JN

Senate Impeachment Trial: After opening statements Trump will file Motion to Dismiss. Debate 2 days. Senate votes, Motion to Dismiss passes

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, DayTrader said:

oh shhh lol, when it 'vibrates' and slams into the ground, there is a noise and so a sound, whether a human brain hears it or not

I'm not getting into this psycho babble mate, I was just mocking Ward

every animal in the area that runs or flies off did so due to sound primarily, not the vibration?

If they exist in the scenario.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

oh so now there is a forest with zero wildlife in it on the planet is there?

are you guys on crack again? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, DayTrader said:

oh so now there is a forest with zero wildlife in it on the planet is there?

are you guys on crack again? 

No I got home from Vegas yesterday.  LOL

Thought experiments are the best.

 

  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

ah how'd you do? 

not when they are drivel and magical forests

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, remake it said:

That is such a weak argument as if wholly fails to address the types of issue the framers were considering regarding impeachment and were spelled out in detail during the Hearings so why don't you read them and come back with something more credible.

More BS.  Don't tell us to research your incorrect assertions.  Prove to us they are correct (they aren't).

fails to address the types of issue  -  NOPE   What types of issues  

were spelled out in detail  -  NOPE   show us where/how they were spelled out

 

So you do your own research and come back with something credible.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

8 minutes ago, DayTrader said:

ah how'd you do? 

not when they are drivel and magical forests

Didn't gamble much as the lady isn't into that (only slipped down to the casino after she was asleep).

Did very well at blackjack on two occasions, lost one night.  Still net $300 positive and a bunch of free drinks.  

Otherwise we rented bicycles, drank, ate too much, and of course had lots of sex. Fun times.

Edited by Enthalpic
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

You play poker ever?

Why did she choose Vegas if she never gambles?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

6 minutes ago, Enthalpic said:

Didn't gamble much as the lady isn't into that (only slipped down the casino after she was asleep).

Did very well at blackjack on two occasions, lost one night.  Still net $300 positive and a bunch of free drinks.  

Otherwise we rented bicycles, drank, ate too much, and of course had lots of sex. Fun times.

Love Vegas.  Last trip was 18.5 hours terror.  

I assume "had lots of sex" was part of the "(only slipped down to the casino after she was asleep)" part of the trip

Edited by Bob D
"
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

6 minutes ago, DayTrader said:

You play poker ever?

Why did she choose Vegas if she never gambles?

She really likes bicycling (I used to race road bikes, she still does).  She's also fond of the drink.

The riding around Vegas is actually really nice (red rock canyon etc.)  Go for a big bike ride to build up the appetite, pig out and get drunk, fuck, sleep, repeat.

I play poker but never have at a casino, just home games. I stopped getting invited to a regular game after I won a couple times...

Edited by Enthalpic
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bob D said:

 

I assume "had lots of sex" was part of the (only slipped down to the casino after she was asleep)" part of the trip

She gets up for work really early -and I'm a night owl- so yeah, I "put her to bed" and then get back up on a regular basis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Bob D said:

More BS.  Don't tell us to research your incorrect assertions.  Prove to us they are correct (they aren't).

fails to address the types of issue  -  NOPE   What types of issues  

were spelled out in detail  -  NOPE   show us where/how they were spelled out

The Framers principally intended “other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” to include three forms of Presidential wrongdoing: (1) abuse of power, (2) betrayal of the national interest through foreign entanglements, and (3) corruption of office and elections.

This was on the second page of the House Judiciary Committee Report  wherefore there is a lot more information thereafter and as you are consistently too lazy to make sensible comments you are now placed on "ignore."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Enthalpic said:

She gets up for work really early -and I'm a night owl- so yeah, I "put her to bed" and then get back up on a regular basis.

I was uneasy typing that.  Obviously you took it good spirit.  Thanks.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, remake it said:

The Framers principally intended “other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” to include three forms of Presidential wrongdoing: (1) abuse of power, (2) betrayal of the national interest through foreign entanglements, and (3) corruption of office and elections.

This was on the second page of the House Judiciary Committee Report  wherefore there is a lot more information thereafter and as you are consistently too lazy to make sensible comments you are now placed on "ignore."

Nooooooo   Don't ignore me BOT.  I will not be igno ....   OK Great!!

  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bob D said:

Nooooooo   Don't ignore me BOT.  I will not be igno ....   OK Great!!

Rest easy as you might enjoy the company of others residing there including Mr Kirkland and 4 others who are listening for trees falling in the forest.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, remake it said:

Rest easy as you might enjoy the company of others residing there including Mr Kirkland and 4 others who are listening for trees falling in the forest.

It is amusing that you keep mis-spelling my name.

Reminds me of

James 8. Corney

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

(edited)

16 minutes ago, remake it said:

who are listening for trees falling in the forest.

I'm not listening for anything in @ronwagn 's magical, mythical forest, as I am busy searching for unicorns and goblins. If unicorns count as wildlife though I will be unsuccessful.

#psychobabble

''Ooh if a plane flies over just a deaf person and no one else then did it make a sound ...?''

Yes. Of course it f**king did. Next question. 

Edited by Guest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DayTrader said:

I'm not listening for anything in @ronwagn 's magical, mythical forest, as I am busy in the forest searching for unicorns and goblins. If unicorns count as wildlife though I will be unsuccessful.

 

52 minutes ago, DayTrader said:

are you guys on crack again? 

 

Hmmmmm, are you on crack again?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

No but I consider trying it more and more, the longer I hang out here. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, DayTrader said:

I'm not listening for anything in @ronwagn 's magical, mythical forest, as I am busy searching for unicorns and goblins. If unicorns count as wildlife though I will be unsuccessful.

#psychobabble

''Ooh if a plane flies over just a deaf person and no one else then did it make a sound ...?''

Yes. Of course it f**king did. Next question. 

Marylin Vos Savant agrees with me and Enthalpic. But what does she know, world's highest IQ and all that…

The proper definition of sound isn't the vibrations, but the cochlear reaction to said vibrations, which we call sounds. Change the sensory apparatus and your "sound" is meaningless to say, a worm. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DayTrader said:

oh so now there is a forest with zero wildlife in it on the planet is there?

are you guys on crack again? 

Jeez Americans (joking)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

1 hour ago, DayTrader said:

You play poker ever?

Why did she choose Vegas if she never gambles?

The women!

Edited by Rob Plant

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ward Smith said:

The proper definition of sound isn't the vibrations, but the cochlear reaction to said vibrations, which we call sounds. Change the sensory apparatus and your "sound" is meaningless to say, a worm. 

Mr Smith you of all people should know that words can be defined according to contexts so to say "The proper definition of sound isn't the vibrations" has omitted @Enthalpic's physical definition while at the simplest level it's just the transportation of energy being realized elsewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DayTrader said:

1. Freedom of speech for all, even atheists and democrats.

2. No guns for you if you're a lunatic. ''Lunatic'' will be defined by psychiatric history and general tests to see if you're mental. You may have to wait a whole week to get your precious gun. Deal with it redneck.

3. Religion and the choice of having and believing in one is your right, until that decision affects the lives of others. At this point, the 'others' may punch you in the face and face no charge, but just a punch.

4. It is forbidden to change any elements of the English language as it is a beautiful thing and must be respected. Failure to do this will result in a jail term with the length dependent on butchering frequency.

5. We will feed and clothe all of our citizens before spending one cent on military objects or space missions

 

I'd vote for most of that.

USA is the "technology superpower" but pays Russia 86 million for each ride on their Soyuz.

Meanwhile Boeing is busy designing planes that crash themselves and failing to properly set the bloody clock on their Starliner.

"The Soyuz rides have cost NASA up to $86 million apiece."

"The problem was with the Starliner's mission clock: It was off-kilter, which delayed timed-commands to put the capsule in the right orbit."

https://app.tmxmoney.com/news/cpnews/article?locale=EN&newsid=f34613&mobile=false

 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

3 hours ago, Ward Smith said:

You on the other hand are a joke, so there's that. 

34 minutes ago, Ward Smith said:

Marylin Vos Savant agrees with me and Enthalpic.

Is this the same Enthalpic that you called a joke just a few hours ago? THAT Enthalpic yeah? Thought so. Now you are quoting the guy when he agrees LOL?  ;)  Love it.

I don't care what YOUR definition of sound is Ward. A huge oak tree falling over in a forest makes a sound because ...drumroll .... it is a huge oak tree falling over in a forest 🤣  That's the end of the discussion to me as it is psychobabble, whatever your high IQ person says. If she changed her mind would you then?

42 minutes ago, Ward Smith said:

The proper definition of sound isn't the vibrations, but the cochlear reaction to said vibrations, which we call sounds.

So a deaf person in my scenario had no cochlear reaction to a plane going overhead yes? Does that mean the plane didn't make a sound as it roared past? The person heard and felt nothing.

33 minutes ago, Rob Plant said:

Jeez Americans (joking)

Don't be joking. I get this shit all day. It's bang on Rob. Hence the crack.  

25 minutes ago, remake it said:

while at the simplest level it's just the transportation of energy being realized elsewhere.

DING.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DayTrader said:

Is this the same Enthalpic that you called a joke just a few hours ago? THAT Enthalpic yeah? Thought so. Now you are quoting the guy when he agrees LOL?  ;)  Love it.

I don't care what YOUR definition of sound is Ward. A huge oak tree falling over in a forest makes a sound because ...drumroll .... it is a huge oak tree falling over in a forest 🤣  That's the end of the discussion to me as it is psychobabble, whatever your high IQ person says. If she changed her mind would you then?

So a deaf person in my scenario had no cochlear reaction to a plane going overhead yes? Does that mean the plane didn't make a sound as it roared past? The person heard and felt nothing.

Don't be joking. I get this shit all day. It's bang on Rob. Hence the crack.  

DING.

Respect DT

nobody is fooling you mate

and yeah if a bloody tree falls in the forest it makes a big crashing sound 

if you don’t believe me try cutting one down and record the noise

duh

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.