China Downplays Chances For Trade Talks While U.S. Plays ‘Little Tricks’

China’s state media signaled a lack of interest in resuming trade talks with the U.S. under the current threat to escalate tariffs, while the government said stimulus will be stepped up to buttress the domestic economy. So we will see a  trade war in full swing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume they're too busy exporting food into North Korea so they don't go into another famine again,  sticking them with unwanted refugee border crossers....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 50 shades of black said:

Great! Let the games now begin!

“China needs the U.S. surplus more than the U.S. needs China’s trade and finances,” notes Spanish author and economist Daniel Lacalle. “And that is why the trade war will not happen. Because China has already lost it.”

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chinese deserve much better than rigid Communist party, but it's not my business. Primary fear coming from this: "There is a 40% chance of a U.S. recession in the next 2 years, according to a large majority of 120 economists, thanks to the U.S.-China trade war"(Reuters poll)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be the most difficult for them: “It sounds like this could go on for years, and we just can’t deal with it out here in the countryside. We are in our sixth straight year of declining farming income and there is not a lot of good news in sight..." - farm owner from Illionois.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, rainman said:

Chinese deserve much better than rigid Communist party, but it's not my business. Primary fear coming from this: "There is a 40% chance of a U.S. recession in the next 2 years, according to a large majority of 120 economists, thanks to the U.S.-China trade war"(Reuters poll)

What someone needs to do is go back in history to every "prediction" economists made and add up the wrong ones. I know someone who ran a hedge fund and hired an economist, and then proceeded to do the opposite of everything the guy predicted to great profit. Unfortunately the dolt figured out his boss' strategy and went reverse psychology, because rather than buck up and admit he was always wrong, he was bound and determined to influence strategy. He didn't last long after that, but the firm lost more than it should have.

 20130806.png

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ward Smith said:

What someone needs to do is go back in history to every "prediction" economists made and add up the wrong ones. I know someone who ran a hedge fund and hired an economist, and then proceeded to do the opposite of everything the guy predicted to great profit. Unfortunately the dolt figured out his boss' strategy and went reverse psychology, because rather than buck up and admit he was always wrong, he was bound and determined to influence strategy. He didn't last long after that, but the firm lost more than it should have.

 20130806.png

SMBC nice!

dpurity.png

 

  • Like 1
  • Great Response! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, ceo_energemsier said:

From that article 

Quote

"The medium- to long-term ramifications on supply chains are being deeply underestimated. I would be severely concerned if I was China,” Robert Lawrence, a nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, recently told journalists in Beijing, where a group from the think-tank met with senior Chinese officials.

An example the other way, Chips and bits

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ward Smith said:

From that article 

An example the other way, Chips and bits

China keeps digging itself into a bigger and deeper hole, the US economy is booming while the Chinese isnt, they lost over 5 trillion $ in market value

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ceo_energemsier said:

China keeps digging itself into a bigger and deeper hole, the US economy is booming while the Chinese isnt, they lost over 5 trillion $ in market value

Geopolitics is complex, yet simple. The USSR had the best chess players on the planet and were playing geopolitics like chess, and we were losing our a$$. Along came Reagan and changed the game from chess to poker. The USSR lost their a$$. The Chinese are the best at Go, and were treating geopolitics like Go, and we were losing our a$$. Along comes Trump and guess what? We're playing poker again, because the US are the world's best at poker. That's why we end up with all the chips

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 5/17/2019 at 4:31 PM, Enthalpic said:

SMBC nice!

dpurity.png

 

The secret about math majors technical_analysis.png

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 5/18/2019 at 7:31 AM, Enthalpic said:

SMBC nice!

dpurity.png

My degree is in Sociology, with a minor in Behavioral Psychology.

The above comic is indeed true. 

Although with my B.A. in Sociology, I am unable to prove my assertion that the comic is true.  But I would be happy to prattle on endlessly with my opinions about why this comic is true.  Oh wait...

