An Important Message For Oilprice Members

RP

America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide

Rob Plant in Geopolitics

Recommended Posts

Eyes Wide Open    + 3,555

Eyes Wide Open

On 2/22/2024 at 6:36 PM, TailingsPond said:

Whoever wrote that garbage doesn't know anything.  Canada is bigger and the USA is going backwards with regard to freedom thanks to republicans.  Remember, the left wing are free-love socialist hippies who oppose excessive laws. 

The Republicans took all your freedom of privacy after 9-11.  Blame them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriot_Act

The Republicans ban more books than anyone.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/14/texas-most-book-bans-2022

The Republicans are taking away women's rights.  Do I really need to link that one?

Freedom, freedom, you say?  At least for now you have the freedom to vote, but don't count on it again if orange man becomes dictator as he wants.  Elections and the constitution do not matter and there are No Rules.

 

No rules.jpg

 

On 2/23/2024 at 10:33 AM, notsonice said:

Comrade

thanks for posting your BS

 

Trump tried to extort Ukraine...remember..... he was impeached for it.....

and the only reason he got off was his dimwitted GOP supporters did a solid for him.....

 

you keep it up, post your BS  and Vlad will give you a ribbon

 

Vlad loves slimeballs

It seems you are just a Russian supporter true to heart

as anyone that posts as you do is anti American

Your posting last year shows who you really are......  a partner to Smirnov???

Comrade

 

your statement on June 9, 2023 .....your post........Biden's illegal activities in the Ukraine...

and now the drama unfolds.............maybe those making allegations ....such as  .predicated on Biden's illegal activities in the Ukraine....should be charged with crimes........

 

 

You stated........

Trumps original impeachment was predicated on Biden's illegal activities in the Ukraine. Burisma as matter of fact...and now the drama unfolds...

Joe Biden allegedly paid $5M by Burisma executive as part of a bribery scheme, according to FBI document

Biden's son Hunter was a board member of Burisma and also allegedly in on the scheme

 

On 2/23/2024 at 10:39 AM, notsonice said:

Vlad loves slimeballs

 

did you get a bonus for your post???

Comrade

thanks for posting your BS

 

 

 

your statement on June 9, 2023 .....your post........Biden's illegal activities in the Ukraine...

and now the drama unfolds.............maybe those making allegations ....such as  .predicated on Biden's illegal activities in the Ukraine....should be charged with crimes........

 

 

You stated........

Trumps original impeachment was predicated on Biden's illegal activities in the Ukraine. Burisma as matter of fact...and now the drama unfolds...

Joe Biden allegedly paid $5M by Burisma executive as part of a bribery scheme, according to FBI document

Biden's son Hunter was a board member of Burisma and also allegedly in on the scheme

 

On 2/23/2024 at 10:49 AM, notsonice said:
Looks like  one of Vlad's Slimeballs is  not to be trusted....go figure
 
How many more of his supporters are lurking in the US trying to do harm to all of US?????
 
Pick them all up as the anti-American slimeballs who forward disinformation and lies are not to be trusted. Those relying on these slimeballs IE top officials in the GOP are no better than Smirnov. Time to investigate the lot of them and their connections to Putin
 
When these slimeballs are trying to undermine good Americans who serve the public they hurt all of us
 
News about FBI, informant

 

On 2/23/2024 at 10:53 AM, notsonice said:

 

On 2/23/2024 at 10:54 AM, notsonice said:

you keep supporting Russia

it is all you and your useless idiots in the GOP have left

 

 

On 2/23/2024 at 1:44 PM, notsonice said:

 

 

this is for the 2 real slow ones who post here , EWO and his pal who is afraid of the news

 

who is the next to fall...

 

clandestine meetings with Mark Meadows getting instructions on how to defame Biden?????

expect more arrests

GOP slimeballs , Smirnov was just the tip of the Iceberg

 

who is the masked man taking instructions from Mark Meadows???? at a campaign rally in Rome, Georgia. in November of  2020

Bobulinski a credible witness???? or part of a conspiracy

 

he claims he was not wearing a mask under oath, today he has been outed by Meadows assistant

 

The photo speaks volumes

 

Time to call in Meadows....FBI call that is

Lawyer up slimeballs ............it is all you have left

let the Drama unfold

 

PHOTO: A photo taken by former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson allegedly shows then-Chief of Staff Mark Meadows meeting with businessman Tony Bobulinski, according to Hutchinson's attorney.

 

 

On 2/23/2024 at 3:23 PM, notsonice said:
Trump does not drink......any other explanation for his slurred speech and gross repeated errors........?????  Drugs???? or the obvious ....He is in mental decline and now he babbles more BS than any time in the past
 
PS Trump still thinks Obama is president and Trump is now incapable of staying on topic when asked a question.....he just starts babbling..his dishwasher, faucet, shower babbling is ....well just plain nuts...no one asked for his opinion he just starts babbling nonsense
 
 
 
 
 
.

 

On 2/23/2024 at 6:23 PM, TailingsPond said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JSFzAvHC_4

No rules.jpg

 

On 2/25/2024 at 9:37 PM, notsonice said:

yawn....you really do need to pay attention

the whole mess was fabricated by Bobulinski ...A Trump operative and his sidekick  Smirnov

 

Have you been watching the news??????

 

 I don't think you know what truth is from lies.

Lets see who just got arrested for lying       

Trumps favorite witness ...Smirnov

Slimeballs

and you think that the Slimeball, Smirnovs,  testimony is credible

Hearing in the morning where he will be arraigned

Please show up ...he is looking for some slow ones to post his bail

 

Bobulinski ....just got accused of Perjury....what do you think ??? he will be charged in the next few months???


are you enjoying all the trials recently??????

 

Trump Found Guilty .........$5 millon

Trump Found Guilty.....$80 Million

Trump Found Guilty.....$380 Million

Joe Biden???? not even a parking ticket

Next up March 25

this is a corruption trial of Trump....Felony charges...election interference

Does Trump even have a good attorney????? ha ha ha the ones he have do not even know how to check the box....

Jury Trial please...

 

enjoy watching the next trial...it will be a hoot

 

 

 

 

23 hours ago, notsonice said:

do you know what the GOP is being called these days 

USEFUL IDIOTS

 

I count you as one of the team with your BS postings on Biden

still laughing at you and your 2020 stolen election garbage....3 years latter and you are still holding on with your BS

Do you know what a charge is??????

 

try this one for a charge.......

what do you think???? GOP ????? a bunch of useful idiots as they jumped on this slimeballs words as evidence

Grand Jury Returns Indictment Charging FBI Confidential ...

 
 
 
Feb 15, 2024 — David C. Weiss, Special Counsel, made the announcement. On February 14, 2024, a federal grand jury returned the indictment and Smirnov was ...

Today, a federal court  unsealed a two-count indictment returned by a federal grand jury in the Central District of California charging Alexander Smirnov, 43,  with making a false statement, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and creating a false and fictitious record, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1519, for statements he made that were recorded in an official record of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) known as a Form 1023. 

David C. Weiss, Special Counsel, made the announcement.

On February 14, 2024, a federal grand jury returned the indictment and Smirnov was arrested at the Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas, Nevada, after his arrival in the U.S. from overseas.   Later today, Smirnov will have an initial appearance at the federal courthouse in the District of Nevada at 2:30 p.m. pacific time.

According to the indictment, Smirnov was a confidential human source (CHS) with the FBI.  As alleged in the indictment, despite repeated admonishments that he must provide truthful information to the FBI and that he must not fabricate evidence, Smirnov provided false derogatory information to the FBI about Public Official 1, and Businessperson 1, the son of Public Official 1, in 2020, after Public Official 1 became a presidential candidate. 

The indictment alleges that in March 2017, Smirnov reported to an FBI Agent that he had had a phone call with the owner of Ukrainian industrial conglomerate Burisma Holdings, Limited concerning Burisma’s interest in acquiring a U.S. company and making an initial public offering (IPO) on a U.S.-based stock exchange.  In reporting that conversation to the FBI Agent, Smirnov also noted that Businessperson 1, Public Official 1’s son, was a member of Burisma’s Board, a fact that was publicly known.  The indictment alleges that Smirnov provided no further information.

Three years later, in June 2020, the indictment alleges that Smirnov reported, for the first time, two meetings in 2015 and/or 2016.  As alleged in the indictment, Smirnov falsely claimed that during these meetings, executives associated with Burisma, admitted to him that they hired Businessperson 1 to “protect us, through his dad, from all kinds of problems,” and later that they had specifically paid $5 million each to Public Official 1 and Businessperson 1, when Public Official 1 was still in office, so that “[Businessperson 1] will take care of all those issues through his dad,” referring to a criminal investigation being conducted by the then-Ukrainian Prosecutor General into Burisma and to “deal with [the then-Ukrainian Prosecutor General].” 

As alleged in the indictment, the events that Smirnov first reported to the FBI Agent in June 2020 were fabrications.  In truth and fact, the defendant had contact with executives from Burisma in 2017, after the end of the administration when Public Official 1 had no ability to influence U.S. policy and after the Ukrainian Prosecutor General had been fired in February 2016. The indictment alleges that the defendant transformed his routine and unextraordinary business contacts with Burisma in 2017 and later into bribery allegations against Public Official 1 after expressing bias against Public Official 1 and his presidential candidacy.

As further alleged in the indictment, when he was interviewed by FBI agents in September 2023, Smirnov repeated some of his false claims, changed his story as to other of his claims, and promoted a new false narrative after he said he met with Russian officials.

If convicted, he faces a maximum penalty of 25 years in prison.  Actual sentences for federal crimes are typically less than the maximum penalties. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after taking into account the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

Court documents and information for this case is located on the website of the District Court for the Central District of California or on PACER by searching for Case No. 2:24-cr-00091.

 

Geez do I sense some anxiety building here? Gentleman were still a few months away from the main event!

Calm down already.

  • Haha 1
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

TailingsPond    + 1,008

GE

(edited)

24 minutes ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

Geez do I sense some anxiety building here? Gentleman were still a few months away from the main event!

Calm down already.

Your senses are not very reliable; we are just trying to educate you.  You should have some concerns / anxiety; trump is threatening to end democracy in the USA.  No constitutional rights, no rules unless they are convenient for him.  Do you want the USA to end as you know it just for trump?

FYI it is "we're" - try harder.

No rules.jpg

Edited by TailingsPond
  • Haha 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

notsonice    + 1,255

DM

(edited)

2 hours ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

 

Geez do I sense some anxiety building here? Gentleman were still a few months away from the main event!

Calm down already.

Comrade

Just need to point out which team you are posting on the behalf of 

Team Russia

Edited by notsonice
  • Great Response! 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eyes Wide Open    + 3,555

Eyes Wide Open

6 hours ago, notsonice said:

Comrade

Just need to point out which team you are posting on the behalf of 

Team Russia

Russia collusion!

 

Screenshot_20240227-064253.jpg

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

surrept33    + 609

st

15 hours ago, Ron Wagner said:

 Of course you wouldn't know about the facts in them. 

Anyone can write a book with so-called facts. People in the end have to convince a court of law. Let's see what happened with Rudy Giuliani and election worker Ruby Freeman for example:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKqNDDYLm9Q

 

The 9th Commandment, Exodus 20:16. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eyes Wide Open    + 3,555

Eyes Wide Open

(edited)

12 hours ago, TailingsPond said:

Your senses are not very reliable; we are just trying to educate you.  You should have some concerns / anxiety; trump is threatening to end democracy in the USA.  No constitutional rights, no rules unless they are convenient for him.  Do you want the USA to end as you know it just for trump?

FYI it is "we're" - try harder.

No rules.jpg

 

 

   Current 2018 Ed. and Supplement IV (1/5/2023) 2018 Ed. and Supplement III (1/3/2022) 2018 Ed. and Supplement II (1/13/2021) 2018 Ed. and Supplement I (1/24/2020) 2018 Main Ed. (1/14/2019) 2012 Ed. and Supplement V (1/12/2018) 2012 Ed. and Supplement IV (1/6/2017) 2012 Ed. and Supplement III (1/3/2016) 2012 Ed. and Supplement II (1/5/2015) 2012 Ed. and Supplement I (1/16/2014) 2012 Main Ed. (1/15/2013) 2006 Ed. and Supplement V (1/3/2012) 2006 Ed. and Supplement IV (1/7/2011) 2006 Ed. and Supplement III (2/1/2010) 2006 Ed. and Supplement II (1/5/2009) 2006 Ed. and Supplement I (1/8/2008) 2006 Main Ed. (1/3/2007) 2000 Ed. and Supplement V (1/2/2006) 2000 Ed. and Supplement IV (1/3/2005) 2000 Ed. and Supplement III (1/19/2004) 2000 Ed. and Supplement II (1/6/2003) 2000 Ed. and Supplement I (1/22/2002) 2000 Main Ed. (1/2/2001) 1994 Ed. and Supplement V (1/23/2000) 1994 Ed. and Supplement IV (1/5/1999) 1994 Ed. and Supplement III (1/26/1998) 1994 Ed. and Supplement II (1/6/1997) 1994 Ed. and Supplement I (1/16/1996) 1994 Main Ed. (1/4/1995)     
 
 
<< Previous   TITLE 18 / PART I / CHAPTER 11 / § 201   Next >>
18 USC 201: Bribery of public officials and witnessesText contains those laws in effect on February 26, 2024
From Title 18-CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDUREPART I-CRIMESCHAPTER 11-BRIBERY, GRAFT, AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

§201. Bribery of public officials and witnesses

(a) For the purpose of this section-

(1) the term "public official" means Member of Congress, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, either before or after such official has qualified, or an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency or branch of Government thereof, including the District of Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such department, agency, or branch of Government, or a juror;

(2) the term "person who has been selected to be a public official" means any person who has been nominated or appointed to be a public official, or has been officially informed that such person will be so nominated or appointed;

(3) the term "official act" means any decision or action on any question, matter, cause, suit, proceeding or controversy, which may at any time be pending, or which may by law be brought before any public official, in such official's official capacity, or in such official's place of trust or profit;

(4) the term "foreign official" means-

(A)(i) any official or employee of a foreign government or any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof; or

(ii) any senior foreign political figure, as defined in section 1010.605 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation;

(B) any official or employee of a public international organization;

(C) any person acting in an official capacity for or on behalf of-

(i) a government, department, agency, or instrumentality described in subparagraph (A)(i); or

(ii) a public international organization; or

 

(D) any person acting in an unofficial capacity for or on behalf of-

(i) a government, department, agency, or instrumentality described in subparagraph (A)(i); or

(ii) a public international organization; and

 

(5) the term "public international organization" means-

(A) an organization that is designated by Executive order pursuant to section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288); or

(B) any other international organization that is designated by the President by Executive order for the purposes of this section, effective as of the date of publication of such order in the Federal Register.

 

(b) Whoever-

(1) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official or person who has been selected to be a public official, or offers or promises any public official or any person who has been selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent-

(A) to influence any official act; or

(B) to influence such public official or person who has been selected to be a public official to commit or aid in committing, or collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or

(C) to induce such public official or such person who has been selected to be a public official to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such official or person;

 

(2) being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for:

(A) being influenced in the performance of any official act;

(B) being influenced to commit or aid in committing, or to collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or

(C) being induced to do or omit to do any act in violation of the official duty of such official or person;

 

(3) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, or offers or promises such person to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent to influence the testimony under oath or affirmation of such first-mentioned person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or with intent to influence such person to absent himself therefrom;

(4) directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity in return for being influenced in testimony under oath or affirmation as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in return for absenting himself therefrom;

shall be fined under this title or not more than three times the monetary equivalent of the thing of value, whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not more than fifteen years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

 

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section201&num=0&edition=prelim

Press ReleasePublished: Dec 4, 2023

Comer Releases Direct Monthly Payments to Joe Biden from Hunter Biden’s Business Entity

 

WASHINGTON—Today, House Committee on Oversight and Accountability Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) released subpoenaed bank records revealing Hunter Biden’s business entity, Owasco PC, made direct monthly payments to Joe Biden. Hunter Biden is currently under an investigation by the Department of Justice for using the Owasco PC corporate account for tax evasion and other serious crimes. 

Following subpoenas to obtain Biden family associates’ bank records, Chairman Comer issued subpoenas for Hunter and James Biden’s personal and business bank records. The House Oversight Committee has identified over 20 shell companies and uncovered how the Bidens and their associates raked in over $24 million dollars between 2015 and 2019 by selling Joe Biden as “the brand.” Financial records obtained show Hunter Biden’s business account, Owasco PC, received payments from Chinese-state linked companies and other foreign nationals and companies.

Payments to Joe Biden from Hunter’s Owasco PC corporate account are part of a pattern revealing Joe Biden knew about, participated in, and benefited from his family’s influence peddling schemes. As the Bidens received millions from foreign nationals and companies in China, Russia, Ukraine, Romania, and Kazakhstan, Joe Biden dined with his family’s foreign associates, spoke to them by speakerphone, had coffee, attended meetings, and ultimately received payments that were funded by his family’s business dealings.

Chairman Comer today released a video outlining the direct payments Joe Biden received from Hunter’s Owasco PC bank account and stated the House Oversight Committee will continue to follow the money to ensure accountability for President Biden’s involvement in his family’s corrupt domestic and international business schemes.

 

https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-releases-direct-monthly-payments-to-joe-biden-from-hunter-bidens-business-entity/

Edited by Eyes Wide Open

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

surrept33    + 609

st

1 hour ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-releases-direct-monthly-payments-to-joe-biden-from-hunter-bidens-business-entity/

that is old news.

in more recent news:

https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/biden-hunter-impeachment-probe-jason-galanis-interview-b2502640.html

Galanis, who is serving a 14-year prison sentence for conspiracy to commit securities fraud, securities fraud, and investment adviser fraud in addition to other crimes, was described in court documents as a “mastermind” of a fraud scheme in which he and Archer worked to convince a Native American tribe to issue economic development bonds, which allowed Galanis to divert the proceeds for his own personal use.

 

Galanis was also previously convicted of participating in a market manipulation and fraud scheme in which he also evaded a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) order prohibiting him from serving as an officer or executive at publicly traded companies. At the time, then Acting US Attorney for the Southern District of New York Audrey Strauss said that Galanis had “orchestrated two multimillion-dollar fraud schemes, and hid behind a team of co-conspirators to conceal his involvement and defy an SEC ban”.

Despite his history of deception, leaders of the Republican-led committees had hoped Galanis would link Mr Biden to his son’s business ventures even though a string of other witnesses — including Archer — had failed to do so.

The failure of Galanis to connect the president with his son’s various business endeavours is just the latest in a succession of embarrassing milestones in the years-long House probe, which has thus far been unsuccessful in finding any justification for impeaching the president.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eyes Wide Open    + 3,555

Eyes Wide Open

(edited)

17 minutes ago, surrept33 said:

that is old news.

in more recent news:

Oh how contraire...Mr. Biden addresses the investigation discoveries/disclosures tomorrow does he not. One can be quite sure these allegations will be cleared up nicely.

Do keep up.

Edited by Eyes Wide Open
  • Haha 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ron Wagner    + 710

Ron Wagner

7 hours ago, surrept33 said:

Anyone can write a book with so-called facts. People in the end have to convince a court of law. Let's see what happened with Rudy Giuliani and election worker Ruby Freeman for example:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKqNDDYLm9Q

 

The 9th Commandment, Exodus 20:16. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.

The Democrats lie about almost everything. It comes naturally to them and they even believe themselves sometimes. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

surrept33    + 609

st

9 hours ago, Ron Wagner said:

The Democrats lie about almost everything. It comes naturally to them and they even believe themselves sometimes. 

How about the Republicans and Democrats?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sCgLqYJlOc

^----- this is Roger Stone's nephew btw.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Marcin2    + 726

MK

On 2/17/2024 at 10:16 PM, TailingsPond said:

The higher courts follow the rule of law, therefore trump is unlikely to win appeals.

FYI you should at least spell check your garbage posts, all the errors make you look even more ignorant than the content.

The SUpreme Court is for Trump (he actually summoned some of the judges...)  Trump will not be harrasssed before the November 2023 and he actually will become the US President . It is 70-30 Trump-Biden for me.

  • Haha 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

TailingsPond    + 1,008

GE

(edited)

53 minutes ago, Marcin2 said:

The SUpreme Court is for Trump (he actually summoned some of the judges...)  Trump will not be harrasssed before the November 2023 and he actually will become the US President . It is 70-30 Trump-Biden for me.

Judges are not "for" anyone if they are real judges, they follow the law.

Yes, trump appointed some of the judges but even they have already ruled against him in cases.

Do you want the judges to follow the law or support "No Rules" Trump and end law all together?  Without the constitution do you have any rights or courts? No.

Zero chance Trump wins 70-30.  Heck when he won it was with less than 50% of the vote, then he lost the next time...

No rules.jpg

Edited by TailingsPond

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eyes Wide Open    + 3,555

Eyes Wide Open

(edited)

7 hours ago, Marcin2 said:

The SUpreme Court is for Trump (he actually summoned some of the judges...)  Trump will not be harrasssed before the November 2023 and he actually will become the US President . It is 70-30 Trump-Biden for me.

It would appear your pretty much spot on, yet political pressure is being mounted at a very disturbing level. Already the malcontents are being rallied, the desperation is palatable. The US has a very small segment of its population base that has been corrupted by fear...and quite vocal..

Fix the Insurrection Act Before a Trump Inauguration

If Congress fails to do so, troops could crush protests to begin a second term

It’s Jan. 19, 2025, the eve of Donald Trump’s second Inauguration Day. Rumors are swirling that protesters plan major disruptions in cities across the country. In response, the president-elect directs his aides to draw up orders placing state national guards across the country under federal control. “Can we do this legally?” some worried staffers ask. “Don’t we need the governors’ consent?” “No,” Mr. Trump’s legal counsel says, “the president has legal authority to federalize the guard, whatever a governor may say.”

The next day, Mr. Trump delivers his address, which will instantly be dubbed “Son of American Carnage,” and protests break out from coast to coast. Protesters block streets, normal business grinds to a halt, and scattered instances of looting and violence take place. The president issues an order in his capacity as commander in chief to federalize and deploy the guards to quell disruptions.

Within hours, tens of thousands of troops are patrolling major cities. By morning, more than 100,000 Americans have been arrested, overwhelming local jails and forcing the military to detain them in

 
OPINION: POTOMAC WATCH

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/fix-the-insurrection-act-before-inauguration-trump-troops-quell-protests-dd746268

Sen. Chuck Schumer's threatening rhetoric to Supreme Court justices crosses a line

I want to tell you, Gorsuch; I want to tell you, Kavanaugh: You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer roared Wednesday to a crowd of protesters angry over a Louisiana case before the court that threatens abortion rights. "You won't know what hit if you go forward with these awful decisions."

 

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/todaysdebate/2020/03/05/chuck-schumer-threatening-rhetoric-gorsuch-kavanaugh-crosses-line-editorials-debates/4964578002/

Edited by Eyes Wide Open

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

TailingsPond    + 1,008

GE

(edited)

3 hours ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

It would appear your pretty much spot on, yet political pressure is being mounted at a very disturbing level.

The whole idea of a court being "on Trumps side" is political pressure.  You have no respect for law.  

Using the military against it's own people is illegal. You have no respect for law and you want this?

"the president-elect directs his aides to draw up orders placing state national guards across the country under federal control. “Can we do this legally?” some worried staffers ask. “Don’t we need the governors’ consent?” “No,” Mr. Trump’s legal counsel says, “the president has legal authority to federalize the guard, whatever a governor may say.”

The next day, Mr. Trump delivers his address, which will instantly be dubbed “Son of American Carnage,” and protests break out from coast to coast. Protesters block streets, normal business grinds to a halt, and scattered instances of looting and violence take place. The president issues an order in his capacity as commander in chief to federalize and deploy the guards to quell disruptions.

Within hours, tens of thousands of troops are patrolling major cities. By morning, more than 100,000 Americans have been arrested, overwhelming local jails and forcing the military to detain them"

Once again, you misspelled "you're" when trying to sound smart; your inability to learn is funny.

 

No rules.jpg

 

Edited by TailingsPond

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

TailingsPond    + 1,008

GE

On 2/27/2024 at 12:58 PM, Eyes Wide Open said:

Oh how contraire...Mr. Biden addresses the investigation discoveries/disclosures tomorrow does he not. One can be quite sure these allegations will be cleared up nicely.

Do keep up.

How did that go

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eyes Wide Open    + 3,555

Eyes Wide Open

1 hour ago, TailingsPond said:

How did that go

Quite well actually...actually far better than anticipated. Mr. Biden will now be given full automity to publicly state his position. He clearly has stated the need for such a event....LMAO dont hold your breath.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eyes Wide Open    + 3,555

Eyes Wide Open

(edited)

1 hour ago, TailingsPond said:

The whole idea of a court being "on Trumps side" is political pressure.  You have no respect for law.  

Which brings up a quite interesting puzzle let's say. Just who can envoke the insurrection act? The president of the United States...or the progressive socialist party of the Democratic party? Oh the irony of it all.

 
 
What Matters
 
 
 

What is the Insurrection Act?

By Paul LeBlanc, CNN
 3 minute read
Published 6:40 PM EST, Mon January 11, 2021
 
 
 
 
 
 

02 Trump FILE

 

Erin Schaff/Getty Images

WashingtonCNN — 

Viral social media posts have falsely claimed that President Donald Trump invoked the Insurrection Act of 1807 law to deploy American soldiers to police US streets. That didn’t happen.

The unfounded posts have gained traction in the wake of the US Capitol breach on Wednesday that engulfed the nation’s capital in chaos and left five dead, including an officer with the US Capitol Police.

While the law provides ample legal footing for presidents to deploy the military if they so choose, in practice it’s been used sparingly. The most notable application of the law was perhaps its invocation to enforce desegregation in the 1950s.

 
ADVERTISING

What is the Insurrection Act?

The main provision of the Insurrection Act states that troops can only be deployed to an American state by the President if the governor or state legislature requests it.

Another provision of the law, however, outlines that under certain limited circumstances involved in the defense of constitutional rights, the President can send troops unilaterally.

“Historically and practically, such a request is not necessarily a prerequisite to the President using regular federal troops for domestic law enforcement,” Stephen Vladeck, a University of Texas law professor and CNN contributor, previously told CNN of the law.

 

 

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/11/politics/insurrection-act-explainer/index.html

Edited by Eyes Wide Open

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

TailingsPond    + 1,008

GE

2 hours ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

Another provision of the law, however, outlines that under certain limited circumstances involved in the defense of constitutional rights, the President can send troops unilaterally.

You do not respect constitutional rights - do not try to invoke constitutional rights when you are trying to overthrow the constitution.

Do you support increased federal power over the individual states?  Please clearly indicate your opinion.

No rules.jpg

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

notsonice    + 1,255

DM

(edited)

14 hours ago, Marcin2 said:

The SUpreme Court is for Trump (he actually summoned some of the judges...)  Trump will not be harrasssed before the November 2023 and he actually will become the US President . It is 70-30 Trump-Biden for me.

So do you vote in person in the US?????? or mail in???? ha ha ha

 

2020  and Trump was suppose to win easily .........he was so popular....ha ha ha

oh wait he lost the Senate also and the House..........

do you think he is now popular?????? he is driving  independent voters and GOP voters away especially women....

 

Jan 23, 2024 — A whole swath of GOP voters appears firmly committed to not voting for Trump in November.

 

Enjoy his trials 

Felony trials start in 3 weeks

 

you can always give Trump a new home in Poland...........he will need one

 

Edited by notsonice

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eyes Wide Open    + 3,555

Eyes Wide Open

(edited)

14 hours ago, notsonice said:

So do you vote in person in the US?????? or mail in???? ha ha ha

 

2020  and Trump was suppose to win easily .........he was so popular....ha ha ha

oh wait he lost the Senate also and the House..........

do you think he is now popular?????? he is driving  independent voters and GOP voters away especially women....

 

Jan 23, 2024 — A whole swath of GOP voters appears firmly committed to not voting for Trump in November.

 

Enjoy his trials 

Felony trials start in 3 weeks

 

you can always give Trump a new home in Poland...........he will need one

 

Trump could use another 5 point boost..it's been rather boring as of late.

 

bd8.gif

Edited by Eyes Wide Open

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eyes Wide Open    + 3,555

Eyes Wide Open

(edited)

Now this is quite interesting...since the Supreme Court has stepped into the litigation of Trumps alleged misconduct the entire Insurrection debacle is falling apart. Even the lower courts are stepping in, things are becoming quite uncomfortable for the US legal system.

Appeals court tosses Jan. 6 sentence in ruling that could affect more than 100 cases

The ruling by a three-judge panel raises the possibility that more than 100 defendants may be resentenced over their role in the attack on the Capitol.

More than 1,300 defendants have been charged in connection to the Jan. 6 riot. Around 750 have pleaded guilty to federal charges, and about 785 have been sentenced.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/court-tosses-jan-6-sentence-ruling-affect-100-cases-rcna141465

Edited by Eyes Wide Open
  • Rolling Eye 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

notsonice    + 1,255

DM

11 hours ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

Trump could use another 5 point boost..it's been rather boring as of late.

 

bd8.gif

yep he also could use some better lawyers............

he will not get any boosts in 2024......is his wife going to divorce him??? now that he is broke

the bigger question is .....did his wife leave him??????

.
 
yet she has gone AWOL.............
 
Maybe she will show up at his Trial.....
 
maybe she does not like losers and will bail on him
 
will she testify on his behalf or against him???.....as he did cheat on her.....and if found guilty she could use the trial as evidence he is unfit 
 
if he is convicted......will she visit him or file for divorce and take his last pennies
 
 
nothing boring about what is happening....unless you are a cult member
 

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

TailingsPond    + 1,008

GE

15 hours ago, Eyes Wide Open said:

Now this is quite interesting...since the Supreme Court has stepped into the litigation of Trumps alleged misconduct the entire Insurrection debacle is falling apart. Even the lower courts are stepping in, things are becoming quite uncomfortable for the US legal system.

More than 1,300 defendants have been charged in connection to the Jan. 6 riot. Around 750 have pleaded guilty to federal charges, and about 785 have been sentenced.

"Alleged misconduct?" Hahaha!

When most straight out plead guilty there is not much controversy.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

turbguy    + 1,544

turbguy

(edited)

On 3/1/2024 at 8:36 PM, Eyes Wide Open said:

Quite well actually...actually far better than anticipated. Mr. Biden will now be given full automity to publicly state his position. He clearly has stated the need for such a event....LMAO dont hold your breath.

I assume you have read the transcript?   You can find it right here:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24451043-read-transcript-of-hunter-bidens-deposition-with-congressional-republicans

If so, did it alter any of your views??

Doesn't seem to provide much support for your position, IMO.

Edited by turbguy

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eyes Wide Open    + 3,555

Eyes Wide Open

(edited)

1 hour ago, turbguy said:

I assume you have read the transcript?   You can find it right here:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24451043-read-transcript-of-hunter-bidens-deposition-with-congressional-republicans

If so, did it alter any of your views??

Doesn't seem to provide much support for your position, IMO.

My postion or suspicion..it was a disposition not a trial. Trials only come if there is merit.

However Mr. Biden might very agree to a public hearing now that the questions have been answered to the best of his abilities.  How this all ends...Let the Drama Unfold.

Hunter Biden admits to being 'high or drunk' when he said he was 'sitting here' with dad Joe just days before $5.1 million flowed into family accounts from Chinese energy company

By Jon Michael Raasch, Political Reporter On Capitol Hill, For Dailymail.Com and Morgan Phillips, Congress Reporter On Capitol Hill For Dailymail.Com and Kelly Laco, Executive Editor Of Politics On Capitol Hill For Dailymail.Com and Dominic Yeatman For Dailymail.Com

  • The president's son told Congress he lied to Chinese company CEFC about his father sitting next to him because he was not sober
  • His Whatsapp message included a demand for $5.1 million which was paid within 10 days
  • But he insisted his father 'never' had any involvement in his business dealings
  • House oversight chair James Comer says Hunter will now face a public hearing after his closed door testimony to the committee 

The WhatsApp message to CEFC was cited by IRS whistleblowers Joseph Ziegler and Gary Shapley last year as evidence of a Justice Department cover-up into the Biden's after they were refused permission to investigate it.

It later emerged from photos on his abandoned laptop that Hunter Biden was not with his father on the day it was sent, but was at Joe Biden's home in Wilmington, Delaware.

 

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13138891/Hunter-Biden-high-drunk-Chinese-energy-company.html

Edited by Eyes Wide Open

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
Go to topic listing