rainman + 263 October 16, 2018 Google's executive director defended his company's plan to explore a search engine tailored for users in China, despite concerns that would enforce the country's severe Internet censors. In his broader public comments on the subject, Sundar Pichai said China is somehow in line with the mission of the company to provide information to the world population, given that one fifth of these people live in China. While respecting China's censors, he said, Google would be able to provide search results to more than 99% of the queries and in some cases provide more useful results than those currently available from local search engines. Comments, during an interview on stage at a Wired Technology conference in San Francisco on Monday, followed by a few weeks on Google's secret research project in China that triggered a backlash from Washington's human rights advocates and legislators, warning that the effort could help a repressive regime. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pavel + 384 PP October 16, 2018 Google's invention a "limited amount of information"... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
50 shades of black + 254 October 16, 2018 Turns out omitting some information while promoting some is called propaganda. So, Google is saying that's in line with their mission? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
franco + 96 FM October 16, 2018 Translate: It's all about the money, and finally someone has confirmed it... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
damirUSBiH + 327 DD October 16, 2018 "We are compelled by our mission to provide information to everyone, and China is 20 percent of the world's population," said Sundar Pichai. It's not about information, if that information is to be controlled and censored! It’s about capitalizing on the China’s market — and, it's about $$$. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pinto + 293 PZ October 16, 2018 Google China's model for censorship is exactly what will be a new model of "freedom" around the world. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ThunderBlade + 231 TB October 16, 2018 They’re just warming up for Google China... They need to make sure the censorship algorithm works. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dan Warnick + 6,100 October 16, 2018 44 minutes ago, rainman said: Google's executive director defended his company's plan to explore a search engine tailored for users in China, despite concerns that would enforce the country's severe Internet censors. In his broader public comments on the subject, Sundar Pichai said China is somehow in line with the mission of the company to provide information to the world population, given that one fifth of these people live in China. While respecting China's censors, he said, Google would be able to provide search results to more than 99% of the queries and in some cases provide more useful results than those currently available from local search engines. Comments, during an interview on stage at a Wired Technology conference in San Francisco on Monday, followed by a few weeks on Google's secret research project in China that triggered a backlash from Washington's human rights advocates and legislators, warning that the effort could help a repressive regime. rainman, are these your thoughts or does this come from some article you've read or a mix of both? It helps if you link any articles and differentiate between sourced info and your opinion. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dan Warnick + 6,100 October 16, 2018 39 minutes ago, 50 shades of black said: Turns out omitting some information while promoting some is called propaganda. So, Google is saying that's in line with their mission? Well, the OP is kinda like that as well, wouldn't you agree? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dan Warnick + 6,100 October 16, 2018 38 minutes ago, franco said: Translate: It's all about the money, and finally someone has confirmed it... They are a corporation... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rainman + 263 October 16, 2018 1 hour ago, Dan Warnick said: rainman, are these your thoughts or does this come from some article you've read or a mix of both? It helps if you link any articles and differentiate between sourced info and your opinion. It's the news, and I do not like to put my comment on news. By definition news is excellent framework for dialogue. And, in this Topic, if you read well, can't find personal comment or opinion. Some sites require a subscription....https://www.wsj.com/articles/googles-ceo-defends-potential-return-to-china-1539661027 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
franco + 96 FM October 16, 2018 1 hour ago, Dan Warnick said: They are a corporation... I do not think I was talking about a corporation, but about rigid censorship. Why? In the broader sense, Google have a different roll from the dimensions of the corporation... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dan Warnick + 6,100 October 16, 2018 22 minutes ago, rainman said: It's the news, and I do not like to put my comment on news. By definition news is excellent framework for dialogue. And, in this Topic, if you read well, can't find personal comment or opinion. Some sites require a subscription....https://www.wsj.com/articles/googles-ceo-defends-potential-return-to-china-1539661027 Just asking for a link, rainman. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dan Warnick + 6,100 October 16, 2018 15 minutes ago, franco said: I do not think I was talking about a corporation, but about rigid censorship. Why? In the broader sense, Google have a different roll from the dimensions of the corporation... No. You said it's all about the money, which is correct. They are a corporation and it is all about money. Last I checked corporations don't have to swear an oath to uphold our freedoms for the people of China, however noble a cause that may be. Google's role is to provide shareholder return. What one can do if they don't like the way a company is providing those returns is either sell out their shares or buy enough to take control and throw out the current management, right? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Most Active Members
Recently Online
Popular Members
Most Active Members
Recently Online
Popular Members
