Pelosi Elevates Climate Change On Day One

22 hours ago, Illurion said:

It doesn't matter whether it is "instinctive" or not.

Nonetheless,  the "children" learn by doing it even before they can talk.

Instinctive and learned are mutually exclusive concepts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We really need to address climate change and yes, "global warming". SHAME ON ALL YOU DENIERS! The science is clear, and when our planet runs out of oil and petroleum industrial potential, we need to get right on curing global warming along with poverty, war and hunger. 

At least the homeless won't be cold, 'cuz of global warming. See? There is always a silver lining....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/4/2019 at 5:00 PM, Dan Warnick said:

Nah, we just love Rodent.  She drives a truck (with a gun rack), carries a gun, knows about oil and some would say she is beautiful.  Top it off with a moniker like Rodent, and that's all you need to know.  :) 

I didn't know anything about Rodent until reading this, and I now love her too!! 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/4/2019 at 6:08 PM, Tom Kirkman said:

Please do.  I'll vote for you.  2019 politics will be a wild ride.

 

1c81055bb8bbefe8daf1926351327cb7937e45e49cdb1c7e9f0843615fcdcf34.jpeg

God help us all...

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/4/2019 at 10:00 PM, Dan Warnick said:

What are TIL and The Stig?

The STIG is Top Gears tamed racing driver that takes cars around the track to see how fast they really are. Michael Schumacher was one of them, they get new ones every once in a while......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bobby Cullari said:

We really need to address climate change and yes, "global warming". SHAME ON ALL YOU DENIERS! The science is clear, and when our planet runs out of oil and petroleum industrial potential, we need to get right on curing global warming along with poverty, war and hunger. 

At least the homeless won't be cold, 'cuz of global warming. See? There is always a silver lining....

This planet is many millions of years old,  and is always changing.

 

It is a natural process,  with much of the changes resulting from the planets relationship with the Sun.

 

Global Warming as defined by a "warming caused by humans" does not exist and there is NO VALID SCIENTIFIC evidence that says it does.

What documentation presented so far by various scientists and entities is fraudulent and based on falsified datasets.

 

Here in the USA,  both NOAA and NASA have had their datasets been shown to have been compromised, and corrupted.

Many of the people behind this organized fraud will eventually be imprisoned for their part in this.

 

But if you want to keep believing in it,  go ahead and do so.

 

But the heyday of "global warming" came and went,  and the treaties / money-shifting scams failed.

 

As for "when our planet runs out of oil" ?  9_9 

IF such an event could ever happen,  it will not be for many,  many,  centuries from now,  and would make an interesting new thread,   as there are theories that oil is continually being created deep below,  so that theoretically,  the planet will NEVER run out of oil.

 

Happy new year.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Illurion said:

This planet is many millions of years old,  and is always changing.  That has no relevance to the scientific sense of climate change.

It is a natural process,  with much of the changes resulting from the planets relationship with the Sun.  So please explain where millions of years ago humans were burning burning fossil fuels to generate electricity, make cement, or were otherwise generating GHGs.  OR, explain why the generational effects of irradiance on planetary temperature are subservient to GHGs, as is presently the case since decadal level insolation has been declining on average for over 40 years.

Global Warming as defined by a "warming caused by humans" does not exist and there is NO VALID SCIENTIFIC evidence that says it does.  That is sheer ignorance and denies what every major scientific organisation in the world attests to based on tens of thousands of peer reviewed science papers.

What documentation presented so far by various scientists and entities is fraudulent and based on falsified datasets.  This is what all conspiracy theorists say, yet are shown to be wrong time and again, and still repeat their lies.

Here in the USA,  both NOAA and NASA have had their datasets been shown to have been compromised, and corrupted. This is what all conspiracy theorists say, yet are shown to be wrong time and again, and still repeat their lies.

Many of the people behind this organized fraud will eventually be imprisoned for their part in this  This is what all conspiracy theorists say, yet are shown to be wrong time and again, and still repeat their lies.

But if you want to keep believing in it,  go ahead and do so.  

But the heyday of "global warming" came and went,  and the treaties / money-shifting scams failed.  There is no credible  science available that is able to show that the planet will be cooling for many decades, even if human GHG contributions fell to pre-industrial levels from today onwards - which is not going to happen.

As for "when our planet runs out of oil" ?  9_9 True - the rate of change of oil use is the salient factor affecting CO2 contributions.

IF such an event could ever happen,  it will not be for many,  many,  centuries from now,  and would make an interesting new thread,   as there are theories that oil is continually being created deep below,  so that theoretically,  the planet will NEVER run out of oil.  True, as there will be cheaper fungible sources of energy.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Bobby Cullari said:

We really need to address climate change and yes, "global warming". SHAME ON ALL YOU DENIERS! The science is clear, and when our planet runs out of oil and petroleum industrial potential, we need to get right on curing global warming along with poverty, war and hunger. 

At least the homeless won't be cold, 'cuz of global warming. See? There is always a silver lining....

Is it scary that I am unable to determine whether you are being serious or just joking?

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On ‎1‎/‎4‎/‎2019 at 10:40 AM, Rodent said:

I, Rodent, hereby announce my candidacy for Congress, despite my complete lack of qualifications, just like nearly every other congressman...err, or Congresswoman. Congress person. Whatever. 

Well you do have experience with nuts. Not sure it transitions to the nuts on capital hill but why not give it a shot.  lol

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

10 hours ago, Bobby Cullari said:

We really need to address climate change and yes, "global warming". SHAME ON ALL YOU DENIERS! The science is clear, and when our planet runs out of oil and petroleum industrial potential, we need to get right on curing global warming along with poverty, war and hunger. 

At least the homeless won't be cold, 'cuz of global warming. See? There is always a silver lining....

more junk science..

https://eaglerising.com/63729/scientists-admit-math-error-led-to-alarming-results-in-major-global-warming-study/

Global warming doesn't exist,  for example,   if it did,  New York City would be under water by now,  just ask Al Gore.... 9_9

The below links list much reliable data that shows global warming does not exist... 

http://www.climatedepot.com

http://climate4you.com

Edited by Illurion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/5/2019 at 12:40 AM, Rodent said:

I, Rodent, hereby announce my candidacy for Congress, despite my complete lack of qualifications, just like nearly every other congressman...err, or Congresswoman. Congress person. Whatever. 

 

2 hours ago, Cowpoke said:

Well you do have experience with nuts. Not sure it transitions to the nuts on capital hill but why not give it a shot.  lol

Rodent would be a great moderator of the nuts on capital hill.

4bc31fe52b731f93b2034a4920857040e2c9203a45e385c6d1ab36c133c5f72d.jpg

  • Great Response! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tom Kirkman said:

Is it scary that I am unable to determine whether you are being serious or just joking?

He is actually Al Gore in disguise...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The notion that humans don't significantly effect the environment is pretty naive, we have fundamentally changed it. Modern agriculture is essential to feeding the planet, but while farming has enabled and created the development of civilization, it also forever changed the nature of the planet as long as people exist in large numbers. The sea of grass that was the midwest, the massive buffalo migrations, it won't happen again. But that doesn't doom the planet, it just changes it, and the person who thinks they really have the net effect of what we do is guilty of hubris. 

Literally half the data created recorded in history has been in just the last two years and we are only beginning to get a handle on how to manage it. This is actually a pretty good time to be alive. 

My first really serious statistical analysis of something proved me completely wrong to my belief structure of the time, and it was a process I was literally betting my life on in a military aviation role, and had it wrong. Fortunately I never got lit-up by an I-HAWK, so my ignorance wasn't punished, but I did learn being stupid and lucky is not the same as being good. We often truly don't know our impact. But doesn't mean we aren't impacting. Trying to fix something without knowing the impact, sometimes the fix is worse than what was broken. Not polluting, when you have the option, is to my mind, good.

  • Great Response! 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, J S said:

The Rodents has his  her head up his her ass and is a right wing prick (umm, maybe the female version of the male appendage, which then makes the act impossible) moderator.  Go ahead and ban me M.F.

As a former forum moderator I welcomed dissent, but hated it when posters messed up their facts. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, J S said:

<below>

Ah, it now makes sense why she banned me, on the post where I got nailed.  That seems to be stating the obvious!

It hit too close to home.  I am so very amused.  Should other readers care? 

To be blunt there are too many far right wing conservatives on here, whose value system can be predicted by a simple predictive model.   Why else would you use a "predictive model?"

You do not have free thought.  So we don't have to pay a penny for them any more? 

Liberals call me conservative, and conservatives call me liberal.  How would that be relevant to providing information into a forum, or arguing a matter on its merits?  

I am the true independent and not libertarian.  And by telling us this I hope you feel better.  But will it make your contributions any better than this drivel?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites