GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES

[TailingsPond + 1,029]

4 hours ago, specinho said:

Not at all. I was refering to methods suggested by @Ron Wagner.  

Say, heat is absorbed by a medium e.g. alcohol, ccl4. Evaporation of medium occurs. Gas produced is used to turned turbine and generate electricity. Gas is compressed into liquid form and recycled.

Or, heat is conducted by black metal grid. This heat boils water (need to test on volume required vs speed of boiling desired). Steam turns turbine to generate electricity. Cooled down by medium ( alcohol, ccl4) to generate second harvest of energy.

No point to stick to solar panel which has low efficiency and shorter lifespan as temperature gets hotter. It takes something easier, common to us, economic, lasting to count.

 

Ron is an idiot.

Try to remember I am the one trying to spoon feed you science.  I gave you links to education.  Learn the material before attempting rebuttal.

If you choose to "learn" from morons like Ecocharger, old Ruffy, or nursing home Ron go ahead.  Do not try to educate me.

Some people just commit to being wrong. Down is not up.

I enjoy your curiosity sometimes but you are fucking stupid if you listen to Ron or Ecocharger for anything.  What level of ignorance does it take to think that some old man on oil price knows how to solve any energy problem other than burning fossil fuels.

There is no free energy.  Little "steam" engines using poisonous solvents is not a good idea.  It is also nothing like the reverse laser you were mentioning.

Choose your path.  Listen to the always wrong old folks, or someone who has actual science education. 

Edited February 15 by TailingsPond

[Old-Ruffneck + 1,281]

4 hours ago, TailingsPond said:

Choose your path.  Listen to the always wrong old folks, or someone who has actual science education. 

Your short-sight look at the trends makes you really scientifically smart. You'll notice that oil tends to fluctuate like alot of commodities. Education in actual science. I think not!! Just another keyboard warrior like notsosmart. Both of whom drive ICE vehicles, but going to save the planet. 

[Polyphia + 87]

4 hours ago, Old-Ruffneck said:

Your short-sight look at the trends makes you really scientifically smart. You'll notice that oil tends to fluctuate like alot of commodities. Education in actual science. I think not!! Just another keyboard warrior like notsosmart. Both of whom drive ICE vehicles, but going to save the planet. 

Are the dollar values adjusted for inflation? If not, this graph is uninterpretable. Also, I question the scale on the vertical axis--it appears to be logarithmic. A title and explanation/legend related to the axes/graph is warranted, too.

[Old-Ruffneck + 1,281]

2 hours ago, Polyphia said:

Are the dollar values adjusted for inflation? If not, this graph is uninterpretable. Also, I question the scale on the vertical axis--it appears to be logarithmic. A title and explanation/legend related to the axes/graph is warranted, too.

That graph is actual at the time what oil cost since 1945. Goes up and down, actual dollars at the time. No need to adjust for inflation. 

[TailingsPond + 1,029]

13 hours ago, Old-Ruffneck said:

Your short-sight look at the trends makes you really scientifically smart. You'll notice that oil tends to fluctuate like alot of commodities. Education in actual science. I think not!!

"Short-sight" - you meant short-sighted. Garbage English, garbage brain. Do you know "a lot" is two words?

Secondly, one year time frames are not short term.  Oil is down on relevant time-frames   We are not talking about generational long trends.

Down is down, you up-vote a moron who says down is up.  You can choose your path; side with a moron or don't - just try not to get sad when you look stupid yet again.

 

[TailingsPond + 1,029]

6 hours ago, Old-Ruffneck said:

That graph is actual at the time what oil cost since 1945. Goes up and down, actual dollars at the time. No need to adjust for inflation. 

"That graph is actual at the time what oil cost since 1945" is more garbage English. 

"The graph presented demonstrates the consumer price of oil since 1945" has a better ring to it, no?

Were you alive in 1945?  Is that time-frame important to a young investor?

Think you are more educated than me?  I can pull out a degree, I doubt you can. You know I'm smart and that is what annoys you so much.

 

Edited February 16 by TailingsPond

[specinho + 494]

9 hours ago, Polyphia said:

Are the dollar values adjusted for inflation? If not, this graph is uninterpretable. Also, I question the scale on the vertical axis--it appears to be logarithmic. A title and explanation/legend related to the axes/graph is warranted, too.

Why do you say so?

X-axis = time in year

Y-axis = oil price ( real price, not in log)

Why uninterpretable?

[TailingsPond + 1,029]

Old Ruffy has decades of oil experience yet is still concerned about the price of filling up his truck.  If he had any clue he would be very wealthy, retired, and certainly not worried about the ticket shock of filling up a tank. 

If Ecocharger had any economic sense he would not be damn wrong about everything.

Specinho dreams he can solve the world problems yet can barely dress or feed himself.  SpoonFeedcinho.  

Down is not up. 

Losers flock together.

Poops are all in a group. shits

Edited February 16 by TailingsPond

[Old-Ruffneck + 1,281]

41 minutes ago, TailingsPond said:

Old Ruffy has decades of oil experience yet is still concerned about the price of filling up his truck.  If he had any clue he would be very wealthy, retired, and certainly not worried about the ticket shock of filling up a tank. 

You don't know me at all boy. I choose to work because I like it! I have no plans on retiring. It's not about the money! I have 6 diesel burners, 2 gasoline. So you just keep your guessing Boy, you obviously haven't lived life yet.

" You know I'm smart and that is what annoys you so much."  If you have to tell the world you're smart, maybe you missed the boat.

Edited February 16 by Old-Ruffneck

[specinho + 494]

19 hours ago, TailingsPond said:

Ron is an idiot.

Try to remember I am the one trying to spoon feed you science.  I gave you links to education.  Learn the material before attempting rebuttal.

If you choose to "learn" from morons like Ecocharger, old Ruffy, or nursing home Ron go ahead.  Do not try to educate me.

Some people just commit to being wrong. Down is not up.

I enjoy your curiosity sometimes but you are fucking stupid if you listen to Ron or Ecocharger for anything.  What level of ignorance does it take to think that some old man on oil price knows how to solve any energy problem other than burning fossil fuels.

There is no free energy.  Little "steam" engines using poisonous solvents is not a good idea.  It is also nothing like the reverse laser you were mentioning.

Choose your path.  Listen to the always wrong old folks, or someone who has actual science education. 

Forum is a place for discussion. You can agree, disagree, have no opinion or have others opinion. Then, the place would be happening.

Basic manner is point discussion, not personal attack. You can attack points as much as you can, as long as you make sense. Why bother to attack the person, who is just a messenger like yourself? 

So what if i merely finish basic schooling? If my common sense prevails your parrotic style of brainless  educated, how valuable your degree or higher cert is? You might use it to wipe the backside during toilet paper shortage if you have to, yes?

What is the point if everyone repeat the same thing disregard if the info is correct?  Why do we bow on uniformity despite it is stupidly damaging? 

"Control water, you control everything" ~ movie Rango

Likewise, control money, you control everything, is it not? 

If we do not stand to resist being control like this, in ultimate stupidity of our own, the future scenarios are already predicted by a few authors:

- movie "ready player one": everyone exists in virtual reality. In real life, everything is broken: broken families, broken lives, broken buildings, broken cities etc. Nearly all former living things runned on chips. Kind intention of founder and creator of game is ruined by imbecile successor. Luckily, the intelligent elder set up a back up system. Only the righteous and pure hearted friends can salvage the game and the world.

- movie " captain America": the sole heir to megaweapon industry tried to ruin or control the world with war. Captain America alone was not sufficient to stop him. USA, somehow, ended the potential disaster in the making by killing the heir, in excellent and courageous team effort.

- uniformity is the latest root cause for global warming, not fossil fuel burning.

* It causes the lost of buffering capacity of earth by rapid copying of model western cities.

* It creates uniformed imbeciles to be controlled at ease;

* Regular financial crisis, war- conflict and disaster in the name of social progress.

* It also causes inhumane inferior breeds to grow arrogant with wide spreading indifference and low overall human capability/ characteristics. 

The ultimate condition is like movie " revolution of matrix": everything is ruined and burned, like hell, by tiny bots sentinel and agent of multiple existence. 

To prevent it, we should not allow inferior breeds of low human characteristics to grow. Nor should we allow multiples to exist ruining the world further with their inhumanity.

When the world unite enough to resist money control game of this breed, we will have a refreshing corner to be human again...

[notsonice + 1,290]

On 2/15/2025 at 9:58 PM, TailingsPond said:

Old Ruffy has decades of oil experience yet is still concerned about the price of filling up his truck.  If he had any clue he would be very wealthy, retired, and certainly not worried about the ticket shock of filling up a tank. 

If Ecocharger had any economic sense he would not be damn wrong about everything.

Specinho dreams he can solve the world problems yet can barely dress or feed himself.  SpoonFeedcinho.  

Down is not up. 

Losers flock together.

Poops are all in a group. shits

Old Ruffy has decades of oil experience?????

a couple of years in the late 70's or early eighties in West Texas at most as  a rig hand...........laborer breaking sacks/mixing mud or hauling water. He was never a deck boss or drilling or mud engineer or wire line logging and those were the jobs were one could bank some real cash.

Working in West Texas would not make one rich at his level..........most everyone on the bottom  blew their earnings on drinking or coke (sniff...sniff) . 

Would not call working in West Teas that much experience at all...The drilling tech at the time was mostly vertical wells and simple ones that did not have the production as frac wells have today...The money was made working Offshore or in the Middle East...........which he is not worldly enough/with the level of education needed  or with any balls to work as an Ex-pat.... and at his education level...HS diploma ....no one was going to pay him squat or pay for him to work as an ex-pat.

All he cares about is cheap diesel as he cries about the price if it is over $3...obviously  a Whiner that cannot afford to tank up his truck, I am sure he works his butt off to make enough to keep going and to afford to tank up....but the whining about $3 plus at the pump.......does not paint him as a guy with a fat wad of cash.

Anyone working for a long time in the Oil business would never whine about high oil prices.......if they did  it while working on a rig they would have been run off ......Bitch about high prices at the pump to the crew????? time to grease the whiner. Usually those that  whined about money where always broke...these were the drunks or heavy drug users. The whole point of Drilling for oil or gas is to have high prices ....those were the glory days......no one on a rig would ever bitch about not being able to tank up their rig. No one

 

Edited Tuesday at 06:32 PM by notsonice

[notsonice + 1,290]

On 2/14/2025 at 6:10 PM, Ecocharger said:

This speaks for itself, very loudly. Already long-term trends are impacting the optimism for oil and gasoline demand.

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Oil-Prices-Rise-Despite-Multiple-Bearish-Catalysts.html

"Oil prices are rising despite concerns about Trump imposing tariffs on trading partners and talk of a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine."

"Backwardation has eased in global crude futures and oil is set to rebound from three straight weeks of losses. This week’s largest geopolitical development – the prospect of a Russian-Ukrainian negotiated settlement – has oddly failed to push prices significantly lower, even though it had a massive and immediate impact on European natural gas prices. As such, ICE Brent futures are set to finish the week trading slightly below $76 per barrel."

Fossil fuels are now entering their dominant phase of world supplies. Judging from your anguished wailings above, that is a good thing.

"With rising instability in the Middle East, potential military conflicts on the horizon, and concerns over the stability of Egypt and Jordan, oil prices are set to rise. If the Gaza war resumes or if tensions escalate with Iran, oil prices could easily break $90 per barrel. Even an OPEC decision to suddenly increase export quotas may not prevent price hikes, as key producers will find themselves caught in geopolitical crossfire."

The use of coal as a basic energy source is still at an all-time high and dominant.

and Crude right now.....

 

any day now it will hit $90 ........ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 

taking a dump again and right before a Monday holiday in the US.....oh my 

WTI CRUDE •	70.39	-0.35	-0.49%
BRENT CRUDE •12 mins	74.48	-0.26	-0.35%

 

and China is dumping on Trump with more Tariffs....Sure looks Like China has old Shit in the pants  cornered 

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Natural-Gas/China-LNG-Tariffs-Put-Future-Contracts-in-Jeopardy.html

China LNG Tariffs Put Future Contracts in Jeopardy

By Alex Kimani - Feb 16, 2025, 6:00 PM CST

[specinho + 494]

3 hours ago, notsonice said:

Old Ruffy has decades of oil experience?????

a couple of years in the late 70's or early eighties in West Texas at most as  a rig hand...........laborer breaking sacks/mixing mud or hauling water. He was never a deck boss or drilling or mud engineer or wire line logging and those were the jobs were one could bank some real cash.

Working in West Texas would not make one rich at his level..........most everyone on the bottom  blew their earnings on drinking or coke (sniff...sniff) . 

Would not call working in West Teas that much experience at all...The drilling tech at the time was mostly vertical wells and simple ones that did not have the production as frac wells have today...The money was made working Offshore or in the Middle East...........which he is not worldly enough/with the level of education needed  or with any balls to work as an Ex-pat.... and at his education level...HS diploma ....no one was going to pay him squat or pay for him to work as an ex-pat.

All he cares about is cheap diesel as he cries about the price if it is over $3...obviously  a Whiner that cannot afford to tank up his truck, I am sure he works his butt off to make enough to keep going and to afford to tank up....but the whining about $3 plus at the pump.......does not paint him as a guy with a fat wade of cash.

Anyone working for a long time in the Oil business would never whine about high oil prices.......if they did  it while working on a rig they would have been run off ......Bitch about high prices at the pump to the crew????? time to grease the whiner. Usually those that  whined about money where always broke...these were the drunks or heavy drug users. The whole point of Drilling for oil or gas is to have high prices ....those were the glory days......no one on a rig would ever bitch about not being able to tank up their rig. No one

 

What do you get bashing the old like that? Self satisfaction by stepping others down?? Pets are groomed more humanely than you. What a shame.

But, if your intention is to draw attention to some left out or forgotten in the gush of wealth, then, you have been kind. Thank you for letting those in charged know, some people are in need.

[notsonice + 1,290]

44 minutes ago, specinho said:

What do you get bashing the old like that? Self satisfaction by stepping others down?? Pets are groomed more humanely than you. What a shame.

But, if your intention is to draw attention to some left out or forgotten in the gush of wealth, then, you have been kind. Thank you for letting those in charged know, some people are in need.

You got one thing right finally ..........Your pal is old 

your pal old-cocksucker bashes people on this forum all the time if you have not paid attention

so buzz off

PS some people are in need.??? you sure are

 

Edited Monday at 05:04 AM by notsonice

[notsonice + 1,290]

On 2/14/2025 at 10:05 PM, specinho said:

Not at all. I was refering to methods suggested by @Ron Wagner.  

Say, heat is absorbed by a medium e.g. alcohol, ccl4. Evaporation of medium occurs. Gas produced is used to turned turbine and generate electricity. Gas is compressed into liquid form and recycled.

Or, heat is conducted by black metal grid. This heat boils water (need to test on volume required vs speed of boiling desired). Steam turns turbine to generate electricity. Cooled down by medium ( alcohol, ccl4) to generate second harvest of energy.

No point to stick to solar panel which has low efficiency and shorter lifespan as temperature gets hotter. It takes something easier, common to us, economic, lasting to count.

 

I thought I would let this one die......

but your post shows how ignorant you are

Have you had any schooling in Thermodynamics????????? because your whole post screams you have no clue with what your are talking about

......Say, heat is absorbed by a medium e.g. alcohol, ccl4. Evaporation of medium occurs. Gas produced is used to turned turbine and generate electricity. Gas is compressed into liquid form and recycled.

Or, heat is conducted by black metal grid. This heat boils water (need to test on volume required vs speed of boiling desired). Steam turns turbine to generate electricity. Cooled down by medium ( alcohol, ccl4) to generate second harvest of energy.......

 

??????? what the hell are you babbling about now???????

so you are going to have a surplus of electricity when you are all done and cooler air at the same time....yeash

 

if what you are proposing was possible ......Fossil fueled power plants would have already done your goofy plan........and generated more electricity of the waste heat/steam...instead they have to have massive cooling towers to take the waste steam to condense the vapor back to water to use it again and in the process they use up a bunch of electrical power

go to school...discuss your plan with your professor....I bet he has a good laugh

 

[Old-Ruffneck + 1,281]

12 hours ago, notsonice said:

bashes people on this forum all the time if you have not paid attention

And whom do I bash? Your just another profane keyboard warrior whose life is shallow and notsosmart. 2 lib-tards on here and i have restrained from calling you names like you call others. 

[Ecocharger + 1,532]

The hot demand for oil requires investment into new sources of production to satisfy the markets. Very simple, and contrary to the anti-market policies of the outgoing Biden folks.

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Upstream-Oil-Investment-Needs-30-Boost-to-Meet-Demand.html

"The slow pace of the energy transition, investment gaps in green energy, and rising global energy demand could keep oil and gas consumption higher for longer.

To meet sustained demand, global upstream oil and gas investment must rise from $500 billion to $660 billion annually.

The world’s biggest independent oil trader, Vitol, expects global oil demand will continue to rise by 2030 to nearly 110 million barrels per day."

"The world’s biggest independent oil trader, Vitol, expects global oil demand will continue to rise by 2030 to nearly 110 million barrels per day (bpd)."

"Currently, everyone in the industry expects peak oil demand after 2030-2035, and none expect a steep decline after the peak—and demand will likely remain at high levels.

But supply could struggle to catch up with demand. With fields maturing and depleting, investment in the upstream is needed just to keep supply at current levels.

Even more would be needed to sustain a stronger-for-longer oil and gas demand, Wood Mackenzie’s analysts say."

"The energy transition could slow due to lower-than-expected investments, rising energy demand, and a renewed focus on energy security and affordability instead of on sustainability. This opens the door to more investments in conventional energy sources such as oil and gas.

Yet, these investments, at current levels, will not be sufficient to supply the additional demand, according to WoodMac’s Delayed Energy Transition Scenario (DETS)."

"...the analysts project that global upstream investment will need to rise by 30% to deliver the incremental supply, from US$500 billion a year currently to US$660 billion annually."

Edited Monday at 07:47 PM by Ecocharger

[specinho + 494]

On 2/17/2025 at 1:14 PM, notsonice said:

I thought I would let this one die......

but your post shows how ignorant you are

Have you had any schooling in Thermodynamics????????? because your whole post screams you have no clue with what your are talking about

......Say, heat is absorbed by a medium e.g. alcohol, ccl4. Evaporation of medium occurs. Gas produced is used to turned turbine and generate electricity. Gas is compressed into liquid form and recycled.

Or, heat is conducted by black metal grid. This heat boils water (need to test on volume required vs speed of boiling desired). Steam turns turbine to generate electricity. Cooled down by medium ( alcohol, ccl4) to generate second harvest of energy.......

 

??????? what the hell are you babbling about now???????

so you are going to have a surplus of electricity when you are all done and cooler air at the same time....yeash

 

if what you are proposing was possible ......Fossil fueled power plants would have already done your goofy plan........and generated more electricity of the waste heat/steam...instead they have to have massive cooling towers to take the waste steam to condense the vapor back to water to use it again and in the process they use up a bunch of electrical power

go to school...discuss your plan with your professor....I bet he has a good laugh

 

This world works on copying. If no one leads but satisfies with status quo, nothing changes. Only when need arisen, someone will take a look at what could be done better.

The concept is not new but familiar to everyone. It is how double boiler steam turbine used to work, if you noticed this discussion years ago. The difference is the source of heat.

Does it necessary to burn fuel to boil water if the place has plenty of heat to be harvested? How?

There is a bandwidth of wavelength where heat from that wavelength can be used to boil water.

The key, is not something when the experts explain, we can not understand. They go round and round and finally said:" This concept is novel. Even if you do not understand, look at the potential it has to help the environment and to make tones of profit when everyone adopting it...." 

Do not want to be embarrassed at how you can not understand how it works, nor miss the opportunity to profit, many would simply fund it generously, except the pioneers. Wasting money, wasting effort, wasting time and material.

If it is something common to us, the young ones bluff, we would know. If it is honest work, we would know also. Make money worth the while.

I have always been an average kid in exam. But i was fortunate to have kind teachers to help me through with weak basic, as late starter, like never laughed at my silly questions but answered them seriously:

- "why are the stars blinking and some are changing colours?";

- " if the sum energy of a capacity is zero, why does it get hot? ";

- took time to give extra classes to her students and tried to include me and others from another class;

- dedicated despite discomfort due to pregnancy etc. 

Only teachers or professors of yours would be shallow enough to dismiss possibility. You are how they taught you to be and what they fed your brain with.

[TailingsPond + 1,029]

13 hours ago, Old-Ruffneck said:

And whom do I bash? Your just another profane keyboard warrior whose life is shallow and notsosmart. 2 lib-tards on here and i have restrained from calling you names like you call others. 

You say insults at the same time as claiming you refrain from insults. Too funny! 

You don't see or take ownership of your own errors.  Smart people learn from mistakes.  People like Ecocharger just keep doubling down on wrong despite reality.  You endorse wrong, that makes you wrong; just stop doing that and nobody will have to tell you are wrong again.

Stop endorsing stupid - simple plan.

 

Edited Tuesday at 06:42 AM by TailingsPond

[TailingsPond + 1,029]

16 minutes ago, specinho said:

Only teachers or professors of yours would be shallow enough to dismiss possibility. You are how they taught you to be and what they fed your brain with.

It is not a novel idea. 

Accept you are not going to revolutionize science or the energy industry.  You are curious but lack basic education.   He is not wrong that you have essentially no understanding of thermodynamics.

There are things that are not possible - listen to the educated. There is No Free Energy.  You can't win, you can't even break even.  These are known laws of physics.  I point you to information yet you retain false beliefs.  So much arrogance to think you know more than the "teachers and professors" when you have clearly not gone to school.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_law_of_thermodynamics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy

Edited Tuesday at 06:29 AM by TailingsPond

[notsonice + 1,290]

11 hours ago, specinho said:

This world works on copying. If no one leads but satisfies with status quo, nothing changes. Only when need arisen, someone will take a look at what could be done better.

The concept is not new but familiar to everyone. It is how double boiler steam turbine used to work, if you noticed this discussion years ago. The difference is the source of heat.

Does it necessary to burn fuel to boil water if the place has plenty of heat to be harvested? How?

There is a bandwidth of wavelength where heat from that wavelength can be used to boil water.

The key, is not something when the experts explain, we can not understand. They go round and round and finally said:" This concept is novel. Even if you do not understand, look at the potential it has to help the environment and to make tones of profit when everyone adopting it...." 

Do not want to be embarrassed at how you can not understand how it works, nor miss the opportunity to profit, many would simply fund it generously, except the pioneers. Wasting money, wasting effort, wasting time and material.

If it is something common to us, the young ones bluff, we would know. If it is honest work, we would know also. Make money worth the while.

I have always been an average kid in exam. But i was fortunate to have kind teachers to help me through with weak basic, as late starter, like never laughed at my silly questions but answered them seriously:

- "why are the stars blinking and some are changing colours?";

- " if the sum energy of a capacity is zero, why does it get hot? ";

- took time to give extra classes to her students and tried to include me and others from another class;

- dedicated despite discomfort due to pregnancy etc. 

Only teachers or professors of yours would be shallow enough to dismiss possibility. You are how they taught you to be and what they fed your brain with.

you post garbage....your science is garbage........

My bet is you have no scientific background whatsoever as what you proposed is just gibberish

Try this one out ....go to Real University  and study something in the sciences..... get a real education..

 

as now you are just posting garbage.........

my advice is for others to ignore your science posting as they really are just garbage

[notsonice + 1,290]

On 2/17/2025 at 10:08 AM, Old-Ruffneck said:

And whom do I bash? Your just another profane keyboard warrior whose life is shallow and notsosmart. 2 lib-tards on here and i have restrained from calling you names like you call others. 

you are an idiot......i have restrained from calling you names like you call others. ???????....just pure bullshit just read your own post...in it  you prove to everyone that you are an idiot......

You are a world class idiot at that.

PS Love the fact that all you do is whine about the price of diesel at the pump.......and you claim you are a successful businessman???? yet  you are unable to deal with paying $3 for a gallon of Diesel ................. please drive over to Missouri so you can save a few pennies ...

 

 

[Old-Ruffneck + 1,281]

14 minutes ago, notsonice said:

you are an idiot......i have restrained from calling you names like you call others. ???????....just pure bullshit just read your own post...in it  you prove to everyone that you are an idiot......

You are a world class idiot at that.

PS Love the fact that all you do is whine about the price of diesel at the pump.......and you claim you are a successful businessman???? yet  you are unable to deal with paying $3 for a gallon of Diesel ................. please drive over to Missouri so you can save a few pennies ...

 

 

 C'mon man, pm your phone and address so I can show you what a real businessman can do. Diesel is 3.60 a gallon here, The costs get passed on so what the f**k are you yammering about. I've been in business 34 years and still going. 

Edited Tuesday at 06:41 PM by Old-Ruffneck

[notsonice + 1,290]

On 2/13/2025 at 6:01 PM, Old-Ruffneck said:

Trump Reverses Biden's Environmental Policies With Assessment Freeze | OilPrice.com

Tell the liberal bitch that wrote this story she needs find another platform to write in. Leftish C**t!!!

Tell the liberal bitch that wrote this story she needs find another platform to write in. Leftish C**t!!!???????

 

another post with name calling from the idiot Old Cocksucker

 

Hey dickhead I thought you said you do not engage is name calling????

 

Myself,  I have no problem with name calling to those that engage in it..

You thing you are a big man by calling someone a C**T???????

You are a fraud...and nothing but a punk

[Old-Ruffneck + 1,281]

1 minute ago, notsonice said:

Tell the liberal bitch that wrote this story she needs find another platform to write in. Leftish C**t!!!???????

 

another post with name calling from the idiot Old Cocksucker

 

Hey dickhead I thought you said you do not engage is name calling????

 

Myself,  I have no problem with name calling to those that engage in it..

You thing you are a big man by calling someone a C**T???????

You are a fraud...and nothing but a punk

PM your real phone and address. I'll drive and meet with you.