Ward Smith + 6,615 December 18, 2019 2 minutes ago, remake it said: That is an interesting claim especially as if it were true then you would be exceptionally wealthy because there are presently no algorithms in the Western world that could make this possible. More Chinese exceptionalism? I've already mentioned Next IT, which your people likely stole intellectual property from. Maybe next time you'll use Inbenta ? Bottom line I'm not seeing anything spectacular here. I've got bookshelves full of AI texts. I used to be more interested than I am today. The true breakthrough hasn't occurred and likely won't. They used to think it was "self awareness" but that's not the key. Perhaps your handler can tell us? 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remake it + 288 December 18, 2019 1 minute ago, Ward Smith said: More Chinese exceptionalism? I've already mentioned Next IT, which your people likely stole intellectual property from. Maybe next time you'll use Inbenta ? Bottom line I'm not seeing anything spectacular here. I've got bookshelves full of AI texts. I used to be more interested than I am today. The true breakthrough hasn't occurred and likely won't. They used to think it was "self awareness" but that's not the key. Perhaps your handler can tell us? In other words what you claimed was not true and is just another distraction in a thread about an important process that probably very soon now sees another US President tainted forever for misdeeds. 1 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tom Kirkman + 8,860 December 18, 2019 Adam Schiff leads cult-like Democrats to their own mass suicide, following in the footsteps of Marshall Applewhite, founder of California’s Heaven’s Gate cult As Democrats tie political nooses around their own necks in a stunning display of coordinated mass political suicide, we are reminded that California is home to all sorts of cults and cult leaders who repeatedly manage to convince large numbers of people to do insanely self-destructive things.The effort to impeach Trump, led largely by California Democrat Adam Schiff, rests entirely on the charge of a thought crime, where Trump is accused of thinking certain things as he took actions to root out corruption and malfeasance in Ukraine. The Democrats have attributed to Trump the most malicious thought crimes they could imagine, and there’s quite a rich kaleidoscope of horrors in the minds of these Dems, considering how many of them are child-raping perverts, drug users and sexual deviants in one way or another.Schiff isn’t the first California lunatic to lead a group of people to their own destruction, of course. In 1997, the Heaven’s Gate cult, headed by an influential sociopath named Marshall Applewhite, led his 38 loyal followers to commit mass suicide by eating applesauce laced with phenobarbital.The lunatic cult leader looks shockingly similar to Adam Schiff, the crazed, wild-eyed conspiracy engineer who led the Democrats’ fake “investigation” into Trump:What Schiff and Applewhite have in common is that they are both leading their followers to commit mass suicide. In Schiff’s case, his “followers” are Democrat House members who are figuratively tying nooses around their own necks as they vote for impeachment, forever cementing their names as co-conspirators in a staged, treasonous political coup attempt against the United States of America.Applewhite’s followers died from phenobarbital while believing they would be teleported to a “mother ship” that would save their souls. We don’t yet know how Schiff’s lawmakers will die, but they no doubt believe that are about to be elevated to heroic status as “saviors” of America, even as they plunge swords into their own political futures and bleed out every last drop of credibility they squandered.Key to the power of a cult leader is denying its members access to any outside information that might contradict the false beliefs of the cult itself. That’s why Adam Schiff would not allow Republicans to call witnesses during his secret basement “trials” in which so-called “witnesses” actually had not witnessed anything at all. The entire fiasco was very much like a “cult confession” phenomena where cult members “testify” their faith in the cult leader and his twisted beliefs.That’s also why the left-wing media will never cover cross examinations carried out by Republicans, and it’s why the tech giants have systematically censored nearly all conservative voices. The only way to keep the left-wing cult deeply saturated with the “faith” of Leftism is to block out all contradictory information. Censorship, lies and media propaganda are all necessary components of this insidious cult, and it doesn’t hurt to have abused either recreational drugs or trafficked children in the past, either — both proclivities of power-hungry Democrats.As in all cults, the Democrat cult members are repeatedly promised unrealistic rewards if they maintain their faith. In the case of Schiff and the cult of the DNC, members are promised political power if they simply toe the line and remove Trump from power. Once achieved, Democrats will finally be able to achieve their rightful positions of power as the alien mothership returns from the comet on the dark side of the moon during a lunar eclipse… or something.In reality, Democrats are all about to plunge head-first into the bungee pit of politics, where sharp sticks protrude from the darkness, ready to pierce the fleshy bodies of those foolish enough to fling themselves into the abyss, chasing illusory pots of gold and other shiny projections. You are watching one of the most embarrassing chapters of U.S. history unfold right before your very eyes, and the butt jokes of this fiasco think they are the stars! Informed Americans aren’t sure whether they should watch all this in horror or laughter. Yes, we are horrified by the realization that an entire group of elected officials could be so stupid (and so full of hatred in their hearts) that they would fall for the insane antics of Adam Schiff, a twisted individual who is clearly in need of a 72-hour psychiatric hold. Yet we are endlessly amused at watching them add their names to an event that history will soon record as the most dishonest, treasonous and downright stupid impeachment effort in the history of this republic. ... 1 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marcin + 519 MS December 18, 2019 23 minutes ago, Ward Smith said: More Chinese exceptionalism? I've already mentioned Next IT, which your people likely stole intellectual property from. Maybe next time you'll use Inbenta ? Bottom line I'm not seeing anything spectacular here. I've got bookshelves full of AI texts. I used to be more interested than I am today. The true breakthrough hasn't occurred and likely won't. They used to think it was "self awareness" but that's not the key. Perhaps your handler can tell us? I respect your experience in ASICs very much, (I think I identified the company you were working for by this example of IP theft you mentioned), so also naturally your expertise in AI. But remake it answers and comments in geopolitical threads clearly show more knowledge, they are simply smarter than yours. I beg you pardon but there is no AI that can show IQ in the range of 130-150 in general discussion. This is not narrow, defined problem of chess. If such would ever exist I would be terrified. Remember short story of Asimov when robot was first elected Mayor and later head of planetary government, I hope it is not possible, is it ? 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tom Kirkman + 8,860 December 18, 2019 14 minutes ago, Tom Kirkman said: The effort to impeach Trump, led largely by California Democrat Adam Schiff, rests entirely on the charge of a thought crime, where Trump is accused of thinking certain things as he took actions to root out corruption and malfeasance in Ukraine Remember that banana that was duct taped to the wall as art? 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ward Smith + 6,615 December 18, 2019 12 minutes ago, Marcin said: I respect your experience in ASICs very much, (I think I identified the company you were working for by this example of IP theft you mentioned), so also naturally your expertise in AI. But remake it answers and comments in geopolitical threads clearly show more knowledge, they are simply smarter than yours. I beg you pardon but there is no AI that can show IQ in the range of 130-150 in general discussion. This is not narrow, defined problem of chess. If such would ever exist I would be terrified. Remember short story of Asimov when robot was first elected Mayor and later head of planetary government, I hope it is not possible, is it ? Nope, they're not smarter than mine. I won't show you my A game in these threads, I'm here for MY amusement, not to impress you. Years ago I swore off doing blogging on my computer, where I can type at a high rate and utilize its quite impressive performance to grab any and all factoids I needed to "win". But that's just a fool's errand. So I blog on this old and weak mobile device, specifically to handicap me. I can't use my full vocabulary because the dictionary that Swype uses is too limited (and not readily extensible) and "typing" on a touch screen is so painful I'd rather not do it at all. On a keyboard I can make walls of text that would make @Papillon blush. On a mobile device? Screw it. I've quite literally got hundreds of better things to do with my time. Perhaps it's time to take a long break. That would suit your purposes no? 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Papillon + 485 December 18, 2019 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Ward Smith said: On a keyboard I can make walls of text that would make @Papillon blush. Highly doubtful sir, I do not blush easily, certainly not at text as far as I am aware. However your lengthy posts would hold the views of Republican users and so be utterly fine so have no fear. 12 minutes ago, Ward Smith said: I won't show you my A game in these threads This is clear to us all sir, as you continually lose arguments to a robot ... /sarc 12 minutes ago, Ward Smith said: I'm here for MY amusement, not to impress you. You must be very easily amused sir then I assume, if arguing with AI is a form of entertainment? And you do not impress me, again, due to the losses mentioned above ... /sarc Joking sir. Forgive me. Edited December 18, 2019 by Papillon 1 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest December 18, 2019 32 minutes ago, Ward Smith said: I've quite literally got hundreds of better things to do with my time. HAHAHAHA he says while arguing with a robot everyday? 🤣 Sorry man, couldn't resist LOL. 33 minutes ago, Ward Smith said: So I blog on this old and weak mobile device, specifically to handicap me. ***translation ... ''My intelligence is so vast that I would confuse you all so I choose to have a shit phone.'' Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remake it + 288 December 18, 2019 36 minutes ago, Ward Smith said: I've quite literally got hundreds of better things to do with my time. Yet you opened a thread on economics in these forums and your posting showed at best a rudimentary understanding which somewhat gives the lie to what you claim relating to AI. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ward Smith + 6,615 December 19, 2019 5 hours ago, remake it said: Yet you opened a thread on economics in these forums and your posting showed at best a rudimentary understanding which somewhat gives the lie to what you claim relating to AI. You don't know sht from shinola Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ward Smith + 6,615 December 19, 2019 5 hours ago, Papillon said: Highly doubtful sir, I do not blush easily, certainly not at text as far as I am aware. However your lengthy posts would hold the views of Republican users and so be utterly fine so have no fear. This is clear to us all sir, as you continually lose arguments to a robot ... /sarc You must be very easily amused sir then I assume, if arguing with AI is a form of entertainment? And you do not impress me, again, due to the losses mentioned above ... /sarc Joking sir. Forgive me. I've never lost to IT. Never 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marcin + 519 MS December 19, 2019 3 hours ago 8 hours ago, remake it said: Yet you opened a thread on economics in these forums and your posting showed at best a rudimentary understanding which somewhat gives the lie to what you claim relating to AI. 3 hours ago, Ward Smith said: You don't know sht from shinola I wanted to be impartial so @Ward Smith and @remake it I read the first page of discussion at this thread about economics created by Ward. And in my opinion Ward < remake it, as remake it has clearly shown better knowledge and understanding of the concept of money, Fisher ideas and fiat currency as one of forms of money. So again alleged 'bot' won with you Ward. There are great precedences like Kasparov vs Deep Blue so as to mention your favorite application of AI, so cheer up! 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PE Scott + 563 SC December 19, 2019 (edited) I have to admit, I got a little chuckle from the boxing robot. "My CPU is a neural-net processor; a learning computer. The more contact I have with humans, the more I learn." -The Terminator With every engagement, his power only grows! Edited December 19, 2019 by PE Scott 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob Plant + 2,756 RP December 19, 2019 11 hours ago, remake it said: In other words what you claimed was not true and is just another distraction in a thread about an important process that probably very soon now sees another US President tainted forever for misdeeds. Loving your new profile picture Remake IT I think you need some dietary advice though as you look more like Ruiz than Joshua and look what happened there! 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tom Kirkman + 8,860 December 19, 2019 46 minutes ago, PE Scott said: I have to admit, I got a little chuckle from the boxing robot. "My CPU is a neural-net processor; a learning computer. The more contact I have with humans, the more I learn." -The Terminator With every engagement, his power only grows! Yep, I chucked when I saw remake it's new avatar, a robot with red boxing gloves throwing punches. Accurate avatar, with good humor. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tom Kirkman + 8,860 December 19, 2019 Worth reading: An Impeachment Role for the Supreme Court? Do the charges against Trump pass constitutional muster? The justices should decide before the Senate does. ... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
James Regan + 1,776 January 6, 2020 Would be interesting now if DT (not you Day Trader) called JB and Stevie B up to take up Hawk position on his shoulders. https://www.boltonpac.com/2020/01/statement-of-john-r-bolton/ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remake it + 288 January 6, 2020 2 hours ago, James Regan said: Would be interesting now if DT (not you Day Trader) called JB and Stevie B up to take up Hawk position on his shoulders. https://www.boltonpac.com/2020/01/statement-of-john-r-bolton/ The legal position of Bolton's case in the Hearings process is interesting in that Judge Leon's ruling is prima facie accurate regarding the reach of separation of powers (Bolton was not being asked to appear as a witness in a trial). However, it was the initial act of the President, in seeking that parties who were essential to the House Hearings did not testify, that was offensive and became an article of impeachment. Bolton has wisely chosen to abide by any Senate subpoena despite Leon's ruling regarding the actions of the House. Constitutionally only the Senate can "try" an impeachment case and no US court could reach a judgement contrary to that role. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bob D + 562 RD January 6, 2020 4 minutes ago, remake it said: However, it was the initial act of the President, in seeking that parties who were essential to the House Hearings did not testify, that was offensive and became an article of impeachment. Hello BOT This is one reason why this Impeachment is a pile of shite. It is not offensive nor illegal for the Executive Branch to disregard a subpoena by the Legislative Branch. Therefore, the Obstruction of Congress Article of Impeachment as well as your constant and inaccurate droning on is ... well pathetic. BTW - the Legislative Branch has a remedy but never approached it for the knowledge that they would be destroyed in every court. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remake it + 288 January 6, 2020 4 minutes ago, Bob D said: Hello BOT This is one reason why this Impeachment is a pile of shite. It is not offensive nor illegal for the Executive Branch to disregard a subpoena by the Legislative Branch. Therefore, the Obstruction of Congress Article of Impeachment as well as your constant and inaccurate droning on is ... well pathetic. BTW - the Legislative Branch has a remedy but never approached it for the knowledge that they would be destroyed in every court. Please come to grips with the elements here as the impeachment process is wholly conducted within the Executive Branch. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boat + 1,324 RG January 6, 2020 On 12/11/2019 at 5:44 AM, James Regan said: Im am confused and not an American, but try to follow the current circus act playing out in Washington. Is the general idea behind the current impeachment that Donald Trump is basically being charged at the core for trying to affect the 2016 and 2020 elections? If so are the democrats not doing the same thing by carrying out this impeachment? As they know it will never get passed the Senate is this not a grandiose publicity stunt to try and affect the US voting public by smearing POTUS. Does political abuse of power not run in many forms? Am I wrong or just naive?? Or the Dem’s are trying to stop a politician out of control. I still want to see those tax returns. It’s possible he is a mini Bernie Madoff only most of the investors are Russian. Trump absolutely whoud make decisions based on money given to him. That is the character of the man. Blame the Dem’s for wanting to bring transparency to Trump’s dealings. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
James Regan + 1,776 January 6, 2020 17 minutes ago, Bob D said: Hello BOT This is one reason why this Impeachment is a pile of shite. It is not offensive nor illegal for the Executive Branch to disregard a subpoena by the Legislative Branch. Therefore, the Obstruction of Congress Article of Impeachment as well as your constant and inaccurate droning on is ... well pathetic. BTW - the Legislative Branch has a remedy but never approached it for the knowledge that they would be destroyed in every court. https://youtu.be/FU-tuY0Z7nQ sorry couldn’t resist it.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bob D + 562 RD January 7, 2020 6 hours ago, remake it said: Please come to grips with the elements here as the impeachment process is wholly conducted within the Executive Branch. Nope 100% conducted within the Legislative Branch House Impeaches Senate Tries It's all in done in Congress which is the Legislative Branch. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites