Danny Hangartner + 31 January 11, 2020 (edited) Social media is something that I'm straying away from. Changing my mind and stuff is impossible when not allowed to delete previous posts. So I edit. Edited September 15, 2022 by Danny Hangartner Social media is something that I'm straying away from. Changing my mind and stuff is impossible when not allowed to delete previous posts. So I edit. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remake it + 288 January 11, 2020 1 hour ago, Danny Hangartner said: Insulting and atrocities! Bragging about not being in a war for such a long time. Pretty much self-explanatory. Civilian targets with precise accuracy. Raising hell with the UN and such when Canada's in charge is expected. A Prime Minister with no gender marked on his driver's license. Much better for President to brag about finding lost pussy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Danny Hangartner + 31 January 11, 2020 (edited) On 1/11/2020 at 1:28 PM, remake it said: Much better for President to brag about finding lost pussy. Social media is something that I'm straying away from. Changing my mind and stuff is impossible when not allowed to delete previous posts. So I edit. Edited September 15, 2022 by Danny Hangartner Social media is something that I'm straying away from. Changing my mind and stuff is impossible when not allowed to delete previous posts. So I edit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remake it + 288 January 11, 2020 2 minutes ago, Danny Hangartner said: Hi. Sounds like you might be on to something. Can you elaborate? Somewhat off-topic and not really the place here but you can always ask Mr Trump's lawyers who have generously cared for their subsequent welfare. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tom Kirkman + 8,860 January 11, 2020 2 hours ago, Danny Hangartner said: Raising hell with the UN and such when Canada's in charge is expected. A Prime Minister with no gender marked on his driver's license. 7 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ronwagn + 6,290 January 11, 2020 17 hours ago, Zhong Lu said: The issue here is whether action PREVENTS further aggression from Iran, or PROVOKES it. Note how Iran was NOT launching missiles and rockets at US bases before killing Suliemani. Note how Iran IS now launching rockets and missiles at US bases. Again, look at the results, and the results do NOT bear out your hopes. If Trump's actions were deterring Iran, then there should be fewer attacks, not more. Actually, Iran is in no condition to wage an actual war, just terrorism. See my topic on Iran https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x5_VNyRz82T9NgOGoaUXqBZaFzHHtwKAkmOCri7WgpQ/edit 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Danny Hangartner + 31 January 11, 2020 (edited) On 1/11/2020 at 1:50 PM, remake it said: Somewhat off-topic and not really the place here but you can always ask Mr Trump's lawyers who have generously cared for their subsequent welfare. Social media is something that I'm straying away from. Changing my mind and stuff is impossible when not allowed to delete previous posts. So I edit. Edited September 15, 2022 by Danny Hangartner Social media is something that I'm straying away from. Changing my mind and stuff is impossible when not allowed to delete previous posts. So I edit. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Danny Hangartner + 31 January 11, 2020 (edited) On 1/11/2020 at 1:28 PM, remake it said: Much better for President to brag about finding lost pussy. Social media is something that I'm straying away from. Changing my mind and stuff is impossible when not allowed to delete previous posts. So I edit. Edited September 15, 2022 by Danny Hangartner Social media is something that I'm straying away from. Changing my mind and stuff is impossible when not allowed to delete previous posts. So I edit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tom Kirkman + 8,860 January 11, 2020 Stunning: Iranian Protests so Huge that Even Regime’s Official Fars News Agency Reported on the Anti-Regime Demonstrations This is remarkable. As Iranian activist Hanif Jazayeri reported — the protests against the regime were so huge on Saturday that even the official news agency associated with the Iranian Guards reported on the demonstrations. Today's #IranProtests are so huge that even Fars News Agency, affiliated to the Revolutionary Guards, just published a report saying protesters chanted for regime change & tore banners of Soleimani. Meanwhile @MSNBC's @HardballChris had falsely claimed he was a hero to Iran's ppl pic.twitter.com/VnxU74vwM6 — M. Hanif Jazayeri (@HanifJazayeri) January 11, 2020 This is atypical. Official Iranian Fars News reported (translated): At the Amir Kabir University, a number of students, estimated to be between 700 and 1,000, walked out onto the street and moved to the north side of Hafez and Taleghani intersections. Initially, the Naja agents provided the opportunity for the students to rally and chant, but then with the entrance of the main street and the closure of this spot and the heavy traffic disrupted the students. The students started with the slogan of mourning today and finally with the slogans against the country’s authorities the rally turned into a radical and radical protest atmosphere. A crowd of protesters chanted destructive slogans that led to the incitement of a number of people to tear down the banner of Haj Qasim Suleimani. 1 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ward Smith + 6,615 January 11, 2020 14 minutes ago, Tom Kirkman said: At the Amir Kabir University, a number of students, estimated to be between 700 and 1,000, If they admit to 700 that means 7,000 or more were there 3 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remake it + 288 January 11, 2020 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Ward Smith said: If they admit to 700 that means 7,000 or more were there Let President Trump be the judge as clearly in the picture below more people worshiped him than Obama Edited January 11, 2020 by remake it Still trying to see which picture has more people. 1 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Papillon + 485 January 11, 2020 (edited) 14 minutes ago, remake it said: Edited 9 minutes ago by remake it Still trying to see which picture has more people. Very amusing sir. Your humour is a delight. Not to some I'm sure, as little details and facts can be somewhat annoying, but fortunately they will not see your jokes, as they have surely ignored or blocked you, as they instruct others to do, in their wisdom. Edited January 11, 2020 by Papillon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ward Smith + 6,615 January 11, 2020 12 minutes ago, remake it said: Let President Trump be the judge as clearly in the picture below more people worshiped him than Obama One picture taken during the inauguration, the other taken hours before. Compared to This picture the audience in attendance is vastly larger. But that didn't fit the narrative. Again your propaganda needs work. Sure Taiwan going with the Nationalist Party was your plan? 2 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Papillon + 485 January 11, 2020 (edited) You've chosen to ignore content by Ward Smith. Options Apparently not though sir. Presumably this is the point at which Mr Buckland tells Mr Smith to ignore you as you do not agree and the conversation is pointless, as he did to myself with regard to Mr van Eck? Or perhaps it will continue for a few more months before this suggestion comes to light from anybody? Your guess is as good as mine sir. The only certainty appears to be the constant hypocrisy here to be honest. Edited January 11, 2020 by Papillon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remake it + 288 January 11, 2020 13 minutes ago, Ward Smith said: One picture taken during the inauguration, the other taken hours before. Compared to This picture the audience in attendance is vastly larger. But that didn't fit the narrative. Again your propaganda needs work. Sure Taiwan going with the Nationalist Party was your plan? Mr Smith there is a thing called perspective and there was also a link in the "fact check" to a photo taken as Trump took the oath which provides that perspective but you cannot see the difference and your supporters also are counting on that - literally. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boat + 1,323 RG January 12, 2020 On 1/9/2020 at 10:15 AM, ronwagn said: We are already spending trillions on defense capabilities and we are saving a lot of money compared to what active wars prior presidents have engaged in. The object is not to wage war but to use our capabilities to prevent further aggression by Iran. Not using our influence would be true isolationism. It would be like giving up your right to control criminals in your neighborhood and just staying home and locking your doors. Holy bat crap, the Republican third rail of government. Destroy democracy by stealing from the future however many military trillions it takes to save money by preventing wars like Afghanistan, Vietnam and Iraq. 1 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Papillon + 485 January 12, 2020 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Boat said: Destroy democracy by stealing from the future however many military trillions it takes to save money by preventing wars like Afghanistan, Vietnam and Iraq. It is fine though sir, as all one needs to do to justify anything in the modern era is make endless comparisons to the other party or Presidents of the past. /sarc This appears somewhat of a hobby here. Incidentally, Mr Bush was a Republican. On 1/9/2020 at 4:15 PM, ronwagn said: we are saving a lot of money compared to what active wars prior presidents have engaged in. Edited January 12, 2020 by Papillon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ward Smith + 6,615 January 12, 2020 3 hours ago, remake it said: Mr Smith there is a thing called perspective and there was also a link in the "fact check" to a photo taken as Trump took the oath which provides that perspective but you cannot see the difference and your supporters also are counting on that - literally. Perhaps your handler can demonstrate how to change the view in the giga pixel link. Because it is high resolution, you can point towards the Washington monument and then zoom to see more crowd by far than in your photo. Calling that site a fact check is beyond laughable. They are anything but. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remake it + 288 January 12, 2020 12 minutes ago, Ward Smith said: Perhaps your handler can demonstrate how to change the view in the giga pixel link. Because it is high resolution, you can point towards the Washington monument and then zoom to see more crowd by far than in your photo. The first and most telling of your omissions was to not see that Trump's crowd barely existed between an area opposite the Smithsonian Castle and the Washington Monument and this was in part due to a structure blocking off the Mall opposite the Department of Agriculture. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ward Smith + 6,615 January 12, 2020 35 minutes ago, remake it said: The first and most telling of your omissions was to not see that Trump's crowd barely existed between an area opposite the Smithsonian Castle and the Washington Monument and this was in part due to a structure blocking off the Mall opposite the Department of Agriculture. This vast empty space? Or is that the space between your ears? Pappy needs to rescue you, again. 1 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remake it + 288 January 12, 2020 10 minutes ago, Ward Smith said: This vast empty space? Or is that the space between your ears? Pappy needs to rescue you, again. You are not well trained in map reading are you and you are equally disinclined to believe every media organisation with photographic evidence to show your claim is false. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ward Smith + 6,615 January 12, 2020 17 minutes ago, remake it said: You are not well trained in map reading are you and you are equally disinclined to believe every media organisation with photographic evidence to show your claim is false. Map reading? You've blown another transistor. Careful you can easily be Replaced by a better cyborg Meanwhile note the time stamp below the picture in your so-called fact check. Because the MSM is even worse than China's propaganda machines. The empty picture that supposedly was taken at 12:01 was really taken at 9:01. Even the NPR video ended well before noon but again, propaganda, because we can't have a populist upsetting the globalist apple cart. 1 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remake it + 288 January 12, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, Ward Smith said: Map reading? You've blown another transistor. Careful you can easily be Replaced by a better cyborg For the visually capable here is yet another photo confirming that Mr Ward Smith is in his own majority Edited January 12, 2020 by remake it Please note that the "white" spaces at Jan 20th 2017 are not "white" people. 3 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Papillon + 485 January 12, 2020 8 minutes ago, remake it said: Edited just now by remake itPlease note that the "white" spaces at Jan 20th 2017 are not "white" people. 🤣 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ward Smith + 6,615 January 12, 2020 10 hours ago, remake it said: For the visually capable here is yet another photo confirming that Mr Ward Smith is in his own majority Kudos for your handler's joke. You've neglected to acknowledge that the photo on the left was taken during the inauguration while the one on the right was many hours before. Map reading indeed. The photographer set the wrong time on his camera, likely on purpose. The Secret Service booted him out of the perfect sniper location long before the President was sworn in. Everyone knows this, except Chinese bots apparently. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites