rainman + 263 January 25, 2019 U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross on Thursday urged furloughed federal workers facing a second missed paycheck to seek loans to pay their bills while adding that he could not understand why they were having trouble getting by. In a CNBC interview, Ross, who made a fortune buying distressed companies, said it was disappointing that some federal workers affected by the government shutdown were not showing up to work. “So the 30 days of pay that some people will be out – there’s no real reason why they shouldn’t be able to get a loan against it and we’ve seen a number of ads from the financial institutions doing that,” Ross said. “So there really is not a good excuse why there really should be a liquidity crisis,” he said. “True the people might have to pay a little bit of interest.” Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pavel + 384 PP January 25, 2019 Right. Why not just get the Treasury to print a bunch of "shutdown dollars"? 1 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
50 shades of black + 254 January 25, 2019 Ross is "full of empathy". How does he think he has any right to express his ignorant opinion about people who work for a living... Sad. No wonder so many people are barely surviving week to week.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pinto + 293 PZ January 25, 2019 Out of touch with reality Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ThunderBlade + 231 TB January 25, 2019 Get a soul... What planet does he live on? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rainman + 263 January 25, 2019 Somehow, he does not need one... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ronwagn + 6,290 January 25, 2019 All the Democrats need to do is approve the wall funding. Then the workers will all get paid. 1 1 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Janet Alderton + 124 JA January 25, 2019 28 minutes ago, ronwagn said: All the Democrats need to do is approve the wall funding. Then the workers will all get paid. The Republicans did not fund a Trump wall during the two years when they controlled both the House and Senate and the Presidency. The reason is fiscal. Border walls have been built where and when they made sense. Let's listen to the experts about what measures are most effective for border security with today's technologies. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tom Kirkman + 8,860 January 25, 2019 1 hour ago, ronwagn said: All the Democrats need to do is approve the wall funding. Then the workers will all get paid. 1 hour ago, Janet Alderton said: The Republicans did not fund a Trump wall during the two years when they controlled both the House and Senate and the Presidency. The reason is fiscal. Border walls have been built where and when they made sense. Let's listen to the experts about what measures are most effective for border security with today's technologies. 2 3 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tom Kirkman + 8,860 January 25, 2019 Speaking of "border security" ... here is the related law: 8 U.S. Code § 1325 - Improper entry by alien (a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection; misrepresentation and concealment of facts Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both. (b) Improper time or place; civil penalties Any alien who is apprehended while entering (or attempting to enter) the United States at a time or place other than as designated by immigration officers shall be subject to a civil penalty of— (1) at least $50 and not more than $250 for each such entry (or attempted entry); or (2) twice the amount specified in paragraph (1) in the case of an alien who has been previously subject to a civil penalty under this subsection. Civil penalties under this subsection are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any criminal or other civil penalties that may be imposed. ... 2 2 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rasmus Jorgensen + 1,169 RJ January 25, 2019 9 hours ago, Tom Kirkman said: I have seen some suggestion on the this forum for the how to end illegal employment once and for all.... It would likely be a lot cheaper than the wall too... why not cheer for that???? Would free up a lot of jobs too... 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ronwagn + 6,290 January 25, 2019 Rasmus, that is a good idea to go along with the wall as is enforcing visa overstays and baby trips etc. Ending ILLEGAL immigration will save far more than what we spend on supporting illegal aliens here in the USA. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbrasher1 + 272 CB January 26, 2019 this is my response to the public outcry of federal workers out of work for a month.... 4 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tom Kirkman + 8,860 January 26, 2019 15 hours ago, ronwagn said: Rasmus, that is a good idea to go along with the wall as is enforcing visa overstays and baby trips etc. Ending ILLEGAL immigration will save far more than what we spend on supporting illegal aliens here in the USA. Oddly enough, I have seen zero reporting about this new EO in the media today: Executive Order: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements If you are a U.S. citizen, whether you like or loathe Trump, it would probably be a good idea to actually read this ^ brand new EO issued today. Educate yourself as a citizen and as a voter. Why? Preparation... 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tom Kirkman + 8,860 January 26, 2019 6 hours ago, cbrasher1 said: this is my response to the public outcry of federal workers out of work for a month.... How the Shutdown Shows Us Exactly Where to Start Cutting Government 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meredith Poor + 895 MP January 26, 2019 (edited) Hadrian's Wall: Outer limit of the Roman Empire. From that point forward Roman civilization shrank. Great Wall(s) of China: The plural indicates that this was done several times, by different emperors in different dynasties. Represented futile efforts to keep foreign invaders out. China has built a lot of walls, and has collapsed in on itself at least that many times if not more. Note: current version of this is '9 dashed line'. Current economic situation in China: getting cloudy. Berlin wall and Iron Curtian: Erected in early 1960's. Soviet Union doesn't survive another 30 years. Using these examples (more are easily found) shows construction of physical barriers is evidence of social and political rot. People want to be 'comfortable' living among their own kind. In short, new ideas and immigrant workers willing to climb the economic ladder remind the native born that they have (to spend real effort) to compete. Edited January 26, 2019 by Meredith Poor 2 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
specinho + 467 January 27, 2019 On 1/25/2019 at 9:02 AM, Pavel said: Right. Why not just get the Treasury to print a bunch of "shutdown dollars"? 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
specinho + 467 January 27, 2019 On 1/26/2019 at 9:36 PM, Meredith Poor said: Hadrian's Wall: Outer limit of the Roman Empire. From that point forward Roman civilization shrank. Great Wall(s) of China: The plural indicates that this was done several times, by different emperors in different dynasties. Represented futile efforts to keep foreign invaders out. China has built a lot of walls, and has collapsed in on itself at least that many times if not more. Note: current version of this is '9 dashed line'. Current economic situation in China: getting cloudy. Berlin wall and Iron Curtian: Erected in early 1960's. Soviet Union doesn't survive another 30 years. Using these examples (more are easily found) shows construction of physical barriers is evidence of social and political rot. People want to be 'comfortable' living among their own kind. In short, new ideas and immigrant workers willing to climb the economic ladder remind the native born that they have (to spend real effort) to compete. This is not trying to support nor against the motion but ........ find the cartoon funny............ 1 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meredith Poor + 895 MP January 27, 2019 42 minutes ago, specinho said: Something got messed up here. If you're quoting me, this isn't something I posted. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ronwagn + 6,290 January 27, 2019 On 1/24/2019 at 8:33 PM, Janet Alderton said: The Republicans did not fund a Trump wall during the two years when they controlled both the House and Senate and the Presidency. The reason is fiscal. Border walls have been built where and when they made sense. Let's listen to the experts about what measures are most effective for border security with today's technologies. True, but we have gotten rid of some RINOS. More Rinos and Democrats need to go! On 1/26/2019 at 5:36 AM, Meredith Poor said: Hadrian's Wall: Outer limit of the Roman Empire. From that point forward Roman civilization shrank. Great Wall(s) of China: The plural indicates that this was done several times, by different emperors in different dynasties. Represented futile efforts to keep foreign invaders out. China has built a lot of walls, and has collapsed in on itself at least that many times if not more. Note: current version of this is '9 dashed line'. Current economic situation in China: getting cloudy. Berlin wall and Iron Curtian: Erected in early 1960's. Soviet Union doesn't survive another 30 years. Using these examples (more are easily found) shows construction of physical barriers is evidence of social and political rot. People want to be 'comfortable' living among their own kind. In short, new ideas and immigrant workers willing to climb the economic ladder remind the native born that they have (to spend real effort) to compete. China's wall obviously worked. The Soviet Unions wall was to keep Germans IN. The wall didn't fail, the Communists failed. We need to up the opposition to China to provide freedoms for the Chinese people. 1 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meredith Poor + 895 MP January 28, 2019 2 hours ago, ronwagn said: China's wall obviously worked. The Soviet Unions wall was to keep Germans IN. The wall didn't fail, the Communists failed. We need to up the opposition to China to provide freedoms for the Chinese people. "the majority of the existing wall is from the Ming Dynasty (1368–1644)." from Wikipedia. "Towards the end of the Ming, the Great Wall helped defend the empire against the Manchu invasions that began around 1600. Even after the loss of all of Liaodong, the Ming army held the heavily fortified Shanhai Pass, preventing the Manchus from conquering the Chinese heartland. The Manchus were finally able to cross the Great Wall in 1644, after Beijing had already fallen to Li Zicheng's rebels. Before this time, the Manchus had crossed the Great Wall multiple times to raid, but this time it was for conquest." Another quote from the same article. From the 1600's onwards China was having to deal with European powers and Japan. Walls did little to preserve Chinese sovereignty under the circumstances. The phrase "with Chinese characteristics", as uttered by various Great Leaders, is a signal that 'foreigners' are a corrupting influence which must be managed and contained. In short, China continues to chart it's own path, for better or worse, often ignoring expensive lessons learned by Westerners within the last few centuries. Whatever is 'obvious' to me is that China's wall faced the wrong direction. The point of the Soviet Iron Curtain was to keep foreign influences out - particularly the ideas around democracy. Had the Soviet economy been as beneficial to its citizens as the West's, no one would have had any incentive to leave. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
John Foote + 1,135 JF January 28, 2019 The easy way into the USA is through the gates, visitor VISA, and overstay. With folks sneaking across the border and recent historical lows, the notion of declaring a national emergency is a bit of an obscenity. The geography of the border is a great barrier. Walls in some areas, absolutely. But the fundamental issue is the estimated 12 million already here. Address real penalties to employers for hiring them, have national ID system, enforce it, and this will correct. Neither party is the least interested in this. Easy to rail against the outlier problems, and best to ignore the major one. 4 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ronwagn + 6,290 January 28, 2019 4 hours ago, John Foote said: The easy way into the USA is through the gates, visitor VISA, and overstay. With folks sneaking across the border and recent historical lows, the notion of declaring a national emergency is a bit of an obscenity. The geography of the border is a great barrier. Walls in some areas, absolutely. But the fundamental issue is the estimated 12 million already here. Address real penalties to employers for hiring them, have national ID system, enforce it, and this will correct. Neither party is the least interested in this. Easy to rail against the outlier problems, and best to ignore the major one. Maybe declaring a national emergency is just what we need to wake people up and get the wall built. President Trump cannot seem to get the help of the remaining RINOS or all but one or two Democrats. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
John Foote + 1,135 JF January 28, 2019 10 hours ago, ronwagn said: Maybe declaring a national emergency is just what we need to wake people up and get the wall built. President Trump cannot seem to get the help of the remaining RINOS or all but one or two Democrats. Declaring an emergency is asking for the shit storm of all shit storms. It will be thrown into the judicial branch, IMHO declaring it a national emergency, when at worst it's business as usual, is grounds for impeachment. And I don't want to see that. Should have forced this issue when the house was Republican but did not. The constitution is very flexible, but very clear on funding. This would be an ill-advised workaround. IMHO. Great interview on NPR this morning by the Republican mayor of El Paso. The folks on the border in Texas, there is no crises expect the political mess. Reform for immigration is 30 years overdue. 1 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ronwagn + 6,290 January 29, 2019 13 hours ago, John Foote said: Declaring an emergency is asking for the shit storm of all shit storms. It will be thrown into the judicial branch, IMHO declaring it a national emergency, when at worst it's business as usual, is grounds for impeachment. And I don't want to see that. Should have forced this issue when the house was Republican but did not. The constitution is very flexible, but very clear on funding. This would be an ill-advised workaround. IMHO. Great interview on NPR this morning by the Republican mayor of El Paso. The folks on the border in Texas, there is no crises expect the political mess. Reform for immigration is 30 years overdue. It has been going on for decades. It benefits crony capitalists RINOS and Democrats. The middle class suffers and declines. Our voting system is corrupted and only the wealthy control government. The cost of illegal aliens to our budget which is already set to implode is not acceptable. We have a crisis of trust in a crooked and self aggrandizing government. Trump needs to test his powers, let the Supreme Court decide. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites