"Leaders and Influencers who have trained under The World Economic Forum" - Climate Change Agenda and Build Back Better...slogans by World Economic Forum

[Tom Nolan + 2,443]

Even Mainstream Media is finally reporting on it...

https://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-on-significant-opportunities-in-current-events-theres-gonna-be-a-new-world-order-out-there

President Joe Biden says:
"…there’s gonna be a NEW WORLD ORDER out there and we’ve got to lead it and we’ve got to unite the rest of the free world in doing it.”

Monday March 21, 2022 - The Daily Wire

Biden On ‘Significant Opportunities’ In Current Events: ‘There’s Gonna Be A New World Order Out There’

By  Ryan Saavedra

•

Mar 21, 2022   DailyWire.com

 

QUEUED WHITE HOUSE VIDEO IN ARTICLE

 

Democrat President Joe Biden said during Business Roundtable’s CEO Quarterly Meeting on Monday that “significant opportunities” in current world events were going to lead to a “new world order.”

The remarks came toward the end of his brief speech where he talked about Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and America’s economic future amid his administration’s push to implement a leftist climate agenda.

BIDEN: “I think this presents us with some significant opportunities to make some real changes.
You know, we are at an inflection point, I believe, in the world economy, not just the world economy, in the world, occurs every three or four generations.
As one of my, as the one of the top military people said to me in a secure meeting the other day, 60 million people died between 1900 and 1946 and since then we established a liberal world order and that hadn’t happened in a long while.
A lot of people died, but nowhere near the chaos.
And now’s the time when things are shifting.
We’re going, there’s gonna be a new world order out there and we’ve got to lead it and we’ve got to unite the rest of the free world in doing it.”

 

 

[TailingsPond + 1,008]

Tom mixes up his various conspiracy theory threads...

Kind of hard for a vaccine to be an agent of political change if everyone dies from the vaccine, no?

 

 

 

 

Edited March 23, 2022 by TailingsPond

[Boat + 1,324]

9 hours ago, RichieRich216 said:

The King of all tax cheats is Black Rock and J.P. Morgan!

Over 400 billion in unpaid taxes every year. It’s an unlawful jungle out there. Trumps boys want to be like Putins boys. Rob the poor and buy a really big boat. The Dems have rich but you needed to get mad. Lol 

[RichieRich216 + 454]

How many Democrats are Billionaires, your statement is pure rhetoric.

[Ron Wagner + 710]

On 2/22/2022 at 11:19 AM, Tom Nolan said:

https://community.oilprice.com/topic/25114-the-davos-meetingworld-economic-forum’s-annual-january-meeting-2022-deferred/

 

Possibly related to Ukraine stealing their attention? 

I think Al Gore is about the best example of this group, although he is focused on Global Warming, AKA Climate Change, AKA just plain weather. He has been an absolute failure with all of his predictions (AKA propaganda) that have utterly failed. https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/50-years-of-failed-doomsday-eco-pocalyptic-predictions-the-so-called-experts-are-0-50/

[specinho + 470]

On 3/21/2022 at 4:00 AM, Boat said:

Apparently your expectations of green are in line with the extreme left. The worlds 1% per year gain is outstanding if your in the know. Since your probably yellow square buss slow, we’ll let it go. It won’t take much to outperform the status quo. Unleash those women and learn how to take care of a house. Look around the world stage. You see competence going on? By mostly men. Sadly, men have been screwing up for thousands of years. The end result is the thing you should judge, not the race, color or gender. Finlands prez seems smart. Join NATO and get better weapons and more of them. 

There are a few things you might still not convince of i.e.

1. male and female are built differently historically. Their strength varies, often not comparable but always could complement. Further details could be found in a book called "why men don't listen and women can't read map"

2. race does affect an outcome of a same effort. Environmental  influence and culture the greatest affecting factors

3. different gene pools affect the outcome of one same effort. Attitude, sometimes could be inborn, difficult to be learnt, or be taught. Exposure could enhance good characteristics that were already built in by genes; could also bring out the worst, unseen yet, in the genes, or the pool of genes.

therefore, easy-random sex and pregnancies of modern civilization might have produced offsprings of unknown names to the parents and distorted ways of growing up........

During each reproduction, good genes would be divided by half to form gametes. Old culture  to marry only family members, relatives, closed circle of tribes might have produced unwanted outcomes. The bad genes have been multiplied; good genes diminished unbeknowingly. Eugenic might stand a point i.e. do not simply seed and reproduce.... The end result might be more troublesome than helpful..

[Boat + 1,324]

3 hours ago, specinho said:

There are a few things you might still not convince of i.e.

1. male and female are built differently historically. Their strength varies, often not comparable but always could complement. Further details could be found in a book called "why men don't listen and women can't read map"

2. race does affect an outcome of a same effort. Environmental  influence and culture the greatest affecting factors

3. different gene pools affect the outcome of one same effort. Attitude, sometimes could be inborn, difficult to be learnt, or be taught. Exposure could enhance good characteristics that were already built in by genes; could also bring out the worst, unseen yet, in the genes, or the pool of genes.

therefore, easy-random sex and pregnancies of modern civilization might have produced offsprings of unknown names to the parents and distorted ways of growing up........

During each reproduction, good genes would be divided by half to form gametes. Old culture  to marry only family members, relatives, closed circle of tribes might have produced unwanted outcomes. The bad genes have been multiplied; good genes diminished unbeknowingly. Eugenic might stand a point i.e. do not simply seed and reproduce.... The end result might be more troublesome than helpful..

So IQ’s go up as the complexity of life increases. Environments make a huge difference. A kid, male or female would learn very differently as goat herders in Afghanistan vrs the children of a couple who were Harvard school teachers. Give every single child a parent like those Harvard teachers and you will grow good genes in abundance. Surround them with guys like Putin and you will get thugs. This is why there there are racists. They can’t think Harvard. Lol They just can’t get smart, not enough good environment to go around. Genes are a factor but I read about a study that showed 10% of adults are predisposed to have a hair trigger for anger more than a normal human. Let’s improve the standard worldwide environment so all can have the opportunity to thrive. 

Edited March 24, 2022 by Boat

[RichieRich216 + 454]

Larry Fink, CEO and chairman of the world's biggest asset manager, BlackRock, said Russia's invasion of Ukraine has upended the world order that had been in place since the end of the Cold War.

"The Russian invasion of Ukraine has put an end to the globalization we have experienced over the last three decades," Fink said in his 2022 letter to shareholders. "It has left many communities and people feeling isolated and looking inward. I believe this has exacerbated the polarization and extremist behavior we are seeing across society today."

Putin may have done the world a favor! Fuck the globalist!

[Ron Wagner + 710]

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2022/03/23/putin-aide-chubais-quits-kremlin-leaves-russia-a77051

Putin Aide Chubais Quits Kremlin, Leaves Russia

This guy was Putin's mentor. RCW

 

 

Updated: March 23, 2022

    

[Tom Nolan + 2,443]

https://www.corbettreport.com/davis-newworldorder/

Iain Davis on the New World Order and How to Oppose It

Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed

Biden has warned that there is going to be a New World Order.

Putin and Xi are writing joint statements about the creation of a New World Order. In fact, all of the globalists are interested in a New World Order. Today, Iain Davis of In-This-Together.com joins us to discuss the history of the "International Rules-Based Order," reveal its "operating system" (technocracy), and discuss how we can fruitfully oppose it.

Watch on Archive / BitChute / Minds / Odysee or Download the mp4

SHOW NOTES:
In-This-Together.com

President Biden: There's Going To Be A New World Order, It Hasn't Happened In A While And America Has To Lead It

Technocracy: The Operating System For The New International Rules-Based Order

Joint Statement of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China on the International Relations Entering a New Era and the Global Sustainable Development

World Order: What, Exactly, are the Rules? (Stewart Patrick of CFR)

Interview 1668 - Iain Davis Dissects the Pseudopandemic

Episode 416 - SHOCKING Document Reveals Trudeau's REAL Plan!

China orders 51 million into lockdown as COVID surges

From a China Traveler - David Rockefeller | New York Times 1973

Episode 297 - China and the New World Order

How & Why Big Oil Conquered the World

Technocracy Study Course

Globalization is Dead. Long Live the New World Order!

https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-369-globalization-is-dead-long-live-the-new-world-order/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Lavrov: Russia, China Moving Towards Multipolar 'Fair World Order'

by Tyler Durden

Wednesday, Mar 30, 2022 - 07:00 PM

Wed March 30th – Zero Hedge
Lavrov: Russia, China Moving Towards Multipolar ‘Fair World Order’
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/russia-china-foreign-ministers-meet-wednesday-discuss-fair-world-order

EXCERPTS
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov met with his Chinese counterpart on Wednesday, where he said the two are carving a path towards a ‘fairer world order.’ [See elbow bump]
The meeting between Lavrov and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, marks the first visit to a key ally since Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine on February 24, according to The Economic Times.

The two countries will work to achieve “a multipolar, fair, and democratic world order,” Lavrov said, speaking from the Chinese city of Tunxi located in the eastern inland Anhui Province.

In a video released by the Russian foreign ministry ahead of a meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, Lavrov said the world was “living through a very serious stage in the history of international relations”.

At the end of this reshaping of global relations “we, together with you, and with our sympathisers will move towards a multipolar, just, democratic world order”, Lavrov said. -Economic Times

Lavrov and Yi were seen on Chinese state TV in face masks bumping elbows in front of their national flags shortly before the meetings – which Lavrov will attend – to discuss ways to help Afghanistan.
Both the US and the Taliban are expected to be in attendance….

[specinho + 470]

On 3/25/2022 at 4:56 AM, Boat said:

So IQ’s go up as the complexity of life increases. Environments make a huge difference. A kid, male or female would learn very differently as goat herders in Afghanistan vrs the children of a couple who were Harvard school teachers. Give every single child a parent like those Harvard teachers and you will grow good genes in abundance. Surround them with guys like Putin and you will get thugs. This is why there there are racists. They can’t think Harvard. Lol They just can’t get smart, not enough good environment to go around. Genes are a factor but I read about a study that showed 10% of adults are predisposed to have a hair trigger for anger more than a normal human. Let’s improve the standard worldwide environment so all can have the opportunity to thrive. 

not too sure if you have made definition for good genes, besides being intelligent and may be moderate rich, alone?

 

for my one cent worth of opinion, good characteristics must not be restricted to smartness, and wealthiness, basic humanistic or basic attitude should be there too e.g. kind hearted, righteous, honest, sincere, positive, considerate,  etc. You might find all these in a shepherd, village kid or/and the right thug easily, but not necessarily in those single child or children of harvard grads, especially in the modern world where lives have been so easy..... Most would lack sincerity for one, being indifferent for two, lack right sense of judgement for three....

When you choose to entrust people who lack basic humanity, many things will not turn out right very soon. Without the ability to become a basic human being with basic right attitude, things can rarely be done right............ No heart, no sense, what are you expecting?

p/s: this is not an advertisement to promote the village kid or the thug...

Edited April 1, 2022 by specinho

[Tom Nolan + 2,443]

On 3/22/2022 at 10:35 AM, Tom Nolan said:

Globalists Release Timeline for Health Tyranny

https://www.corbettreport.com/globalists-release-timeline-for-health-tyranny/

https://corbettreport.substack.com/p/globalists-release-timeline-for-health?s=r

Globalists Release Timeline for Health Tyranny

The Corbett Report Mar 20 by James Corbett corbettreport.com March 20, 2022 One thing you learn after spending years in the conspiracy realist space: when the globalists tell you that something is about to happen, you'd better believe they're hard at work behind the scenes to make that "prediction" a reality. For example, when 9/11 suspect Philip Zelikow takes to the pages of Foreign Affairs to "warn" about the "eminent threat" of "Catastrophic Terrorism" that, "like Pearl Harbor," will "divide our past and future into a before and after," you'd better believe his neocon cronies are about to deliver a 9/11 to the public. When Bill Gates "warns" us that "we're not ready" for what he calls "the next epidemic," you'd better believe that he's using his monopolization of global "health" to prime the pump for the COVID scamdemic. When Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping release a joint statement vowing to "accelerate the implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development" by cooperating on "key areas" like "vaccines and epidemics control, financing for development, climate change, sustainable development, including green development, industrialization, digital economy, and infrastructure connectivity," you'd better believe they are actively collaborating on the promotion of an AI-driven, Fourth Industrial Revolution globalist agenda with their WEF cronies. And when the globalists release a detailed timeline telling you exactly what the next steps are in the rollout of the global biosecurity security state, you'd better believe they are hard at work erecting that enslavement grid as we speak. Luckily for us, we do not need to be mind readers or fortune-tellers to know what the globalists are preparing for our dystopian future. We simply have to read their documents. And boy, have they released some real doozies in the past month: three documents that lay out a precise timeline and an overview of what they're hoping to achieve and how they're hoping to achieve it. Today, let's examine these documents so that we can better understand what we're up against and form a more effective plan for derailing this agenda of control. DOCUMENT #1: The European Council's Handy-dandy Infographic Timeline Earlier this month, the European Council released a document laying out the EUreaucrats' own timetable for the implementation of global health tyranny. Entitled "Infographic - Towards an international treaty on pandemics," it cuts down on all those complicated linguistic thingies—what do you call them again? words?—and reduces the complexities of a legally binding global pandemic treaty down to the lowest common denominator: the "infographic." With this Buzzfeed-worthy gimmick in hand, the European Council wastes no time in getting down to business, informing us that "On 3 March 2022, the Council adopted a decision to authorize the opening of negotiations for an international agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response" before patting itself on the back for its role in proposing the idea of a global pandemic treaty in the first place: So far, so unsurprising. This is the exact kind of mealy-mouthed "global approach" blah blah blah "common cause" yadda yadda "protecting health" pabulum that you would expect the global technocratic class to administer in a document like this. Then, they lay out an incredibly abbreviated history of how we have arrived at the proposal for a global health tyranny: You'll note that this curiously truncated "history" unhelpfully informs you that 2021 was "only the second time in WHO history that its governing body . . . met for a second time in the same year" without bothering to link you to the list of World Health Assembly meetings. If they had bothered to do so, as I do here, you could see for yourself that the first time this two-meetings-in-one-year event happened was back in 2006, when the WHO met in May to discuss "Strengthening pandemic-influenza preparedness and response" in the context of the newly revised International Health Regulations and then again in November of that year to appoint Margaret Chan as the organization's Executive Director. It's not hard to understand why they leave out that part of the history, though. Not only would it be too much information to include in their childish infographic, it also might have prompted you to learn more about the creation of the "public health emergency of international concern" that lewas then invoked by Chan during the ginned-up swine flu "pandemic" of 2009 (and again during the ebola "pandemic" of 2014) to justify the consolidation of WHO powers in the dawning era of biosecurity. And, obviously, that kind of history is not what the European Council is aiming for here. Back to the document: Next, we see what is really at stake in this seemingly innocuous proposal for a global pandemic treaty. We learn that what is really being proposed is not that political blather about "banding together for a common cause" but creating a legally binding agreement to govern the global response to global public health "crises" (real or imaginary). Don't worry, though, this agreement—in addition to promoting the sharing of genetic data and samples among WHO member countries—is rooted in the constitution! . . . The WHO constitution, that is, not your silly, outdated national constitution. This agreement will override that. At last, we arrive at the juicy part: And so we discover the real roadmap for the creation of the biosecurity state as the European Council sees it. First there will be a meeting of an "intergovernmental negotiating body" to discuss progress on a draft for the globalist "health" takeover. "What body? Representing which governments? Convening under what authority? And represented by whom, exactly?" you might ask, if you were the sort to question the information that is forcibly shoved down your throat by the self-proclaimed authorities. But relax, dude! This is an infographic, not one of those complicated overly talky explainer doohickeys! Just turn off you mind, relax and float downstream with the European Council and whoever else is steering this ship! Next we learn that this "negotiating body"—"Is this an official body? Who gets to decide who is appointed to this body? Is it part of the WHO itself?" . . . but there you go again with those pesky questions—will deliver a "progress report" to the WHO's annual-ish meeting next year. (Now don't go asking what this progress report will consist of, how it will be delivered, who will review it or what these unnamed officials will do with it! That's way more information than these poor infographic designers could possibly supply you with!) And then, in May 2024, the "proposed instrument" will be presented for adoption at the WHO's World Health Assembly, and the biosecurity takeover will be complete. Think of it as Patriot Act 2.0, but global. And focused on medical martial law. Finally, our friends at the European Council put our minds at ease about why a legally binding global agreement is needed after all: You see, it's just about keeping you safe in the loving arms of the de facto global health tyranny so that they can implement long-term fascism at all levels! Nothing to see here, right? So there you have it, folks: we have two years left before they close the barn door on health freedom at the global governmental level. At least, according to the European Council. But why listen to the EU, you might ask? Good question. The simple answer is that they have a track record of correctly "predicting" the next moves in the erection of the medical martial law grid. Remember when the European Commission released the snappily named "Roadmap for the Implementation of Actions by the European Commission Based on the Commission Communication and the Council Recommendation on Strengthening Cooperation against Vaccine Preventable Diseases" back in 2019? No? Well, let me refresh your memory: Ahhh, right. It just so happens that the EUreaucrats were forecasting the creation of a vaccination card/passport for EU citizens in 2022 just months before the scamdemic was launched. Coincidence, I'm sure. DOCUMENT #2: A Roadmap for Living with COVID But, to be sure, it isn't just the European Council talking about the coming biosecurity grid, and we don't have to rely on some contextless, sourceless, idiotic infographic to learn what the globalists are planning next. We could turn, for example, to "Getting to and Sustaining the Next Normal: A Roadmap for Living with COVID." This is a document from . . . who exactly? Well, according to the "About" page on the website, this 136-page report on our coming medical martial law nightmare was put together by some unnamed group of random individuals. Apparently, they all woke up one day filled with concern for Americans in the COVID era and decided out of the goodness of their hearts (and with the help of a bit of Rockefeller funding) to write a handy-dandy roadmap for getting us to what they call the "next normal." And which random good Samaritan took on the role of "shepherding" (their word) the 53 authors of this report? None other than Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Vice Provost for Global Initiatives at the University of Pennsylvania and former Biden Transition COVID-19 Advisory Board member. Yes, that Ezekiel Emanuel. The document is precisely as disturbing as you would expect, laying out step-by-step exactly how to hardwire the biosecurity state into place through the creation of centralized testing, surveillance, data sharing, monitoring and reporting standards. It also calls for the development of new technologies and processes for combating the inevitable next pandemic. But if all that wasn't Huxleyan enough, the report also advocates the creation of "a comprehensive, scientifically-tested communication and behavioral intervention infrastructure to increase vaccination, testing and treatment" and . . . wait for it . . . the creation of a new post on the National Security Council: Deputy Assistant to the President for Biosecurity! (And you thought I was joking about biosecurity being the next paradigm, didn't you?) DOCUMENT #3: National Covid-19 Preparedness Plan Equally disturbing is the Biden White House's own "National Covid-⁠19 Preparedness Plan," unveiled earlier this month. Purporting to be a plan for "getting America back to our normal routines while protecting people from COVID-19, preparing for new variants, and preventing economic and educational shutdowns," the document is broken down into four goals: Protect against, and treat, COVID-19 Prepare for new variants Prevent economic and educational shutdowns Continue to lead the effort to vaccinate the world and save lives Worryingly, many of the creepy aspects of the biosecurity state embedded in this particular plan are already being implemented. For example, on page 34 of the document the US surgeon general is directed to "issue a Request for Information (RFI) from researchers, healthcare workers, tech platforms, and community organizations on the impact of health misinformation during the pandemic." As The New York Times reports, this request has now been issued: President Biden’s surgeon general on Thursday formally requested that the major tech platforms submit information about the scale of Covid-19 misinformation on social networks, search engines, crowdsourced platforms, e-commerce platforms and instant messaging systems. A request for information from the surgeon general’s office demanded that tech platforms send data and analysis on the prevalence of Covid-19 misinformation on their sites, starting with common examples of vaccine misinformation documented by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The notice asks the companies to submit “exactly how many users saw or may have been exposed to instances of Covid-19 misinformation,” as well as aggregate data on demographics that may have been disproportionately exposed to or affected by the misinformation. Meryl Nass summarizes the bone-chilling nature of this request nicely in a recent Substack post on the topic: The feds are asking for detailed information about the demographics 'exposed to misinformation.'  You know that obtaining the names of who is reading what is their next step. Furthermore, read the last paragraph in the NY Times article below, closely.  The feds want citizens to start 'sharing' information on misinformation.  Isn't that sweet?  This is how they dress up the Stasi in 21st century euphemism to encourage ratting out your friends and neighbors. Given what we have just seen taking place in Canada around the doxing and financial de-personing of the Freedom Convoy supporters, can there be any doubt that the systems are now being erected so that thoughtcriminals will be penalized for sharing "misinformation" about the next scamdemic? CONCLUSION The COVID narrative has fallen apart in recent months and the mockingbird repeaters of the MSM have refocused the attention of their zombie-like viewers onto the spectacle in Ukraine, but the biosecurity agenda has not gone away. Indeed, as Kit Knightly warns in his latest insightful article at Off-Guardian, the "stealth omicron" scare story that is being floated in the media right now reminds us that the COVID narrative has not gone away; it is merely sleeping for now. Regardless of what happens next in the continuing COVID saga, though, the erection of the biosecurity state continues apace. In fact, it is even helped along by the fact that so few are paying attention to this agenda now. Distracted by the pyrotechnics of warfare, the hoi polloi hardly notice that the European Commission is happily announcing their imminent victory in the war over the formerly free peoples of the world. By 2024, if all goes well, they will have their global pandemic treaty in place and absolute power to implement their will anywhere in the world at any time under the cover of any declared health emergency. If you had sprung any of this (literally any of it) on the public two years ago, it would have been swiftly and roundly rejected. Today, it is simply accepted that this is happening. After all, it is the next logical step in the narrative of "pandemic and recovery" that the masses have been brainwashed with for the past two years. The social engineers know what they are doing. They are wearing the population down, first generating hysteria over a perceived crisis and then slipping in the poison pill once the public's attention has turned elsewhere. This suggests, once again, that our perception and attention are themselves important. They cannot implement their agenda without our acquiescence, so they spend unbelievable amounts of energy propagandizing the public, preventing information about their true agenda from circulating among the public, and working to distract the public. And, once again, this suggests that the work we are doing in pursuing this information and sharing it with others is an important part of stopping the would-be rulers from erecting their biosecurity state. However, this also implies that if we cannot raise sufficient awareness of this agenda among the general public then we will surely lose this fight. The choice is ours. We can either go back to sleep and follow the shiny baubles of the latest breaking news on the MSM news feeds or we can continue to focus on the creation of the biosecurity state, build coalitions with those who are resisting it, and move forward with the creation of a parallel economy for overcoming our reliance on the state's tools of coercion and control. I know which of those two options I'll be choosing. I hope you'll be here with me. This weekly editorial is part of The Corbett Report Subscriber newsletter.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/pandemic-treaty-will-hand-who-keys-global-government

"Pandemic Treaty" Will Hand WHO Keys To Global Government

by Tyler Durden

Friday, Apr 22, 2022 - 08:00 PM

Authored by Kit Knightly via Off-Guardian.org,

The first public hearings on the proposed “Pandemic Treaty” are closed, with the next round due to start in mid-June.

We’ve been trying to keep this issue on our front page, entirely because the mainstream is so keen to ignore it and keep churning out partisan war porn and propaganda.

When we – and others – linked to the public submissions page, there was such a response that the WHO’s website actually briefly crashed, or they pretended it crashed so people would stop sending them letters.

Either way, it’s a win. Hopefully one we can replicate in the summer.

Until then, the signs are that what scant press coverage there is, mostly across the metaphorical back-pages of the internet, will be focused on making the treaty “strong enough” and ensuring national governments can be “held accountable”.

An article in the UK’s Telegraph from April 12th headlines:

Real risk a pandemic treaty could be ‘too watered down’ to stop new outbreaks

It focuses on a report from the Panel for a Global Public Health Convention (GPHC), and quotes one of the report’s authors Dame Barbara Stocking:

Our biggest fear […] is it’s too easy to think that accountability doesn’t matter. To have a treaty that does not have compliance in it, well frankly then there’s no point in having a treaty,”

The GPHC report goes on to say that the current International Health Regulations are “too weak”, and calls for the creation of a new “independent” international body to “assess government preparedness” and “publicly rebuke or praise countries, depending on their compliance with a set of agreed requirements”.

Another article, published by the London School of Economics and co-written by members of the German Alliance on Climate Change and Health (KLUG), also pushes the idea of “accountability” and “compliance” pretty hard:

For this treaty to have teeth, the organisation that governs it needs to have the power – either political or legal – to enforce compliance.

It also echoes the UN report from May 2021 in calling for more powers for the WHO:

In its current form, the WHO does not possess such powers […]

To move on with the treaty, WHO therefore needs to be empowered — financially, and politically.

It recommends the involvement of “non-state actors” such as the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, World Trade Organisation and International Labour Organisation in the negotiations, and suggests the treaty offer financial incentives for the early reporting of “health emergencies” [emphasis added]:

In case of a declared health emergency, resources need to flow to countries in which the emergency is occurring, triggering response elements such as financing and technical support. These are especially relevant for LMICs, and could be used to encourage and enhance the timely sharing of information by states, reassuring them that they will not be subject to arbitrary trade and travel sanctions for reporting, but instead be provided with the necessary financial and technical resources they require to effectively respond to the outbreak.

It doesn’t stop there, however. They also raise the question of countries being punished for “non-compliance”:

[The treaty should possess] An adaptable incentive regime, [including] sanctions such as public reprimands, economic sanctions, or denial of benefits.

To translate these suggestions from bureaucrat into English:

• If you report “disease outbreaks” in a “timely manner”, you will get “financial resources” to deal with them.

• If you don’t report disease outbreaks, or don’t follow the WHO’s directions, you will lose out on international aid and face trade embargoes and sanctions.

In combination, these proposed rules would literally incentivize reporting possible “disease outbreaks”. Far from preventing “future pandemics”, they would actively encourage them.

National governments who refuse to play ball being punished, and those who play along getting paid off is not new. We have already seen that with Covid.

Two African countries – Burundi and Tanzania – had Presidents who banned the WHO from their borders, and refused to go along with the Pandemic narrative. Both Presidents died unexpectedly within months of that decision, only to be replaced by new Presidents who instantly reversed their predecessor’s covid policies.

Less than a week after the death of President Pierre Nkurunziza, the IMF agreed to forgive almost 25 million dollars of Burundi’s national debt in order to help combat the Covid19 “crisis”.

Just five months after the death of President John Magufuli, the new government of Tanzania received 600 million dollars from the IMF to “address the covid19 pandemic”.

It’s pretty clear what happened here, isn’t it?

Globalists backed coups and rewarded the perpetrators with “international aid”. The proposals for the Pandemic treaty would simply legitimise this process, moving it from covert back channels to overt official ones.

Now, before we discuss the implications of new powers, let’s remind ourselves of the power the WHO already possesses:

• The World Health Organization is the only institution in the world empowered to declare a “pandemic” or Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).

• The Director-General of the WHO – an unelected position – is the only individual who controls that power.

We have already seen the WHO abuse these powers in order to create a fake pandemic out of thin air…and I’m not talking about covid.

Prior to 2008, the WHO could only declare an influenza pandemic if there were “enormous numbers of deaths and illness” AND there was a new and distinct subtype. In 2008 the WHO loosened the definition of “influenza pandemic” to remove these two conditions.

As a 2010 letter to the British Medical Journal pointed out, these changes meant “many seasonal flu viruses could be classified as pandemic influenza.”

If the WHO had not made those changes, the 2009 “Swine flu” outbreak could never have been called a pandemic, and would likely have passed without notice.

Instead, dozens of countries spent millions upon millions of dollars on swine flu vaccines they did not need and did not work, to fight a “pandemic” that resulted in fewer than 20,000 deaths. Many of those responsible for advising the WHO to declare swine flu a public health emergency were later shown to have financial ties to vaccine manufacturers.

Despite this historical example of blatant corruption, one proposed clause of the Pandemic Treaty would make it even easier to declare a PHEIC. According to the May 2021 report “Covid19: Make it the Last Pandemic” [emphasis added]:

Future declarations of a PHEIC by the WHO Director-General should be based on the precautionary principle where warranted

Yes, the proposed treaty could allow the DG of the WHO to declare a state of global emergency to prevent a potential pandemic, not in response to one. A kind of pandemic pre-crime.

If you combine this with the proposed “financial aid” for developing nations reporting “potential health emergencies”, you can see what they’re building – essentially bribing third world governments to give the WHO a pretext for declaring a state of emergency.

We already know the other key points likely to be included in a pandemic treaty.

They will almost certainly try to introduce international vaccine passports, and pour funding into big Pharma’s pockets to produce “vaccines” ever faster and with even less safety testing.

But all of that could pale in comparison to the legal powers potentially being handed to the director-general of the WHO (or whatever new “independent” body they may decide to create) to punish, rebuke or reward national governments.

A “Pandemic Treaty” that overrides or overrules national or local governments would hand supranational powers to an unelected bureaucrat or “expert”, who could exercise them entirely at his own discretion and on completely subjective criteria.

This is the very definition of technocratic globalism.

[Tom Nolan + 2,443]

https://community.oilprice.com/topic/28682-heres-whats-next-on-the-globalist-calendar-by-james-corbett/

 

[Tom Nolan + 2,443]

People often talk about Democracies as a freedom torch, but in actuality Democracies tend to enslave people as opposed to a Constitutional Republic which enforces the innate liberties of the individual.  Aaron Russo gives a good summary about this aspect.

The famous Aaron Russo died in August of 2007.

Reflections And Warnings - An Interview With Aaron Russo – VIDEO 95 minutes

https://archive.org/details/19.ReflectionsAndWarnings-AnInterviewWithAaronRusso

Video DESCRIPTION

In an historic final interview, filmmaker and music promoter Aaron Russo goes in depth on the insider-knowledge given to him by a member of the Rockefeller family. Russo was told-- prior to 9/11-- of plans to stage terror attacks, invade foreign nations, and kickstart a high-tech police state control grid that would track the populations' every move with implantable RFID microchips.

[Tom Nolan + 2,443]