Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
TN

"Exposing the Deceptions of The CLIMATE CHANGE NARRATIVE" - Sources of Information, Websites, Articles, Videos and more

Recommended Posts

Science and politicians have done a very poor job slowing climate change, let alone the millions of deaths from pollution related health care problems. There never has been the commitment that has been needed. Historians and intellectuals give this crop of humans a pass. I think future generations who will live with worsening conditions will judge more harshly. But hey, you got the Putins, the Trumps the hitlers and the pol pots to be compared with. You’ll get off easy. You’ll just be part of the ignorant masses that didn’t do anything. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Boat said:

Science and politicians have done a very poor job slowing climate change, let alone the millions of deaths from pollution related health care problems. There never has been the commitment that has been needed. Historians and intellectuals give this crop of humans a pass. I think future generations who will live with worsening conditions will judge more harshly. But hey, you got the Putins, the Trumps the hitlers and the pol pots to be compared with. You’ll get off easy. You’ll just be part of the ignorant masses that didn’t do anything. 

 

Toxic chemicals in the environment are a real problem.  CO2 is not a problem.  Corrupt Federal Agencies are responsible for intentionally ignoring the toxic chemicals and helping to promote a false narrative as to their safety.  For example, the caustic hazardous waste from the phosphate industry must be disposed of in special EPA approved dumps because it kills all life forms and permanently destroys the soil...however, that same exact toxic waste (hydrofluoric acid HFS which can melt steel and concrete) can legally be added to the drinking water.  https://imageprocessor.digital.vistaprint.com/crop/0,0,1147x1918/maxWidth/1000/https://uploads.documents.cimpress.io/v1/uploads/8bc7fcf6-27f2-4583-ad3f-7c099cba0ba1~110/original?tenant=vbu-digital

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 8/19/2022 at 3:39 PM, Tom Nolan said:

Toxic chemicals in the environment are a real problem.  CO2 is not a problem.  Corrupt Federal Agencies are responsible for intentionally ignoring the toxic chemicals and helping to promote a false narrative as to their safety.  For example, the caustic hazardous waste from the phosphate industry must be disposed of in special EPA approved dumps because it kills all life forms and permanently destroys the soil...however, that same exact toxic waste (hydrofluoric acid HFS which can melt steel and concrete) can legally be added to the drinking water.  https://imageprocessor.digital.vistaprint.com/crop/0,0,1147x1918/maxWidth/1000/https://uploads.documents.cimpress.io/v1/uploads/8bc7fcf6-27f2-4583-ad3f-7c099cba0ba1~110/original?tenant=vbu-digital

The dental dogma is that fluorine is good for your teeth (in very small concentrations, though)

Honestly, I don't see any reason for it being so, with possible exception of fluorinated amines, which seems to be how fluorine is added to the toothpaste. That stuff acts as a base, counteracting acids produced by bacteria.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Andrei Moutchkine said:

The dental dogma is that fluorine is good for your teeth (in very small concentrations, though)

Honestly, I don't see any reason for it being so, with possible exception of fluorinated amines, which seems to be how fluorine is added to the toothpaste. That stuff acts as a base, counteracting acids produced by bacteria.

There currently is an unprecedented citizen lawsuit against the EPA against fluoridated water.  During the course of the this extended trial, it beomes obvious how corrupt the EPA is.  For decades the EPA and CDC have misled the public about fluoridated water...even top scientists at the EPA were warning about it.   Most folks will not research the topic.  HUGE RESOURCE on FLUORIDE  https://web.archive.org/web/20210608144053/https://www.dallasforsaferwater.com/

The EPA blatantly lied to the world on 9/11 that the "air was safe to breathe" and many first responders are now dead from ill health.  Like all the government agencies, the welfare of the public is not on their agenda.  Technocrats do not care about health and well being of individuals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EXCERPT:

It’s been over a year since Oilprice published an article titled “The U.S. Desperately Needs To Modernize Its Power Grid,” and while President Joe Biden’s administration has thrown considerable money and publicity toward the issue, the need is no less desperate today. More than $400 billion have been allocated for clean energy infrastructure and climate initiatives broadly through last year’s infrastructure bill and this month’s Inflation Reduction Act, but a the U.S. needs to spend $360 billion through 2030 and $2.4 trillion by 2050 on energy transmission systems alone in order to keep up with projected renewable energy expansion, according to a Princeton study from December of 2020.

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/The-US-Power-Grid-Cant-Support-Its-Climate-Pledges.html

The U.S. Power Grid Can’t Support Its Climate Pledges

By Haley Zaremba - Sep 01, 2022, 12:00 PM CDT

 

  • Great Response! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/greenpeace-co-founder-patrick-moore-says-climate-change-based-false-narratives

Greenpeace Co-Founder Patrick Moore Says Climate Change Based On False Narratives

Tyler Durden's Photo
by Tyler Durden
Thursday, Sep 08, 2022 - 07:20 PM

Authored by Lee Yun-Jeong via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Patrick Moore, one of the founders of Greenpeace, said in an email obtained by The Epoch Times that his reasons for leaving Greenpeace were very clear: “Greenpeace was ‘hijacked’ by the political left when they realized there was money and power in the environmental movement. [Left-leaning] political activists in North America and Europe changed Greenpeace from a science-based organization to a political fundraising organization,” Moore said.

moore2.jpg?itok=y_lpZZah

Moore left Greenpeace in 1986, 15 years after he co-founded the organization.

The ‘environmental’ movement has become more of a political movement than an environmental movement,” he said. “They are primarily focused on creating narratives, stories, that are designed to instill fear and guilt into the public so the public will send them money.”

He said they mainly operate behind closed doors with other political operatives at the U.N., World Economic Forum, and so on, all of which are primarily political in nature.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] is “not a science organization,” he said. “It is a political organization composed of the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Program.

The IPCC hires scientists to provide them with ‘information’ that supports the ‘climate emergency’ narrative.

Their campaigns against fossil fuels, nuclear energy, CO2, plastic, etc., are misguided and designed to make people think the world will come to an end unless we cripple our civilization and destroy our economy. They are now a negative influence on the future of both the environment and human civilization.”

Today, the left has adopted many policies that would be very destructive to civilization as they are not technically achievable. Only look at the looming energy crisis in Europe and the UK, which Putin is taking advantage of. But it is of their own making in refusing to develop their own natural gas resources, opposing nuclear energy, and adopting an impossible position on fossil fuels in general,” Moore wrote.

The Left ‘Hijacked’ Greenpeace

GettyImages-1323736951.jpg?itok=6ehMZqvpA “Greenpeace” protester is seen flying into the stadium prior to the UEFA Euro 2020 Championship Group F match between France and Germany at Football Arena Munich in Munich, Germany, on June 15, 2021. (Alexander Hassenstein/Getty Images)

He said “green” for the environment and “peace” for the people were the organization’s founding principles, but peace was largely forgotten, and green had become the sole agenda.

Many [so-called] ‘environmental’ leaders were now saying that ‘humans are the enemies of the Earth, the enemies of Nature.’ I could not accept that humans are the only evil species. This is too much like ‘original sin,’ that humans are born with evil, but all the other species are good, even cockroaches, mosquitos, and diseases,” Moore argued.

He said the new dominant philosophy is that the world would be better if fewer people existed.

“But the people who said this were not volunteering to be the first to go away. They behave as if they are superior to others. This kind of ‘pride’ and ‘conceit’ is the worst of the Cardinal Sins,” Moore said.

Environmental Activist

As a prominent scholar, ecologist, and long-time leader in the international environmental field, Patrick Moore is widely regarded as one of the world’s most qualified experts on the environment. He is also a founder of Greenpeace, the world’s largest environmental activist organization.

Moore received his Ph.D. in Ecology from the University of British Columbia in 1974 and an Honorary Doctorate of Science from North Carolina State University in 2005.

KakaoTalk_Photo_2022-08-30-11-01-05.jpegPatrick Moore, Canadian Ecologist, Chair of CO2 Coalition, and Co-Founder of Greenpeace. (Courtesy of Patrick Moore)

He co-founded Greenpeace in 1971 and served as president of Greenpeace Canada for nine years. From 1979 to 1986, Moore served as the Director of Greenpeace International, a driving force shaping the group’s policies and directions. During his 15-year tenure, Greenpeace became the world’s largest environmental activist organization.

In 1991, Moore founded Greenspirit, a consultancy focusing on environmental policies, energy, climate change, biodiversity, genetically modified food, forests, fisheries, food, and resources.

Between 2006 and 2012, Moore served as co-chairman of the Clean and Safe Energy Coalition, a U.S.-based environmental advocacy group.

In 2014, he was appointed Chairman of Ecology, Energy, and Prosperity of Frontier Centre for Public Policy, a non-partisan Canadian public policy think tank.

In 2019 and 2020, Moore served as the Chair of CO2 Coalition, a U.S.-based nonprofit environmental advocacy group dedicated to disputing false claims on CO2 as relates to climate change.

False Narrative on Chlorine

At the time I decided to leave Greenpeace, I was one of 6 Directors of Greenpeace International. I was the only one with formal science education, BSc Honors in Science and Forestry, and Ph.D. in Ecology. My fellow directors decided that Greenpeace should begin a campaign to ‘Ban Chlorine Worldwide.’”

Moore said it is true that elemental chlorine gas is highly toxic and was used as a weapon in World War I. However, chlorine is one of the 94 [naturally-ocurring] elements on the Periodic Table and has many roles in biology and human health. For example, table salt (NaCl or Sodium Chloride) is an essential nutrient for all animals and many plants. It is impossible to “ban” NaCl.

GettyImages-1021739730.jpg?itok=JiQ0AOJ6Salt pans cover 10,000 hectares at Aigues-Mortes, where workers collect salt crystals on Aug. 22, 2018.  After harvesting the ‘fleur de sel,’ a hand-harvested sea salt, they must wait until September to harvest the salt which is used as table salt. (Pascal Guyot/AFP via Getty Images)

He pointed out that adding chlorine to drinking water, swimming pools, and spas was one of the most significant advances in public health history in preventing the spread of water-borne communicable diseases such as cholera. And about 85 percent of pharmaceutical drugs are made with chlorine-related chemistry, and about 25 percent of all our medicines contain chlorine. All halogens, including chlorine, bromine, and iodine, are powerful antibiotics; without them, medicine would not be the same.

Greenpeace named chlorine ‘The Devil’s Element’ and calls PVC, polyvinyl chloride, or simply vinyl, ‘the Poison Plastic.’ All of this is fake [and] to scare the public. In addition, this misguided policy reinforces the attitude that humans are not a worthy species and that the world would be better off without them. I could not convince my fellow Greenpeace directors to abandon this misguided policy. This was the turning point for me,” Moore said.

False Narrative on Polar Bears

When asked how Greenpeace utilizes its massive donations, Moore said it was used to pay for “a very large staff” (likely over 2,000), extensive advertisements, and fundraising programs. And virtually all of the organization’s ads for fundraising are based on false narratives, which he had thoroughly disproven in his books, one example being the polar bears.

Polar-bear-in-fireweed-10.jpg?itok=ZwFZMPristine white polar bear on an island off the sub-Arctic coast of Hudson Bay, Churchill, Manitoba, Canada, after swimming to shore from a winter on the sea ice.

“The International Treaty on Polar Bears, signed by all polar countries in 1973, to ban unrestricted hunting of polar bears, is never mentioned in the media, Greenpeace, or politicians who say the polar bear is going extinct due to melting ice in the Arctic. In fact, the polar bear population has increased from 6,000 to 8,000 in 1973 to 30,000 to 50,000 today. This is not disputed,” Moore said.

“But now they say the polar bear will go extinct in 2100 as if they have a magic crystal ball that can predict the future. In fact, this past winter in the Arctic saw an expansion of ice from previous years, and Antarctica was colder during the last winter than in the past 50 years.”

Moore said that he does not pretend to know everything and predict the future with confidence like many in the “climate emergency” business claim they can do.

The Goal of the ‘Environmental Apocalypse’ Theory

“I believe the human population has always been vulnerable to people who predict doom with false stories,” Moore said.

“The Aztecs threw virgins into volcanos, and the Europeans and Americans burned women as witches for 200 years claiming this would ‘save the world’ from evil people. This has been [referred to as] ‘herd mentality,’ ‘groupthink,’ and ‘cult behavior.’ Humans are social animals with a hierarchy, and it is easiest to gain a high position by using fear and control.”

Moore said the environmental apocalypse theory is mostly about “political power and control,” adding that he is dedicated to showing people that the situation is not as negative as they are told.

“Today, in the richest countries, our descendants are making decisions that our grandchildren will have to pay for,” he said. “Predictions that the world is coming to an end have been made for thousands of years. Not once has this come true. Why should we believe it now?”

“People are naturally afraid of the future because it is unknown and full of risks and difficult decisions. I believe there is also an element of ‘self-loathing’ in this apocalypse movement.”

Moore said the young generation today is taught that humans are not worthy and are destroying the earth. This indoctrination has made them feel guilty and ashamed of themselves, which is the wrong way to go about life.

The Demonization of Carbon Dioxide

Very few people believe the world is not warming. The record is clear that the world has been warming since about the year 1700, 150 years before we were using fossil fuels. 1700 was the peak of the Little Ice Age, which was very cold and caused crop failures and starvation. Before that, around 1000 A.D. was the Medieval Warm period when Vikings farmed Greenland. [And] before that, around 500 A.D. were the Dark Ages, and before that, the Roman Warm Period when it was warmer than today, and the sea level was 1–2 meters higher than today,” Moore said.

GettyImages-79011951.jpg?itok=dHHxVE3B Representatives of car companies arrive at the Vienna Autoshow as Greenpeace activists protest against carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from sports utility vehicle cars (SUV) on Jan. 16, 2008. (Dieter Nagl/AFP via Getty Images)

“Even until about 1950, the amount of fossil fuel used and CO2 emitted were very small compared to today. We do not know the cause of these periodic fluctuations in temperature, but it was certainly not CO2.”

Moore clarified that the “minority opinion” is not about the history of the Earth’s temperature, but it is the relationship between the temperature and CO2 that is at the center of the dispute.

In this regard, I agree that many believe CO2 is the main cause of warming. CO2 is invisible, so no one can actually see what it is doing. And this ‘majority’ are mainly scientists paid by politicians and bureaucrats, media making headlines, or activists making money. [The rest are] the public who believe this story even though they can’t actually see what CO2 is doing,” Moore said.

Moore provided a graph of temperature continuously measured over 350 years (from 1659 to 2009) in central England. “If carbon dioxide was the main cause of warming, then there should be a rise in temperature along the carbon dioxide curve, but it doesn’t,” he explained.

d3a30b413062f76111a27aff2aed1e22.jpg?ito1659–2009 Temperature and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Central England. (Courtesy of Patrick Moore)

Moore described the demonization of CO2 as “completely ridiculous.” He added that CO2 is the basis of all life on Earth and its concentration in the atmosphere today, even with the increase, is lower than it has been for a large majority of life’s existence.

Rising CO2 Correlates With Increased Plantation: Study

A study in 2013 found that increased levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) have helped boost green foliage across the world’s arid regions over the past 30 years.

2dad3bfcb637062d6a49cb5e6f243fbf.jpg?itoThe Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), in collaboration with the Australian National University (ANU), found the distribution area of vegetation increased by 11 percent due to the effect of carbon dioxide fertilization in arid areas of the world between 1982 and 2015 through satellite observations. (Courtesy of Patrick Moore)

The Australian government agency CSIRO conducted the research in collaboration with Australian National University (ANU). The data was based on satellite observations from the year 1982 to 2010 across parts of the arid areas in Australia, North America, the Middle East, and Africa.

It found an 11 percent increase in foliage cover in the studied area due to what’s called “CO2 fertilization.”

The study said a fertilization effect occurs when elevated CO2 levels enable a leaf during photosynthesis—the process by which green plants convert sunlight into sugar—to extract more carbon from the air or lose less water to the air or both.

“If elevated CO2 causes the water use of individual leaves to drop, plants in arid environments will respond by increasing their total numbers of leaves. These changes in leaf cover can be detected by satellite, particularly in deserts and savannas where the cover is less complete than in wet locations,” according to Randall Donohue, the CSIRO research scientist.

Breaking the Global Warming Narrative

Climate alarmists prefer to discuss climate knowledge only since 1850. The time before this they referred to as the pre-industrial age. This ‘pre-industrial age’ was more than 3 billion years when life was on the Earth. Many climate changes [occurred during that period], including Ice Ages, Hothouse Ages, major extinctions due to asteroid impacts, and other unknown causes,” Moore said.

“Today, the Earth is in the Pleistocene Ice Age, which began 2.6 million years ago. … So, the most recent major glaciation, which peaked 20,000 years ago, was not the end of the Ice Age. We are still in the Pleistocene Ice Age no matter how the climate alarmists wish to deny this.”

He said the great irony of the present panic about the climate is that the Earth is colder today than it was for 250 million years before the Pleistocene Ice Age set in. And CO2 is lower now than in more than 95 percent of Earth’s history.

“But you would never know this if you listen to all the people who benefit from the lie that the Earth will soon be too hot for life and that CO2 will become higher than in Earth’s history,” Moore said.

‘More CO2 Is Beneficial to the Environment and Humans’

According to Moore, nearly all commercial greenhouse farmers worldwide buy CO2 to inject into their greenhouses to realize up to 60 percent higher crop yields.

Read more here...

  • Great Response! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/chinas-esg-funds-include-coal-companies-and-firms-tied-alleged-human-rights-violations

China's "ESG" Funds Include Coal Companies And Firms Tied To Alleged Human Rights Violations In Xinjiang

Tyler Durden's Photo
by Tyler Durden
Thursday, Sep 08, 2022 - 06:20 PM

Further proving that ESG investments can include...anything anybody wants...and proving that the entire notion of ESG investing is one giant racket, it was reported this week that ESG investment initiatives in China have investors funneling their cash into liquor and coal companies. 

[ARTICLE CONTINUES]

  • Great Response! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/23/2022 at 12:30 PM, Old-Ruffneck said:

Imagine that!!!!!!  It's just plain B.S. period.  Don't need no windmills and solar crap, it's a scam to make some wealthy folks more wealthy.

True, they hate abundant cheap energy and want to make a maximum profit and money to help them which will come from the states and federal government. This will come from supporting Democrats and RINOS getting elected. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/renewable-energy-paradox-more-costly-way-forward

EXCERPTS -  Michael Shellenberger, founder of Environmental Progress, said one of the “most misleading ways that renewable salespeople sell their technology” is they claim the electricity produced by wind and solar is cheaper.  

Shellenberger, author of “Apocalypse Never: Why Environmental Alarmism Hurts Us All” and “San Fransicko: Why Progressives Ruin Cities,” argued that renewables were more environmentally damaging than fossil fuels and nuclear energy.

The Renewable Energy 'Paradox': A More Costly Way Forward

Edited by Tom Nolan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0