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can make the time, I recommend watching This video

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

o

Edited by ceo_energemsier
wrong posting

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

US Ports’ Revenues Insulated from US-China Tariffs

ncreased tariffs on bilateral US-China goods trade may result in decreased traffic at certain US ports, says Fitch Ratings. However, revenues are not likely to be similarly affected in the medium term given the landlord-based operating model at many of the more exposed west coast ports in which contractual minimums provide a floor for revenues should volume declines worsen. Imports, which make up the largest share of volumes at many of the ports with higher exposure to Chinese trade, have thus far been resilient to the imposition of tariffs, though the risks to volumes will rise if trade protectionism is prolonged.

On May 10 the US increased existing tariffs to 25% from 10% on $200 billion of imports from China and additional tariffs on almost all remaining imports are being contemplated. China’s corresponding increase of 20% or 25% on approximately $60 billion of US goods was announced on May 13.

Volume data show some ports are feeling more of an effect than others, particularly when looking at US export volume as measured by loaded outbound 20 foot equivalent units (TEUs). Of the larger west coast, east coast, and Gulf of Mexico ports, there is a levelling off or decline in loaded exports, other than Port of Houston, TX, since tariffs were put in place in January 2018. This trend worsened in second-half 2018 onward as additional tariffs went online in June and September.

The steepest declines occurred at Virginia Port Authority (VPA, commonwealth port fund AA+/Stable), City of Long Beach (Port of Long Beach, senior lien revenue bonds AA/Stable), Port of Oakland (Oakland, senior lien revenue bonds A+/Stable), and in recent months, Los Angeles Harbor Department (Port of LA, revenue bonds AA/Stable) and Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ, revenue bonds AA-/Stable). “Empties” are rising by double digits, partly due to a catch-up effect as shippers reposition containers back to Asia after the tariff-driven rush in fourth-quarter 2018 led to congestion for many west coast ports.

 

Due to offsetting features unique to each of these credit’s revenue profiles, port volume declines are unlikely to directly translate to revenue reductions or affect ratings. In the cases of both Port of Long Beach and the Port of LA, the ports’ long-term guaranteed contracts with most tenants provide a revenue floor, which helps to insulate port revenue from trade-related volume volatility. In the case of Oakland and PANYNJ, bondholders benefit from diversified revenue pledges from business divisions in addition to port operations, namely airport operations in Oakland, and airport, road, rail, ferry and real estate assets in the case of PANYNJ, serving to mitigate volatility in any one area. VPA’s rating is based on the Commonwealth of Virginia’s legislative appropriations from the general fund if needed and is not reliant on port volumes or revenues.

The US imported $450 billion of goods from China in 2018, the vast majority of which arrive through seaports. In contrast with exports, all Fitch-rated ports continue to see volume increases in loaded imports since tariffs were introduced in January 2018, although with stronger growth for east coast and Gulf ports. As US imports from China tend to be made up of higher value cargos than exports, and comprise roughly 70% of loaded cargo for the Port of LA, Long Beach, and PANYNJ , and 50%-60% for the other ports considered here, the revenue effect of a decline in export cargo will likely be muted. Any long-term imposition of higher tariffs would result in lower US consumer demand, which would reduce US imports and curb trade volumes beyond 2019.

 

Shifts in production centers may be exacerbated by ongoing trade turmoil with China. This trend, already underway, has the potential to more permanently affect port cargo levels and shipping route decisions. Depending on where goods are produced, all-water routes via the Suez Canal may become comparatively more cost-effective for importing goods to the US compared with traditionally dominant transpacific routes.
Source: Fitch Ratings

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Senior China official says trade war with U.S. could cut growth by 1 pct point-SCMP

A senior official of China’s ruling Communist Party said the trade dispute with the U.S. could reduce China’s growth pace this year by as much as 1 percentage point, the South China Morning Post reported on Friday, citing an unnamed source.

The paper said Wang Yang, a member of the Communist Party’s seven-person Standing Committee, told a delegation of Taiwanese businesspeople whose firms are based in China that the worst-case scenario from the trade war was a 1 percentage point drop in GDP growth this year.

Beijing has set a growth target of between 6% and 6.5% for 2019.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites