most grew up with hydrogenated margarine and peanut butter and Crisco instead of bacon grease and lard which are healthful.  Highly processed foods is a generic term for industrialized food processes and additives that are not good for us. These foods have led us into metabolic syndrome, obesity, and shorter life spans. 

I think that RFK will be approved for HHS Secretary and will guide some great changes but it will be a never ending struggle to educate people about health issues. 

Edited 37 minutes ago by Ron Wagner